A Duty to Warn

By James Moore In 1960, a handsome young senator and war hero from…

Democracy - Is It Worth The Fight?

In light of recent elections, it's very tempting to look at the…

Fencing the Ocean: Australia’s Social Media Safety Bill

The Australian government is being run ragged in various quarters. When ragged,…

HECS Debt Forgiveness: Path to Free Education

By Denis Hay Description Explore why HECS debt forgiveness and reinstating free public education…

Implementation will be key to success of Aged…

Palliative Care Australia Media Release This week’s bipartisan support for the Aged Care…

Trump, AUKUS and Australia’s Dim Servitors

There is something enormously satisfying about seeing those in the war racket…

Expert alert: Misinformation bill before Australian Senate…

La Trobe University Media Release The Australian Senate is set to consider the…

Political Futures: Will Conservative Global Middle Powers Go…

By Denis Bright National elections in Germany and Australia in 2025 will test…

«
»
Facebook

Track Replacement Services Lacking

By Jane Salmon

“Fast Track” Visa Process DeRailed,
Connecting Service Missing: Mass Transit to PR Overdue, Tony Burke.

The clunky “Fast Track” visa processing “system“ was dismantled for refugees long before a connecting service could be arranged. In fact, it proved to be an expensive “Side Track”.

A much-discussed High Speed Rail route to permanency for asylum seekers (who bought tickets more than a decade ago) is still nothing more than an empty election cycle mirage.

Refugees missing access to higher education, permanent jobs, consistent Medicare, family reunion, citizens’ rights are sick of having their lives derailed. They pay tax for services consistently denied them: a bit like passengers on the Bankstown Line.

Immigration Minister Tony Burke must provide rapid mass transit to permanency and then citizenship rights for those still braving the elements at his immigration station.

 

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button

Communications Legislation Amendment (Combatting Misinformation and Disinformation) Bill 2024

On 19 September 2024, the Senate referred the provisions of the Communications Legislation Amendment (Combatting Misinformation and Disinformation) Bill 2024, to the Environment and Communications Legislation Committee for report by 25 November 2024.

Submissions close on the 30 September 2024 (Monday).

Critics argue the bill will limit free speech and give the government too much power to censor information. Concerns have been raised about who gets to define what constitutes misinformation or disinformation, and what is considered harmful.

There is heaps of information being published out there via social media. However, as yet there does not appear to be anything much substantial published or covered via Australian media sources.

Based on the details provided in the explanatory memorandum, there are several potential problems and concerns for the media regarding this bill:

Broad Scope and Definitions

1. The definitions of “misinformation” and “disinformation” are quite broad and could potentially encompass legitimate journalistic content. While the bill claims to exclude professional news, the boundaries between professional and non-professional content are increasingly blurred in the digital age.

2. The concept of “serious harm” is also broadly defined, including vague notions like “harm to public health” or “imminent harm to the Australian economy”. This ambiguity could lead to overzealous enforcement or self-censorship.

Potential for Censorship

1. Although the bill states it does not empower ACMA to directly regulate content, the threat of penalties could lead digital platforms to err on the side of caution and remove or suppress legitimate media content.

2. The bill’s focus on “verifiably false” information could potentially stifle reporting on developing stories where facts are not yet fully established.

Impact on Free Speech

1. The bill’s limitations on freedom of expression, while acknowledged, could have a chilling effect on public discourse and investigative journalism.

2. The power given to ACMA to approve industry codes and determine standards could indirectly influence editorial decisions and content strategies of media organizations.

Transparency and Oversight Concerns

1. While the bill includes some oversight mechanisms, such as parliamentary scrutiny of ACMA-approved codes, there are concerns about the concentration of power in a government agency to determine what constitutes misinformation.

2. The requirement for digital platforms to assess and report on misinformation risks could potentially expose journalistic sources or methods.

Critical Analysis

The bill attempts to address a genuine problem of online misinformation, but its approach raises significant concerns for press freedom and independent journalism:

1. The broad definitions and scope could lead to overreach, potentially affecting legitimate reporting on controversial or developing issues.

2. The emphasis on platform responsibility could result in excessive content moderation, impacting the distribution of news and opinion pieces.

3. While the bill includes some safeguards, such as exemptions for satire and academic content, the overall framework could still have a chilling effect on free expression and press freedom.

4. The bill’s focus on digital platforms overlooks the complexity of modern information ecosystems and could disproportionately affect smaller, independent media outlets.

5. The potential for government influence over content moderation practices raises concerns about indirect censorship and political interference in the media landscape.

In conclusion, while the bill aims to address a legitimate issue, in its current form presents significant risks to media freedom and could have unintended consequences for journalism and public discourse in Australia.

 

Govt website reference link.

 

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button

RMIT expert responds to PM’s negative gearing comments

RMIT Media Release

Debate around negative gearing reform and capital gains tax has heated up in the past few days.

This morning, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese told the ABC he’s ruled out taking negative gearing reforms to election.

RMIT’s Dr Liam Davies, an expert in social and affordable housing, can respond to the PM’s comments.

Last week, Davies co-authored a report calling for negative gearing to only be available to investors whose properties meet national standards for fair rental contracts and construction quality.

Dr Liam Davies, social and affordable housing:

“The Commonwealth foregoes about $6 billion per year in tax revenue due to negative gearing and capital gains tax discounts. Despite this large spend, there is very poor transparency of outcomes, particularly for tenants.

“The debate about negative gearing and capital gains tax has, so far, been largely binary. Some argue to remove negative gearing and capital gains tax, while others argue to retain it.

“However, there is another option: to make negative gearing and capital gains tax an opt-in system for investors whose properties meet national standards for fair rental contracts and construction quality.

“We have outlined these options in a recently released report.

“Prime Minister Albanese said he is concerned removal of these concessions would decrease housing supply. Others claim removing concessions would raise rents.

“But what Australia really needs is a supply of affordable and secure rental housing. Our solution would maintain the tax advantages for investors and housing supply, while also increasing security for tenants.”

Read more about the proposal.

Dr Liam Davies is a lecturer in RMIT’s Centre for Urban Research and an expert in social housing policy and urban planning. His research looks at state and commonwealth government policies that affect affordable housing.

 

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button

Neoliberalism and Tradie Shortage in Australia

By Denis Hay

Description

Explore how neoliberalism in Australia led to tradie shortage, changing training and employment. Learn how we can rebuild a skilled workforce.

Introduction

Australia is grappling with a severe shortage of skilled tradespeople – a crisis that is stalling industries, inflating project costs, and threatening the nation’s economic growth. Construction delays are becoming commonplace, infrastructure projects are on hold, and businesses are struggling to find qualified workers. Before the advent of neoliberal policies, government entities at the federal, state, and local levels played a pivotal role in training and employing thousands of apprentices annually.

This system not only ensured a steady supply of skilled workers but also provided high-quality training and stable employment. The shift towards neoliberalism transferred this responsibility to private companies, leading to the skills shortage we face today. This article explores how neoliberalism has contributed to Australia’s tradie shortage and how using the nation’s monetary sovereignty can pave the way towards a more compassionate and ethical political system.

I. Understanding the Tradie Shortage in Australia

The Magnitude of the Skills Crisis

Australia’s tradie shortage is a pressing issue with far-reaching consequences. According to the National Skills Commission’s 2023 Skills Priority List, over 150 occupations are experiencing shortages, many within the trades sector. Industries such as construction, manufacturing, and mining are feeling the pinch, with a significant lack of electricians, carpenters, plumbers, and other essential tradespeople.

Economic Impact

The shortage is not just a workforce issue but an economic one:

Project Delays: Major infrastructure and construction projects are facing delays, leading to cost overruns and decreased productivity.

Increased Costs: The high demand for skilled tradespeople drives up wages, increasing operational costs for businesses.

Reduced Competitiveness: A lack of skilled workers hampers Australia’s ability to compete globally, affecting trade and investment opportunities.

Social Consequences

The tradie shortage also changes society at large:

Housing Crisis: Delays in construction worsen the housing affordability issue, making it difficult for Australians to find affordable homes.

Service Quality:
A scarcity of skilled workers can lead to compromised quality in construction and maintenance work, posing safety risks.


Youth Unemployment:
Limited apprenticeship opportunities contribute to higher unemployment rates among young Australians, affecting their long-term career prospects.

II. Historical Context: Government’s Role Before Neoliberalism

Government Employment of School Leavers

Before neoliberalism took hold, the Australian government was deeply invested in workforce development, providing ample training and employment opportunities for school leavers.

A Personal Experience: Apprenticeship at Ipswich Railway Workshops

In the late 20th century, I began my career as an apprentice at the Ipswich Railway Workshops in Queensland. This government-run facility was more than just a workplace; it was a cradle of craftsmanship and learning. Each year, the workshop employed about 200 new apprentices, all eager to learn and contribute.

Dedicated Training Facility: The Ipswich Workshops had a dedicated TAFE school on the premises, ensuring that apprentices received both theoretical education and practical experience without leaving the site.

Master Craftsmen as Mentors: The tradesmen were not just workers; they were craftsmen who took immense pride in their work. They went out of their way to pass on their knowledge, ensuring that we, the apprentices, learned the intricacies of our trades.

