Remembering Pete Steedman

By Gareth Evans I know it’s a cliché to say of someone that…

Ex-Politicians and the Revolving Door Problem

By Denis Hay Description: Ex-politicians routinely join the fossil fuel industry after leaving office.…

Young First Peoples from Australia and Asia-Pacific unite…

Oxfam Australia Media Release Four young grassroots climate leaders from the Asia-Pacific region…

Australia moves further away from National Housing Accord…

New industry forecasts released by Master Builders Australia show the country has…

Digital Serfs

By Roger Chao Digital Serfs In the glow of the screen, where pixels dance…

Stop (critical) thinking!

By Bert Hetebry Politically the world seems to be moving very much…

Cemetery America

By James Moore Time to tip a hat to America. We’ve only had…

The Strange Case Of The Unelectable Albo!

As I said the other day, it's easy to make predictions; getting…

«
»
Facebook

Calls for Australian food labelling to be improved

Following the Food Ministers’ Meeting last week, concerns have emerged that food labelling regimes are falling short.

By Dr Sharayah Carter, Human Biosciences (Nutrition and Dietetics)

“Recent discussions at the Food Ministers’ Meeting have highlighted key changes to the Health Star Rating (HSR) system in Australia.

“This system aims to help consumers make healthier choices by rating foods from half a star to five stars, with more stars indicating a healthier option.

“Unfortunately, only 32% of products currently carry the rating, falling short of the 60% target set for 2024. This gap highlights the need for improved implementation and effectiveness of the HSR system.

“A significant step forward is the decision to shift oversight from the food industry to government regulators. This change will place management of the HSR system under Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) and the Food Regulation Standing Committee, increasing transparency and reducing industry influence.

“However, while this move is promising, simply making the HSR system mandatory won’t address all its issues.

“The current system can be manipulated by food manufacturers.

“For instance, ultra-processed foods – linked to health issues like diabetes, heart disease and cancer – often contain few or no whole food ingredients and undergo multiple processing steps, including the addition of sweeteners, colourings, flavourings and emulsifiers. These products can still receive high star ratings if they add back certain healthy nutrients like protein or fibre.

“For example, sugary breakfast cereals might score high due to added fibre, and diet soft drinks might get a good rating despite their low nutrient value because they use artificial sweetener instead of sugar.

“Therefore, it is essential to review and update the HSR system to close these loopholes and ensure that ratings truly reflect a product’s healthiness.

“Education also plays a vital role.

“Many consumers know that items like lollies, chips and biscuits are ultra-processed and provide no health benefits, but they may not realise that seemingly healthy foods like flavoured yoghurts, protein bars, ready-to-eat meals, cooking sauces, and even baby food can also be ultra-processed.

“Raising awareness about this is key to helping people make more informed choices.

“Additionally, the Nutrition Information Panel (NIP) needs improvement.

“While the NIP provides details about a food’s nutritional content, it can be confusing.

“Simplifying and standardising the NIP, and highlighting key factors such as added sugars, artificial ingredients and processing methods, will help consumers better understand what they are eating. For instance, making a clearer distinction between naturally occurring and added sugars can make a significant difference.

“Ultimately, food labelling should offer clear, accurate, and easy-to-understand information to help Australians make healthier choices.

“This requires not only regulatory changes, but also collaboration with public health experts, nutrition experts, and consumers.

“The recent decisions at the Food Ministers’ Meeting are a positive step forwards, but ongoing efforts will be crucial to ensure these changes lead to real health benefits for everyone.”

Dr Sharayah Carter is a Lecturer in Human Biosciences (Nutrition and Dietetics) with over a decade of clinical experience as an Accredited Practising Dietitian. Her research focuses on chronic disease prevention and treatment, particularly in cardiometabolic conditions, with interests in behavioural lifestyle modifications, personalised nutrition, lifestyle medicine, and food equality and sustainability.

 

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button

5 comments

Login here Register here
  1. Andrew Smith

    Yes, a food technology professor at RMIT last century said that if we had our time again salt, sugar and vinegar would be controlled substances.

    The latter’s an issue in places with high consumption of pickled vegetables and nitrates/nitrites e.g. Central Eastern Europe (often with salami etc. too).

  2. Senna

    Andrew, that’s true. If the health authorities were real they’d say:
    ‘First thing first, make sure food is a benefit to health and not disease-causative’.
    But for whatever reason they cannot or will not do that.
    Labelling has importance but the actual contents should be the main focus.

    One of the best food researcher-advocates in Aust was Maryanne Demasi. She was so good ABC’s science program Catalyst decided to brown nose to the breakfast cereal industry and sack her. Her docos ‘challenged orthodox views about sugar, fats and gluten’ where a bridge too far for captains of the food industry. https://michaelwest.com.au/cereal-offenders-how-the-sugar-lobby-wins-friends-and-targets-enemies/ 2018

  3. leefe

    Another problem with the star system is that it applies within category, not overall. A 4star chocolate biscuit is not the same as a 4star bag of muesli.

  4. Donald Cameron

    Appalling situation
    MPs of BOTH parties are equally culpable
    in their lack of concern for consumers.

    and the various consumer groups are equally weak
    in campaigning for detailed food labelling

    from the size of the print
    the misleading claims
    to country of origin.

    then you have the hugely expensive government agencies
    fat cats one and all.
    Most politicians are on the gravy train
    asleep at the wheel..

  5. Donald Cameron

    Very well put Senna,
    THE ACTUAL CONTENTS of the food is the problem
    this of course leads directly to Ultra Processed Food (UPF)

    UPF includes all those foods produced in factories
    annually by the thousands of tonnes and thousands of litres
    and containing a bewildering array of additives,
    most not found in the average household kitchen,
    and often using manufacturing processes
    not found in the average household kitchen.

    Americans refer to their MPs as law-makers,
    on this basis Australian MPs fail dismally
    on the subject of consumer health and safety.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 2 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

Return to home page