Can we believe that the Australian government will really refuse to take USA/UK nuclear submarine waste?
By Noel Wauchope
The tangled nuclear web of lies and half-truths – can we believe that Australia will refuse to take USA toxic wastes?
Today comes one of those amazing bits of news that a national government, in this case, Australia it seems, has actually listened and responded to the many voices of peace and environment activists who are shocked at the proposed Naval Nuclear Propulsion Treaty. This Treaty would benefit the USA, but not Australia, and would make Australia responsible for high level nuclear wastes from U.S/UK nuclear submarines.
If we can believe the Labor government – they are going to stand up to the USA and the UK, and refuse to accept high level toxic radioactive trash from USA.
The latest information on Australia getting nuclear submarines is that as early as 2027, the United States will begin rotational presence in the Western Australia facility. Ultimately, there will be up to four U.S. Virginia-class submarines and one United Kingdom Astute-class submarine at HMAS Stirling.
So these nuclear submarines will be stationed in Australia, but owned by the USA and UK, not by Australia.
Well, here are a couple of clauses from this jargon-filled proposed Treaty:
Article IV – D
Australia shall be responsible for the management, disposition, storage, and disposal of any spent nuclear fuel and radioactive waste resulting from the operation of Naval Nuclear Propulsion Plants transferred pursuant to this Article, including radioactive waste generated through submarine operations, maintenance, decommissioning, and disposal.
Annex B: Section 1 – Special Nuclear Material
Such Power Units shall contain highly enriched uranium and, only with respect to irradiated fuel, may contain plutonium.
Friends of the Earth are among the many who have sounded the warning:
“Minister for Defence Richard Marles has stated that Australia would not accept radioactive waste from overseas, but this has not been explicitly ruled out in the Australian Naval Nuclear Power Safety Bill 2023 currently before Parliament. The words of an under-pressure defence minister in 2024 are unlikely to count for much decades hence if Australian legislation and the Agreement between Australia, the UK and the US do not prohibit the acceptance of foreign spent nuclear fuel.”
It is important to acknowledge Australia’s poor history regarding radioactive waste disposal facilities.
How is the Australian government going to twist their way around THIS ONE!
I’d really like to believe Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, who once was a noble opponent of the military-industrial-nuclear complex.
PM Albanese has been adroit at making himself a “small target” for both the Opposition nuclear enthusiasts, and for his own Labor Party members who deplore the AUKUS nuclear deal. No doubt he will rely on the mealy-mouthed USA-sycophant defence Minister Richard Marles to spin the story on this.
Like what we do at The AIMN? You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight. Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes! Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted. You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969
8 comments
Login here Register here-
Roswell -
GL -
Terence Mills -
ajogrady -
John C -
Clakka -
Truth Teller -
Return to home pageI believe them. For now.
But I bet $5 that they change their mind?
Honestly? No.
Well, let’s not forget the alternative Prime Minister’s comments :
‘Peter Dutton in announcing the Coalition’s nuclear plan used a previously heard line that one standard-sized reactor produces just a handful of nuclear waste each year. “If you look at a 450 megawatt reactor, it produces waste equivalent to the size of a can of Coke each year,” Mr Dutton said.’
Hmmm !
Albanese thoughtless acceptance of Morrison’s AUKUS nuclear subs trap has left the door wide open to give Dutton’s mainstream nuclear power option credibility.
I can’t recall any time when Australia’s government, no matter which party was in power, has ever stood up to their American ‘masters’ and said ‘no’!
Yeah, the waters are constantly muddied by both sides of our duopoly.
I wonder just when the ‘Treaty’ is due to be signed, before or after the next Oz federal election?
Will it take a policy ‘adjustment’ by Labor? Will it take new ‘enabling’ legislation?
Where is this likely to head if there’s a hung parliament / minority govt?
It would seem that the broader public would not like to see our waters (above or below ground) irradiated, especially by foreigners. But one can never be sure in the wild wild West, the abused Centre and the radical troppo far North.
Given all the mumbling, I guess we’ll just have to wait and see.
The following piece from P & I shows at least one PM was able to order the ‘Septics’ to declare the contents of their war machinery:
johnmenadue.com/they-will-tell-me-malcolm-frasers-cold-war-nuclear-heterodoxy-and-labors-willed-ignorance-today/
I don’t agree with a lot of his politics but he was on the ball with this one.
Pingback: News countering the nuclear-military-industrial-political complex this week – Equilibrion