Exceptional Training Quality: The training was second to none. The comprehensive curriculum and hands-on experience equipped us with skills that have remained invaluable throughout our careers.

However, the closure of the Ipswich Railway Workshops marked the end of an era. The workshops ceased operations as a railway maintenance facility in 1995 due to government restructuring and cost-cutting measures influenced by neoliberal policies.

This closure not only displaced about 3000 skilled workers but also dismantled a pivotal training ground for future tradespeople. The site has since been repurposed as the Workshops Rail Museum, a testament to its historical significance but a stark reminder of lost opportunities in workforce development.

Wikipedia contributors. (2023). North Ipswich Railway Workshops.

Government-Led Apprenticeship Programs

Beyond Ipswich, similar initiatives were widespread:

Structured Apprenticeships: Government programs offered structured apprenticeships across various trades, ensuring consistent training standards nationwide.

Employment Stability:
Apprentices were assured stable employment upon completion, encouraging long-term career development.


Skill Transfer:
Experienced tradespeople mentored apprentices, helping the transfer of expertise, and supporting high skill levels within the workforce.

Socioeconomic Benefits

Government involvement yielded numerous advantages:

Accessibility: Training programs were accessible to individuals from all socioeconomic backgrounds, promoting inclusivity.

Quality Assurance:
Government oversight ensured that training met rigorous standards, producing competent and reliable tradespeople.


Community Development:
Skilled workers contributed to essential public projects, enhancing infrastructure and public services that helped society.

III. The Rise of Neoliberalism in Australia

Definition and Core Principles

Neoliberalism is an economic philosophy emphasizing:

Free Markets: Advocating minimal government intervention in economic activities.

Privatisation: Transferring public assets and services to private ownership.

Deregulation:
Reducing government regulations to encourage business freedom.


Reduced Public Spending:
Cutting government expenditure on social services, including education and training.

Implementation by Successive Governments

Starting in the 1980s, Australian governments began embracing neoliberal policies:

Policy Reforms: Key policies included deregulating financial markets, reducing tariffs, and privatising state-owned enterprises.

Education Cuts:
Funding for
vocational education and training (VET) was significantly reduced.


Shift in Responsibility:
The onus of training and workforce development shifted from the government to private entities.

Reduction of Government Involvement

Privatisation of Training Institutions: Many government-run training facilities were closed or sold off, including the historic Ipswich Railway Workshops.

Budget Reductions:
Cuts to public spending affected TAFE colleges and apprenticeship programs.


Market Reliance:
The assumption was that private companies would fill the gap left by the government in training provision.

IV. Reliance on Private Companies for Training

Transfer of Training Responsibilities

Shift in Burden: Private companies became primarily responsible for training apprentices, often without the necessary infrastructure or incentives.

Funding Changes:
Government funding shifted towards private training providers, many of which prioritised profit over quality education.


Commercialisation of Education:
Training became a commodity, with costs passed on to students, making it less accessible.

Impact on Apprenticeship Opportunities

Decline in Apprenticeships: The number of available apprenticeships dwindled as private companies were less willing to invest in long-term training.

Variable Quality:
The quality of training varied widely among private providers, leading to inconsistencies in skill levels.


Accessibility Issues:
Increased fees and reduced government support made it difficult for many to pursue trades training.

Challenges Faced by Private Companies

Profit Motives: Companies often focused on immediate financial gains rather than investing in comprehensive training programs.

Lack of Infrastructure:
Unlike the Ipswich Railway Workshops, many private companies lacked the facilities to provide hands-on training.


Economic Pressures:
In times of economic downturn, training budgets were often the first to be cut.

 


V. The Direct Link Between Neoliberal Policies and the Tradie Shortage

Analysis of Policy Outcomes

Correlation with Shortage: The decline in government-led training coincides with the onset of the skills shortage.

Case Studies:
The closure of facilities like the Ipswich Railway Workshops shows the direct impact of reduced government support.


Statistical Evidence:
Data shows a
significant drop in apprenticeship commencements following cuts to public funding.

Economic and Social Implications

Industry Bottlenecks: Sectors such as construction face delays and increased costs due to a lack of skilled workers.

Community Impact: The reduction in skilled tradespeople affects community projects and maintenance of public infrastructure.

Youth Employment:
Young Australians miss valuable career opportunities, affecting the future workforce.

Workforce Development Failures

Skill Gaps: Training provided by private entities often does not align with industry needs, leading to a mismatch in skills.

Retention Issues: Without the mentorship and career pathways previously offered by government programs, retention rates in trades have declined.

Long-Term Consequences:
The cumulative effect is a workforce ill-prepared to meet current and future industry demands.

VI. The Role of Education and Vocational Training

Changes in the Vocational Education System

TAFE Cuts and Funding Reductions: Significant funding cuts led to reduced course offerings and facility closures.

Rise of Private Providers:
An increase in private training institutions brought about inconsistent training quality.


Regulatory Challenges:
Inadequate oversight allowed some providers to offer subpar education.

Accessibility Challenges

Financial Barriers: Higher fees deter individuals from pursuing trades, particularly those from lower-income backgrounds.

Geographical Limitations: Rural and remote areas suffer from a lack of accessible training facilities.

Digital Divide:
Limited access to online resources further hampers education opportunities in certain regions.

Comparison with Past Systems

Training Quality: The comprehensive training once provided at places like the Ipswich Railway Workshops is now rare.

Employment Outcomes:
Previously, apprenticeships led to stable, long-term employment; today, job security is less assured.


Social Mobility:
Government programs helped upward mobility, a benefit that has diminished under the current system.

VII. Critiques of Neoliberalism’s Impact on Workforce Development

Academic and Expert Opinions

Research Findings: Studies link neoliberal policies to decreased investment in human capital and increased skills shortages.

Expert Testimonials:
Economists and educators advocate for a return to government-led training to address the crisis.


Policy Analyses:
Reports suggest that market-driven approaches do not meet the needs of essential public goods like education.

Counterarguments Supporting Privatisation

Efficiency Claims: Some argue that private providers are more efficient due to competition.

Innovation Potential:
It’s suggested that the private sector can offer more innovative and flexible training solutions.


Choice and Autonomy:
Proponents believe privatisation offers individuals more choices in their education paths.

Critical Discussion: Limitations and Failures of PPPs in Australia

The Problem with Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs)

Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) have been proposed to bridge the gap between government funding and private sector efficiency. However, their application in Australia has revealed significant drawbacks, especially when it comes to public services and infrastructure. While PPPs are intended to use the strengths of both sectors, their track record in Australia suggests a different reality.

1. Socialising Losses, Privatising Gains

One of the most contentious aspects of PPPs is that they often result in socialising losses while privatising gains. This means that while private companies benefit financially, the government (and thus the public) often withstands most of any financial risks or failures. A notable example is the Sydney Airport Rail Link, where public money was used to bail out the private consortium after it did not meet projected revenue targets. Such outcomes create a system where profits are privatised, but losses are passed onto the public.

2. Lack of Accountability and Transparency

PPPs can complicate accountability and transparency. Contracts between government and private entities are often not subject to the same scrutiny as traditional public projects. This can result in poorly managed projects with inflated costs and reduced public oversight. The East West Link project in Victoria is a prime example, where a lack of transparency and public consultation led to widespread criticism and eventually the project’s cancellation, costing millions in compensation.

3. Higher Long-Term Costs

While PPPs may appear to be cost-effective in the short term, they often lead to higher long-term expenses for the public. This is because private companies’ factor in their profit margins, which can increase the overall cost of projects. The Clem Jones Tunnel (Clem7) in Brisbane, which faced lower-than-expected traffic volumes, left the public with substantial long-term costs due to contractual obligations.

4. Quality and Public Interest Concerns

The primary goal of private companies is to generate profit, which can conflict with the public interest, particularly in sectors like education and healthcare. In the context of workforce development, relying on PPPs to provide training can lead to inconsistent quality and accessibility. This has been observed in the vocational education and training (VET) sector, where the introduction of private providers has often resulted in subpar training and exploitation of government funding schemes, as seen in the VET FEE-HELP scandal.

Implications for Workforce Development

The history of PPPs in Australia highlights significant limitations in applying this model to workforce development. Relying on private entities to provide essential training and education can lead to a misalignment between public needs and corporate goals. This can result in an under-skilled workforce, as private providers may prioritise cost-cutting and profitability over comprehensive, high-quality training.

Given the track record of PPPs in Australia, it is clear that this approach is not well-suited for addressing the current tradie shortage and skills crisis. A stronger focus on government-led initiatives and investment in public institutions is necessary to ensure quality, accountability, and long-term benefits for the Australian workforce and economy.

Rebuttals to Counterarguments

Quality Concerns: Evidence shows that privatisation has led to lower training standards.

Inequality Issues:
Market-based approaches can widen the gap between those who can afford quality education and those who cannot.


Long-Term Impact:
Short-term efficiencies may lead to long-term deficiencies in workforce competency.

VIII. Solutions and Policy Recommendations

Reinvesting in Government-Led Training Programs

Revival Initiatives: Reestablish facilities like the Ipswich Railway Workshops to provide dedicated training.

Increased Funding:
Allocate government resources to expand and enhance public apprenticeship programs.


Quality Control:
Implement strict standards to ensure training quality matches or exceeds past benchmarks.

Public-Private Partnerships

Collaborative Efforts: Encourage partnerships where government provides funding and oversight while private companies offer practical training opportunities.

Shared Investment:
Both sectors invest in the development of a skilled workforce, helping the broader economy.


Success Models:
Look to successful partnerships in other countries or industries as templates.

Enhancing Education and Vocational Training

Curriculum Modernisation: Update training programs to include modern technologies and methodologies relevant to today’s industries.

Support Mechanisms:
Provide financial help, mentorship programs, and career services to support apprentices.


Accessibility Initiatives:
Ensure training is accessible to all, regardless of socioeconomic status or location.

Long-Term Workforce Planning

Strategic Forecasting: Use data to predict future industry needs and adjust training programs accordingly.

Policy Stability:
Develop bipartisan support for workforce development policies to ensure their longevity.


Inclusivity Focus:
Address barriers faced by underrepresented groups to create a diverse and capable workforce.

IX. Conclusion

Recap of the Tradie Shortage Origins

The current tradie shortage is a direct outcome of neoliberal policies that reduced government involvement in vocational training. The dismantling of programs like those at the Ipswich Railway Workshops has led to a decline in skilled tradespeople.

The Imperative for Government Involvement

It’s imperative for the government to reassume a leading role in training and workforce development. By investing in quality education and apprenticeship programs, Australia can rebuild its skilled workforce.

Call to Action for Policymakers

Policymakers must recognise the critical need for change. Immediate action is needed to reinstate government-led training programs and provide the necessary funding and support.

Final Thoughts on Rebuilding Australia’s Skilled Workforce

Leveraging Australia’s monetary sovereignty to invest in workforce development is not just an economic necessity but a moral imperative. By fostering a more compassionate and ethical political system, we can ensure a prosperous future for all Australians.

Question for Readers

How do you think the closure of facilities like the Ipswich Railway Workshops has changed Australia’s ability to train skilled tradespeople, and what steps should be taken to address this issue?

Call to Action

If you’re passionate about rebuilding Australia’s skilled workforce, take a stand today. Contact your local representatives to advocate for increased investment in vocational training. Share this article to raise awareness and join the movement towards a fairer and more prosperous Australia.

Social Sharing

Help spread the word about the importance of government involvement in workforce development by sharing this article on social media.

References

The Economic and Social Benefits of the TAFE System

Why Australia’s tradie shortage is getting worse and threatens the housing, climate crises

Workshops Rail Museum

Quiggin, J. (2018). Economics in Two Lessons: Why Markets Work So Well, and Why They Can Fail So Badly. Princeton University Press.

Mitchell, W., & Fazi, T. (2017). Reclaiming the State: A Progressive Vision of Sovereignty for a Post-Neoliberal World. Pluto Press.

Australian Government Department of Education, Skills, and Employment. (2022). Vocational Education and Training

Noonan, P. (2016). Building a Sustainable Funding Model for Higher Education in Australia. Mitchell Institute.

Cahill, D. (2014). The End of Laissez-Faire? On the Durability of Embedded Neoliberalism. Edward Elgar Publishing.

This article was originally published on Social Justice Australia.

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button

‘Driving environmental destruction and social inequality’: current economic system fails examination by sustainability experts

UNSW Sydney Media Release

Research led by UNSW Sydney sustainability scientists challenges the basis of leaving major socioeconomic and environmental decisions to the market.

Our current economic system is based on poor science and should not be used to guide government decision-making when faced with threats to existence like climate change. That’s the conclusion of a new paper led by UNSW Sydney sustainability scientists that finds our economic system is driving environmental damage and social inequality and needs substantial reform.

The research, published recently in the peer-reviewed international journal Global Sustainability, critically reviews, from a natural science perspective, the basis of neoclassical economics – the theory that underpins the neoliberal ideology of free markets, deregulation, and minimal government expenditure and taxes. Many countries, including Australia, follow neoliberalism in policymaking.

The research found that hypotheses underlying neoclassical economics – including supply-demand determined pricing, and claims like Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is a meaningful measure of well-being and markets can solve major environmental and social problems – are based on invalid assumptions and lack empirical support.

“Neoclassical economics is fundamentally flawed, bad science, and irrational in the common meaning of the word,” said Honorary Associate Professor Mark Diesendorf, lead author of the study from the School of Humanities & Languages at UNSW Arts, Design & Architecture. “It is doing more harm than good by supporting politically powerful corporations that are driving environmental destruction and social inequality, and therefore must no longer be used for government socioeconomic policies.”

Misconceptions of neoclassical economics

For the study, the research team, consisting of sustainability experts from across scientific disciplines, refuted 10 key hypotheses and four claims of neoclassic economics on the grounds they are either contradicted by observation, lead to different results from those reported by neoclassical economics, are ill-defined, or are inconsistent. The review found each hypothesis or claim failed to satisfy one or more of these conditions – basic requirements of good scientific practice.

Co-author Thomas Wiedmann, Professor of Sustainability Research in the School of Civil & Environmental Engineering, said that neoliberal ideologies and many neoclassical economists strongly support the notion that endless growth on a finite planet is feasible and desirable.

“[However] science shows that growth in GDP is closely correlated with growth in the consumption of materials and energy,” said Prof. Wiedmann. “This leads to major environmental impacts that are threatening our life support system, the biosphere.

“The assumptions that the natural environment is an infinite resource and an infinite reservoir for waste and that it can be separated from the economic system are refuted by the findings of Earth System Science, which show that six out of nine planetary boundaries have been exceeded.”

Another claim the researchers contest is that wealth trickles down from the rich to the poor. While not all neoclassical economists accept this claim, the review cites a major study finding that tax cuts for the rich of OECD countries are correlated with higher income inequality and have no effect on economic growth and unemployment in the short and medium term.

Other hypotheses and claims challenged scientifically in the review include:

  • Existential environmental threats can be managed by pricing alone when the market has failed to curb global heating and other major environmental threats.
  • Humans can be credibly modelled as entirely self-interested, economically ‘rational’, competing individuals and able to process all available information on prices, despite scientific findings in anthropology and sociology showing that cooperation is fundamental and coexists with competition in all societies.
  • Government budget deficits are generally inflationary, even though many countries, such as Japan, have historically had significant budget deficits without inflation.
  • The economic efficiency ideal of neoclassical economics, Pareto efficiency, is useful, even though it’s unattainable in practice and fosters socially unjust policies.

“While a common defence of neoclassical economics is that it has advanced and no longer depends on all the assumptions critiqued, it still depends on at least three hypotheses that are not generally true”, A/Prof. Diesendorf said. “These are the hypotheses that individual decisions can be separated from social influences, that economic systems are generally in or near equilibrium, and that neoclassical economics theory doesn’t need to explain or predict economic phenomena such as the Global Financial Crisis.”

A new economic approach is needed

The researchers said neoclassical economics can be replaced with an improved mixed economic system. However, this will require pressure on governments from community organisations and academics.

“Leaving it to the market alone is another way of saying leaving it to the 1%, that is, the big corporations and super-rich that control the market,” said A/Prof. Diesendorf. “It’s too late for the market to solve a major problem like climate change and the market cannot reduce the increasing gap between the rich and poor.

“We need stronger government intervention guided by genuine community consultation.”

The researchers recommend a new economic system that prioritises ecological sustainability and social justice over economic efficiency. This would move beyond striving for increased GDP to include wellbeing indexes such as educational attainment and public health measures.

“If we look at Scandinavian countries, their quality-of-life measures are the highest because their governments don’t leave everything to the market,” said A/Prof. Diesendorf. “They simply spend more to provide universal basic services to their people.

“To achieve ecological sustainability, it is necessary, but not sufficient, to limit the scale of human activity in a considered way and, with it, policies to support managed de-growth.

“At a fundamental level, we must reduce our physical consumption of energy, land and other natural resources, which could be done while still improving the quality of life for all.”

 

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button

Massive thermal coal mine approvals a slap in the face for bushfire survivors

Bushfire Survivors for Climate Action Media Release

BUSHFIRE SURVIVORS FOR CLIMATE ACTION (BSCA) has spoken out in response to the news that Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek has approved three new large coal mining projects in NSW: Whitehaven Coal’s Narrabri thermal coal project to 2066, MACH Energy’s Mount Pleasant thermal coal project to 2058, and Yancoal’s Ashton coal project to 2064.

The Albanese Government’s three new coal mine expansions will emit 1.4 billion tonnes of carbon pollution, more than three times Australia’s total annual emissions. The Government refused to consider the climate impacts of these massive coal projects, and is refusing to fix Australia’s environment laws to consider climate change and protect nature.

Just two months ago Bushfire Survivors for Climate Action delivered a joint BSCA-Climate Council petition to the Environment Minister with over 11,000 signatures asking the government to fix these laws and to pause approvals of coal and gas projects until they adequately considered climate impacts.

