Delusions of Self-Defence: Biden Bombs Syria

Every power worth its portion of salt in the Levant these days…

If a Bishop of the Brisbane Archdiocese drove…

As a Survivor of childhood sexual abuse in a Catholic orphanage, I…

The Presumption Of Innocence Is Reserved For Those…

A couple of weeks ago I wrote that I found the phrase,…

Morrison shows us again how much he despises…

In his press conference today, Prime Minister Scott Morrison was asked about allegations pertaining to…

Breaching Digital Rights: India’s Platform and Media Ethics…

Having made something of a splash last month with the fuss over…

Politics is a charade

By Ad astra   Charade: an absurd pretence intended to create a pleasant or…

The Morrison government is a sewer

An allegation of the brutal anal rape of a child in 1988 has been…

Fight Club, Wolverines and Swinging Dicks – is…

When Young Liberals in Chris Hartcher’s Terrigal electorate were inspired by Brad…

«
»
Facebook

Note To Morrison: “You’re Going To Need A Bigger Carpet!”

There’s a famous line in “Jaws” after Brody first sees the shark: “You’re going to need a bigger boat!”

With all the things that the Coalition have swept under the carpet, I can’t help but think it’s about time someone asked the Promo Minister if he has any plans to get a bigger one.

Now when I say “swept under the carpet”, I’m not entirely accurate. Large problems of ethics and corrupt behaviour are met with the suggestion that no rules were broken so what’s the big problem or, if rules were broken we’ll be told that what happened wasn’t a “hanging offence”.  Of course – as I’ve pointed out before – there are no capital crimes on the statute books in Australia, so it would be correct to say that rape and murder aren’t hanging offences but I doubt that were a government member to be found guilty of a crime that serious, nobody would be saying that they shouldn’t lose their job because well they haven’t committed “a hanging offence”.

Just like the guy who – allegedly – took a woman – allegedly – into an allegedly restricted area where the alleged CCTV allegedly showed them entering and the woman was allegedly raped. He hasn’t committed a hanging offence even if all the alleged behaviour is true.

I’m using the word “allegedly” because it saves one from a law suit because some MPs have been throwing the word “defamation” around a lot lately. I think I can say that without adding the word “allegedly”.

For example, Peter Dutton did make it clear that he regarded suggestions that he was corrupt as defamatory so I’m going to make it very clear that I’m not talking about Mr Dutton – or any other alleged government MP – in the following dialogue and I’m speaking more generally. And if there are any generals who feel that I’m talking about them, I’d like to suggest that everything I write is fiction and any resemblance to them or any member of the government is entirely coincidental.

By the way, you know that the difference between fiction and reality is that fiction has to be plausible… I can’t remember who said that, but whoever it was, they said it before Donald Trump was elected so one has to be impressed.

A short fiction:

“Does Mr Bent need to stand down?”

“No, I’ve looked into it and no rules were broken.”

“But he went outside the guidelines…”

“Guidelines are just that, they’re a guide. Like those lines down the middle of the road, you’re allowed to cross them from time to time if you think it’s reasonable.”

“Actually we’ve noticed that he also broke the rules.”

“Yes, but we’re the ones who wrote the rule book and if we think it’s time for a rule change, it’d be a lot of meaningless red tape if we had to change them before we ignored them entirely.”

“Doesn’t that mean that the rules are irrelevant then?”

“On the contrary, the rules are there to give us a starting point. After all, if rules didn’t change we’d still be keeping slaves and forbidding women to vote…”

“Isn’t there a difference between changing a law and ignoring a rule? I mean we didn’t just wake up one day and decide that we’d ignore the law that prevented gay people from marrying because most people thought that it was a violation of their rights.”

“Look, nobody but the left cares about this issue and while we govern for all Australians we don’t govern for those who aren’t patriotic and if you don’t want to get behind your government, whose side are you on? China’s? If you like rules so much, why don’t you move to China?”

Anyway, moving back to the real world, we had Bridget McKenzie, who was once allegedly a minister in this alleged government suggesting that the word “rorts” was unparliamentary and that if it were used outside she would sue… Not sure why she hasn’t sued all those other people using the word, but anyway… I was more intrigued by the idea that changes were made by an unnamed member of staff after she’d signed off. Is it normal for members of a minister’s staff to decide that the minister doesn’t know what they’re doing and add a few million to marginal seats here and there?

Still it does make sense.

If the Prime Monster needs his wife, allegedly Jen, to explain to him that he has to think about a rape case as though he’s a father -which he is, allegedly – and to think of what he’d want to happen if it were his own alleged daughters in the same position as Brittany Higgins, then you certainly wouldn’t want any of the ministers in this government having the final say on anything!

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Donate Button

7 comments

Login here Register here
  1. Yes Minister

    By far the most efficient watchdog in Australia in terms of defusing complaints against official criminals is Queensland’s Crime Cover-up Commission. A while ago it was necessary to replace all the carpets in their HQ as the lumps becamte impossible to ignore, in fact I understand there were a number of serious incidents where staff tripped over the crap swept under he old carpets.

  2. Kerri

    I’m waiting for Scotty to grab her hand to shake it!

  3. Gangsta's Paradise

    Rossleigh

    Not so much a bigger carpet ….. as more people to pass it on to.

    Morrison is a master at passing the buck.

  4. Phil Pryor

    The pictured vision of that vomitouis viper, the P M, our own Poxed Mentality,Political Pervert, Pathetic Misfit, is too hard on the tummy. A failure, a lazy liar, a backstabbing plotter, schemer, yabbering domineering ambitious oaf, has become our national leader, widely represented and a disgrace and humiliation to the nation. Stinking shit is not shining silk, no matter the constant deceptions and lies.

  5. Bronte D G ALLAN

    Yes minister to a tee! Well put, as usual, Rossleigh! I consider this inept lying bunch of so-called “liberals” to be a clusterfuck, allegedly. Is there anything that this failed from marketing, lying, happy clapper, flat earth believer, idiotic fucking Slo MO can do right?

  6. Lambchop Simnel

    God bless ya, Rossleigh

  7. New England Cocky

    Ah Rossleigh ….. enough said.

    ”If the Prime Monster needs his wife, allegedly Jen, to explain to him that he has to think about a rape case as though he’s a father -which he is, allegedly – and to think of what he’d want to happen if it were his own alleged daughters in the same position as Brittany Higgins, then you certainly wouldn’t want any of the ministers in this government having the final say on anything!”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Return to home page
Scroll Up
%d bloggers like this: