Murdoch: forever brutal

There is much to read and know about Rupert Murdoch but there…

A 'Fair Go' is now a Myth

Perhaps I have not lived in Australia for long enough to know…

Assange’s Fifteenth Day at the Old Bailey: Solitary…

September 28. Central Criminal Court, London.Throughout the sham process formally known as…

The best laid schemes

The best laid schemes o’ Mice an’ Men Gang aft agley, An’ lea’e us…

So, How Will You Do It Better?

By 2353NMIn the next 12 to 18 months there are a number…

A personal view of a failed democracy

I sometimes wonder if it is in becoming a parent, responsible for…

Assange’s Fourteenth Day at the Old Bailey: Elections,…

September 25. Central Criminal Court, London.On this Friday, the Assange trial moved…

Reverse JobKeeper cuts and protect working people, say…

Two days after assailing the Morrison government for inaction on a jobs…

«
»
Facebook

What is an Opposition?

opposition

Tony Abbott, leader of the Opposition

On July 2 Lenore Taylor wrote an article in The Guardian titled Tony Abbott’s policy gap: what’s on theCcoalition’s “Figure it out later” list?

In it she summarises LNP policy”. Or more accurately as the title suggests tells us that in reality it consists of a miss mash of uncosted plans and thought bubbles that really just ask the electorate to elect us and we will “Figure it out later”.

When I finished her piece I was a little alarmed. No perhaps I was a little angry and I asked myself. What do we expect from an opposition or indeed what is opposition. Tony Abbott is on the record as saying that the function of opposition is to oppose. I fundamentally disagree with that proposition. An opposition’s job is to hold a government to account but just as importantly is its duty to show that it is a worthy alternative. Mr Abbott is also said to be the most effective opposition leader the country has ever had. If by definition this means that by being negative about your country and having little regard for the common good then those who embellish him with this title are probably correct.

On the other hand I would judge him on his alternativeness”. We the taxpayers of Australia pay our politicians to do a job. Mr Abbott has been opposition leader for some four and a half years now and an election is upon us. We have been paying him all this time to formulate policies that the people could reasonably consider as alternatives to the governments. Thus far he has not delivered. Not one costed policy is before the people for their perusal.
For a moment let’s look at Mr Abbott as the CEO of a Public Company who had been charged with the re structure of his company. He has been given three years to complete the task with recourse to adequate resources to complete the mission. What progress do you think he has made? Are the shareholders entitled to question his work ethic and those of his subordinates? He has to face a shareholders meeting soon. Is the business plan in a reasonable condition taking into account the common good of all the stakeholders? Will the costing’s stand up to the most rigorous inspection. After all the future of the company is at stake.

As Lenore Taylor points out:

“We are spending a lot of time talking about Kevin. But we also need to talk about Tony’s policies – the ones we know about, but particularly the ones we don’t know about, and probably won’t when we cast a vote.’’

“Real Solutions for all Australians” plan, which looks reassuringly like a big book of policies, all chunky and nicely bound, but is actually a much less definitive collection of goals and priorities, with very little detail.”

‘’But Abbott has also said clearly there are a long list of policies he will not announce in detail before this poll, but will think about afterwards. Having attacked Kevin Rudd in 2007 for “hitting the ground reviewing”, the Coalition has a “figure it out later” list easily as long.”

As chairman of the board I would be entitled to say that a “figure it out later’’ policy is not policy at all and I would be entitled to sack him. All he is doing I would argue is trying to foist upon the shareholders an inadequate plan in the hope that they are gullible enough to accept it. And in doing so obtain a position of trust he is unworthy of. And together with that all the perks that go with the job without putting in the hard yards.

Below is a list of policy arrears itemised from Leonor Taylor’s article. I am sure after reading it that you will agree with me. This is simply not good enough. The opposition has had three years to piece together and put before the Australian public policies as an alternative to those of the ALP. If the public accepts this nonsense and takes Mr Abbott on trust they must truly have rocks in their heads.

• Education funding. The education spokesman, Christopher Pyne, has said the Coalition wants to repeal Labor’s Gonksi funding package, roll over the existing system for two years and in that time strike a different funding agreement with the states. It is difficult for the Coalition to develop an alternative policy while details of the government’s policy continue to change and it remains unclear how many states will sign funding deals, but nevertheless, it seems parents will vote at this election without knowing how much money the Coalition is promising to spend on education beyond its first two years in power.

Tax Policy. Abbott has said he will repeal the carbon and mining taxes and promised a “modest” company tax cut, with the size and timing still uncertain. He has also said he will have a white paper, a full review of the tax system, with any subsequent decisions to be taken to the next election.

• Climate change. Business is desperate to know how the 2009 Direct Action policy will actually work, but usually emerge from meetings with the Coalition spokesman, Greg Hunt, with few answers. Hunt has promised a white paper after the election to flesh out the details, with legislation to be finalised within six months of a Coalition term.

• Renewable energy. The Coalition has promised a review of the 20% renewable energy target in 2014, even though it was already reviewed by the Climate Change Authority just last year. Some in the Coalition are demanding that it be scrapped altogether. More likely, say senior sources, it will be wound back a little, because its promise to deliver 41,000 gigawatt hours of renewable energy by 2020 is working out to be more like 25%, due to falling electricity demand. Bottom line: the renewable energy industry is not sure what will happen to the target under the Coalition.

• Federal state relations and Coag.
In his budget-in-reply speech, Abbott promised that within two years of a change of government, working with the states, the Coalition would produce a white paper on Coag reform, and the responsibilities of different governments, to ensure that, as far as possible, the states are sovereign in their own sphere. The objective will be to reduce and end, as far as possible, the waste, duplication and second-guessing between different levels of government that has resulted, for instance, in the commonwealth employing 6,000 health bureaucrats even though it doesn’t run a single hospital.”

• Financial system. The shadow treasurer, Joe Hockey, has said he will have a “root and branch review” to improve competition in the banking sector.

• Spending. The Coalition will announce savings in the lead-up to the poll but it has also promised a “commission of audit” after the election, to review government spending “top to bottom”, rein in waste, identify where taxpayer funds should be spent and start “with a clean slate” on government spending. That’s a pretty broad brief.

• Northern Australia. The absence of a northern Australia policy would not normally be notable, but Abbott recently released a “vision” to have a white paper on the development of the north. The “vision” said the white paper would look at most of the ideas being vocally advocated by mining magnate Gina Rinehart and the Institute of Public Affairs, but in terms so vague and non-committal it is unclear whether the Coalition intends to actually do them, or was just trying to appease its powerful backers.

• Industrial relations. The Coalition’s policy promises only minor changes to the fair work laws, but will ask the Productivity Commission to undertake a “comprehensive and broad” review of industrial relations policy – with the results to be taken to the next election

• Car industry assistance. We know the Coalition will cut $500m from the budgeted car industry assistance between now and 2015. It says it will have another Productivity Commission inquiry into what assistance should be provided after that and how it should be spent. Given that the industry says ongoing assistance is essential for its survival, that leaves a large question mark.

* Childcare policy will be the subject of yet another Productivity Commission review. The terms of reference ask for policy to be assessed against the working hours and needs of modern families, and leave open the possibility of government rebate being extended to in-home nannies. That all sounds good, but we also know spending will be constrained so the results remain unclear.

* Competition policy.
The Coalition has given mixed signals on competition policy, saying both that the existing laws are too onerous and that small business needs more protection against large competitors. Competition law will be the subject of another “root and branch review” after the election.

It can be seen that there is very little policy in all this. Plenty of reviews that will take another three years. And of course no costings. Oppositions have to be more than opposition for opposition’s sake. More than just endless negativity and suspensions of standing orders. We must demand more from them. Otherwise what are we paying them for? We deserve better.

Incidentally Lenore Taylor is to be congratulated for being one of the few journalists in mainstream media who focuses on policy areas.

 

27 comments

Login here Register here
  1. vfmarky

    These are thought bubbles not policy – a con job in other words…

  2. rosellajam

    The LNP and Tony Abbott have been very effective at demonising innocent people, telling bold faced lies and talking down the Australian economy.
    They have been very ineffective in giving Australians a viable alternative for government.
    And still – no detailed policy on anything except Fraudband..

  3. brickbob

    Tony and the gang have used up all their capital over the last 4 years with the 3 word slogans and constant negativity and now find themselves bankrupt. As the late Joh from Queensland use to say,the horse has bolted,the jockey is badly injured,and the stable hands are trying desperately trying to clean up the mess,and in the end will all end up getting the sack by the punters.

  4. wantok

    Well, Greg Hunt did announce that the Direct Action climate plan will involve a green army of 15000 young unemployed people who will be planting trees, cleaning up creeks etc. as part of a work for the dole project.
    The only exemptions will be for those engaged in further education or other work related training. Otherwise it seems it seems it will be compulsory.
    Should prove interesting in its implementation.

  5. johnlord2013

    It hasn’t been costed yet Wantok.

  6. puffytmd

    I hope none of the Green army slip down a creek bed and hurt themselves. I can see the headlines now.

    Actually, no I won’t.

  7. Geoff Of Epping

    Yeah I read his….er….pamphlet…. more photographs than text. And so vague it sounds too good to be true….. it’s what all Oppositions say…better, fairer, cheaper more equitable…all really nice stuff. Really utopian stuff with no effort to describe actually how?
    The true mark of a wanker.

  8. johnlord2013

    Seriously funny that Doggy.

  9. horatio

    Looks like coalition is relying on the Productivity Commission to flesh out its policies and public service to implement them. Will be interesting to see how many senior public servants will be left after planned sackings. How did they manage to calculate the number of sackings if the Productivity Commission has yet to write their policies?

  10. helenmarg

    what hope have we got if they become the government.We can not have Abbot and Co strutting on the world stage looking after the wealthy and not caring about anyone else at all. What a sad outlook for the future of our country.Thanks again .

  11. Min

    Wantok, Abbott’s Green Army aka work for the dole is simplistic beyond belief. As any horticulturalist will tell you “planting trees” isn’t a matter of digging a hole, shoving the plant in and hoping like hell that it will grow.

    Where will this Green Army be housed? How will they be fed? If it’s everyone unemployed under age 30, does this include women with children?

  12. gordonwa

    Tony Abbott vows to cut ‘green tape’ so his ‘Green Army’ will have something to do mopping up all the toxic spills generated by deregulated industry. At taxpayer’s expense, of course. The ‘free market’ is all about ‘privatising’ profits and ‘socialising’ losses.

  13. Pingback: What is an Opposition? | lmrh5

  14. lmrh5

    Reblogged this on lmrh5.

  15. Chris Gould

    Green army has been in place for years. It is one of the biggest work for the dole initiatives. Nothing will change.

  16. CMMC

    Wantok : To Wank

  17. Bob Evans

    The Coalitions 5 pillar economy should be called the 5 finger discount.

    All of Abbotts plans except giving money or power to Rhinehart and Murdoch can be easily can be easily taken away with one of his cheap analogies.

    “You shouldn’t buy a new car, if you can’t afford to pay for your groceries or electricity”.

    And with that, he will target the solar and wind first. Also, Im amazed that public servants arent already filling the trenches over Abbotts inevitable gutting of the public service similar to Newman here in QLD.

    Newman promised he wouldnt , then proceeded to gut the place. Public servants voted for him thinking they were safe. They have warning this time, as Abbott has been up front about it. So it’s a case of vote to potentially lose your job.

    And we know when it comes to education, health and infrastructure, the Coalition will seriously wind back spending on these things. Conservatives believe these things should be privately funded, so they present an ideological barrier for the free market fans. Problem is, the free market never steps in to fill the gap.

    Then there is the NBN. That piece of infrastructure they want deader than dead. If it’s popular and allowed to finish as is, perception will be that Labor builds things the nation needs and they cant have that. It also conflicts with Murdoch and Kerry Stokes interests and we cant have that can we? It would also be an admission that everyone in my industry knows…….Howard mucked up when he sold telstra and we cant have that.

  18. Truth Seeker

    It was interesting watching Turdball defending the indefensible on QandA last night.

    He has no credibility now, and for an alternative leader of the LNP, he’s proved himself to be as mendacious and dishonourable as the rest of the right wing nut jobs 😯

    Cheers 😀

  19. johnlord2013

    Posted your poem on Facebook.

  20. Truth Seeker

    John, thanks for that mate, I appreciate it 😀

    Cheers 😀

  21. bernyl

    I’ve been wondering about this too, but not only about what Abbott is going to do, but just what he, and the rest of his party have been doing all these months/years while receiving very generous recompense, other than simply voting against any and all Labor Party propositions, good or bad?????
    My question is; Do they actually want govern, given that it’s way easier to simply sit around and say no every day?!!!!

  22. Robbie

    Thanks Johnlord. Well written and argued. When you consider how much an Opposition costs the taxpayers of this country in terms of wages and conditions, and then you look at what you get for your money, i.e. alternative government based on policies and ideas, it becomes apparent that they have been dudded! What an outrage that we the tax-payers and we the electorate have been so short changed by this man Abbott who leads what they call an Opposition. Talking down the economy; belittling the institutions of our Parliamentary Democracy; destroying the tradition of debate in this country; pushing priveledge and advantaged interests of individual billionairs; this man Abbott , who can’t talk & walk like a statesman, wishes to gain control of this country without showing any-one as to why this should be so. “I’m not Julia” is his catch-cry, which now is bereft of meaning as he faces Rudd. He had his time to plan and present the alternative government for people to chose, but instead has slipped and will fall come the election. Rightly so!

  23. bilko

    Johnlord
    I have enjoyed your previous posts including this one, however don’t you go worry about policies.
    Julie the plagiarist Queen plus Robb from memory are members of their think tank involved in policy creation.
    Output so far, a cheaper second grade NBN, a more expensive parental scheme aimed at the rich, offset by taxing oops a levy, as it is not universally applied to all, just the big company’s and passed straight on to consumers, four and half years effort rather like an elephant birthing exercise.
    They will have plenty of time in opposition during the next three years, like the Lannisters of Game of thrones fame, slash their deadwood from their front benches.
    When it comes to productivity no one can beat the noalition.

  24. Möbius Ecko

    Heard Hockey on the radio a little while ago saying the Coalition will bring in a carbon tax leading to an ETS if they win government and the rest of the world moves to it, which is what they are doing.

    Huge backflip and I believe it’s because they can’t keep their promise of carbon price compensation without the carbon price.

  25. Chris Gould

    You are dead right, Bob. With little or no policies this lot would be worse than Newman. As far as the NBN goes it is all about supporting big business yet again. If it goes as far as the node then we will all have to pay private companies a lot of money to take it further to the house. There will be a lot of householders, students etc. who could not possibly afford this. Once again a policy for the wealthy.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Return to home page
Scroll Up
%d bloggers like this: