Job Application for a Politician

By Andrew Klein Job Application for a Politician - Elections in the wind. To…

Off to the Supreme Court: Assange’s Appeal Continues

With December’s High Court decision to overturn the lower court ruling against…

What is required of a woman if she…

2021 Australian of the Year Grace Tame yesterday met with Prime Minister…

Budget 2022: Time to 'double down' on our…

Science & Technology Australia Media Release The 2022 Budget should “double down” on…

The longevity of conservative bullshit clogs their veins…

Election Diary No7, Wednesday, January 26 2022 People need to wake up to…

Tame's Break With Protocol And Rossleigh's Rum Rebellion…

In an amazing break with protocol, Australian of The Year, Grace Tame…

Modern Monetary Theory and The Great Fraud of…

The time has come to expose the great fraud that has been…

Nostalgia at the AUKMIN Talks: Britain’s Forces Eye…

Give the man credit where it’s due. Few could possibly be congratulated…


The march of opinion

In this recent piece in The Australian Laurie Oakes laments the decline of traditional journalism as it faces the rise of independent journalism. The article leads off with:

Press gallery veteran Laurie Oakes has warned how new media technologies are challenging political journalists with “implications for the health of our political system”.

He is rueful that what he calls fact-based journalism is now confronted by what he calls the march of opinion. It is interesting that he blames new media technologies and fresh opinions as the threat to traditional journalism. I would blame the decline in mainstream media standards, which I will return to later.

The Oakes story was repeated a few days later in the National Times of The Age where he continued his lament:

I want to be optimistic about the future of political journalism and the press gallery, if for no other reason than that its past shows that it really matters. But I have to say I’m not as optimistic as I’d like to be.

For 111 years Australia’s federal politicians and members of the Federal Parliamentary Press Gallery have been matching wits. The politicians have used every trick they know to try to control what the journalists report and how they report it. Gallery members have used every trick they know to get behind the spin and try to dig out things the politicians want to keep hidden.

But in an internet era that is fragmenting the media as we’ve known it, and making new communications technology easily and cheaply available to anyone, the press gallery’s role seems set to decline, which obviously has implications for the health of our political system.

If one looks at this opinion, the implication is that by making communications technology available to anyone will, as a natural consequence result in a decline in standards. The involvement of these “anyones” has previously been lamented by professional journalists. Is it that only those directly employed by a major newspaper or who gets behind a microphone, or in front of a television camera has a valid opinion? Is an anyone aka a nobody, aka an ordinary citizen not permitted to voice an opinion; not have an opinion worthy of note?

One need to look no further than Letters to the Editor for example, and especially those in the Murdoch press, or attempt to have an opinion published on a Murdoch blog for it to become obvious that not just anyone and especially those with a contra opinion, is permitted to voice that opinion.

Oakes’ suggestion is that the internet era is set to cause a decline in journalism by fragmenting the media and as a consequence has obvious implications “for the health of our political system”. The logic of this argument escapes me.

I would suggest that the decline is more likely due to what he refers to as fact-based journalism being dead and buried, right under his nose. The march of opinion will of course be the driving force of the independent media but they will be marching alongside the Press Gallery who replaced fact-based journalism with biased opinion, seemingly, when Howard lost government in 2007.

Ad astra at The Politic Sword in his fine article “The Canberra Press Gallery stumbles – yet again” succinctly summed up the Press Gallery with the astuteness that Laurie Oakes is oblivious to:

Journalists hate being wrong, being wrong-footed. Political journalists regard themselves as the insiders, privy to the labyrinthine goings-on in the corridors of power. They yearn for the scoop, one that places them a cut above their colleagues. Being out of the loop is anathema to them. They foster contacts, their ‘sources’, from whom they suck whispers, or speculation, or information, which sometimes turns out to be misinformation, accidentally purveyed or deliberately so by Machiavellian operators. Although at times it must be hard for them to know what to believe, that does not seem to inhibit most of them from rushing into print with their ‘exclusives’, so long as it makes for a good story, and trumps their fellow journalists in the process.

Ad astra discusses many instances where the Press Gallery have failed to apply the fact-based journalism that Oakes proudly boasts is the hallmark of the gallery. And more recently we can add Ashbygate – or the absence of it in the media – to the list. In an earlier piece “The Canberra Press Gallery will decide who governs this country” Ad astra also recognises the dismantling of and replacement of fact-based journalism with the marching opinion that apparently only the new media is guilty of:

Blatant political bias: This is the most contentious framework ‘bias’ of all. It is one that I wrestled with defining specifically because I could not decide, as I have never spoken to any of the protagonists about it, how fully invested politically are some journalists in defining the stories they write based upon their own political prejudices? It is probably fair to say that some are guilty of this bias. Yet others may only be playing to the audience that the proprietor instructs them to write for.

Today’s article by Gay Alcorn in the National Times kicks the stuffing out of Oakes’ blind faith.

Federal Parliament resumes in a fortnight. Are you looking forward to it? Can’t wait to tune in for question time? Hanging out for an election this year?

As a journalist for more than 20 years, and an editor for seven, I’m surprised at how much I’m dreading it. Already, press gallery journalists have pronounced that politics will be more bitter, more personal, more toxic this year and that – groan – the election will be about “trust and character”.

Well, what if it wasn’t? Specifically, what if the media decided it wasn’t going to be? The 2010 election – “Real Julia”, a gate-crashing Mark Latham, Tony Abbott’s “stop the boats!” – was pilloried by politicians and journalists as the most woeful in memory. Journalists complained about the politicians, but this time the rise of online commentary meant that feedback about our own performance was out of our control.

Two weeks into the campaign, blogger Greg Jericho was listening to Abbott announce the Liberals’ disability education policy. As he recounts in his book, The Rise of the Fifth Estate, as a father of a daughter with Down syndrome, he – and presumably others affected by disability – was interested and, “like a naive fool”, waited for questions. But reporters asked nothing at all about the policy, instead grilling Abbott on whether he believed Latham when he accused Kevin Rudd of leaking to Channel Nine’s Laurie Oakes.

A frustrated Jericho blogged that news directors should “bring home your journalists” because they were wasting money and delivering little. He still thinks that if you weigh up who was most at fault for that campaign – the politicians or the media – “a greater level of blame should be directed towards the media”.

It might surprise Jericho to know that many in the established media, where most Australians still get their political news, agree with him. We limped to the end exhausted and chastened. Why didn’t those journos ask about policy? Because their head offices weren’t much interested. Because the assumption is that policies – apart from a few the parties want to talk about – are dull compared with personalities. And because once it starts, a campaign has one big narrative: who’s going to win? The polls are the story, and how they go week to week dictates whether the leaders are judged harshly or kindly.

At last, a journalist who recognises that something is clearly wrong with the traditional media.

As I earlier wrote, those of the new media believe they are better suited to provide the diversity that today’s democracies need, yet which are often ignored by traditional journalists, or in Oakes’ case, the rise of which is lamented. New, independent media advances the opportunity to expose doctored or omitted facts from mainstream media and point out the bias – referred to above by Ad astra – by particular reporters who do not provide such opportunity for his/her readership to give voice to alternate opinions.

The new media also encourages readers to think objectively and ask the probing questions that might often be avoided by the mainstream media (MSM), particularly if they are working to a different (or hidden) agenda. Further, through independent media, people have the opportunity to analyse and disseminate the news and opinions thrown at them from the established media; the blogosphere, for example, is awash with a more objective and factual analysis.

Independent media has exploded, not because they are the echo of dissenting voices, but because the MSM has created an arena for them to enter. If the MSM was objective, impartial and committed to providing a quality service then in a modern democracy there may not be any citizen journalists, or for that matter, the dozens of independent media sites that exist purely to fill in the gaps exposed by the mainstream media empires.

Welcome to the march of opinion. Only now might it be laced with fact.

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Donate Button


Login here Register here
  1. Di

    Migs….I wrote on Team Labor Connect the other day about Barrack Obama: ‘Every main stream media outlet in America said he would lose, that he would be flogged, and it was streamed into this country with the same dire outcome. Political reporters in the USA and in this country, with years of experience, said he would absolutely lose by a mile…and yet there he is, enjoying his second inaugural ball…he won easily….so I ask: why are these reporters still in their jobs? Track them down, hold them to account….they are all full of shit….How can they seriously look at themselves in the mirror and call themselves reporters?’……Migs i am now wondering if it possible this is what the MSM are doing to this country, ie telling the population that labor will be annihilated at the next election, when they know the truth is a much closer election result than they ever dreamt of?

  2. Mark Rich

    Oakes is an ego on legs, opinion masquerading as journalism is what is killing them and people are turning to bloggers for the facts. As usual MSM have it arse about face

  3. Di

    I reckon MSM will be telling all that listen that Labor are way behind in the polls from here on in, and that Labor will lose the next election by a mile! I think these reporters would lose their job if they ever told a truth in regards to the Labor Party, and if it meant they had to hold the Liberal Party to account or truthfully report that the election result will be close, or in Labors favour, they wouldn’t for fear of any repercussions (they have mortgages to repay)!!!

  4. Miglo

    Di, come closer to the election they’ll be telling us how close it will be (whether they believe it or not).

  5. Crash Skeptic

    Di, I have Foxtel and CNN was saying Obama was likely to win. I do not recall any outlet, even Fox, claiming Obama would be flogged. (although Fox did get overly enthusiastic after Romney soundly won the first debate, even they chilled out and said the second debate was pretty even).

    You seem to be watching a different election to me.

  6. Crash Skeptic

    Plus Di – the polls are produced by polling companies. Journalists merely report the results.

    There is a lengthy and circular discussion about polls and the mathematics of them on the “never” thread.

  7. John Lord

    ‘It is a pity that fact in journalism cannot be made compulsory and decency legislated’

  8. mischmash1

    Come on guys..One man rules our political discourse in the trashy MSM..His name is Rupert Murdoch and spin artist Laurie works for him..Di is correct about the US election..Fux Newz owned by Rupert were saying Romney would win easily..When their Mormon hero was beaten well, he didn’t win like Rupert told them he would they looked like a pack of spoiled children beaten for the prized lolly pop.

  9. 730reportland

    on polls folks, pbs/sbs were flogging Romney
    that went well

  10. 730reportland

    Journalists are creatures of average intelligence
    still rings true, and sometimes the academics they feature in their write-ups.

    Gay Alcorn is just saying what a blogger of average intelligence and pays attention has said. Her referenced academic is only saying what another blogger has said, just much, much earlier than the academic.

  11. 730reportland

    Gay seems to have followed this blogger of average intelligence

  12. reb

    “I’ve given you the answer I’m going to give you.”

  13. reb

    Reblogged this on The Daily Trash and commented:

    Good piece by Miglo on the woeful state of political journalism in Australia..

  14. 730reportland

    Gay Alcorn Columnist
    Alcorn has done a 5 out of 5 blog-post, reciting and answering Grogsgamut, 2 years too late.
    Gay Alcorn is a former editor of The Sunday Age and will write a regular column for The Age this year.
    This what l bark about so often, another so-called Journalist vacating the field of `news-reporting` to dabble in blogging. Alcorn would have better spent her time grilling some politician or biz leader on a topic of importance.
    LOL Goodmorning Reb

  15. reb

    morning 730…

  16. 730reportland

    On Alcorn, my bet is this is an online pap piece only, and doesn`t get put in the print edition.

  17. Ricky (Tory Torcher)

    Most Journalists are more interested in becoming commentators and have forgotten what the word “Reporter” means. Funny how most journalists are turning to the fifth estate to do their work for them…in fact “hello to all the journalist trolls” reading this post. Say Hi to Laurie for me and give him my regards in that financially and morally bankrupt Jurassic Park channel 9 .

  18. mischmash1

    Meanwhile at Murdoch central the front page newz is ancient history on NSW Labor, a well heeled female journo’s ‘Opinion’ that ‘Koche’ is right and a full page attack on the PM calling her a racist by convicted racist Andrew Bolthead.

  19. Buff McMenis

    I do hope wheelchairs are welcomed on the March of Opinion because I have both a wheelchair and an opinion that Laurie Oakes might just belong to the era of journalistic dinosaurs.

  20. Min

    Migs and,

    Independent media has exploded, not because they are the echo of dissenting voices, but because the MSM has created an arena for them to enter.

    I agree. Is it but a mere coincidence that the continuing rise of left wing blogs and Facebook groups in particular also coincides with the almost complete lack of let/right balance in today’s MSM. Where are today’s Matty Prices? The MSM in my opinion seeks to create opinion by providing only one.

  21. Tom of Melbourne

    With the popularity of facebook, blogs, on line publication… anyone with a keyboard can have their opinions published and read by thousands of people each day. Voicing an opinion in public or having it published has never been easier. There is a blog site for every sectional interest, every perspective, every shade of the political spectrum. The old media is becoming less relevant in shaping public opinion, and its irrelevance is gathering pace.

    Youth don’t buy newspapers, they don’t watch ACA. The print media is probably in its death throes.

    But despite all the new, easy access to publishing opinion and the decline of the MSM, the pressure from “teh left” for greater regulation becomes more intense.

    It’s odd.

  22. 730reportland

    “_Independent media has exploded, not because they are the echo of dissenting voices, but because the MSM has created an arena for them to enter._”
    This needs bisecting
    ” Independent media has exploded, not because they are the echo of dissenting voices ”
    True if independent means blogs, fb, twitter.
    False if independent means non-government.
    but because the MSM has created an arena for them to enter.
    The embedded media has been playing catch-up with citizens and tech-nerds for years. Share-holders had to drag their so-called journalists and board-rooms onto the web kicking and screaming.
    Newsgroups(email) nntp, irc, all existed on the web well before twitter, which scares and haunts so-called journalists.
    Murdoch`s myspace is the perfect example of `how-well` the embedded media understand the web.

  23. Miglo

    but because the MSM has created an arena for them to enter.

    730, perhaps I should have said:

    . . . but because the biased MSM has created an arena for them to want to enter.

  24. 730reportland

    Each to their own views Miglo,
    tho MSM “created“ seems the long drawn bow to me.
    ie: kicking and screaming

  25. Miglo

    I guess we all have our own interpretation of the word ‘created’.

  26. 730reportland

    Phrases like the MSM has created an arena often is used to diminish credit due to folks like Mike Stuchbery (on wordpress) when they get off their arse and go and do actual reporting of topics like `Occupy` and try to give un-earned credit to the embedded-media who has merely vacated the field. Don`t fall for this trick. lt is usually used in pap-piece`s on their favorite topic, the media talking to itself, about itself.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 2 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

Return to home page
%d bloggers like this: