The Silent Truth

By Roger Chao The Silent Truth In the tumult of a raging battle, beneath…

Nuclear Energy: A Layperson's Dilemma

In 2013, I wrote a piece titled, "Climate Change: A layperson's Dilemma"…

The Australian Defence Formula: Spend! Spend! Spend!

The skin toasted Australian Minister of Defence, Richard Marles, who resembles, with…

Religious violence

By Bert Hetebry Having worked for many years with a diverse number of…

Can you afford to travel to work?

UNSW Media Release Australia’s rising cost of living is squeezing household budgets, and…

A Ghost in the Machine

By James Moore The only feature not mentioned was drool. On his second day…

Faulty Assurances: The Judicial Torture of Assange Continues

Only this month, the near comatose US President, Joe Biden, made a…

Spiderwoman finally leaving town

By Frances Goold Louise Bourgeois: Has the Day Invaded the Night or Has…

«
»
Facebook

USEPA Carbon Regulations to create tens of thousands of jobs

By Dr Anthony Horton

On June 9, 2015, a report from the Economic Policy Institute (EPI) stated that The United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Clean Power Plan will create approximately 100,000 more jobs than are lost by 2020.

Coal mining and coal fired power plant jobs will face the most substantial losses if the Plan is implemented, because coal fired power plants contribute nearly 40% of the United States’ electricity generation and 75% of the electricity sector’s carbon dioxide emissions. The Policy Institute’s report examined both direct employment (eg. coal mining positions lost or solar energy jobs created) and indirect employment (eg. railcar driver jobs affected by less coal shipping). Renewable energy, scientific research and appliance manufacturing jobs will all increase as well.

The EPA estimates that the Clean Power Plan will have health and climate benefits totalling $55-$93 billion per year and includes avoiding 2,700-6,600 premature deaths and 140,000-150,000 asthma attacks in children. These savings were not included in the Economic Policy Institute’s analysis according to Research and Policy Director Josh Bivens.

According to the National Mining Association, approximately 80,000 people are employed in coal mining in the United States, however this number is declining each year as coal is less competitive as a result of lower natural gas prices. Increased automation in the coal mining industry is also contributing to the decline. In addition, a number of very high profile groups including Stanford University and the Church of England have divested from coal investments, and reports are emerging that some coal companies may have insufficient funds to restore the lands they have mined.

The decline in the workforce is having other effects that may not have been foreseeable to any great extent. The United Mine Workers pension fund is reportedly approximately $1 billion short of being in balance, according to the EPI report. President Obama has proposed in excess of $55 million in funding for job retraining, job creation and other economic measures in communities impacted by the decline in the coal industry in the Fiscal Year 2016 Budget. The funding is unprecedented and is seen as critical to ensuring the financial security of coal miners and their families who have “kept the lights on in the US for generations” according to the White House.

Anthony Horton blogs on his own site: The Climate Change Guy

 

9 comments

Login here Register here
  1. darrel nay

    I am interested in Dr. Horton’s views regarding geoengineering.

    Cheers

  2. darrel nay

    Why are the government planes being exempted from the new EPA regulations?

  3. darrel nay

  4. diannaart

    According to Dr Horton’s article the USA government is genuinely interested in investing in renewable technology, an investment that will support the move to sustainable technology and increase job opportunities.

    Dr Horton is not alone in seeing the benefits of governments supporting future and long term ventures for the benefit of all.

    http://reneweconomy.com.au/2015/renewable-energy-targets-quadruple-globally-as-australia-winds-ret-back-35594

    Global renewables jobs surge as Australia shrinks

  5. Harquebus

    Renewable energy generators do not return the total embodied energy used to manufacture, construct and maintain them. How many times do I have to say it and how does an idiot like Anthony Horton become a doctor?

  6. DC

    ^^I’m guessing he became a Doctor like anyone does, by earning it with hours and hours of learning, researching, writing, teaching and completing a PhD in his field of enquiry. It doesn’t make him unfallable but it is worthy of respect and validates an ability to think critically and read widely. By the way its 2015 you might want to fact check your repetitive rants. Wind and solar already have positive returns on energy and will only get better. Constantly saying otherwise doesnt make it untrue.

  7. DC

    ^^by doing a PhD what do you think? By the way wind and solar already have a positive return on embodied energy and with proper capital alocated to renewable energy who knows what kind of innovations could be possible?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 2 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

Return to home page