Population Policy found in a filing cabinet in…

What we do know about Australia's population is that it will achieve…

Who's the real baby here, Mr Trump?

Who's the real baby here? A monster orange balloon-effigy of Trump as…

Persuasion ... (the language of sedition)

Mr. Hogarth spoke: “He would honestly and fairly put the objects of…

The Woes of Luka Modrić: Croatia, Nationalism and…

Juraj Vrdoljak of Telesport was convinced. “I think half the population didn’t…

Just because you are Aboriginal doesn't make you…

Every time I hear Alice Springs councillor and political hopeful Jacinta Price…

Das Testament

Any reading of the annals of human history, its achievements and failings,…

Stomping in Britain: Donald Trump and May’s Brexit

What a rotten guest, but then again, that was to be expected.…

The Treasurer’s pick

The resignation of Treasury Secretary John Fraser was too good an opportunity…


Screwing the Murray Darling Basin Plan

In light of the current concern about water rights in the Murray Darling Basin, I would like to offer this piece I wrote on our old community blog about the “perfect storm” existing amongst the smaller “generational farms” along this section where I live on the River. The cause of this concern is because of the creation of mega “Agricorp managed investment schemes” that have sprung up using irrigation to grow huge crops of veggies and nuts and fruits.

Many of you would remember the collapse of “Great Southern” and “Timbercorp”, two mega Hedge-Fund/Managed Investment Schemes that bought up huge amounts of water licences along the Murray River. These and other schemes have dominated the water market and by sheer weight of numbers, have corrupted the cycle of produce markets and pricing … and have bumped up the cost of water for irrigation.

Read on …

Community Centralised Markets

Discussion Paper on Solutions for Sustainability of a Community

Listing the realities of farming in the Mid-Murray Council area:

a) That it is primarily an agricultural constituent

b) That the agriculture producers are mostly of multi-generational owned small holdings

c) The imposts of market requirements, restrictions and pricing are more favoured to large holdings, large corporate agri-business and Managed Investment Scheme producers.

The result being the development of a “perfect storm” of squeezed “family farms”, concentration of production to “outside interests” that export their produce, dumped excess commodities resulting in rock-bottom prices for produce and concentration of water allocation licences with corporate agri-business. The result could be a complete loss to the local community of independence in growth and supply of produce from family farming enterprises.

Many might say “So what! Let the market decide.” But it isn’t “the market” deciding … its “Fund – Managed” speculators with super capital, super credit and cross-border/cross-seasonal guarantees of profit margins protected against crop-failure by multi-location producers that, being so large and having the capacity to produce so much, they can control the wholesale price of produce by dumping or withdrawing commodities from a market that will eventually be reliant on their capacity. The smaller producer having neither the capacity, flexibility, nor the credit to “ride-out” long-term problems. Add to the mix an uncertain climate, and we have that perfect storm mentioned above.

The conundrum facing those many small farmers is – that having only a certain acreage – they can only grow a set amount of produce per acre. There are only so many onions that can be grown in every square metre, for instance. And because of their limited collateral with the small acreage, and their incapacity to compete with these mega farms, they are not well-received by the banks who already are aware of their asset and growth capacity. So they are locked into a vicious cycle of not having enough land to compete with the agricorp output. They cannot compete with the wholesale price per kilo of produce marketed by the mega farms and they cannot get credit from a secure source to expand their acreage, nor afford to buy any more water licences for irrigation..a perfect storm.

I spoke to one young couple in such a situation where they lamented borrowing some money just to get their goods to market, which only returned a fraction of the expected price, leaving them to say they would have been better off if they had let the crop rot in the ground.

What can we do?

Those mega-producers deliver their products either interstate or ship to ports for export way outside this council area, so they are not affected by local fluctuations, yet do have capacity to affect the viability of local produce with the flow-on pricing control from their mega production capacity. It is the smaller, family-owned farms that are at risk and perhaps we can do something there. It is a new idea, building not on a cooperative of producers, though they would be good … it is a “market-oriented” proposal that would require a contract between individual parties, no different than the usual “contract to supply” of many businesses. It would require the Mid-Murray Council to become an “investor in the constituency” to supply locations and under-cover premises where a regular, consistent, semi-permanent stalls (much like the Adelaide Central Market) of local farmers could sell a huge variety of produce to local shoppers. Produce such as vegetables, meats and fruit and even cereal grains in either bulk or packaged. Or … there could be an emphasis on wholesale selling to many local country stores that would save transport time and costs for all parties while delivering fresh produce to local buyers on a more regular basis.

Certainly, it is a bit of a BBQ stopper. I believe we have the capability to do this. We have to think big. Very big! We have quality growers of everything in the lines of vegetables, meats, fruits and cereals. Do we have the population of consumers to purchase? The population count of the Riverland area alone could add up to at least thirty or forty thousand people. Not all of them will shop at such a market, but all of them do eat. If these “centralised” markets stayed open for say, three consecutive days each, I would think they would be a goer. Considering also the weekend tourist flows through the area – if council could obtain State or Federal monies to construct multi-purpose under-cover arenas with appropriate cold-store facilities – then it could be a goer. There would have to be at least four locations all operating simultaneously over three days, perhaps one in Morgan, one in Blanchetown, one in Sedan and the other in Mannum. The multi-purpose arenas could be hired out on other days for other pursuits.

Sure, this is a simplistic over-view of possibilities of de-centralising produce supply buying, that would involve cooperation and contractual certainties between council, growers and a willing-to-participate public. But what other choice is there? Just lay back and watch as all these hard-working, quality producing generational farms and families get squeezed out of the industry? Or do we affiliate and come together as a society and instead of ending up with a community that is depreciating and all our young people want to move away from, we become a community that is creating and not only do we get our young people to stay, but we attract more keen people to come to the area because they want to be a part of a growing community.

What do you think?


  1. Freethinker

    If we like to support the primary industry, small farmers, cooperatives and food processors and at the same time look after the soils and water quality (life of the rivers) we need to change the farming techniques including large monocrop plantations, irrigation methods and fertilization.
    This will be costly and have to be supported by protecting the crops and processing by stopping the import of heavy subsidies of products from Europe and other regions.
    Globalisation does not work and we need to protect our food production if we like to keep our sovereignty.

  2. Matters Not

    That Canavan has departed form Cabinet and is no longer a Minister (presumably) and perhaps, never was a legal Minister – might have some interesting legal implications.

    Perhaps all the documents he signed are now in doubt? What about the appointments he sponsored? Now ‘null and void’? If not then why not?

    Seems to me that Canavan, as a (fake and illegally appointed) government Minister, is in an entirely different boat than Waters and Ludham who were mere bit players in comparison. When Turnbull et al ‘appointed’ Canavan as a Minister, did he engage in ‘due diligence’? And if not then why not? Surely Malcolm can’t be accused of extraordinary negligence ? A claim he levelled against the Greens with unbounded glee. If not then …

    As I say, some interesting ‘implications.

  3. Matters Not

    Then there’s other legal implications. Generally speaking, Ministers in the course of their duty are protected from personal legal responsibility if they engage in ‘wrong doing’ as part of their job. A current example is Ludwig’s cattle export ban which is now being challenged for eye-watering amounts. It’s not Ludwig that will have to pay – it’s us that will.

    Canavan probably caused economic harm to Westpac re vehement criticism of their decision not to fund ADANI. I suspect that Canavan has now lost his ‘legal’ protection. After all he was an illegal candidate and Mal’s illegal appointment.

    Again – interesting legal times ahead. Perhaps extraordinary negligence might be too kind of a description.

  4. Michael Taylor

    MN @ 10:20. Damn interesting points you raise. I do hope they are brought to light.

  5. Johno


  6. Jack Straw

    Go back home Matt Canavan; you dago bastard. LOL

  7. Joseph Carli

    Michael..The situation is more tragic than I have brushed upon…many of those small acreages are handed down to a reluctant but loyal to tradition son or daughter…mostly son..who in some cases would have liked to leave the farming business, seeing how fruitless is the possibilities, but then loyal to the heritage of “The Family Farm”…
    My partner was contracted to conduct a survey of EVERY irrigator on this stretch of the river between Morgan and Mannum…I was her chauffeur and escort as we drove around to all these farms over a couple of months…while she took the numbers and names of crops etc. I made a point of casual conversation with the farmer..to glean the “vibe” and to get subtle bits and pieces for my own interests…It was not a cheery picture, and I could feel for those struggling young couples…even if they were hamstrung by voting for the very political party that was most screwing them over…quite tragic really.
    I sent a more edited version of this article to the SA minister responsible and I got a kind of form-letter response…again, quite unsatisfactory..and I sometimes wonder on the people who go for a responsible job in politics…whether they have the capacity to think outside the square.

  8. townsvilleblog

    Section 44 is fairly specificit clai9med two Green Senators and this bloke has to go too.

  9. Andreas Bimba

    This situation where small and medium farming operations are being disadvantaged by government regulations and the market power of large operators is yet another consequence of our corrupted democracy where lobbying and money hold more sway over politicians than votes or the need for good government policy and enforcement. Get the money out of politics, remove the influence of business lobbyists, investigate and prosecute political corruption, improve the mass media and investigative journalism and improve our democratic processes. For example proportional representation voting would more closely reflect changes in voting allegiances that may occur when an important issue arises, rather than our current single local member per seat voting system as voters would elect five local members per each larger seat if the Hare-Clark voting system was used. In this way voters would have more choice in voting for local candidates based on merit and how well they addressed important issues but the disadvantage is that seats would need to be larger and have approximately five times as many voters.

  10. Dave

    Shouldn’t the theft of water from the tributaries of the Murray Darling system be investigated by duttons’ “Homeland Security” department?

  11. diannaart

    Barnaby Joyce stripped of water ministry, please, please, please and may this result in the end of his deputy PM-ship also.

    …and maybe, Weatherall and Xenophon can work together… maybe?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Return to home page
Scroll Up
%d bloggers like this: