Unleashing the potential of the rural and remote…

National Rural Health Alliance Media Release The long-awaited final report Unleashing the Potential…

Aged Pension in Australia Makes Life a Struggle

By Denis Hay Description Living on the aged pension in Australia is challenging. Discover…

Reality check: Monash experts navigate the future of…

Monash University Media Release Monash University's multi-award-winning podcast, What Happens Next?, examines artificial…

Ruthless Settlements: BHP, Brazil and the Samarco Fundão…

The BHP Group, as with other mining giants, has much explaining to…

Washington Twilight

Exploring Washington DC in late October 2024 was a surreal experience. In…

Racing is a dangerous and sometimes lethal pursuit,…

By Maria Millers With the Spring Racing Carnival in full swing this week…

Monash expert: ‘Fake’ news, misinformation and why it…

Monash University From the deep-fake ‘endorsement’ by Taylor Swift of Republican candidate Donald…

How many holocausts?

Browsing through the new releases at a local bookshop I found a…

«
»
Facebook

Tag Archives: The Australia Institute

New report finds Australian wind tower manufacturing would create thousands of jobs

The Australia Institute Media Release

Australia could create more than 4300 quality direct jobs by making its own wind towers instead of importing them, according to new research by the Centre for Future Work.

At present, all wind towers installed in Australia are imported from overseas with most coming from China.

Centre for Future Work’s research found a domestic wind energy sector would generate:

  • 4,350 ongoing jobs in wind tower manufacturing, and thousands more in input industries, especially steel
  • Output of over 800 towers per year, with cumulative value of up to $15 billion over the next 17 years
  • Incremental demand for up to 700,000 tonnes of Australian-made steel per year, creating a foundation for the recapitalization of Australian steel plants with carbon-free technologies
  • Avoiding 2.6 million tonnes of CO2 emissions thanks to reduced sea shipping of imported wind towers

Wind energy manufacturing represents a prime opportunity to apply the new policy tools of the federal government’s Future Made in Australia manufacturing strategy.

The report recommends the federal government, in partnership with state counterparts, commission an engineering and financial study into an east coast domestic wind manufacturing industry.

Report author Professor Phil Toner, Honorary Senior Research Fellow at University of Sydney, said:

“It’s conventional in traditional economic circles to say Australia should stick to its so-called ‘comparative advantage’, in determining its role in the emerging net-zero global economy.

“But if we follow the advice of conventional economists we will lock Australia into once again being just a supplier of raw resources to other, more technologically sophisticated countries.

“These countries will purchase Australian resources at the going global rate, transform them into innovative and expensive products, and then sell them back to us at premium prices.

“With all the opportunities of a net-zero global economy, do we really just want to replace traditional mineral exports like coal with new generations of unprocessed minerals like lithium and rare earths?

“Manufacturing our own wind power equipment represents an enormous opportunity for Australia to attain a more balanced industrial structure and create good quality well paid jobs.

“Most other industrial countries are investing aggressively in manufacturing the new equipment and products that will be in demand as the energy transition continues. Australia needs similar policy activism to maximise the industrial, technological and employment potential of the energy transition.

“Anyone concerned about the climate should be up in arms at the fact we’re importing huge heavy steel towers from China when we could be producing them here, which would provide fantastic opportunities for our burgeoning green steel sector.”

 

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button

Big Super is still investing in nuclear weapons: report

Quit Nukes / The Australia Institute Media Release

A new report has found that despite claiming not to invest in ‘controversial weapons’ 13 of the top 14 Australian super funds are still investing in nuclear weapons companies, in some cases even in an option described as ‘responsible’.

One of the 14, Hostplus, has excluded nuclear weapons companies across its portfolio since December 2021.

At least $3.4 billion of Australian retirement savings are invested by these funds in companies involved in making nuclear weapons, according to the new research conducted by Quit Nukes in collaboration with The Australia Institute.

The report analyses financial returns and finds that the exclusion of nuclear weapon companies from portfolios has an immaterial impact on returns.

Rosemary Kelly, Director, Quit Nukes:

“It’s frankly unconscionable to sell super fund members a responsible investment option and then use their money to invest in nuclear proliferation.

“The thing that makes this baffling is that investing in nuclear weapon companies is just completely unnecessary in the broader scheme of things.

“Superannuation funds should divest immediately from weapons manufacturers who produce nuclear weapons. If you’re a member of 13 of these 14 leading funds you can request that your fund divest or threaten to take your savings elsewhere.

“Super funds are being sneaky by boasting of policies to exclude “controversial weapons” but not counting nuclear weapons as “controversial.” That’s pretty hard to swallow when you consider that most ESG advisers now consider nuclear weapons as controversial weapons, given the UN Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons that came into force in 2021.

Alice Grundy, Research Manager, The Australia Institute:

“The most frustrating thing about the lack of process in this area is that excluding nuclear weapon companies from super portfolios is so easy. Divesting has an immaterial impact on investment returns.

“Your super fund could divest your money from nuclear weapon companies without materially impacting your returns.

“So long as nuclear weapons exist, nuclear war is an ever-present risk. Its impacts would be catastrophic. Even a limited nuclear war, involving say 250 of the over 12,000 nuclear weapons in the world, would kill 120 million people outright and cause nuclear famine, putting 2 billion lives at risk. There would be massive impacts on global supply chains and manufacturing.

“The long-term financial implications should be factored into decisions about where to invest Australian super.”

The full report

 

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button