A hex according to the Cambridge dictionary is ‘to put an evil spell on someone or something in order to bring them bad luck’. Looking at the recent article on HECS debts and how they are increasing under the indexation of the debt, certainly seems like an evil spell to a curse to those who aspire to a university education.
A university education is the gateway to exciting careers. Medicine; doctors and other health professionals. Law; lawyers, barristers, judges, and so many more. Engineers; and architects designing and building the infrastructure for contemporary life. Scientists; exploring the world around us, geology, marine biology, environmental sciences. Educators, and so the list goes on, opening opportunities and commanding some pretty good renumeration packages.
The cost of a university education is expensive and has traditionally been difficult for lower and middle class people to enter without some serious financial support and was considered elitist.
Over the last 80 or so years governments have lent a helping hand, offering scholarships to graduating high school students who have passed the Leaving Certificate or later iterations of a score-based criteria for university entrance, but these were limited in number and highly competitive. Graduates from wealthy families could pay fees directly, as they still can and do. During the 1940s and 50s scholarships were offered to help students into undergraduate courses, and under the Curtin Labor government the scheme was increased to include women. A bursary scheme was introduced to for Teacher’s College fees to be paid in return for an agreement to teach in government primary schools for an agreed number of years on graduation.
The election of the Whitlam Labor government in 1972 saw university fees abolished so that lower- and working-class students could gain access to a university education and universities grew in enrolments; the new graduates finding interesting work in careers which for many had seemed unimaginable without the support offered. Included were a number of young people who entered politics.
The cost of funding university tuition became a bit of a budgetary sore point but the benefits of enabling a broad cohort to benefit from the opportunities offered were too important for aspirational students to be discouraged, and so the HECS scheme was introduced, essentially a loan offered by the government to pay university fees to be paid back when income thresholds were reached after graduation.
Interestingly several ministers in the Hawke government had benefitted from the free university education the Whitlam government had enabled, including Gareth Evans, Sue Ryan and Kim Beazley. In part, the rationale made good sense, the amount owed remained fixed, it was interest free and not subject to any increases and repayments commenced once an income threshold had been reached. In other words the benefits of earning a higher income allowed the debt to be repaid. The other rationale is that under the income tax regime, which is progressive, that is, the more you earn the higher rate of tax is paid, the graduate would in time make a greater contribution to the national tax take than without the extra earning capacity the degree enabled.
With the 1996 Liberal government under John Howard, the commitment to the well-known dedication Liberals have to responsible financial management it was decided that HECS debt needed to be indexed according to the annual inflation rate as defined through the March CPI figures and applied at the commencement of each new Financial Year. Each year the debt, or once repayments had commenced, the remaining debt was increased by the rate of inflation. I guess it’s a bit like buying a car for say $20,000 and financing that over a number of years, but instead of just paying off the $20,000 the price went up each year by the amount the new car price rose during that year due to inflation. Nothing at all wrong with that, is there?
Ministers who had benefitted from the free university education of the 1970s through to the introduction of the HECS scheme included Treasurer Peter Costello and fellow cabinet ministers Peter Reith, Dr Michael Wooldridge and Amanda Vanstone among others. For Alexander Downer, it seems the Australian universities were just not up to scratch, he attended Newcastle University in England.
Under the Morrison government, the price of a university education was increased dramatically, especially for those who chose ‘useless’ degrees such as an Arts Degree, you know, History, who needs to know about that? Geography, oh dear that just may include topics like global warming, nah, don’t need that, Sociology, English Lit, and so forth, even psychology and mental health subjects. University degrees which taught skills in engineering and such like, yep, need them, so make them affordable.
The hex bit of HECS is that now that the debt is indexed, it grows year on year, and through a period of higher inflation it grows very quickly, leaving the student with a repayment commitment which appears never ending. A debt of around $100,000 grows by $6,000 when the CPI is 6%, the next year if inflation has dropped to say 4.5% another $4,770 is added.
The incredible irony in all this is that the ministers and members of the government who have made these changes included people who had benefitted from the earlier initiative, breaking down the elitism of university education, making it available to all who aspired to the fruitful careers such an education offered and is now slamming the door on those aspiring to such careers.
Can we ask that the HECS hex can somehow be removed, that those dedicated students who work so hard to gain an education and careers which not only promise them a quality of life and worthwhile careers, and incomes that bring them to higher income tax brackets so their contributions late in life more than repay the costs they have incurred?
That’s right, the Stage 3 tax cuts have worked to minimise that benefit… worse before the Albo ‘lie’ as he adjusted the rate thresholds to make the system a smidgeon more equitable.
[textblock style=”7″]
Like what we do at The AIMN?
You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.
Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!
Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be greatly appreciated.
You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969
[/textblock]
My proposal –
1. Introduce a graduate tax/levy, set at (perhaps) 1%, for each year of tertiary education. This isn’t a debt, it is a permanent partial funding program where graduates help fund their successors.
2. End fee payment per year for domestic students, there is only a tax/levy. The curent system of allowing fee payment by high income parents entrenches income and education inequity. Only foreign students are required to pay fees in advance.
Being a bit of a dumb bunny, can someone explain why it is that when I went through uni in the early to mid-eighties I didn’t have to pay an exorbitant fee for the privilege, but now students do?
Smacks of Robodebt
Abolish HECS
#abolishHECS
My family is probably a norm. Daughter with a debt, son in law paid off.
When the rabbott gave his daughter’s institute, et al, access to the HECS trough, I wrote many letters that these companies could con students at about $5m per 100.
Since then the all welcome unis have changed the importance of ATAR and the private institutes don’t even use it.
ps
I assess that there are tens of thousands of functionally illiterate and enumerate bums on university seats with vice chancellors using government money under ‘loose’ application of operating conditions.
HECS(HELP) should be evaluated to remove rorts.
The government will be addressing this HECS/HELP problem in the Budget. Whilst they won’t be waiving debts as Biden is doing in the US they will surely come up with a more equitable loan scheme.
For instance, for those medical students with a HECS debt it would seem socially desirable to discount their debt provided they spend, say five years in general practice or public hospitals. Ideally we should try to do the same with dental services.
I have always referred to it as a HEX. It is an unnecessary burden on our young people who should receive free education as I did.
@Rosemary Jacob:
Yes, I agree, there’s a whiff of sadism in the very concept of student debt.
Furthermore – as alluded to in Lucy Hamilton’s recent piece – there’s a dual purpose achieved by the dumbing down of the critical faculties so reliant upon an education in the humanities.
And, as noted by Bert Hetebry, certain ingrate politicians toeing the HEX party line were actually recipients of free education under Whitlam.
Plus ca change.
This government, as anticipated, will be addressing the HECS/HELP (including vocational education VET Student Loans and Australian Apprenticeship Support Loans schemes) with a view to easing (but not eliminating) the burden on students. Something, incidentally, that the former coalition government neglected to address and even refused to discuss.
Backdated to 2023 indexation for student loans will be based on whichever is lower: the Consumer Price Index (CPI), which measures inflation, or the Wage Price Index (WPI), which measures hourly wage rates in the same job.The WPI was lower than the CPI in 2023, so the 2023 indexation rate will be cut retrospectively from 7.1% to 3.2%.
Based on Australian Taxation Office data, a person with average debt levels in 2023 would see their debt cut by about $800. The government estimates about
$3 billion in indexation debt will be cancelled, helping about 3 million Australians.
These changes will have to be passed by the parliament before becoming law so it will be interesting to see how the coalition will respond allowing for their dislike of students, universities and an educated electorate.