The agent of chaos is at it again. Boris Johnson, frontman of the Brexit disaster show, prime minister responsible for breaking regulations, rules and laws, and overall self-serving gross figure of indulgence, has decided to throw in the towel. He is leaving the House of Commons. The time had come for him to walk to the cricketing pavilion, accepting the umpire’s verdict.
Not that Johnson was exactly thrilled with the decision. The findings of the House of Commons Privileges Committee in what is known as the Partygate Report were damning. Released on June 15, 2023, the 30,000-word document details the numerous instances the then Prime Minister systematically undermined the very same pandemic regulations that his own government had implemented, only to then consistently mislead and deceive, most notably the Commons itself. In “deliberately misleading the House Mr Johnson committed a serious contempt. The contempt was all the more serious because it was committed by the Prime Minister, the most senior member of the government.”
The nature of that misleading conduct centred on Johnson’s refusal to double-check advice given to him by, for instance, Jack Doyle, his former press secretary, over a number of gatherings on whether they were compliant with COVID-19 rules and guidance. Johnson’s Principal Private Secretary, Martin Reynolds, had also pressed Johnson on the issue as to whether the guidance “had been followed at all times”, notably on the December 18, 2020 gathering. He wondered “whether it was realistic to argue that all Guidance had been followed at all times, given the nature of the working environment in No. 10. He agreed to delete the reference to Guidance.”
The report had to be rewritten at short notice to take into account Johnson’s abrupt resignation. Had he remained, the Committee members would have recommended a 90-day suspension for, among other things, the former PM’s deliberate misleading of the House, members of the Committee, and being “complicit in the campaign of abuse and attempted intimidation of” its members. Instead, it concluded that Johnson should be deprived of his Member’s pass.
The Committee took umbrage at Johnson’s attack upon its members, which he condemned as undemocratic, a kangaroo court, and executioners of a witch hunt. “We consider,” states the report, “that these statements are completely unacceptable. In our view this conduct, together with the egregious breach of confidentiality, is a serious further contempt.”
His overall contemptuous attitude to the inquiry was also conveyed by his effort “to re-write the meaning of the [pandemic] rules and guidance to fit his own evidence.” One example was the “assertion that ‘imperfect’ social distancing was perfectly acceptable when there were no mitigations in place rather than cancelling a gathering or holding it online, and his assertion that a leaving gathering or a gathering to boost morale was a lawful reason to hold a gathering.”
Johnson’s base of supporters is a shrinking one; but from pandemonium land some continue to express their support. Nigel Adams, MP for Selby and Ainsty, wished to no longer occupy his position in the Commons. Then came former culture secretary Nadine Dorries, who initially claimed she was going to “immediately” step down, only to then do a bit of fence sitting. Bruised in not getting her promised peerage from Johnson, she is seeking answers from the House of Lords appointment committee. She has also warned that any Tory MP who would side with the findings of the report “will be held to account by members of the public. Deselections may follow. It’s serious.”
Brendan Clarke-Smith, MP for Bassetlaw, was similarly “appalled” by the “spiteful, vindictive and overreaching conclusions of the report.” He promised to “be speaking against them both publicly and in the House.” The comically anachronistic Tory Man of the Nineteenth Century, Jacob Rees-Mogg, found himself in agreement, observing that Parliament, when standing “upon its dignity […] often ends up looking foolish. The Privileges Committee report is a case in point.”
Many of the supporters can be said to be part of the scandalous “Honours List” that Johnson drew up on grounds of gratitude, a veritable Who’s Who of fans and flunkeys that was, for the most part, approved by Prime Minister Rishi Sunak. One was the 29-year-old Charlotte Tranter Owen, who has become the youngest life peer in British history. Her less than distinguished journey from York University graduate to a life peer took a mere six unremarkable years.
While some Tories have been desperate to jettison the Johnson link, many were complicit in stacking the compendium of deception. As Peter Oborne explains, the Tory party saw Johnson as an election winner. For three years, they were “thus prepared to put up with his false claims. Ministers and MPs appeared happy to repeat claims on radio and television, in print, and inside the Commons chamber.”
Sunak is, therefore, in more than a spot of bother, not least because Johnson will be holding fort as a newly appointed columnist at the Daily Mail. His plight is made worse given his struggling efforts to keep the party together before potential electoral oblivion. Johnson, with his poison pen tirades, is unlikely to help.
A final note on the whole Boris Bonanza is also worth reiterating. For Oborne, “Johnson will be remembered by history as the most immoral, dishonest and morally squalid of all British premiers.” This is going a bit far; it was a certain Tony Blair who, playing the role of sidekick to US President George W. Bush, embarked upon an illegal war that led to the destruction of Iraq and a good portion of the Middle East. His conduct, both directly or otherwise, in the confection, and intentional misreading of intelligence material elevating Iraq’s Saddam Hussein to the level of globally dangerous despot, must surely be seen as squalid as any. Along the way, he corrupted public life and politicised institutions. And yet he moves and speaks, to this day, with impunity – the one who got away.
[textblock style=”7″]
Like what we do at The AIMN?
You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.
Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!
Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.
You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969
[/textblock]
David Cameron opened a Pandora’s Box with the Brexit matter and now all the UK are suffering, especially the working persons. The political demise of Boring Boris is little joy for undoing British export markets and increasing transport & regulatory costs. How the mighty have fallen …. helped along by a little too much licking of the then POTUS anal sphincter sending troops into Iraq on a lie of WMDs, Words of Mass Deception, without noting that the Iraq Oil Ministry escaped bombardment ….. now which corporations would benefit from the knowledge held in that building?
Good riddance to bad rubbish springs to mind …..
Study some U K history over time and you’ll agree with the usual summaries and consensus about those who did little, including harm, e g, Rosebery, Balfour, Campbell-Bannerman, Bonar Law, Ramsay Mc Donald, Baldwin, etc, even Heath, Callaghan, Douglas Home, Major, you cannot get a worse run of dribbling dung in premierships than the Boris/Liz/Sushi (Rishi?) streak of anti-British, uncivilised, unprincipled, puerile, pathetic office bashing. Boris opened more than Pandoras’s box as well as bottles bought by…whom? Not by the homeless, jobless, foodless, betrayed. It was very easy to predict almost exactly the current Brexit resulting position long ago, but Threadneedle St. and the maggots of Money are doing O K. What will become of the Britain of “soon”?
Since the year dot, self-engorgement and the arrant disregard for the welfare of citizens has in the main been the hallmark politics in the peerage and aristocracy, unless otherwise forced by the citizens. That they lie and deceive and beguile with their trappings and the assistance of equally deceptive religious institutions and their armies of flunkies is their standard m.o.
Nothing has changed, except in this electronically connected world it is difficult for them to maintain the secrecy of their heinous crimes, exceptionalism and lack of moral fibre.
That they continue to invest aspirant fall-guys into their ranks as cover for their misdeeds, is nothing new and no surprise.
Ah yes,Tony Blair,who bears an uncanny resemblance to the villain the Joker of Batman comic fame.Speaking of squalid,we must not forget the ‘man of steel’,our very own Lying Rodent,still out and about squeeking his justifications for his serial despoilation of Australian politics,but boy,hasn’t he spawned some worthy successors.
Clakka, wrt ‘self-engorgement and arrant disregard for the welfare of citizens’, something like this, for instance?
TBH, I’m somewhat in support of something akin to the French Revolution, tumbrils, guillotines, blood in the streets, horror, gore and more. While we continue to tolerate almost zero consequences for the abuses endured by the majority which emanate from the so-called ‘privileged’ minority, whether they be politicians and their apparatchiks, financiers with their never-ending schemes to further enrich themselves at everyone else’s expense, businesses and corporations that ruthlessly ravage the environment and its natural inhabitants and get away with their pillaging again & again, then nothing less ought to suffice.
Canguro,
Yes indeed, something akin to that, but for our amusement, something perhaps more Pythonesque; within in their sieges, by their own grasping hands, perished in their own excrement following their mastroianni quest and la grande bouffe.
On a Donald note: As if this is going to stop the 13 year old spiteful petty mind in a 77 year old body from throwing a giant tantrum and releasing the information.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/jun/19/donald-trump-classified-documents-evidence-restrictions