Coronavirus Socialism for the Wealthy

When capitalism screeches to a halt and starts its old business of…

COVID-19 child care crisis

By Melissa Underwood  I am writing to request your urgent assistance to ensure…

A Serf in the time of plague ...

Greetings, and salutations on vellum even, to my fellow manorial slaves. There…

University Bailouts, Funding and Coronavirus

In a set of stable circumstances, funding higher education should be a…

COVID-19 – A Journey without Maps

By Dr John Töns  Politicians around the world are treating the COVID-19 as…

Why Scott Morrison Should Be Compared To Churchill!

There's been a definite change from some of the commentators with respect…

Is a Food Crisis the next big hit…

By Julian Cribb  As the world reels under corona virus and the resulting…

What makes the Morrison government's actions of the…

What is conservatism?"Conservatism is a political and social philosophy promoting traditional social…


Terror in Myanmar as US faces off against China

China’s Belt and Road Initiative portends a monumental transformation of the global economic order; one which poses an existential threat to the Pax Americana which has existed since the end of the Cold War. Understanding this context is critical to making sense of the current hysteria gushing from the NGO-Industrial complex and being fuelled by Western liberal punditry.

As I’ve argued previously, decisions taken by the Trump administration since January indicate a shift in US foreign policy. No longer concerned with waging petty wars on behalf of the Israel lobby and the billionaire class, attention has been focused acutely on Asia, and in particular China. Former White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon was quite forthright about this in his August 16 interview with American Prospect magazine in which he stated unequivocally “To me, the economic war with China is everything. We have to be maniacally focused on that. If we continue to lose it, we’re five years away, I think, 10 years at the most, of hitting an inflection point from which we’ll never be able to recover.” Without a hint of irony, Mr. Bannon later said “China right now is Germany in 1930. It’s on the cusp. It could go one way or the other.” “A hundred years from now, this is what they’ll remember — what we did to confront China on its rise to world domination.” “We have to reassert ourselves as the real Asian power: economically, militarily, culturally, politically.”

China’s BRI is an $8 trillion infrastructure project which aims to rebuild the old Silk Road, integrating the Eurasian continent in a vast network of road, rail and sea routes across 60 plus countries, and absorbing much of China’s current overcapacity in what President Xi Jinping describes as an open, innovative path to win-win cooperation. It also signals the end of permenant US global hegemony.

Significant foreign policy decisions taken so far under the Trump administration include strategic retreat from Syria, increased hostilities toward Iran, dropping the 11-ton mother-of-all-bombs on eastern Afghanistan, and a doubling down on troop deployment in America’s longest war. All of these are signs of a single-minded approach focused on disrupting China’s growing regional influence by any and all means possible.

One of six economic corridors making up the BRI, the 2800 km Bangladesh-China-India-Myanmar (BCIM) corridor will link Kolkata in India with Kunming in China’s Yunnan province, via Dhaka (Bangladesh) and Mandalay (Myanmar). The central hub of this corridor is the Kyaukphyu Special Economic Zone (KSEZ), which includes an express railway and deep water port, and has the potential to turn Myanmar into a regional logistics hub drawing in trade from neighbouring Thailand and Laos.

But rather than a great opportunity for regional development, the generals at the Pentagon see the BCIM as an enemy supply line. With the US flexing its military muscle in the South China Sea and eyeing off the Strait of Malacca – a potential choke point for the supply of oil into China – the $10bn Sino-Myanmar pipeline running from the Bay of Bengal to China’s Yunnan province is now critical to China’s energy security. In order to sabotage this project, Myanmar’s Rakhine state is about to become the next Kosovo.

Like the Uighur of China’s Xingxang province, Myanmar’s Rakhine Muslim minority, known more widely as ‘Rohingya’, include insurgents backed by Western political interests, who receive arms and training from the usual sources. Playing the role of agents provocateur in the latest round of psy-ops, their violent crimes against the local Buddhist population have provoked brutal counter attacks against ethnic Muslims across the country – violence which the “international community” blames on the Burmese authorities.

Aung San Suu Kyi has been the darling of the liberal ‘free press’ for two decades. The poster child for Burmese independence, her opposition to Myanmar’s military Junta earned her a Nobel Peace Prize and 15 years under house arrest before her National League for Democracy finally won a landslide victory in 2015. Suu Kyi now finds herself in the illustrious company of Saddam Hussein, Manuel Noriega and Ngo Dinh Diem – a rogue asset whose lease has expired and who is about to be thrown under the proverbial bus.

So far the Russian foreign ministry is not buying the imperial line on Myanmar, and should the US or NATO seek to place Rakhine State under its protection, China is likely to respond with force.

Turkey has been most vocal in its calls for humanitarian intervention so far. This comes as no surprise given its role within the NATO alliance. It was Turkey after all which led the call to arms on behalf of Libyan Muslims, allegedly the victims of rape and genocide under the brutal dictatorship of Muammar Gaddafi. Embarrassingly Amnesty International would later be forced to admit that these claims weren’t based on any actual evidence. Turkey was also an important player in the six year effort to topple Syria’s secular democracy and replace it with a Wahhabist theocracy favourable to Western oil interests. Unlike Libya, which was completely destroyed and handed over to terrorists within six months, Syria survived, thanks to the dedication and determination of its army and its allies, Russia, Iran and Hezbollah.

Before we allow our emotions to be manipulated into supporting more humanitarian violence, we should have no illusions about what comes next. Responsibility to Protect is almost always a precursor to genocide. One of the principle advocates for Libyan war was French public intellectual and media personality Bernard-Henri Lévy. When asked by BBC Hard Talk’s Stephen Sackur “Would you agree that the military intervention in Libya is not going the way you hoped it would?”, Lévy replied “No (laughs) No no, I never doubted it would go this way.”

Author’s Note: This is a revised and abridged version of a piece which originally appeared on Counterpunch


Login here Register here
  1. Denis H

    It seems to me that behind any unrest anywhere in the World you will find the US covertly involved, financing, and arming forces to protect their financial interests. The US wants to dominate the World no matter how much misery they inflict on others.

  2. Harquebus

    No need to confront China. It is an economic and environmental basket case just waiting for the bottom to fall out.

    “It is needed to build more steel mills so as to build more shipyards, ports, railways and bridges so that more ships can be built to carry more iron ore to more ports and thence along more rails and bridges to more steel mills so as to build more shipyards, ports, railways …
    What we have here, in short, is a giant Ponzi scheme.”

    Further reading.
    Search criteria: china rehypothecation

  3. Sue T

    There are so many moving parts. Who can adequately describe what is happening, let alone understand enough of it to formulate policies that effect a reasonable outcome for those involved?

    In the game of geo-political checkmate, refugees are convenient pawns.
    Create conditions that lead to mass movements to neighbor countries, wait a few years/decades until countries the refugees fled from and/or the ones they fled to become dysfunctional, then send in the ‘help’. The ‘help’ often comes in the form of aid in exchange for privatization of national assets as described by author of Shock Doctrine, Naomi Klein. This ethos is also called disaster capitalism. This form of capitalism feasts on the carcass of dysfunction and disaster. Whether or not the disaster is natural as in the case of earthquake or typhoon or the result of covert human intervention as in the case of pys-ops leading to civil wars and mass displacement of a population is irrelevant in terms of profit motive. Any country or multi-national corporation can play this semblance of an imperialistic game, any country can be its victim. Waking up to the games being played is a start.

  4. John

    “No need to confront China. It is an economic and environmental basket case just waiting for the bottom to fall out.”
    Unlike Australia which imports low cost workers so foreign owned iron miners can ship ore to China and import it as rails to ship more ore.

  5. Anniebee

    Denis H “The US wants to dominate the World no matter how much misery they inflict on others.”

    ….. and they will do it any which way they can, crossing every possible line of decency and restraint to do so. It is INDEED way past time, the entire world woke up to this most damaging of countries and its leaders.

    They are afflicted with their own pompous ideas of themselves – and quite simply, no one else matters.

    Wondering what counter measures China might bring into play, if the U.S. meddle even further. Pay us back what you owe asap ($1.3 trillion ).. !! Quite simple ….. could be interesting, at that !! It is China that well could pull the sanctions trick on America.

    Just a thought or two ~ ~


    Anniebee. ‘Wondering what counter measures China might bring into play, if the U.S. meddle even further.’ How about…RUSSIA! I would say the Chinese and Russians have each others backs when it comes to good old Uncle Sam

  7. Anniebee

    OTMP …. you could be spot on with that comment, however, one is still overtly communist and the other ??? gawd knows what. ( Russia ) … but Russia seems to be marching to its’ own drum, and I don’t think would want any uproars anywhere in the world. On the other hand, their regimes have been similar throughout — so they could have each others backs … depending I think on fiscal considerations.

    On that – they seem to me, to run on very different lines. ( I might be wrong – stand to be corrected ).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Return to home page
Scroll Up
%d bloggers like this: