Bayside SEQ Seats to Watch in 2024 QLD…

Oodgeroo a Seat to Watch for the Next 4–8 years By Callen Sorensen…

It seems the Coalition really want a Double…

As I write this, there is a Senate debate on one of…

Beyond Irritation: Bali’s Tourism Scourge

Like eager lice on a ripe scalp, tourists have become a much-reviled…

Freedom

By Bert Hetebry Freedom’s just another word for nothin’ left to lose, Nothin’ don’t…

U.S. Imperialism, Religious Land Conflicts, War Economics

By Denis Hay Description: U.S. Imperalism Discover how U.S. imperialism, war economics, and…

Urgent action needed – ‘community’ is the challenge…

Dementia Australia Media Release New research released today by Dementia Australia for Dementia…

A Culture of Cowardice

By James Moore We were somewhere over America at 35,000 feet and moving…

With Misinformation Do You Miss Information?

I'm often torn between different points of view because, as a Gemini,…

«
»
Facebook

New hate speech laws prioritise freedom of speech over safety

RMIT University Media Release

The federal government today released its long-awaited hate speech bill alongside other laws designed to crack down on big tech and the safety of online users.

RMIT expert, Dr Nicole Shackleton, Graduate School of Business and Law says:

“The federal government’s decision to water down promises to introduce new laws criminalising serious vilification, instead relying on changes to sedition laws, capitulates to those who prioritise freedom of speech over the safety of minority groups, particularly online.

“These new laws send a strong message to the community that hate crime is unacceptable but overlook a key underlying cause of hate crime – hate speech which denigrates a person or community simply because of who they are.

“The creation of enhanced penalties for doxxing is a clear indication that the federal government recognises the increased weaponisation of technology against minorities.

“However, the reliance on criminal penalties and incitement to violence, rather than hatred or ridicule, means these new laws would only target deliberate acts that seek to incite violence or cause harm.”

Dr Nicole Shackleton is a lecturer in law at RMIT University with expertise in gender and technology. She has specific interest in the regulation of technology to prevent gendered abuse.

 

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button

2 comments

Login here Register here
  1. Andrew Smith

    Freedom of speech is an oxymoron in the hands of power as it is used by the right to target then denigrate and dog whistle pet hates inc. woke, LGBT, climate, immigration etc. issues.

    Further, when repeated often by RW MSM they become reinforced as do stereotyping and attitudes towards the ‘other’ and helps destroy the middle class…

  2. Albany

    The crackdown on hate speech is really about shutting down freedom of speech altogether. Really, post covid-19, who needs insights and facts? That’s the driving mentality. Why else did the govt hide from the public some 70 percent of submissions to the Covid-19 Response Inquiry in 2023? Hate speech? Or just another example of the governmental hating anyone who dared to question the official narrative? At this time in history, if you believe the official narrative you are reckless or an ignoramus.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 2 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

Return to home page