Bureaucrats tasked with protecting national security are often inclined to encourage insecurity. It’s all part of the job prescription. The imperative is understandable if chillingly amoral: increased budgets are demanded to counter threats, however spectral; justifications for existing budgets needlessly bloated are always sought. In the Cold War, an old favourite was the teeth-chattering concern that the other side might just steal a march on the other in terms of nuclear missiles. Legendary “missile gaps” were confected to frighten lawmakers.
In any logical sense, such distinctions were always superfluous, even idiotic: one can only destroy the planet once, and claiming to have the capacity to do so a hundred times over eliminates the relevance of having any such advantage to begin with. The threat, to that end, becomes purely psychic, a matter of ego and accountancy.
The director general of ASIO, Australia’s domestic intelligence service, is very much of the belief that drumming up threats is indispensable. To that end, Mike Burgess is proving to be one of the most garrulous chiefs of what is otherwise a secretive profession. Rather than working under the radar and plotting in the shadows, he has become a regular commentator on the gloomy state of the world, and, more relevantly, certain people who live in it.
On August 5, Burgess appeared alongside Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus at a press conference. It signalled something of a change in arrangements, given the administrative reshuffle of taking ASIO out of the hands of Home Affairs and placing them under the direction of the Attorney-General.
Such a change did nothing to temper the Burgess world view, one framed darkly and foreboding of the next threat. “Australia’s security environment is degrading – it is more volatile and more unpredictable.” (When was it not degrading or volatile?) He goes on to say that espionage and foreign interference had previously been “principal security concerns”. No longer. “While the threats to our way of life remain elevated, we are seeing an increase in extremism.”
Terms are lustfully used to signify danger. “More Australians are being radicalised and radicalised more quickly.” Australians, in greater numbers, were “embracing a more diverse range of extreme ideologies” and content “to use violence to advance their cause.”
Peering into the lexical mangle, and one can detect certain tendencies on the part of the intelligence security establishment. Burgess frowns on the way politics and political objectives have become issues of protest. While paying lip service to the importance of political differences, debates and the role of protest, always a prelude to authoritarian disapproval, he laments “spikes in political polarisation and intolerance, uncivil debate and unpeaceful protests.”
The spy chief wishes to expand the nexus between politics and terrorism. All “violent” acts or threats fall within this assessment, be it “violent protest, riot or an attack on a politician or our democratic institutions.” Such events as the COVID pandemic and the October 7 attacks on Israel and its military response, had seen individuals embrace “anti-authority ideologies, conspiracy theories and diverse grievances. Some are combining multiple beliefs to create new hybrid ideologies.” The prospect of war in southern Lebanon also posed further risks.
Who, then, are these individuals? Those of the “lone actor” persuasion, prone to using such crude weapons as knives, guns or improvised explosives. Or minors transfixed by ideology. (An old ASIO favourite is to see teenagers, gorged on internet scrolling, as posing a terrorist threat, including those as young as 14.)
Having deluged the press corps with such grim warnings, though giving little by way of actual evidence, Burgess moved on to play with an old favourite of the security establishment: the National Terrorism Threat Level. Such levels are rarely tangible but serve as catalysts of needless fear and warning. With oracular force, he proposed an adjustment. “After careful consideration and consultation, ASIO is raising the National Terrorism Threat Level from ‘Possible’ to ‘Probable’. Our decision reflects the degrading security environment.”
To the clear of mind, these are meaningless utterances. But for Burgess and the desk filing wonks, they constitute a world of pulsating realities. “A threat level of ‘Probable’ means we assess there is a greater than 50 per cent chance of an onshore attack or planning in the next twelve months.” This did not mean that ASIO had actual intelligence of an ongoing plan to attack, or even “an expectation of imminent attack.” But relevant “subject matter experts” at the National Threat Assessment Centre had been busy using “analytical techniques to test, retest and contest their assumptions.” The soothsayers, it would seem, are busy.
Such addresses as those given by Burgess generate their own sinister code. That code promises further surveillance and control, a call for increased monitoring and cocooning of the Australian body politic and broader society from a wicked world. While ASIO is tub-thumping about the dangers of increased radicalisation, the absurdly named office of the e-Safety Commissioner wages war against the offending defilements of the Internet. With these officials in charge, the world will be made safe for censorship and docile thought.
[textblock style=”7″]
Like what we do at The AIMN?
You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.
Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!
Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.
You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969
[/textblock]
Yeah,good article.You have to worry about the apex spook,is he channeling J.Edgar Hoover,or has he recognised, along with so many other vested interests,like the fossil fuelers ,the corporate, non tax paying criminals, the banking gougers,the media moguls, the gambling industry fuckers etc,that this particular government is gutless in the extreme, and stands out as ripe for the plucking? Would not be surprised if he was in the same gin rummy circle as the arsehole Pezzullo and the pretender to the throne,the recently inducted Zionist, Peter ben Dutton.
One might have to wonder just how many versions of the ‘Rules-Based Order’ are in their files, and which one forms part of the current m.o.
They might elucidate, so we know when we move about as holiday makers, business people, scientists, researchers or reporters, whether we’ll be viewed as potential insurgents and mapped, listened to, or without warning, thrown in a dungeon
One might satirically suggest, SPOOKS R US, given the degree of attention afforded to the likes of the senior echelons of these professions as they promulgate their sense of current and impending dangers to this country. As my old aunt Maude would rejoin, they would say that. After all, that’s what they’re paid to do, and again, after all, it fits the psychosocial profile of the type of person who is attracted to that kind of spook profession in the first instance; men (and possibly women) who are inclined to see dangers lurking at every corner and under every rock; scaredy-cats and paranoiacs who sublimate their primitive fears through lengthy reports on the fragile nature of this and other societies… about to be overrun by febrile teenagers intent on overturning the status quo and replacing the calm with a storm, anglochristic traditions reduced to ashes as alien ideals seek ascendancy by virtue of it being their time in the sun, a deeply threatening position irrespective & devoid of reality… fevered fears being the primary drivers of such concerns.
I can imagine Burgess slinking into some Canberran alleyway on appointment with Pezzullo, the two Mikes, clad in their slicked raincoats, off to a dive to knock back hard liquor and exchange their senses of just how close this society is to collapse and how they might contrive to prevent such a calamity. God help us, as we the taxpayers gift these grifters significant sums of money to fantasise on their pet concerns and let their deepest fears run riot to our detriment.