Can the Libs come up with someone even…

When discourse between fair-minded people turns to speculation as to who has…

Brawling over Vaccines: Export Bans and the EU’s…

The European Union has been keeping up appearances in encouraging the equitable…

We are destroying the future for our descendants

This is the third time in the last 8 weeks that I…

The beauty of AIMN

Hi to all the writers and readers who associate with AIMN. I…

Funding and Services Crucial for Aged Care

The Aged Care Royal Commission had laid down its findings. These should be…

Open letter to Scott Morrison and Christian Porter

By Tracie Aylmer The first time it happened I was 16-years-old, in 1988…

Down the Aisle ... Your shopping Correspondent

With Ambrose Quint. Series 4 #1 Happy specials, shoppers! Was greeted as I came through the…

« The Sewer Of Twitter » Is Why Chris Uhlmann…

Chris Uhlmann should receive an award for his writing about Twitter. No,…

«
»
Facebook

The Julian Assange Pardon Drive

The odds are stacked against Julian Assange, the WikiLeaks publisher who faces the grimmest of prospects come January 4. On that day, the unsympathetic judicial head of District Judge Vanessa Baraitser will reveal her decision on the Old Bailey proceedings that took place between September and October this year. Despite Assange’s team being able to marshal an impressive, even astonishing array of sources and witnesses demolishing the prosecution’s case for extradition to the United States, power can be blindly vengeful.

Such blindness is much in evidence in a co-authored contribution to The Daily Signal from this month. The authors are insipidly predictable: national security and technology types with comic strip names (Charles “Cully” Stimson; Klon Kitchen) and rule of law advocates who seemingly campaign against their own brief (John G. Malcolm). Having not bothered to read the evidence submitted at the extradition trial, the authors are obedient to a fictitious record. This includes allegations that WikiLeaks harmed US diplomatic relations; the stubborn libel that Assange’s actions, far from exposing US atrocities, led to a loss of life; and the disruption of essential “intelligence sources and methods.” (Accountability can be expensive.)

The authors fail to appreciate the dangers of the Assange case to the First Amendment, free speech and the publication of national security information. They merely claim to be free speech defenders, only to neatly hive Assange’s activities off from its protections. Free speech is a fine thing as long as it is innocuous and inconsequential. “Suppression of speech, in a free society, is wrong. But Assange is not a free-speech hero.”

By internationalising the reach of the Espionage Act, the indictment against Assange threatens the global documentation and reporting of classified information in the public interest. To put it in elementary terms for the legions of ignorant security hacks, granting the request will legitimise the targeting of US citizens. Bruce D. Brown, executive director of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, summarises the implications. “If the UK grants the request to deliver Assange, UK prosecutors could make similar arguments in an effort to extradite a journalist in the US for violations of its Official Secrets Act, which explicitly criminalizes the publication of leaked military or intelligence information.”

Of central importance in the Assange pardon drive is the cultivation of vanity and, it follows, the appeal to posterity. “We write to request that you put a defining stamp to your presidential legacy by pardoning Julian Assange or stopping his tradition,” urge the signatories of yet another letter to Trump on the subject. The heavy artillery is impressive, including five Nobel Prize laureates: Northern Irish peace activist Mairead Maguire, human rights activist Adolfo Pérez Esquivel, Iranian political activist and lawyer Shirin Ebadi, feminist campaigner Rigoberta Menchú Tum and Austrian novelist Peter Handke.

Appropriately, the signatories impress upon Trump that the case “threatens the constitutional protections that Americans hold dear” and suggest that history will be kind should he show sound judgment in the case. “By offering a pardon, to put a stop to the prosecution of Assange, your presidency will be remembered for having saved First Amendment protections for all Americans.”

The approach taken by the UN Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment is more expansive and detailed. In his appeal to Trump on December 22, Nils Melzer outlines the high price Assange has paid “for the courage to publish true information about government misconduct throughout the world.” The deteriorating health condition of the publisher is noted, including the risks posed to him by the COVID-19 pandemic at Belmarsh prison in London.

The relevant pointers are there: that Assange is not an enemy of the American people; his work and that of WikiLeaks “fights secrecy and corruption throughout the world and, therefore, acts in the public interest of the American people and of humanity as a whole.” He had not hacked or pilfered the information he published, having “obtained it from authentic documents and sources in the same way as any other serious and independent investigative journalists conduct their work.”

Melzer then seeks to appeal to Trump the man, pleading for Assange’s release as the president had “vowed… to pursue an agenda of fighting government corruption and misconduct; and because allowing the prosecution of Mr Assange to continue would mean that, under your legacy, telling the truth about such corruption and misconduct has become a crime.”

Finally, the personal touch is being fashioned for the president, spearheaded by Assange’s fiancée Stella Moris. Her appearance on Fox News with host Tucker Carlson was primed for Trump’s hearty consumption, laden with hooks of catchy lingo. This made perfectly good sense; there is still some time to go before the world’s first Fox News president vacates the White House. “Once he [Assange] gets to the US,” feared Moris, “he will be in the hands of the Deep State. That’s why I pleaded with the President to show the mercy the Deep State will not show Julian if he is extradited.”

Carlson was certainly convinced, taking a position at odds with various national security wonks that pullulate the US airwaves. “Whatever you think of Julian Assange and what he did, he is effectively a journalist. He took information and he put it in a place the public could read it.” The Australian was spending time in prison for releasing documents “he did not steal,” merely providing a platform for their dissemination, showing that “the US government was illegally spying on me, and everybody else in this country.”

The seeds for a stinging provocation against the US imperium have been sown. Whether they take firm root and grow in the self-absorbed mind of the commander-in-chief is another matter.

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Donate Button

6 comments

Login hereRegister here
  1. Karen

    So frustrating to know the total inaction opted by the Australian Federal Government. There was more effort applied to the cases of Schapelle Corby and the Bali Nine. Seemingly intervention chances from government are greater for smuggling drugs than publishing documents detailing illegal activities by the USA. As expertly modelled by the Federal Government’s responses to Witness K, Bernard Collaery, and Richard Boyle.

  2. Dan Oakhill

    Karen
    I couldn’t agree more. Disgraceful abandonment by all Australian Politicians.

  3. Terence Mills

    If this extradition and the intended US prosecution can be deemed to be politically motivated then by the words of the extradition treaty, Assange has to be released. To do otherwise would be a fatal blow to the freedom of international journalism.

    What disturbs me is that people like Assange – and I’m thinking of the family detained on Christmas Island – are jailed in the interim while the law works through its ponderous stages. He should at minimum have been granted bail pending a decision on extradition.

    We should not forget so easily that is was Trump who loved WikiLeaks when the reporting worked in his favour against Hillary :

    “WikiLeaks, I love WikiLeaks,” Mr Trump, then a presidential candidate, said on October 10, 2016.

    “This WikiLeaks is like a treasure trove,” he commented three weeks later on October 31, and “Boy, I love reading those WikiLeaks”, on November 4.

    In fact, Mr Trump mentioned WikiLeaks 141 times in the month before the 2016 election, according to MSNBC.

  4. Phil Pryor

    History records the termination of many lives, by hanging, chopping, poison, gases, electric chairs, garroting, firing squads, etc. Many of today’s “leaders” are followers of political perversity, superstition, strict and narrow dogma and doctrine, intense absurdity, yet live on, while active truth seekers, perhaps devious of difficult personally, are hounded and killed. So, why is Trump the Tremendous Turd still alive and kicking in childish tantrumpish self obsession, while Assange is incarcerated? Never be outside, never drop out, convert, betray, depart, double cross, though both Trump and Assange are accused of these things. It’s a strange world, but only if you think so…

  5. Jack Cade

    A US spy based in England killed a cyclist by driving on the wrong side of the road while blind drunk. She claimed diplomatic immunity, and was spirited out of the country, back home to the good ole US of A, which refuses to extradite her to Britain for trial. Assange merely referred to existing US papers documenting the activities of All-American boys in a country the US invaded under false pretences but in truth about getting oil, the same aim in the US demands that Venezuela – which has been reported by people who know – as having the fairest and most honest electoral system ON EARTH and has the effrontery to refuse to allow the vile Koch brothers to administer its resources, instil as its president a scumbag who will do anything US scumbags demand of Venezuela.
    Australia is the US greatest ‘ally’, which means the only country which supports any rancid scheme the US decides to undertake without asking any questions.

  6. The AIM Network

    Jack! Great to see you!

    Are you still having that problem with posting from your phone?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Return to home page
Scroll Up
%d bloggers like this: