Modi’s Cricket Ploy: Hindutva as Twelfth Man

This week, the International Cricket Council’s One Day International tournament will commence…

I'm an angry bigot, in a tiny country…

My first love is satire and comedy – I used to run…

Crash and Burn

This is both optimistic and troubling. Fairfax media reports that "China has put…

The Admirable Demonstration of Dan Tehan And Other…

Apparently, Dan Tehan was on QandA last night. I only know this…

Condensed Fun Facts, Dates, Myths/Misconceptions

By Richard Whitington Fun Referendum Facts Fun Referendum Facts #1: The ballot paper for…

Cannabis: We can shut up, toe the line,…

When President Obama commented that he thought cannabis was likely less dangerous…

Corruption suspicions hang over secret PNG refugee contracts

Refugee Action Coalition Media Release AUSTALIA’S SECRET PNG DEAL MUST BE INVESTIGATED Refugee advocates…

Dianne Feinstein: National Security State Diva

The tributes for the late Democratic Senator from California, Dianne Feinstein, heaped…


What’s The Saying About a Pro Se Defendant? Morrison Defends Himself

In a long and rambling statement posted to Facebook, former Prime Minister Scott Morrison has defended his actions in seizing control of five ministries simultaneously. In a similar fashion to my response to John Howard’s character reference for George Pell (which I think is also available on this site), I want to analyse and deconstruct Mr. Morrison’s defence. This will be a long one, folks.

The Statement, Part One: Desperate Times Call for Desperate Measures

Morrison opens up his statement with the following:

The devastating impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and associated recession required an unprecedented policy response from our Government.

These were extraordinary times and they required extraordinary measures to respond. Our Government’s overriding objective was to save lives and livelihoods, which we achieved. To achieve this we needed to ensure continuity of government and robust administrative arrangements to deal with the unexpected in what was a period of constant uncertainty during the nation’s biggest crisis outside of wartime.

The situation required an unprecedented policy response from the government. Hanged by your own words. The government was required to put forth an unprecedented policy response. Not you as an individual. You were a member of a team. Second, how can you simultaneously claim that there was a recession and that you saved livelihoods? Finally for this section, continuity of government and establishing ‘robust administrative arrangements’ means putting in place deputy ministers, acting ministers or assistant ministers. These are people who can fulfil the role of the minister in the event of their incapacitation. The response is not to engage in a personal power grab. Extraordinary times required extraordinary measures, yes, but not to serve your own selfish ends.

The Statement, Part Two: Red Herrings

Ever a master of distraction, Morrison’s statement contains multiple red herrings, as the next section demonstrates:

Information and advice changed daily and even hourly. Meetings with Ministers, officials and advisers were constant, as was liaison with industry and other stakeholders as we were dealing with everything from supply chain shocks to business closures, the overwhelming of the social security and hospital system and the sourcing of critical medical supplies and workforce.

The prospect of civil disruption, extensive fatalities and economic collapse was real, especially in the early stages, which was occurring in other parts of the world.

The risk of Ministers becoming incapacitated, sick, hospitalised, incapable of doing their work at a critical hour or even fatality was very real. The Home Affairs Minister was struck down with COVID-19 early in the pandemic and the UK Prime Minister was on a ventilator and facing the very real prospect of dying of COVID-19

If the situation were as chaotic as he makes out (which, in fairness, it was) and the information was changing as rapidly as he says, should he not have had more hands rather than concentrating power in fewer? His own rationalisation does not work: a chaotic situation requires more people involved, not less. Next.

The red herrings continue when he discusses ministers in both his and the UK government coming down with the virus. As referenced above, this is what assistant, deputy and acting ministers are for. Also, any ministers in Johnson’s government suffering from COVID are irrelevant to discussions of your power grab in Australia. The other major flaw in his reasoning is what if he himself had contracted the virus? If he truly was the indispensable minister because of the risk to others from the plague, how utterly stuffed would the government have been if he had COVID? Once again, his rationalisation does not work.

The Statement, Part Three: The Garbage Continues

Morrison continues with this:

The Parliament was suspended from sitting for a time and Cabinet and others meetings were unable to be held face to face, as occurred with businesses and the public more generally.

As Prime Minister I considered it necessary to put in place safeguards, redundancies and contingencies to ensure the continuity and effective operation of Government during this crisis period, which extended for the full period of my term.

To ensure oversight, the Government, with the support of the Opposition, established a concurrent public Senate Inquiry into the management of COVID that effectively ran for the duration of my term as Prime Minister.

Even if the meetings were unable to be held face to face, this is why video conferencing apps such as Zoom were invented. As I said in the last piece, you adapt convention and the law to circumstances rather than simply destroy them. Blaming the plague for your inability to do your job only goes so far. Further, you speak of safeguards and redundancies. Even if I buy the idea that such contingencies were necessary (ministers fall sick for various reasons all the time; such would be worse in a pandemic), this does not extend to vastly increasing your own personal power.

Finally, this oversight committee that you set up evidently was not effective since it somehow missed you swearing yourself into various ministries. Oh and nice attempt to blame the opposition there, too, but I see through it. You don’t get to blame the opposition here, Scotty, this is all on you.

The Statement, Part Four: Res Gestae Scotti Marketi (The Achievements of Scotty from Marketing)

The former Prime Minister continues:

In addition I took the precaution of being given authority to administer various departments of state should the need arise due to incapacity of a Minister or in the national interest. This was done in relation to departments where Ministers were vested with specific powers under their legislation that were not subject to oversight by Cabinet, including significant financial authorities.

Given the significant nature of many of these powers I considered this to be a prudent and responsible action as Prime Minister.

It is not uncommon for multiple Ministers to be sworn to administer the same Department. However, given that such additional Ministers were in a more junior position in the relevant Departments, and would not be familiar with all the details of the pandemic response, I considered it appropriate that the redundancy be put in place at a higher level within the Government and not at a more junior level.

Augustus would have been proud of that first sentence. You took the precaution of being given authority? This was forced on you? Oh get that garbage outta here!

The first sentence here is fascinating for another reason: did you see the subtle shift? The inclusion of ‘or in the national interest’ essentially generalises the extraordinary powers Morrison granted himself beyond the pandemic. The rationale here is seemingly contradictory. He seized control of these portfolios (purely as a precaution) because ‘Ministers were vested with specific powers…that were not subject to oversight by Cabinet’. Seriously? So because there was no Cabinet oversight of Ministerial action, you seized their portfolios? The mind reels!

He mentions the existence of additional ministers (deputies, assistants etc) but notes their junior status and consequent lack of familiarity with the details. The obvious follow-up here is why not bring them into the briefings? Why not bring the most senior active representative of a department into the briefings so they can become familiar with the details? It is not as though political convention was sacred to you.

The Statement, Part Five: Scotty on The Details

Mr Morrison finally gets to the point of what happened: his many ministries:

The major Department for which this was considered was the Health Department, given the extensive powers afforded to the Minister by the Biosecurity Act. This was put in place on March 14, 2020. The Department of Finance was added on March 30, 2020.

As an added administrative precaution, as a ‘belts and braces’ approach, the Departments of Treasury and Home Affairs were added some time after in May 2021. I did not consider it was likely that it would be necessary to exercise powers in these areas, but the future was very difficult to predict during the pandemic.

As events demonstrated with the resurgence of COVID-19 in the second half of 2021, we could never take certainty for granted. In hindsight these arrangements were unnecessary and until seeking advice from the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet today, I had not recollected these arrangements having been put in place. There was a lot going on at the time.

It is true that then Health Minister Greg Hunt did have issues with his health, but once again, deputies and other junior associates exist. It was not necessary to concentrate his power in yourself. Finance and Treasury both had representatives inside your administration, at least one of whom (minister Cormann) did not know that you had seized his portfolio. In addition, is Home Affairs not separate from the pandemic? Your statement that you did not consider that these powers would need to be used renders curious your decision to take on these portfolios in the first place.

Finally, for this section, we have the classic ‘I do not recall’, which is political speak for ‘this happened but I don’t want to admit it’. Parasite. You do not recall being in charge control of five ministries simultaneously!? Just about the only true thing in this entire statement is the statement ‘these arrangements were unnecessary’. For once, Mr. Morrison, we agree, but for different reasons.

The Statement, Part Six: An Irrational Rationale

This rambling and incoherent justification continues with this:

Thankfully it was not necessary for me to trigger use of any of these powers. In the event that I would have to use such powers I would have done so disclosing the authority by which I was making such decisions. The authority was pre approved to ensure there would be no delay in being able to make decisions or take actions should the need arise.

The crisis was a highly dynamic environment and it was important to plan ahead and take what precautions could lawfully be put in place to ensure I could act, as Prime Minister, if needed.

It is important to note that throughout this time Ministers in all Departments, where I was provided with authority to act, exercised full control of their Departments and portfolios without intervention. Ministerial briefs were not copied to me as Prime Minister in a co-Minister capacity, as this was not the nature of the arrangement. These arrangements were there as a ‘break glass in case of emergency’ safeguard.

I also did not wish Ministers to be second guessing themselves or for there to be the appearance of a right of appeal or any diminishing of their authority to exercise their responsibilities, as this was not the intention of putting these arrangements in place. I simply wanted them to get on with their job, which they did admirably and I am grateful for their service.

The former Prime Minister is an eel. He did not have to use the powers, but if he did he would have disclosed the authority by which he acted. In other words, he was totally justified in keeping this power-grab secret because he never had to use the powers. He says again that the situation was dynamic and that safeguards needed to be in place, and my response is the same: assistants, deputies etc.

The second paragraph of this section is fascinating. Morrison says Ministers exercised their full authority without intervention. Fine, but he then admits that he himself did not receive copies of ministerial briefings. Earlier in his statement, he claimed that more junior members of the government would not be across the details and so it was necessary to put the fail-safes in higher levels of government. But then he admits he was not briefed. So how could he be across the details if he ever needed to exercise the power of a given ministry? If it truly was a ‘break glass in case of emergency situation, having someone not across the details of a situation as the fail-safe is at best useless, and at worst could cause the situation to deteriorate. This rationale is garbage.

The Statement, Part Seven: Jumping in the [Keith] Pitt

In reference to taking over the Resources and Energy Portfolio, Mr Morrison said that:

The decision in relation to the Department of Industry, Energy and Resources was undertaken in April 2021 for separate reasons. This was the consequence of my decision to consider the issues of the PEP11 license directly. Under the legislation the decision is not taken by Cabinet, but unilaterally by a Minister with authority to administer that Department.

I sought and was provided with the authority to administer matters in relation to this Department and considered this issue observing all the necessary advice and issues pertaining to the matter before making a decision, without prejudice, which I announced publicly.

Once having been given the authority to consider this matter I advised the Minister of my intention to do so and proceeded to consider the matter. I retained full confidence in Minister Pitt who I was pleased to have serve in my Ministry. I believe I made the right decision in the national interest. This was the only matter I involved myself directly with in this or any other Department.

The first sentence here says much: this decision was utterly separate from the pandemic and the associated crisis. Mr. Morrison just wanted a particular outcome and, since he could not direct the minister explicitly, he took the decision himself. Perhaps he should have tried to persuade Mr Pitt instead of grabbing power for himself. Also, why was it necessary to state that he made his decision ‘without prejudice’? Every decision Scott Morrison makes is (in my opinion) motivated by some external force (typically money). Finally, it is curious indeed that the only time he actually used his powers had nothing to do with the pandemic. Shock Doctrine, anyone?

The Statement, Part Eight: Conclusion

Morrison ends his rantings with the following

The use of the powers by a Prime Minister to exercise authority to administer Departments has clearly caused concern. I regret this, but acted in good faith in a crisis.

I used such powers on one occasion only. I did not seek to interfere with Ministers in the conduct of their portfolio as there were no circumstances that warranted their use, except in the case of the Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources which I have explained.

The pandemic has been a difficult time for Australia, although we have performed better than almost any other developed country in the world. There is no guide book in these circumstances and there is much commentary that will be offered in hindsight from the comfort of relatively calmer conditions. It is not surprising that some of this commentary will have a partisan or other motive, but that’s politics. In a democracy it is a positive thing for these issues to be discussed and for experience to inform future decisions and I hope my statement will help inform that process.

I have endeavoured to set out the context and reasoning for the decisions I took as Prime Minister in a highly unusual time. I did so in good faith, seeking to exercise my responsibilities as Prime Minister which exceeded those of any other member of the Government, or Parliament. For any offence to my colleagues I apologise. I led an outstanding team who did an excellent job and provided me great service and loyalty as Ministers.

The concern is not the use of Prime Ministerial power to administer various departments, but how you achieved this. You swore yourself into these various roles. I know you say you ‘sought authority’, but the sheer volume of lies you have told in the past makes any claim you make difficult to believe. Further, to claim that you acted in good faith is laughable. Alternatives to a vast expansion of Prime Ministerial power were available. To suggest that your intentions were pure is ludicrous.

You say that Australia has performed ‘better than almost any country in the world’. By what metric? In what way? That statement was almost Trumpian in its vagueness. Further, to claim that commentary and analysis have a partisan motive is an attempt to poison the well, delegitimising any criticism of your plainly unconstitutional actions as mere partisan hackery. It is entirely possible to be critical of you (as some of your colleagues, including former Home Affairs Minister Karen Andrews, have been) without being partisan. Kindly cease conflating the two.

The final insult to the electorate within this barrage of nonsense is the phrase ‘for any offence to my colleagues, I apologise’. So you apologise to your fellow Liberals, but not to the nation as a whole? It is truly remarkable that you can make a statement like that and accuse your critics of partisanship. Get that garbage outta here! Finally, you did not lead ‘an outstanding team’. You led what was possibly the most incompetent, corrupt (in my opinion), cruel and destructive government in the history of the country.

Conclusion: The End of Scott Morrison

The former Prime Minister may spin this any way he likes, it does not look good. Swearing one’s self into several ministries (while not being briefed) in a blatant usurpation of Executive Authority vested in the Governor General renders both your and his positions untenable. It falls to you, Scott Morrison, to emulate that last iota of patriotism that Richard Nixon displayed on August 9th, 1974:



Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button



Login here Register here
  1. Terence Mills

    So let’s get this right.

    It’s all our fault that Scottie did not become our sovereign emperor and Lord of all he surveys.

    After all democracy just gets in the way.

    The man is unhinged and has detached from reality . Best we send in the men in white coats to gently escort him from the building.

    Good Grief !

  2. New England Cocky

    Funny how a little forensic analysis discloses the real intent of Scummo SECRETLY taking five additional Ministries at various times as the need required. My good mate Blind Freddie could clearly see that this was a narcissistic attempt to become Julius Scummo, ”Caesar of all the Antipodean colonies”.

    The Liarbral Party must be staining their pants in the unrealistic hope that Labor, the Teal Community Independents and the few thinking Nazional$ do not ban him from the Parliamentary precinct for life over this contemptuous misrepresentation of ”good” misgovernment.

    Apologising to his Liarbral Party colleagues and NOT the Australian voters once again demonstrates that Scummo’s completely unfit to be a representative of any Australian voters ….. but that has been the gutter standard of the previous Liarbral leaders encouraged by Murdoch Media and paid for with about $30 MILLION taxpayer funds.

    Bring on the Federal ICAC because this has all the hallmarks fo becoming bigger that the Dismissal of Gough Whitlam by Betty Windsor & the US CIA in 1975.

  3. Albos Elbow

    Even after they lost the election, I thought we’d heard the last of Scummo and his Banged Up Merry Men, but there is still more news coming out about how corrupt the former PM and his government and even the Governor General were FFS.
    We know who they were really governing for.

  4. New England Cocky

    The role of GG David Hurley may be explained in this article by Kangaroo Court of Australia. Who are the persons behind the Australian Future Leaders Foundation Ltd a charity gifted about $18 MILLION by Scummo and witnessed by Hurley???

    Scott Morrison and Governor-General David Hurley conspired for the secret multi-ministry appointments. How much money did they make?

    That makes at least three (3) such donations; AFLM, Hell$inger$ cult about $40 MILLION and the Great Barrier Reef Foundation, about $400 MILLION. Now how much of each of those gifts flowed back to the Liarbral Party coffers?

  5. Harry Lime

    I’m not ashamed to say I’m really enjoying the self immolation of Scotty from Marketing,the High Priest of lies and self delusion.Was there ever going to be a different outcome?The bloke is a bona fide nut case.He thinks he’s going to remain as the (non) member for Cook? Good luck with that.Sitting with Depredation Dutton’s pathetic Opposition,he will be like the kid that shit himself,but refuses to admit it,with the stench enveloping everyone.Scratch another member, Spud,you will be the chrysalis that never hatched.Wonderful stuff.

  6. Pete Petrass

    Audit of all 5 Ministries, NOW. We need to see everything he has been able to do outside the Cabinet process.

  7. leefe

    It is so utterly and overwhelmingly Morrisonian that the one time he admits to using any of these additional powers is to try to buy favour for the upcoming election.

    He is totally bereft of ethics, morals, wisdom, compassion, insight, competence, substance … the ultimate flim-flam man.

  8. Henry Rodrigues

    And why did the Governor General acquiesce with Scummo’s madness and subversion of the constitution ?

    What was Murdoch’s role in this ????

    Why did the News Corpse establishment not raise eyebrows ?????

    Many questions remain to be answered…

  9. Fred

    Why hasn’t the obvious question been asked – “How long does it take to swear in a replacement minister in the event of the incapacitation or death of a sitting minister?”. Given that at the height of the pandemic “it wasn’t a race”, anything under a couple of days would have been quick enough that there was no need for ScoMo to preemptively take on any ministry.

  10. Eric

    Well, it’s Albos to lose. Simply talk up ICAC everyday while looking at Morrison.
    NEC, that charity has 3 directors, one – Julie Overton, is linked to Kings Cup Org Committee, as in Royal Sponges Henley Regatta.

    The more I think about what the ex-PM almost achieved the more I think we should all thank our lucky stars. When the riots erupted in Melbourne in September 2021 after coercive threats were made to the building sector workers to inject an experimental substance or lose their job, the power was sitting in the hands of the PM to do what he liked with no oversight. It was only, I suspect, that not all the pieces of the totalatarian jigsaw were in place that prevented the nation being handed over to the military by the ex-PM. For all Western nations to fall they each need to be sitting within a pre-determined bandwidth of weakness at the same time.
    Morrison set the precedent for showing other nations that power can be usurped very easily in a democracy.
    Henry R, Morrison is more a puppet than puppeteer as is the case with Murdoch.

  11. Kathryn

    Words cannot describe what an insufferably arrogant, megalomaniacal narcissist Morrison really is! This smug bible-thumping hypocrite and Horizon cultist is not only an obnoxious, self-promoting egotist, it is evident that he is a born-to-rule autocrat with stratospheric delusions of grandeur! Morrison’s appalling, ill-conceived decision to usurp other members of his government, micro-manage our nation and appoint himself as judge and jury over at least five portfolios, goes beyond staggering conceit, it is undemocratic!

    Morrison MUST be held to account for his oppressive level of tyranny; his attempt to stomp on others in order to solely rule over our nation is an act of uncompromising fascism! This type of behaviour should NEVER be overlooked nor tolerated! Even his own colleagues are now baying for his blood – and rightly so! Morrison has taken steps that go way, way beyond what is acceptable in our democratic nation – his shocking level of megalomaniacal conceit is downright dangerous and completely undemocratic! Morrison’s tyranny needs to be addressed – he needs to be made to face full responsibility for his behaviour and sacked from government! This unspeakably depraved tyrant is absolutely unfit to park his pretentious behind in the seats of government! When Murdoch-manipulated, shrieking Z-rated shock jocks, like Bolt and Murray, abandon a corrupt, self-serving member of their favoured extremists in the worst, most corrupt regime in our nation’s history, you just KNOW that that subject is on-the-nose and that their halcyon days of being irrationally promoted and protected by the nauseating right-wing media rabble are well and truly over! Morrison has proven himself to be a pathological liar who’s level of arrogance and conceit is so irrational and undeserved, it reveals a sick twisted egotist with severe mental health issues and a level of dictatorial tyranny that needs to be immediately subdued!

    Morrison must be prosecuted for his level of fascist autocracy! There can be NO DOUBT that Morrison is the worst kind of sociopath and every bit as bad as that lying, conniving little war criminal, John Howard, who just happened to be the malignant mentor of two of the worst, most corrupt politicians in our history: Morrison himself and that lying, strutting, swaggering misogynist, Abbott! It is impossible to think of a regime more thoroughly depraved, self-aggrandising, avaricious, elitist and so inherently corrupt as the unspeakably depraved political psychopaths in the LNP!

    The fact that the undemocratic David Hurley was complicit in the fascist rule of Morrison, says SO MUCH about WHY it is absolutely integral that we get rid of the imperialistic role of governor general. The sooner Australia stands up, grows up and severs the apron strings from the UK, the better! The UK has always been an ultra-conservative nation and, as such, our governor general will always promote and support the born-to-rule, regressive Neanderthals in the LNP – Australia’s answer to the racist, rigidly conservative and misogynistic Tories!

  12. Frank Smith

    How come the two Murdoch journalists who are the authors of the book “Plagued”, where these machinations of Morrison were first revealed late last week, sat on this story for months? Is it not the duty of a good journalist to publish such bombshell information as soon as it can be verified? And what does the editor of The Australian (and the proprietor) think about their failure to provide the paper with this major scoop in the run-up to the election? Something fishy here perhaps.

  13. Phil Pryor

    We have never had as childish, superstitious, obsessive, infatuated, selfdrenched and inferior a political leader ever. The Illiberal party is to blame for perverted attitude over time. The country party had Joyce, a guzzling gaunching goat and useless castoff, but he was at least a bit of a joke. Morrison, a massive misfit, possibly a neurotic psychopathic fringe bipolar inner deviate, is not amusing, is regressive, has done harm, has ruined the nation’s already low reputation and must go while awaiting investigation charges, punishment, one hopes. Self focussed fist agitating romantic solo acts are repulsive.

  14. New England Cocky

    i am starting a campaign to have the mainstream media correctly identify Scummo Morrison as “”the Member for Cook” WITHOUT any reference to his despicable reign as Prim Monster of Crooks & Co.
    The continual reference to ”former Prime Minister” implies that there will be a change back to Scummo at some point in the future. The media rarely talk abou t”former Prim Monster Little Johnnie Howard” arguably the most damaging politician since Federation and before RAbbott et all. Similarly, there is reticence at referring to ”the former Prim Monster” Malodious Turdball.
    Time to move on and allow Australian voters to assess the present incumbents rather than look back to the glory years of the worst financial managers in Australian political history. THAT is the job for the Federal ICAC.
    @ Eric: An astute observation. I do NOT understand why Australian dollars are funding a Pommie ”charity”.

  15. Kerri

    When considering the role the GG played in Morrison’s dirty power grab, it should be remembered that, like many right wing appointments to the post, Hurley is ex-military.
    In the military obedience in the form of unquestioning orders is reflexive.
    The GG is “advised” by the PM. But when the GG is accustomed to following orders, is he/she acting on a lifetime of blind submission or properly fulfilling their role as both the queen’s man and the head of state for the people of Australia.
    In other words are his/her allegiances to what they are being told by the PM of the day or to the monarch and her peoples?

  16. Brad Black

    ‘Resign’ and lose his substantial taxpayer funded perks!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 2 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

Return to home page
%d bloggers like this: