Shutting Down in Trumpland
It is a political idiosyncrasy that most political systems avoid: the state, as if suffering a stroke, operating at only partial capacity, incapable of paying certain employees and incapable of fronting certain services. And so it is in the United States, which is facing the longest shut down in its history after the record set under the Clinton Presidency – 21 days in 1995 – was passed.
Prior to the 1970s, the administration of the day could generally expend moneys without prior congressional approval. Then came a shifting of power from the executive to Congress in a 1974 law, reorganising the budget process. Scrapping duly followed between the arms of government, and the legal opinion of United States attorney general Benjamin R. Civiletti provided the kiss of dysfunction to politics in Washington. Agencies could not, he surmised with high priest severity, continue to operate in the absence of congressional appropriations, bar those engaged in certain vital tasks, such as protecting life and property.
The reasons for the current squabble remain less significant than the process and consequences. President Donald Trump wants his wall on the Mexico border; the Democrats remain cool to aspects of the idea. The result has been a standoff and the drying up of pay checks to certain federal employees.
The term “shutdown” is deceptive. The state itself, for the most part, is still functioning, hence that qualifying word “partial”. The imperial mechanisms of waging war, procuring weapons of death and lining the pockets of the military industrial complex are exempt activities, the purview of the Department of Defence. Many agencies have also been funded through the current fiscal year.
But services out of the news, and on the margins, are the first to go into the world of pro-bono delivery, food pantries and food banks. An estimate in terms of how many are going without pay runs into 800,000.
Then come those flexing arms of Homeland Security: the CoastGuard and the Transportation Security Administration. Political decisions can have stinging irony, and for a president keen to press home his interest in border security and impervious walls, not paying members of these parts of the security apparatus seems a jarring, and risible, oversight. TSA employees have found small ways to inflict vengeance: employees are calling in sick in large numbers; checkpoints have been closing.
The Coast Guard has had to be comforted by words rather than cash. Chief of Naval Operations Adm. John Richardson described members as “brave” in their task of keeping “America’s waters safe” even as they assisted the navy in various “maritime theatres of war” in maintaining security and countering piracy.
The issue with shutdowns is problematic in several ways. Trump’s loyal base may remain unmoved by his obstinate childishness, but the issue remains depleting to the entire practice of governance. When the money stops trickling into services, the political figures of the day will be noted and marked. But Trump retains a padding that resists corrosion and wearing. The same cannot be said either about members of the GOP, or the Democrats. As the Republic rusts before the fantasy of a wall and a self-engineered, partial paralysis, the man who remains standing, whatever the polls say, is Trump.
The danger for the Democrats is how to stay mighty and distant, instead of close and small. This has been all but impossible for them. Trump is ramping it up with delinquent enthusiasm, as he always does, playing the trivial politics of small gains and considerable bellows, and also making it hard for his opponents to escape falling for much the same.
He has, for instance, delighted in preventing House Speaker Nancy Pelosi from using a plane that would have taken her on a trip to Afghanistan. Trump’s administration, in the words of a White House official, “worked with the Air Force and (the Defence Department) and basically took away the rights to the plane from the speaker.” The note from Trump to Pelosi explaining the decision suggests an emperor keen to prevent an out of favour official from seeing the sights of the imperium. “Due to the Shutdown, I am sorry to inform you that your trip to Brussels, Egypt and Afghanistan has been postponed.” The “seven-day excursion” (how true) would be rescheduled “when the Shutdown is over”.
Pelosi, not wanting to be left out of the barnyard romp of low expectations, retaliated by insisting that the House of Representatives “will not consider a concurrent resolution authorizing the president’s State of the Union address in the House chamber until the government has opened.”
Trump, in a previous note to Pelosi, dared and cajoled the House Speaker into seeking to prevent the speech from going ahead. “It would be so very sad for our country if the State of the Union were not delivered on time, on schedule, and very importantly, on location.” Trump, inadvertently, is accurate in one respect: if Congress be that great cinema, and theatre, of dissimulation and intrigue, a studio production line insulated from the electors, it is only appropriate for the chief to address its members there and then.
Trump’s dark pull, Washington’s scolding id, is total and consuming to opponents and followers alike, barrel scraping, and ultimate circus. Others, as they have done before, will have to busy themselves running matters while those on the Hill and in the White House pursue matters of non-governance.
Like what we do at The AIMN?
You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.
Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!
388 total views, 2 views today
10 commentsLogin here Register here
A couple of globe-trotting ministers…we seem to have something of a shut down here!
It’s theatre of the absurd from all sides in this spat. The losers in this are the workers (government and otherwise), the rest of the country, and the world in general. Always in the background, if the stalemate keeps going, is the threat of a bunch of lunatics who decide that physical action is required to resolve it. Scary times.
On a side note: Anyone else get the feeling that Pomparse Pompeo, no doubt “Bomb ’em back the stone age” Bolton is lurking in the background as well, with the blessing of Trump are doing this on purpose? Provoke a reaction then step in “to save the day for democracy.”
I’m not in the least little bit surprised with this –
Trump is blaming the Democrats, quelle surprise, because they disagree with building an expensive wall that will not achieve his purported aim, keeping out those brown skinned southerners.
Ladders, tunnels and air craft?
The federal opposition must not cave to this bully.
“Vice President Mike Pence paid Senate Republicans a visit Thursday and told them the president is considering multiple options. But Pence didn’t offer any “specifics,” Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) said.” What it means is that The Donald has absolutley no idea at all what to do and his sycophants are trying to bullshit the people into thinking that the “worlds greatest negotiator” will solve the problems he has created. Donaldstein’s monster is The Donald himself except he does not create sympathy/pathos like Frankenstein’s creature.
Trump has what he thinks are brutal nick names for those he doesn’t like. Remember Little Rocket Man for the North Korean Leader and Pocahontas for Senator Elizabeth Warren well he’s now outdone himself – he calls Senator Pelosi – Nancy.
Her poll numbers are up 6 percentage points. His continue to decline. Another own goal.
“Politics” world wide is / has, turned / turning, to shambolics. The verocity of this madness is frightening. We are just pawns watching this crazyness around the globe. At some point there will be a dramatic occurance, with no winners. Greed is their driving force, pure greed.
The stupid bloody trumpster seemingly forgets that when he first talked about this bloody wall, in the very early days of his so-called “administration”–or when he first talked about it on the campaign trail–he suggested then that he wanted the Mexicans to pay for it! But then this idiot has a very short-term memory, tells far too many lies, & is only concerned with denigrating his opposition, much like here in Australia! The sooner he relents from this stupid bloody proposal the sooner all the affected people in America, can get back to work, get paid what they are owed & the better off everyone will be! But under this lying toe-rag of a would be president will probably never allow this to happen until he gets his own way!
Bronte, I can’t see The Dorkster, oops, Donald backing down any time soon the blow to his massive but very fragile ego would almost shattering to him. I honestly think he’s hanging on to anything that vaguely resembles sanity and reality by a thread.
Walls work. But only as tourist attractions these days. (Just ask the Chinese who will gladly export big sections when the tariff wars are ended.)
Or sites for obstacle races. You can go up ’em – down ’em – under ’em – around ’em – or over ’em. It matters not.
This does not bode well for The Donald –
I wonder how long it will take Stone to flip on Trump? Tweet storm looming from Trumpty Dumpty. The rest of the Trumpafia family will also be be very worried.