Bedtime Stories #2

The search for soul …Down the Adelaide Central Market, between Marino’s butchers…

Rachel Maddow on the daily madness

Let's hear it for the 'leader' of the free world.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nhtc-jVgUSA&feature=youtu.beAnd just to…

Mosques, Museums and Politics: The Fate of Hagia…

When the caustic Evelyn Waugh visited the majestic sixth century creation of…

COVID-19: Where was it born: China, the United…

Continued from: COVID-19: Where was it born: China, the United States or…

We live in shadowy times and white men…

As a man who is but months away from turning 80 I…

An open letter to Scott Morrison, PM

Mr Morrison,Do you realise how much better off you are than the…

The Hypocrisies of Recognition: The Supreme Court, Native…

The Supreme Court of the United States has barely had time to…

Bedtime Stories #1

I stare into time’s eyes … She stares back at me. Actually,…

«
»
Facebook

One Rule for Me and Another for Everyone Else: The Cummings Coronavirus Factor

Leaving crises to Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s management skills will never disappoint those who favour chaos and the attractions of vague direction. The double standard is to be preferred to the equal one. With the United Kingdom sundered by death and the effects of COVID-19 (the PM himself having had his battle with the virus), the population was hoping for some clarity.  When, for instance, would the lockdown measures be eased?

On May 10, Johnson delivered an address from his comically staged desk which had the appearance of being trapped in the door during a bungled removal effort. “We have been through the initial peak – but it is coming down the mountain that is often more dangerous,” he tried explaining. “We have a route, and we have a plan, and everyone in government has the all-consuming pressure and challenge to save lives, restore livelihoods and gradually restore the freedoms that we have.” Seeds of confusion were sowed with promise. People would be allowed to do “unlimited amounts of outdoor exercise,” and the “Stay Home” message had changed to “stay alert, control the virus and save lives.” The broader citizenry were puzzled.

Mixed messaging was not the only problem facing Johnson, whose preferable default during any emergency is the behaviour of the reasonable Briton, characterised by patience and common sense. Within his own circles, abiding by the rules has been a lax affair. His chief adviser, Dominic Cummings, has been defiant before the lockdown rulebook.

In a statement and press address, Cummings laid out his explanation for his recent bad behaviour. The heart-tugging element was important. So was the ignorance that he had done nothing to niggle the ethical. Johnson had just been found out to have contracted COVID-19. Arrangements of how to handle the emergency were discussed. Then came the urgent call from Cummings’ wife. “She’d vomited and felt like she might pass out. And there’ll be nobody to look after our child.  None of our usual childcare options were available.”

What followed that April, with most of the UK in mandated self-isolation, was travel – some 260 miles in all – that involved leaving his London home on a trip to County Durham, accompanied by his wife and child. The decision had been made to stay in a cottage on the farm of Cummings’ father. It was there that Cummings fell ill, as did his son, who spent a stint in hospital. It subsequently surfaced that Johnson’s aide had also repaired to Barnard Castle, a visit reported to Durham police by Robin Lees, a retired chemistry teacher. That visit raised eyebrows for falling within the category of non-essential travel.

The aide’s conclusion for breaching such rules were self-exculpatory, which cannot excite any surprise from those familiar with those behind the law and policy of the state apparatus. The higher up the food chain of power, the more likely the powerful will misbehave and change the meals. Andre Spicer puts it in a dull though accurate manner: “a large body of research […] shows that it is people in positions of power that are most likely to take excessive risks.” Such risks are minimised, if not ignored altogether. The one who assumes, and presumes to be in a position of power, is likely to cheat, bend and break the order.

Cummings, in his reasoning, might have done unreasonable things in the past, but thought that what had transpired over those 14 days was reasonable. “The regulations make clear, I believe the risks to the health of small children were an exceptional situation, and I had a way of dealing with this that minimised risk to others.”

Such a statement of behavioural latitude, in times when those in the United Kingdom, for the most part, have complied with the coronavirus lockdown, looks politically indulgent. Johnson has added to that indulgence, claiming that Cummings merely “followed the instincts of every father and every parent, and I do not mark him down for that.” The “right kind of childcare” was not available” at that time; both Cummings and his wife “were about to be incapacitated by coronavirus.”

Staying with Cummings is courting a grand risk. And such risks compound when they are given the Johnson touch. Professor Stephen Reicher of the Scientific Advisory Group on Emergencies (SAGE) furnishing Downing Street with advice on how the public might best respond to the lockdown measures, seethed on hearing about the prime ministerial defence. “I can say that in a few short minutes tonight, Boris Johnson had trashed all the advice we have given on how to build trust and secure adherence to the measures necessary to control Covid-19.” Honesty had been “trashed,” as had respect for the public, equity, equal treatment, consistency and the message “we are all in this together.”

Even conservative commentary on the subject is wary of the prime minister’s loyalty to Cummings, showing that this is no ordinary row in the halls of Westminster. Former Johnson adviser Tim Montgomerie expressed embarrassment for having “ever backed Boris Johnson for high office.” Chair of the Northern Ireland select committee, Simon Hoare, was baffled. “With the damage Mr Cummings is doing to the government’s reputation, he must consider his position. Lockdown has had its challenges for everyone.” The prime minister “is a populist who no longer understands the populace,” suggests Nick Cohen in The Spectator. “Dominic Cummings pretends to be an anti-elitist but cannot see how lethal the slogan ‘one rule for me and another for everyone else’ is to him and the elite her serves.” That about sums it up.

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Donate Button

6 comments

Login here Register here
  1. Phil Pryor

    Why do people wish to get on the political ladder and try to slide up, snakelike? It is almost certainly to get preferment, position, pose, chances at career, money or the equivalent, to swell the pride, ego, self. Feeling empowered at early success, hardens the armour of defiance, and doing what you effing well like is such fun. Bonks, bribes, blathering, brown paper bags, all is imagined as about to arrive. Hess could borrow airplanes, Goering could take (borrow, acquire) paintings and any valuables seen and admired. Hitler could eliminate real and imaginary rivals. Trump can enrich a private corporation, defy investigations, cover up dealings and workings. So, what of Boris the Inserter, a man of easy humour and flexible morals? Used to privilege, he can envisage its rubber qualities in office, and so friends may shelter under an umbrella of potential critical deluge. Virus one day, brexit, or even the adhesion of components of the U K itself, it’s all such fun, as children know. Devoted liars have dozens of scripts ready in the quiver of alibis and stories. Alibilious??

  2. wam

    Well bone, doctor, the coffin is well nailed and who gives a rat’s arse about the poms and the septic we live in south Asia let’s work here.

  3. Andrew Smith

    Not surprising for some and too many assume, although under the PMs purview, Johnson can sack Cummings. However, the latter has some very influential supporters and sock puppets from the EU Leave campaign including Tory and/or US libertarian corporate donors in an eco-system including Mercers (Cambridge Analytica fame), Murdoch, Gove, Farage and no doubt Bannon, Kochs et al.; follow the money and/or media influence.

    Good description of how Cummings et al. operated during Brexit campaign in article titled The real reason we should fear the work of Dominic Cummings:

    It’s the ongoing question of rule of law. For him, it’s an opportunity to drive an axe through everything he most hates about the British state, starting with parliament, and ending, I suspect, with the civil service. That’s the deal I believe he will have done with Johnson: he’ll help Johnson get Brexit through, and in exchange, Cummings will blow up his hated civil service…. (one would add regulation and taxes, along with the EU influence on trade and finance)…

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/sep/07/smash-and-grab-dominic-cummings-democracy

    It is no coincidence this fits snugly with the radical right libertarian ideology and strategy we see in US, Australia and UK?

  4. New England Cocky

    Queensland has the correct approach; borders closed until there have been no fresh positive IDs for COVID-19 for 28 consecutive days.

    As seen in the Sydney private schools where early return school led to early return to lock down because ONE student tested positive is sensible policy implementation.

    This COVID-19 has an symptomatic, infectious incubation of up to ten (10) days, an expression period of 7-14 days and an unknown re-infective period after recovery. The medical fraternity are presently determining whether one infection create immunity, and for how long.

    The problem with easing lock down is that state governments cannot prevent an asymptomatic carrier entering their clean state, naturally causing the re-infection cycle.

    Thank you AP for following the best medical advice.

  5. DrakeN

    Just how much ‘dirt’ does Cummings have on Johnson and other Tory Party persons?
    Macchiavelli is still their guiding reference.

  6. Ross

    You would think the Tory government is starring in another series of “The Thick of It”.
    It’s all there, the chaos, the unseen Prime Minister, the power struggles, the cock ups, the sheer incompetence of government all controlled by a foul mouthed unelected bully boy.
    Dominic Cummings really is Malcolm Tucker, albeit not as well dressed, the hugely powerful media director preying on vain and clueless third rate government ministers.
    Makes you think who our version of Malcolm Tucker/Dominic Cummings might be.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Return to home page
Scroll Up
%d bloggers like this: