University Investments: Divesting from the Military-Industrial Complex

The rage and protest against Israel’s campaign in Gaza, ongoing since the…

Australian dividend payouts to shareholders rise 6 times…

Oxfam Australia Media Release   Australian dividend payments to shareholders from corporate investments grew…

The Wizard of Aus - a story for…

By Jane Salmon A Story About Young Refugee or Stateless Children Born Overseas Once…

Anzac and the Pageantry of Deception

On April 25, along Melbourne’s arterial Swanston Street, the military parade can…

Neoliberalism dreads an educated electorate

Those with a dedicated interest in maintaining the status quo fear education…

The HECS Hex

By Bert Hetebry A hex according to the Cambridge dictionary is ‘to put…

To Peacefully Petition

By James Moore   “You don’t go on bended-knee to petition the official culture…

Israel’s Anti-UNRWA Campaign Falls Flat

The Israeli authorities, in their campaign of remorseless killing, doctoring and adjusting…

«
»
Facebook

Peter Dutton And Albo’s Special Sort Of Weakness…

Interviewer: Tonight we have a spokesman for Peter Dutton because he wasn’t available so we have Noah Dear to explain what Mr Dutton meant when he complained about our decision not to send a ship to the Middle East and said that it took a “lot of effort and a special sort of weakness and incompetence for our Prime Minister to turn his back on our closest ally, a decision that could only be welcomed by Hamas (a listed terrorist organisation).” Good evening, Mr Dear.

Dear: Good evening. Yes, it’s a shameful decision and a weak decision. I mean we’ve never turned our backs on the United States. Whenever they’ve asked us to be involved in any war anywhere we’ve always done what we were told and anything less is, well, pretty weak, frankly.

Interviewer: But the government says that they’re more concerned about what’s going on in the Pacific. Shouldn’t that be our focus? 

Dear: No, our focus should be whatever America tells us is our focus. As Mr Dutton said, it’s pretty weak when you don’t do what your greatest ally tells you to do.

Interviewer: So you’re suggesting that refusing to do what the USA tells him to do makes Mr Albanese weak? 

Dear: Exactly. He’s not standing up to the people who think that we shouldn’t be sending a ship to Middle East.

Interviewer: And who are those people exactly?

Dear: The left of his party. I mean there’s never been a war that they supported… If it was up to them we’d have never gone to Vietnam to stop the communists from invading and we’d be overrun by Marxists.

Interviewer: Don’t some members of your party think that we have been overrun by Marxists?

Dear: Yes, so?

Interviewer: Doesn’t that suggest that going to Vietnam didn’t stop them and it was pretty much a waste of time? 

Dear: Waste of time? That’s an insult to all the people who died protecting our freedom.

Interviewer: But by sending a ship to the Middle East aren’t we risking the lives of young Australians?

Dear: Yes, great, isn’t it? Give them a chance to die and preserve the legacy of people dying so that we can thank them and say that people died protecting our freedom so how dare you abuse their memory by saying something that we disagree with…

Interviewer: Why did he add the bit about the decision being welcomed by Hamas? After all, it’s the Hootsi pirates that the ship is meant to be warding off.

Dear: Well, they’re all on the same side, aren’t they? Hootsi, Hamas, Iran, university students, China, the ALP…

Interviewer: I see… Leaving that for the moment, I have information that certain people in Defence didn’t want the ship to be sent because of our limited capacity. For example, it would tie up more than one ship because we’d need to have another on its way to replace it and then we’d need a third one to replace that while the first one was returning home. Also the pirates in the Middle East are using drones and we have a limited capacity to protect ourselves against drone strikes. 

Dear: Well, I don’t know if that’s true but if it is doesn’t that suggest that the Albanese government has been asleep at the wheel?

Interviewer: But your party was in power until last year.

Dear: Now you’re just spouting Labor Party talking points. I mean the idea that our current leadership team is responsible for anything is just nonsense. Peter Dutton wasn’t the PM, David Littleproud wasn’t the Deputy PM, Barnaby wasn’t paying attention, Sussan Ley was trying to solve the housing crisis by buying up more investment properties, Stuart Robobert was trying ensure that any debts that people owed were paid back whether they owed them or not … None of them are responsible…

Interviewer: So you’re saying that they’re all irresponsible? 

Dear: Yes… No… Look, I’m saying that Labor are in power and it’s up to them to fix things and not to attempt to blame others for what they haven’t done. 

Interviewer: So it’s Labor’s fault and they shouldn’t seek to shift the blame?

Dear: Exactly. We’ve never tried to shift the blame even though most of things that went wrong are the direct result of Tony Abbott’s inability to accept that he won the election and actually had to get on with governing, or Malcolm’s inability to lead because it was a condition of becoming PM that he promised not to move the party to the centre, or  Scott Morrison’s inability to move at all because he was posing for a photo. We’ve just accepted that it’s time to move on and we don’t want to look back and talk about what we did or didn’t do. It’s time to forget the past unless we’re talking about how the Rudd/Gillard years are the worst government we’ve ever had apart from this one and the Whitlam one.

Interviewer: So you’re prepared to take some of the blame?

Dear: Only when it’s actually our fault in some way and, so far, it never has been. 

Interviewer: I see. On another matter, in order to clean up all those nasty rumours swirling around on the Internet, why did Peter Dutton leave the police force?

Dear: Honestly, is there no level that you won’t stoop to? He left for personal reasons. 

Interviewer: There was a story in one paper that it was because he’d had a car accident and he was afraid to drive.

Dear: Even if that were true, it’s terrible that you’d resort to a personal attack like that…

Interviewer: I was just giving you the opportunity to set the record straight. 

Dear: It’s just typical of you lefties! You have nothing to offer so you attack the person. It’s pathetic! It’s weak, just like the PM is weak. You resort to name-calling like when Albanese said: “Sit down, Boofhead!” to Mr Dutton. I mean, he was terribly upset and it took great courage to sit down after that. Mr Dutton is a lovely man and insults hurt him…

Interviewer: Some might say that sounds weak?

Dear: That’s a terrible thing to say. Accusing the leader of political party of being weak is not appropriate… 

Interviewer: I was just asking the questions and giving y…

Dear: Well, you should think long and hard about what you’re doing because if we were in power you’d…

Interviewer: Yes?

Dear: Never mind. It’s been a pleasure.

Interviewer: But I haven’t finished…

Dear: You will be once I ring your boss!

 

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

12 comments

Login here Register here
  1. Uncletimrob

    Very good, very good …… I can almost imagine this as a real interview….

  2. OldWomBat

    Uncle, you mean it isn’t a real interview?

  3. Clakka

    Excellent reportage Rossleigh,

    And quite some feat, dragging Noah Dear from his full-time job of sorting BS from the decks of the stranded ark “LNP”

    Noah’s absence from his job during the interview, seems to have facilitated an emergence from the shadows, of Andrew Hastie with a gob-full to spray into the public discourse.

    Such knowledgeable gravitas, but perhaps a tad hasty, as his premature ejaculation leaves its brown stain dribbling down his chin.

    Seems he’s not across the latest sitrep of the goings-on over the high-seas of the indo-pacific

    Despite Hastie’s military service, perhaps the style and ethos of his thesis champion, Charles Bean, is emerging from his depths. After all, journalism was his first choice of career.

  4. New England Cocky

    Excellent Rossleigh!! When will it be played on OUR ABC??

    The absence of Boofhead Duddo from the MSM headlines has been a true blessing. The mediocre squawking of former SAS officer Hastie probably shows why he ”retired” from the military. Certainly his logic leaves many questions about his competence at military strategy.

    But I stand with the Albanese LABOR government in this matter.

    If I remember correctly, Australian military personnel have been sent to fight other people’s wars since Menzies defended his decision to defend the Empire rather than Australia, and Scullin was properly elected his replacement.

    How much has this stupid dedication to the imperialist ideology of others, particularly the USA (United States of Apartheid) since 1960s, cost the Australian taxpayers in the purchase of third rate American armaments, the financial cost of overseas service and the very costly loss of Australian lives?

    Surely this huge amount would have better served Australian taxpayers being expended on public infrastructure projects?

  5. Terence Mills

    “Operation Prosperity Guardian” is bringing together multiple countries which include in the coalition of the willing, the USA, the United Kingdom, Bahrain, Canada, France, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Seychelles and Spain.

    Notable by their absence is Saudi Arabia who have the greatest exposure to the Red Sea and Egypt who control the Suez Canal. Also the UAE, Qatar and Jordan who all have much greater regional interest in the safety of shipping in the Red Sea.

    And James Paterson stresses that it is in Australia’s interests to send an armed frigate ????

  6. John C

    Very enjoyable and truthful reading.

  7. GL

    Terence,

    Looking at a photo of Patterson made me think about the closest he’s ever been to having anything to with the military is that he once watched Platoon.

  8. wam

    dutton would have handled those questions better with a rabbottian ‘we are always economically superior to labor, since ’48, as was proven by whitlam. Look at albanese taking our surplus.

  9. Cool Pete

    Tone the Botty farted that the Liberal Party was “ready to govern,” which was akin to a father giving his 16-year-old son the keys to his car after he’d obtained his learner’s permit! Tone the Botty had no idea of how to govern; he could rule, however. And Jimmy Patterson looks like Butthead with that ridiculous excuse for a beard.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 2 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

Return to home page
Exit mobile version