And in 2023 the tiny charity, founded and led by bushfire survivors, challenged Whitehaven’s Narrabri project in court by challenging the decision of the NSW Independent Planning Commission on the grounds that in the face of the climate impacts already being experienced by the people, environment and economy of NSW, the approval was legally unreasonable. The group lost the case.

“We’ve done everything we can to protect our homes – even to the extent of taking on a massive coal company in the courts.” said Serena Joyner, Chief Executive Officer of Bushfire Survivors for Climate Action.

“We can’t do anything more, and yet the Government keeps raising the risk level. This is a cowardly decision by the Albanese Government that is actively failing to take real climate action to protect our communities from worsening fires, floods, and extreme weather. If this government won’t stand up to the coal billionaires and polluters, then who will? Who will say no to these projects?”

Speaking from her new home on the mid-north coast of NSW Fiona Lee has said she is devastated. “Nearly 5 years ago I lost my home to the climate-fueled bushfires of 2019-20. Now Tanya Plibersek has the audacity to greenlight three more coal mines. Approving coal while we brace for even worse fires? That’s not leadership—it’s betrayal.”

Jo Dodds, President of Bushfire Survivors for Climate Action has spoken about the impact on locals of the Narrabri mine expansion. “BSCA visited the Narrabri community during preparation for our legal action to stop the expansion of the Whitehaven coal mine. We talked to locals, business owners, First Nations people, farmers and politicians. Not one person we talked to was happy about the mine.

“They feared the impacts on water, the damage to the land, the pollution to the very air they breathe. They feared more frequent, more destructive bushfires. With the Government’s approval of these three mines, the fears of this community have been realised.

“Even as we mark the 5 year anniversaries of so many who lost everything in the Black Summer fires, bushfire survivors are having to face the fact that the Australian Government is failing to take genuine meaningful action to protect them from climate-fuelled fires and wondering who will? It’s a huge slap in the face. It’s hard not to take it personally – in fact we do.”

 

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button

Our kids will not forgive coal mine approvals

Climate Council Media Release

IN A DAMAGING MOVE, the Albanese Government has approved three massive coal mine extensions in New South Wales, locking in decades more climate pollution that “our children will not forgive” says the Climate Council.

The federal government has approved three coal mine extensions in the Hunter Valley: Whitehaven’s Narrabri Stage 3 Expansion, MACH Energy’s Mount Pleasant Optimisation, and Glencore and Yancoal’s Ashton-Ravensworth Extension.

Climate Council CEO Amanda McKenzie said: “At the midway point of the crucial decade for climate action, it’s shocking that 7 coal mines have been given the green light since Labor has come to power. Every decision like this betrays future generations. Our children will not forgive us for locking in more climate pollution for decades to come.

“These projects are forecast to pump out over a billion tonnes of pollution until 2048 – more than double Australia’s total annual emissions. Mount Pleasant will become Australia’s largest black coal mine, dwarfing Adani, while Narrabri could add 259 million tonnes of pollution and destroy 500 hectares of critical koala habitat.

“Under Labor, Australia is making strong progress on clean energy, but approving coal projects undermines our momentum. They can’t have it both ways – continuing to invest in fossil fuels pours more petrol on the out-of-control fire that is the climate crisis.

“Approving polluting coal mines undermines the government’s reputation as the world shines a spotlight on climate and environmental leadership at the upcoming Global Nature Positive Summit. It’s astonishing that Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek will represent Australia on the global stage after green-lighting coal mines, a contradiction that harms Australia’s credibility on nature and climate.

“Climate scientists could not be more clear; coal, oil and gas are causing immense harm and this will only get worse if we do not stop burning them. Australia must not approve new coal, oil and gas projects. If the government fails to listen to this advice, future generations will pay the price.”

 

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button

Oxfam responds to Lebanon crisis

Oxfam Australia Media Release

Oxfam is responding to the escalating crisis in Lebanon, providing essential support to the hundreds of thousands of people who have been forced to flee as Israeli airstrikes bombard their homes and communities. The influx of internally displaced people, primarily from southern Lebanon, will quickly create disastrous conditions for local communities, beyond the ability of an overloaded international humanitarian system to properly meet.

Oxfam and our partners are supporting internally displaced people in shelters in Beirut, Mount Lebanon and North Lebanon with clean water and sanitation, emergency cash, food, and hygiene and menstrual hygiene kits.

Oxfam’s Lebanon country director Bachir Ayoub said the country can ill afford this on top of existing crises.

“This conflict was predictable and avoidable. It is the result of the failure to achieve a ceasefire in Gaza. For decades, the people of Lebanon have endured one crisis after another without getting the opportunity to fully recover. This latest emergency will only deepen the existing challenges facing the people of Lebanon and further destabilise an already volatile region.”

The international community must condemn this escalation and take bold action to stop it now. Israel continues to act with impunity and it must be held to account for its actions in both Lebanon and Gaza. All parties must abide by international humanitarian law and held to account where potential violations may be involved.

The spread of hostilities into Lebanon has inflicted immense damage on civilian infrastructure and led to a tragic loss of life. Lebanon and the region cannot afford to bear the weight of this crisis. This broader regional escalation underscores the urgent need for an immediate and permanent ceasefire in Gaza.

 

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button

Oxfam Australia welcomes Declaration for the Protection of Humanitarian Workers

Oxfam Australia Media Release

Oxfam Australia welcomes the Australian Government’s effort to champion a declaration aimed at safeguarding humanitarian personnel at the United Nations General Assembly in New York this week.

Oxfam Australia Chief Executive Officer Lyn Morgain acknowledged the importance of the declaration in the protection of frontline aid workers.

“We commend the Australian Government’s leadership in highlighting the critical need to protect humanitarian workers. Minister Wong’s advocacy on this issue is timely and necessary.

“As we consider the need for protection, we remember the hundreds of humanitarian workers who have tragically lost their lives in Gaza, but also in other conflict areas such as Yemen, Syria, and among the Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh.

“On World Humanitarian Day this August, humanitarian organisations, including Oxfam, came together to call for stronger action to protect aid workers in conflict situations. We are pleased to see that the Australian Government has now responded to our calls.

“Civilians, including humanitarian and health-care workers, continue to suffer from attacks in violation of the laws of war and human rights. Far too often, these breaches go unpunished.

“The Australian Government, alongside others, has the ability to apply immediate pressure on states failing to adhere to international humanitarian law.

“We call on the Australian Government to take further action by ensuring that existing accountability mechanisms are effectively used to hold perpetrators of these violations accountable.”

 

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button

Hidden Influence of Neoliberalism in Australian Institutions

By Denis Hay

Description

Explore the hidden influence of neoliberalism shaping our institutions. Learn about the impact on policy and the path to a fairer political system.

Introduction

Neoliberalism has deeply infiltrated Australia’s key institutions, shaping policies that prioritize market interests over public welfare. From economic agencies to healthcare and local government, this ideology has created systemic barriers to progressive change. Understanding how neoliberalism works within these institutions is crucial for citizens looking for a more compassionate and ethical political system. In this article, we explore the roots and impact of neoliberalism in Australian institutions and discuss how Australia can use its monetary sovereignty to build a fairer society.

Neoliberalism’s Deep Roots in Australian Institutions

What is Neoliberalism?

Neoliberalism is an economic and political ideology that emphasizes free markets, deregulation, privatization, and reduced government intervention in the economy. While it promises efficiency and growth, it often leads to increased inequality, diminished public services, and prioritization of corporate interests over the common good. In Australia, neoliberalism became prominent in the 1980s and has since influenced the policies of both major political parties, embedding itself in various institutions and affecting their functioning and priorities.

The Separation of Powers: Parliament vs. Government and Opposition

Australia’s parliamentary structure is designed to separate legislative authority from executive power. However, the ideological alignment of key institutions with neoliberal values blurs this separation, undermining the intended checks and balances.

Parliament should serve as an independent body standing for diverse viewpoints, but in practice, it often becomes an arena where neoliberal policies are reinforced rather than challenged. This has led to a narrowing of political discourse, where both government and opposition largely run within a neoliberal framework, limiting genuine debate on alternative policies.

Key Institutions Influenced by Neoliberalism
Treasury and Economic Policy

The Treasury is pivotal in shaping Australia’s economic policies, including taxation, public spending, and fiscal strategy. Influenced by neoliberal ideology, it has consistently advocated for policies that favour budget surpluses, reduced public spending, and tax cuts for corporations. This focus has often resulted in underfunded public services and infrastructure, widening the gap between rich and poor.

For example, the prioritization of balanced budgets over social investment has constrained funding for education, healthcare, and welfare programs, affecting the most vulnerable Australians.

Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA)

The RBA’s primary focus on controlling inflation rather than achieving full employment reflects neoliberal principles. While low inflation is essential, an overemphasis on it can lead to underemployment and wage stagnation, worsening economic inequality. The RBA’s policy decisions, such as raising interest rates to curb inflation, often ignore broader economic conditions, affecting households with high debt levels and increasing financial stress on working families.

Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA)

APRA oversees the stability of the financial sector, yet its neoliberal leanings have led to a regulatory environment that Favours large financial institutions over consumer protection. The 2018 Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation, and Financial Services Industry revealed systemic issues in the financial sector, many of which were enabled by a regulatory framework that prioritized corporate interests over public accountability.

Education: Focus on Private Schools

Neoliberalism has significantly influenced the Australian education system, leading to increased support for private schools at the expense of the public system. Government funding policies have disproportionately favoured private and independent schools, creating a two-tier education system where resources and quality of education vary widely.

This trend has worsened inequality, as well-resourced private schools offer more opportunities to their students, while public schools, especially in lower socioeconomic areas, struggle with inadequate funding and support. The focus on privatization and competition undermines the principle of fair education for all, reinforcing societal divides.

Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC)

ASIC, responsible for regulating corporate conduct and protecting consumers, has also been shaped by neoliberal ideology. The Commission has faced criticism for its perceived leniency towards corporate misconduct, reflecting a regulatory approach that often prioritizes market stability over strict enforcement.

The influence of neoliberalism is clear in its reluctance to impose significant penalties on major corporations, as seen in the aftermath of the banking Royal Commission. This has led to a belief that ASIC is more concerned with protecting corporate interests than safeguarding the rights of consumers and investors.

Defence and Security

Neoliberal influence extends to defence policy, where decisions are often driven by strategic alliances and military procurement rather than national interest. The alignment with U.S. foreign policy, showed by significant defence spending and involvement in conflicts like Iraq and Afghanistan, reflects a neoliberal agenda that prioritizes geopolitical strategy over regional stability and peace.

Medical and Healthcare Bodies

Healthcare in Australia, although better than in many countries, is not immune to neoliberal policies. The increasing push for privatization, the underfunding of public hospitals, and the promotion of private health insurance have created a two-tier system where access to quality care depends on one’s financial status. This approach undermines the principle of universal healthcare and worsens health inequalities.

Local Government and Planning

Local governments often run under severe financial constraints, as funding models shaped by neoliberal policies limit their ability to deliver essential services. The emphasis on ‘efficiency’ and ‘cost-cutting’ has led to the outsourcing of many services, resulting in reduced quality and accountability. For instance, the privatization of waste management and public transport services in many municipalities has often led to higher costs for residents and lower service standards.

The Consequences of Neoliberal Domination

Economic Inequality and Social Services

Neoliberal policies have significantly widened economic inequality in Australia. The emphasis on market-based solutions and reduced government intervention has led to a situation where the wealthiest benefit from tax cuts and deregulation, while low- and middle-income families face stagnating wages and rising living costs. Social services, once seen as a safety net, are increasingly underfunded, forcing more Australians into poverty and insecurity.

The Housing Crisis

Australia’s housing crisis is a direct consequence of neoliberal policies that prioritize investment and profit over the right to housing. The federal government’s reluctance to directly build public housing, instead relying on market mechanisms and incentives for private developers, has resulted in skyrocketing rents and unaffordable home prices. State governments have struggled to address this issue effectively, constrained by funding limitations and political pressure from the property sector.

Environmental Degradation

Neoliberalism’s focus on economic growth often comes at the expense of environmental sustainability. In Australia, policies that support fossil fuel industries and deregulate environmental protections contribute to ongoing degradation and hinder the transition to renewable energy. Corporate influence on environmental policy is clear in decisions such as approving new coal mines despite widespread public opposition and the urgent need to address climate change.

Disconnect Between Politicians and Voters

Australia’s political system works within a framework that often disconnects elected officials from the expectations and desires of their constituents. Once politicians are elected, there is no formal obligation for them to fulfill the promises or policy positions they campaigned on. This lack of accountability is compounded by the influence of party politics and corporate interests, which often shape decisions more than voter demands.

As a result, the electorate often finds that their votes do not translate into meaningful representation or policy outcomes, reinforcing the belief that the political system serves vested interests over public needs.

This dynamic is particularly problematic when addressing complex issues like housing, healthcare, and climate change, where public sentiment is often ignored in favour of keeping the status quo.

Challenging Neoliberalism and Promoting Public Interest

Progressive Movements and Political Alternatives

Grassroots movements and smaller political parties, such as the Greens, play a crucial role in challenging neoliberal dominance. These groups advocate for policies that prioritize public welfare, environmental sustainability, and social justice. Building public support for these alternatives requires raising awareness of neoliberalism’s impact and showing that there are practical, progressive policy options available.

Institutional Reforms

Reforming key institutions is essential to reducing neoliberal influence. This could include:

Revising the RBA’s Mandate: Expanding the RBA’s focus to include employment and wage growth alongside inflation control.

Strengthening Regulatory Bodies: Enhancing the independence and accountability of bodies like APRA and the ACCC to protect public interests more effectively.

Public Investment: Increasing government investment in public services and infrastructure, funded by public money rather than relying solely on private capital.

Using Australia’s Monetary Sovereignty

Australia’s status as a sovereign currency issuer means it has more fiscal flexibility than commonly understood. The government can use its monetary sovereignty to fund essential public services, build infrastructure, and support full employment without the constraints of a household budget. Embracing this approach can transform public policy, enabling a more fair and sustainable society.

Summary: The Need for a Paradigm Shift

Neoliberalism has entrenched itself in Australian institutions, creating systemic barriers to progressive change. Understanding the hidden influence of neoliberalism is the first step toward challenging it. By advocating for institutional reforms, supporting progressive movements, and using Australia’s monetary sovereignty, citizens can push for a political system that truly serves the public interest. This change in basic assumptions is essential for building a fairer, more just society that prioritizes people over profit.

Question for Readers

What changes do you think are necessary to reduce the hidden influence of neoliberalism in Australian institutions?

Call to Action

If you’re passionate about creating a fairer society, visit my website and do your best to support progressive change in Australia.

Social Sharing

Share this article with your network to raise awareness about the hidden influence of neoliberalism in our institutions and how we can advocate for a fairer Australia.

 

This article was originally published on Social Justice Australia.

 

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be greatly appreciated.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button

 

Why is Peter Dutton so frightened of nuclear detail?

Solutions for Climate Australia Media Release

Still missing from the Coalition’s nuclear fantasy – any plans on costs, reducing climate pollution or nuclear accidents

The public will have to keep waiting after Opposition Leader Peter Dutton failed to announce anticipated costings and other detail of the Liberal National Coalition’s nuclear proposal today.

Following Mr Dutton’s speech, Solutions for Climate Australia called on the Federal Liberal and National parties to step up and tell the public just how long, how expensive and how risky their pro-nuclear reactor policy is.

Solutions for Climate Australia senior campaigner Elly Baxter said:

“Today, Peter Dutton has again failed to give any detail on how he plans to establish nuclear reactors in Australia. Mr Dutton seems to be bug-out frightened to put forward any detail – what’s he got to hide?

“Australia’s coal plants are old and falling apart. Nuclear would never be delivered in time, whereas solar and wind already provide 40% of Australia’s electricity.

Solutions for Climate Australia director Dr Barry Traill said:

“Multiple credible estimates from industry experts show that even if, somehow, the nuclear reactors were built by 2040, they could only produce 4% of Australia’s total electricity needs.

“Why would we spend many billions on the most expensive and risky way of making electricity in Australia, to produce just 4% of the power we need?

“We call on the Coalition to have the guts to put out the details of what they are proposing.”

 

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be greatly appreciated.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button

Regional communities welcome $140 million boost to Queensland’s nature fund

Media Release

Queensland’s regional communities are set to benefit from an announcement that will see the Queensland Nature fund triple in size, with significant investments made to support farmers, landholders and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples capitalise on emerging natural capital markets.

This new commitment, made by the Miles Labor Government yesterday will support natural capital demonstration projects, a six-year pilot of annual stewardship payments to landholders, the provision of extension support by regional NRM organisations to drive landholder engagement in natural capital markets, develop regional Natural Capital Accounts, and help protect one of Australia’s largest nature refuges.

Julie Boyd, Chair NRM Regions Queensland – the peak body for Queensland’s 12 regional NRM organisations – welcomed the announcement.

“International investors have their eyes set on Queensland when it comes to delivering nature positive outcomes, and landholders that demonstrate sustainable management of their natural resources can access new markets and trade opportunities as a result,” Julie said.

“More than 88% of Queensland’s land is used for primary production and that means how we manage agriculture is intertwined with how we manage our environment.”

“Regional NRM organisations have been building trust with farmers and primary producers for decades, which is why we are trusted from paddock to Parliament.”

“We know that to participate in these emerging markets land managers need access to trusted, independent advisers. We’re on the ground, in regional and remote Queensland with these networks already in place, and we’re ready to deliver outcomes for Queensland’s Nature Fund, and for Queensland’s economy.”

Chris Norman, CEO said the sector engaged upwards of 10,000 land managers every year.
“Queensland’s regional NRM organisations have been doing this work for decades. We are Queensland’s largest, hands-on professional conservation network with more than 340 staff on the ground where it matters most – in the regions, working face-to-face with people who manage the land.”

“I applaud this announcement by the Miles Labor Government.”

“We simply cannot meet our Nature Positive and Natural Capital targets without this kind of investment in regional communities.”

“With this new level of support from the Queensland Government, we can accelerate positive outcomes for agricultural communities, for jobs, and for our precious natural assets – the land, water and biodiversity we all rely on for quality of life, food security and a thriving Queensland economy.”

 

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button

Housing disaster will extend for years if population growth ignored

Sustainable Population Australia Media Release

Without a mature discussion on population growth, the housing crisis will extend for years to come, according to Sustainable Population Australia (SPA).

SPA National president Peter Strachan says there is deep denial within the government that population is the main factor driving housing demand.

“The government’s focus is on supply while the demand side is ignored,” says Mr Strachan. “The result is a diabolical housing crisis causing misery for renters and home buyers alike.

“Instead of doing something about population growth, all sorts of reasons are found to blame ordinary Australians for somehow causing this crisis.

“They say we have too much space in our homes and we need to increase the occupancy ratio. They say we are NIMBYs for resisting inappropriate development. They say we need to get used to living in shoddy high rise and don’t worry about green space. They say we need to lift restrictions on development, adding to urban sprawl and destruction of the natural environment.

“All of this just so these unprecedented levels of population growth can continue. It is absurd.”

This is despite the respected economist, Alan Kohler, having recently laid out in forensic detail how, over two decades, population growth fuelled by high immigration has led to the current housing situation.

“We are now at the point where housing construction has no chance of catching up to ever-increasing demand caused by population growth,” says Mr Strachan.

“It will be impossible to reach the Albanese government’s target of 1.2 million new dwellings over five years. For that to happen, we need to be approving an average of 264,000 dwellings per year. In the past 12 months (to July 2024), 165,250 dwellings were approved, which is even lower than the 175,130 approvals in the preceding 12 months. We are heading in the wrong direction.

“The Urban Development Institute of Australia concedes that we are building less than we were five years ago and we are facing an ever-increasing housing supply gap.

“All of the supply side solutions, including social housing, require houses to actually be built. But this is not happening at anywhere near the rate required, due to a perfect storm of factors including: interest rates at a 12 year high; a 40% rise in construction costs since the start of the Covid pandemic; high rates of construction industry insolvency; and competition for materials and labour with big infrastructure projects.

“The obvious solution is to stop adding to demand with sky-high immigration levels,’ Mr Strachan says. “This can be done relatively quickly by adjusting immigration visa policies and targets.

“Why the government is not doing this is one of life’s great mysteries. But one thing is certain, if we don’t do it, this housing disaster will drag on for years.”

Further information can be read in the SPA commissioned report “The Housing Crisis is a Population Crisis“.

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button

The Deep State Influence on Global and Australian Politics

By Denis Hay

Description:

Uncover how the deep state influence shapes global politics, including Australia’s policies, serving corporate and geopolitical interests.

Introduction: The Shadowy World of the Deep State

In a world where democracy is celebrated as the cornerstone of modern governance, the concept of a “deep state” challenges our most fundamental beliefs. The deep state refers to a hidden network of powerful individuals within government, military, and intelligence agencies who operate behind the scenes, manipulating political outcomes for their gain. While this idea might sound like a plot from a spy novel, extensive research and historical events suggest that the deep state has had a profound impact on global politics, including in Australia.

The influence of the deep state on world politics is largely invisible to the public, yet it shapes major political decisions and outcomes.

As citizens, we are often unaware of the hidden forces that govern our lives. This lack of transparency undermines democratic principles and allows a select few to wield unchecked power.

By uncovering the deep state’s influence, we can better understand global political dynamics and advocate for greater transparency and accountability in government.

The Emergence of the Deep State: A Global Perspective

Definition and Origins of the Deep State

The term “deep state” originated in Turkey during the 20th century, referring to a network of military officers and civil servants who worked clandestinely to influence the country’s politics. Over time, the concept has evolved to describe similar power structures in other countries, particularly in the United States. The deep state operates independently of elected officials, often prioritizing its agenda over the will of the people.

Key Statistics:

– According to a 2020 Pew Research survey, 63% of Americans believe in the existence of a deep state.

– Historical examples, such as the Iran-Contra affair and the Watergate scandal, highlight the deep state’s potential to operate in secrecy.

Key Historical Events Illustrating Deep State Influence

The deep state’s influence on global politics is best understood through a series of key historical events. For instance, the CIA’s covert operations during the Cold War, as detailed in David Talbot’s The Devil’s Chessboard, demonstrate how intelligence agencies have shaped political outcomes without public scrutiny. Similarly, James Douglass’s JFK and the Unspeakable argues that President Kennedy’s assassination was orchestrated by deep state actors who saw him as a threat.

Deep State’s Role in US and Global Politics:

CIA Covert Actions: From orchestrating coups in Iran (1953) and Guatemala (1954) to supporting anti-communist regimes during the Cold War, the CIA has often operated outside the purview of democratic oversight.

Assassination of JFK: Douglass contends that JFK’s push for peace and disarmament threatened the military-industrial complex, leading to his assassination by deep state operatives.

Mary Pinchot Meyer’s Murder:
In Mary’s Mosaic, Peter Janney explores the murder of JFK’s mistress, who allegedly knew too much about the CIA’s operations and JFK’s assassination.

The Deep State’s Influence on US Politics: Key Case Studies

The Role of the CIA Under Allen Dulles

Allen Dulles, the longest-serving CIA director, played a pivotal role in establishing the agency’s covert operations. As explored in The Devil’s Chessboard, Dulles leveraged the CIA’s power to conduct secret missions that often subverted democratic processes. From toppling foreign governments to manipulating domestic politics, Dulles exemplified the deep state’s ability to shape global events.

Key Operations:

Operation Ajax (Iran, 1953):
The CIA’s coup to overthrow Iran’s democratically elected Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh and reinstall the Shah, ensuring Western control over Iranian oil.

Bay of Pigs Invasion (Cuba, 1961): A failed CIA-led operation to overthrow Fidel Castro, highlighting the agency’s willingness to pursue aggressive actions without full government approval.

The Assassination of JFK and Its Implications

JFK and the Unspeakable presents a compelling case that JFK’s assassination was the result of a conspiracy involving the deep state. Douglass argues that Kennedy’s opposition to the Vietnam War and his efforts to improve relations with the Soviet Union put him at odds with powerful military and intelligence figures. This clash culminated in his assassination, an event that has been shrouded in mystery and speculation for decades.

Key Points:

JFK’s Push for Peace:
Kennedy’s actions, such as the signing of the Nuclear Test Ban Treaty and his efforts to de-escalate the Cuban Missile Crisis, were seen as threats to the military-industrial complex.


The Warren Commission:
The official investigation into JFK’s assassination has been criticized for its shortcomings, with many believing it was a cover-up orchestrated by the deep state.

The Silencing of Dissent Through Targeted Assassinations

In Mary’s Mosaic, Peter Janney examines the death of Mary Pinchot Meyer, a close confidante of JFK who was believed to have knowledge of CIA activities. Janney’s investigation suggests that Meyer was murdered to prevent her from revealing sensitive information about the deep state’s involvement in JFK’s assassination and other covert operations.

Key Points:

Meyer’s Influence on JFK:
Meyer is believed to have played a role in JFK’s shift towards peace and his skepticism of the CIA.

Cover-Up: The official investigation into Meyer’s death was marked by irregularities, leading to suspicions of a deep state cover-up.

The Deep State’s Global Impact

How the Deep State’s Influence Extends Beyond the US

The deep state’s influence is not limited to the United States. Across the globe, intelligence agencies, military leaders, and other powerful entities have worked to shape political outcomes in their favor. From Europe to the Middle East, deep state actors have manipulated elections, supported authoritarian regimes, and orchestrated coups to maintain control over geopolitical interests.

Examples:

Chile (1973):
The CIA supported the coup that overthrew democratically elected President Salvador Allende, installing the military dictatorship of Augusto Pinochet.

Operation Gladio: A covert NATO operation during the Cold War, involving clandestine paramilitary groups in Europe aimed at preventing the rise of communism by any means necessary.

Corporate Interests and the Deep State

One of the defining characteristics of the deep state is its close relationship with powerful corporate interests. The US deep state, in particular, has consistently worked to protect American corporate power, ensuring that multinational corporations maintain access to resources, markets, and labor around the world.

Examples:

Oil Interests in the Middle East:
The US government, often through the CIA, has intervened in countries like Iran and Iraq to ensure that American oil companies retain access to the region’s vast oil reserves.


Mining and Resource Exploitation:
American corporate interests in mining and other extractive industries are often protected by US foreign policy, with the deep state playing a role in ensuring that these corporations face minimal local resistance. This has significant implications for countries like Australia, where US corporations have a strong presence in the mining and energy sectors.

The Impact on International Relations and Global Stability

The deep state’s actions have had profound consequences for global stability. By prioritizing their agendas, these actors have often undermined diplomatic efforts, leading to prolonged conflicts, economic instability, and the erosion of trust between nations. The legacy of these actions continues to shape international relations today.

Consequences:

Prolonged Conflicts:
Deep state interventions have often exacerbated conflicts, such as the Vietnam War, where deep state interests overrode diplomatic solutions.

Erosion of Sovereignty: Countries subjected to deep state operations often experience a loss of sovereignty, as foreign interests take precedence over national autonomy.

The Deep State’s Influence on Australian Politics

Australia, often seen as a stable democracy with a strong tradition of rule of law, has nonetheless been subject to the influence of deep state dynamics, largely due to its close relationship with global powers, particularly the United States. This influence manifests through political decisions, intelligence operations, economic policies, and even media narratives. The deep state’s reach into Australian politics is both subtle and significant, shaping the nation’s direction in ways that often escape public scrutiny.

Historical Background: Australia’s Political and Intelligence Relationship with the US

Australia’s deep ties with the United States, solidified during and after World War II, have placed it firmly within the orbit of American geopolitical strategy. This alignment has meant that Australian political and intelligence decisions have, at times, reflected broader US interests, sometimes at the expense of Australia’s own national interests. The establishment of key intelligence-sharing agreements, like the Five Eyes alliance, and joint military bases, such as Pine Gap, underscore the depth of this relationship.

Pine Gap: The joint defense facility at Pine Gap in the Northern Territory is a critical part of the global surveillance network managed by the US. It plays a key role in signal intelligence (SIGINT) and has been involved in operations ranging from drone strikes in the Middle East to global eavesdropping. While Pine Gap is crucial to Australia’s defense, its operations are heavily influenced by US strategic priorities, which can lead to conflicts of interest when Australian and US objectives diverge.

Five Eyes Alliance: Australia’s membership in the Five Eyes intelligence alliance, along with the US, UK, Canada, and New Zealand, has deepened its integration into global intelligence networks. While this provides Australia with valuable intelligence, it also subjects the country to the priorities and policies of more powerful allies, particularly the US. This influence extends beyond security into areas like foreign policy and economic strategies, where Australia’s actions often align with US interests, even when those interests might conflict with local needs.

Case Studies: Instances of Deep State Influence in Australia

Several significant events in Australian history suggest the influence of the deep state, often linked to broader US geopolitical goals. These instances highlight how Australia’s political landscape has been shaped by external forces operating with little public oversight.

Whitlam Dismissal (1975): The dismissal of Prime Minister Gough Whitlam by Governor-General Sir John Kerr remains one of the most controversial events in Australian political history. Whitlam’s push for greater independence from US influence, including his efforts to assert control over the Pine Gap facility and his opposition to US involvement in Vietnam, put him at odds with US interests. Declassified documents and research suggest that the CIA may have played a role in his ousting, fearing that Whitlam’s policies would undermine the strategic alliance. This event exemplifies how deep state actors can disrupt democratic processes to align with broader geopolitical agendas.

East Timor Crisis (1975-1999): Australia’s involvement in the East Timor independence movement is another example where deep state influence may have played a role. After Indonesia’s invasion of East Timor in 1975, which resulted in widespread human rights abuses, Australia’s response was notably restrained. This hesitation has been attributed to deep state interests, as maintaining strong relations with Indonesia, a key ally against communist expansion in Southeast Asia, was deemed more important than supporting East Timor’s independence. When Australia eventually intervened in 1999, it was under international pressure, highlighting the complex interplay between ethical considerations and deep state strategies.

Economic Policies Favoring Multinationals: Australia’s economic policies have occasionally favored multinational corporations, particularly in the resource extraction sector. These policies, often justified as necessary for economic growth, can also be seen as aligned with the interests of global capital and deep state actors who benefit from the exploitation of natural resources. The influence of international financial institutions and corporate lobbying on Australian economic policy raises questions about the extent to which these decisions serve the public versus private, often foreign, interests.

The Role of Australian Intelligence Agencies and Their Ties to Global Deep State Networks

Australia’s intelligence community, particularly agencies like the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO) and the Australian Secret Intelligence Service (ASIS), plays a crucial role in national security. However, their close ties to US intelligence agencies, especially through the Five Eyes alliance, have led to concerns about the extent of foreign influence on Australian intelligence operations.

ASIO’s Role: ASIO has historically worked closely with the CIA and other US agencies, particularly during the Cold War when the threat of communism justified extensive surveillance and intelligence operations within Australia. While ASIO’s primary mission is to protect Australia from espionage, sabotage, and terrorism, its close collaboration with US agencies sometimes blurs the lines between national and foreign interests. For instance, ASIO’s involvement in the monitoring of Australian citizens with alleged communist ties during the mid-20th century was heavily influenced by US anti-communist policies.

ASIS Operations: ASIS, responsible for Australia’s covert operations abroad, has also been implicated in activities that align closely with US objectives. For example, ASIS’s involvement in intelligence gathering in Southeast Asia during the Vietnam War was largely in support of US military and political goals. The secrecy surrounding ASIS’s operations makes it difficult to fully assess the extent of its alignment with deep state agendas, but its close collaboration with the CIA and MI6 suggests significant influence.

Media Influence and Public Perception

The deep state’s influence in Australia is not limited to political and intelligence operations; it also extends to the media and public perception. The consolidation of media ownership in Australia, with a few major corporations controlling most of the country’s news outlets, has led to concerns about the lack of diverse perspectives and the potential for deep state narratives to dominate public discourse.

Media Ownership: Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp, which owns a significant share of Australian media, has been criticized for promoting narratives that align with corporate and political interests, including those of the deep state. The concentration of media ownership allows for the shaping of public opinion in ways that support the status quo, suppressing dissenting voices and alternative perspectives.

Shaping Public Opinion: The framing of issues such as national security, foreign policy, and economic strategies in the media often reflects the priorities of deep state actors. For example, coverage of Australia’s military engagements abroad tends to emphasize the necessity of these actions for national security, downplaying the potential influence of external actors or the ethical implications of these operations.

The Consequences of Deep State Influence in Australia


How Deep State Activities Have Shaped Australia’s Foreign and Domestic Policies

The deep state’s influence has had lasting effects on Australia’s foreign and domestic policies. From military alliances to economic agreements, Australia’s political landscape has often been shaped by the interests of powerful, unelected actors. This influence has led to policies that may not always align with the Australian public’s interests, resulting in a democratic deficit.

Key Impacts:

Military Alliances: Australia’s involvement in wars like Iraq and Afghanistan can be seen as a result of deep state pressure to support US military objectives.

Economic Policies:
Trade agreements and economic policies have sometimes favored multinational corporations and foreign interests over local industries and workers.

The Impact on Australian Democracy and Public Trust in Government

The deep state’s activities have eroded public trust in Australian democracy. When citizens perceive that their elected officials are not truly in control, it leads to disillusionment and apathy. This democratic deficit undermines the very foundations of Australian society, making it difficult to address critical issues like inequality, climate change, and social justice.

Key Points:

Public Distrust: Surveys indicate a growing distrust in government, with many Australians believing that powerful interests, rather than the electorate, drive political decisions.

Democratic Resilience:
Despite these challenges, there are efforts to strengthen democratic processes and increase transparency in government.

Possible Consequences for Australia’s Future if Deep State Influence Remains Unchecked

If the deep state’s influence in Australia remains unchecked, the consequences could be dire. Australia risks becoming increasingly subservient to foreign interests, losing its ability to make independent decisions. This could lead to further erosion of democratic institutions, economic instability, and a diminished role on the global stage.

Future Scenarios:

Increased Foreign Dependence:
Australia may find itself further entangled in US-led military and intelligence operations, reducing its sovereignty.


Erosion of Civil Liberties:
As the deep state’s influence grows, there is a risk of increased surveillance and restrictions on civil liberties in the name of national security.

The Need for Transparency and Accountability

The deep state’s influence on global and Australian politics is a complex and multifaceted issue that requires serious attention. While the deep state operates in the shadows, its impact on our world is real and far-reaching. To protect democracy and ensure that political power remains in the hands of the people, we must advocate for greater transparency and accountability in government. By shining a light on these hidden power structures, we can begin to reclaim our political systems and build a future where democratic principles truly guide our societies.

Summary

In summary, the deep state represents a powerful and covert network that has shaped global politics, including in Australia. Through historical examples and case studies, we’ve explored how the deep state operates and its profound impact on democracy and governance. It is crucial to remain vigilant and push for transparency to safeguard democratic institutions and public trust.

Reader Interaction

What are your thoughts on the influence of the deep state in global politics? Do you believe that this influence extends to Australia? Share your thoughts and experiences in the comments below.

Call to Action

Stay informed and engaged by subscribing to our newsletter. By staying connected, you can receive the latest insights and analysis on global and Australian politics.

Social Sharing

If you found this article insightful, share it with your friends and colleagues on social media. Let’s spread awareness about the deep state’s influence.

Book Reviews

1. The Devil’s Chessboard by David Talbot

Overview: Talbot’s book explores the career of Allen Dulles, former head of the CIA, and his profound influence on American politics and global affairs. The narrative suggests that Dulles and his allies in intelligence, finance, and law enforcement operated as a “deep state,” manipulating events to maintain their power, often at odds with democratic principles.

Key Themes:
The covert operations of the CIA, the manipulation of political events, and the assassination of foreign and domestic leaders to serve the interests of a powerful elite.


Relevance:
The book underscores the idea that the deep state, led by individuals like Dulles, has had a lasting impact on world politics, shaping events in ways that often contradict public interests.

2. JFK and the Unspeakable by James Douglass

Overview: Douglass delves into the circumstances surrounding the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, arguing that his death was the result of a conspiracy involving the deep state. The book explores JFK’s evolving stance against the military-industrial complex and his push for peace, which Douglass argues made him a target.

Key Themes: The moral struggle between good and evil in politics, the power of the military-industrial complex, and the lengths to which the deep state will go to maintain its influence.

Relevance:
Douglass’s work is a powerful argument for the existence of a deep state that operates independently of democratic oversight, often with devastating consequences for global politics.

3. Mary’s Mosaic by Peter Janney

Overview: Janney’s book investigates the mysterious death of Mary Pinchot Meyer, a socialite and mistress of JFK, who was allegedly assassinated because of her knowledge of CIA operations and her influence on Kennedy’s political views. The book ties her death to the broader conspiracy theories surrounding JFK’s assassination.

Key Themes:
The intertwining of personal relationships and political power, the ruthless nature of deep state operatives, and the silencing of those who threaten the status quo.


Relevance:
Janney’s book adds another layer to the narrative of a deep state willing to commit murder to protect its secrets and maintain control over political outcomes.

 

This article was originally published on Social Justice Australia

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button

Little Johnny’s Sex Change

By James Moore

Little Johnny was off to school with his backpack and baseball glove. Teachers said classmates could play catch during recess. They noticed something about him, however, that he was not as aggressive as other boys and was overly thoughtful and concerned about his fellow students, and there was just something about the way he crossed his legs that bothered his educators.

The surgeons grabbed him out of the hall on his way to the library, probably to check out copies of “Little House on the Prairie” or some other book written by a woman. Doctors understood his character and physiology better than even Johnny. On a cold, metal table in shop class, with the curtains pulled, the doctors grabbed scalpels, sliced off his boyhood, and went to work fashioning a vagina so Johnny could become full female. Estrogen was pumped into his veins and they gave him a cute little dress and patent leather shoes to wear back to class.

“They’ll call you Johnette now,” one of the doctors said. “But you’ll be so much happier.”

It was all that simple. Johnette struggled a bit with the pain and his stitches hurt for a while, but he slowly adjusted. When he got home that day, his parents were upset because they had not authorized a sex change operation for their son. They adjusted, too, though, believing the teachers and the school were probably only doing what they thought best for his future. The future quarterback was now a prospective cheerleader. Johnette put away her baseball glove and went shopping with her mother for girls’ clothing. Her mom was happy to have a daughter after four boys.

Absurd? Sure. Comical? Hell, yes. But it’s what a man who wants to be president thinks is happening to many school age children in America: They go to school of one gender in the morning and come home the opposite in the afternoon or a day or two later. Secret operating rooms are apparently being set up in study halls and cafeterias and between library shelves. Who the hell knows other than Donald Trump? He believes it so it must be true.

 

 

Out of all the senile rantings the Republican presidential candidate spouts off, this one most clearly establishes his disconnect from reality and the psychotic break he has undergone. Watching him make the claim on video, it is obvious he is not fashioning a horror story on the fly for political effect. The man is truly convinced that children are undergoing sex changes at their schools and going home a different gender. Were he making such assertions on national television as the President of the United States, Trump would likely be confronted with the 25th Amendment and there would be an effort to remove him from office, quickly. His party, however, stands mute, privately hoping he will lose and go away and they can begin the generational challenge of rebuilding the GOP.

“The transgender thing is incredible,” Trump said at one of his rallies. “Think of it. Your kid goes to school and comes home a few days later with an operation. The school decides what’s going to happen with your child.”

If you doubt his psychosis, consider that the campaign, almost certainly without Trump’s knowledge, admitted to the media it had not even the slighted indication such a thing had happened anywhere in America. Surely, Trump did not know his staff were telling the truth behind his back because just a few days later he repeated the scenario at another rally.

“Can you imagine you’re a parent and your son leaves the house and you say, Jimmy, I love you so much. Go have a good day in school and your son comes back with a brutal operation.”

No, actually, no parent can imagine that because it has not happened. What they are forced to envision on an almost daily basis, however, is a crazed gunman, slinging an automatic weapon and sweeping a classroom with a rain of bullets, destroying children. Trump increased the odds of that occurring with a resolution issued during his first month in office that rolled back an Obama-era rule that made it harder for people with certain mental health conditions to purchase firearms. The measure had required the Social Security Administration to provide the names of people who receive disability benefits for mental illnesses to the FBI’s background check system. Crazy and want a gun to do some fun killin’? Don’t worry about the feds finding out. Trump fixed that.

The lunacy of his vision regarding school surgery for sex changes seems to have astonished the American public less than his assertion Haitian immigrants are eating dogs and cats and other pets belonging to the residents of Springfield, Ohio. Because Trump’s mind is balanced precariously on the edge of the cracker, the oddities that spring from it spontaneously are losing their shock value. Little Johnny losing his willie during school lunch hour, however, must have set a new standard for absurdity, and, yet, the party of cowards that follows and votes for Trump is non-plussed; they move on waiting for rallies to hear more laughable claims before they walk out bored and carrying their MAGA gear.

The real world is so frustrating and unwilling to adore Trump that his pathology requires him to create a place his mind can occupy where he is respected and honored. There is, for instance, no state of Michigan in this universe that has named him “Man of the Year,” a claim he has repeated numerous times. The award doesn’t even exist, and yet since 2016, Trump has said it was given to him, and during a campaign event in the state recently insisted he had been vindicated regarding the honor.

“The press said, ‘Oh, it never happened.’” he told a crowd. “Well, then it did happen. They found out where it was. But it was like 15 years ago, a beautiful area, but nobody remembered it; nobody remembered it all. All of a sudden, like through a miracle, they found out it did exist.”

No, they did not find out it existed because it does not and never has, except in the gray goo that comprises Trump’s mind. The story has the same lack of validity as the one about the Congo emptying “rough prisoners” into America through illegal immigration. He manufactured images with his short-circuited synapses that showed him visions of prisons in Africa opening their doors and helping convicts get transit to the U.S. – Mexico border. Thematically, though, he is consistent; his tales of fright are all related to people of color. They are black Africans and Haitians, brown Mexicans and Central Americans, yellow hordes of Chinese coming to infiltrate our economy and steal our technology, and, of course, the dark-skinned Mid easterners determined to destroy our Christian way of life. That leaves out his warnings that undocumented immigrants “are poisoning the blood of our country” and are “invading our country and replacing our cultural and ethnic background.” Aggregate polls indicate that 67 percent of Trump supporters believe those falsehoods.

Weariness sets in when trying to keep up with or catalogue the lying, and the addition of J.D. Vance to the ticket has added a new dimension of prevarication to the campaign. The Ohioan has admitted that he is willing to “make up stories” if that’s what’s needed to get the attention of voters, which makes him more Trump than even Trump. His confession ought to frighten the electorate even further away from Trump’s restoration. The former president is old, angry, and demented, and given his manifest mental state, there is a likelihood he will not serve out four years even if he were elected, which means a vote for Trump is, in effect, a vote for Vance. The inevitable conclusion from that probable scenario is that, yes, there is a worse than Trump scenario.

And that ought to scare hordes of sane Americans to the polls.

This article was originally published on Texas to the world.

James Moore is the New York Times bestselling author of “Bush’s Brain: How Karl Rove Made George W. Bush Presidential,” three other books on Bush and former Texas Governor Rick Perry, as well as two novels, and a biography entitled, “Give Back the Light,” on a famed eye surgeon and inventor. His newest book will be released mid- 2023. Mr. Moore has been honored with an Emmy from the National Academy of Television Arts and Sciences for his documentary work and is a former TV news correspondent who has traveled extensively on every presidential campaign since 1976.

He has been a retained on-air political analyst for MSNBC and has appeared on Morning Edition on National Public Radio, NBC Nightly News, Last Word with Lawrence O’Donnell, CBS Evening News, CNN, Real Time with Bill Maher, and Hardball with Chris Matthews, among numerous other programs. Mr. Moore’s written political and media analyses have been published at CNN, Boston Globe, L.A. Times, Guardian of London, Sunday Independent of London, Salon, Financial Times of London, Huffington Post, and numerous other outlets. He also appeared as an expert on presidential politics in the highest-grossing documentary film of all time, Fahrenheit 911, (not related to the film’s producer Michael Moore).

His other honors include the Dartmouth College National Media Award for Economic Understanding, the Edward R. Murrow Award from the Radio Television News Directors’ Association, the Individual Broadcast Achievement Award from the Texas Headliners Foundation, and a Gold Medal for Script Writing from the Houston International Film Festival. He was frequently named best reporter in Texas by the AP, UPI, and the Houston Press Club. The film produced from his book “Bush’s Brain” premiered at The Cannes Film Festival prior to a successful 30-city theater run in the U.S.

Mr. Moore has reported on the major stories and historical events of our time, which have ranged from Iran-Contra to the Waco standoff, the Oklahoma City bombing, the border immigration crisis, and other headlining events. His journalism has put him in Cuba, Central America, Mexico, Australia, Canada, the UK, and most of Europe, interviewing figures as diverse as Fidel Castro and Willie Nelson. He has been writing about Texas politics, culture, and history since 1975, and continues with political opinion pieces for CNN and regularly at his Substack newsletter: “Texas to the World.”

 

 

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button