Mangroves: environmental guardians of our coastline

University of South Australia Media Release They are the salt-tolerant shrubs that thrive…

Tuvalu, Climate Change and the Metaverse

When lost to climatic disaster and environmental turbulence, where does a whole…

Nats Vote No OR When You're Standing At…

It's sort of interesting that just a few days ago we had…

Was Amtrak Joe derailed?

By 2353NM Prior to becoming President, Joe Biden was a US Senator for…

Football Capitulates at Qatar

It did not take much. The initial promises of protest from a…

Thanks To Dan Andrews I Got My First…

Just to be clear here, I didn't get it at the polling…

Democracy Tested

The only defence that we, the people, have against an arrogant leader…

Promises, Promises, Promises

What's a promise or, more specifically, an election promise? Is it a…

«
»
Facebook

Not Knowing What You Stand For: Deborah Birx and Public Health

Pity the public health official tasked with convincing those beyond convincing that a pandemic crisis is worthy of serious consideration. This is further complicated in instances where such officials feel the need to play court jester, appeaser or silent sufferer.

When she was made coordinator of the White House coronavirus task force, Deborah Birx was taking the position with a hefty resume, heavily credentialed by such achievements as being the US global AIDS coordinator during the Obama administration. Former US Secretary of State John Kerry had said of her in 2014 that she “embodies the best of what it means to be a pioneer, to be a practitioner, and a public servant all rolled into one.”

With such bountiful praise, the risk of disembodiment and unravelling is never far. Birx began to get increasingly undone as the pandemic started to gallop through the United States. President Donald Trump, true to his singular method of managing staff, came up with what can only be described as an alternative universe of suggestion and data. Filled with mishaps, keen misreading and a certain astrological quality, the views conveyed to Trump on how best to cope with COVID-19 were not so much quashed by Birx as gently fielded.

To the suggestion that disinfectants or a “very powerful light” might be used to treat and eradicate COVID-19, a visibly discomforted Birx took to the Fox News field to muddy the boots and defend the commander-in-chief and his distinct way of consuming information. “When he gets news information, he likes to talk that through out loud and really have that dialogue, and so that’s what dialogue I think he was having.” According to Birx, “he just saw the information at the same time immediately before the press conference and he was still digesting that information.”

Such behaviour prompted members of the Biden transition team to look at her warily. Were her services to be retained in some capacity, the new administration might be inheriting an unnecessary handicap. “Publicly,” came the unflattering assessment of public health academic Gregg Gonsalves at Yale, “she too often looked like an apologist.” It did not “bode well for confidence as a public leader when nobody knows what you stand for.”

Birx now has a different song sheet. This has entailed dumping, quite heavily, on her former employer for mishandling the pandemic. In doing so, she is hoping to iron any creases that have found their way into her image while highlighting the depravity of the administration she worked for.

On the CBS program “Face the Nation,” Birx took solid aim at the Trump White House, claiming “there were people who definitely believed this was a hoax.” This was not aided by incomplete, even chaotic messaging. “Every time a statement was made by a political leader that wasn’t consistent with public health needs, that derailed our response.” Birx was not shy in promoting her white knight credentials. “It is also why I went out on the road, because I wasn’t censored on the road.”

 

 

Her recommendations on limiting the number of people at gatherings – for instance, dining – were ignored as a matter of course. This necessitated various measures of mitigation including direct communications with state governors and local officials. Her advice on the wearing of masks was also rebuked, with preference given to regular testing overprotective face wear.

Birx does little to accept complicity in the Trump misinformation show, despite doing little, publicly, to rebuke the evolving narrative. She exudes shock and incredulity, wondering where certain sources of data on infections were being generated. “I saw the president presenting graphs that I never made.” There were those “creating a parallel set of data and graphics that were shown to the president.”

She draws on that most discredited of justifications, the I-followed-orders defence, and the claim that she “was not able to do national press.” It was essential that she not “go outside the chain of command.” Hardly words to inspire, coming from a prominent public health official.

While Birx was holding forth with her apologetics at CBS, the country’s top infectious disease expert Anthony Fauci was also doing his bit to single out the peculiarities of the Trump administration in the New York Times. This was the belated season for public health officials to return the serve. The president, recalled Fauci, attempted “to coax you and minimise” the coronavirus crisis. “It was clear that he was getting input from people who were calling him up, I don’t know who, people he knew from business, saying ‘Hey, I heard about this drug, isn’t it great? or, ‘Boy, this convalescent plasma is really phenomenal.”

While Fauci cautioned against embracing such suggestions in the absence of clinical trials and peer-reviewed findings, Trump was stubborn. “He would take just as seriously their opinion – based on no data, just anecdote – that something might really be important.”

Such revelations after the fact present troubling dilemmas. Admirable as it is for public servants to remain loyal to their briefs and employers, self-censoring and a refusal to demonstrate an ethical backbone for the public is deeply troubling. AIDS Healthcare Foundation president Michael Weinstein offers a bleak suggestion. “History will have to judge whether they enabled the president by giving him credibility based on their expertise or whether [Birx] and the others did more in helping prevent more people from being hurt by [Trump’s] craziness.”

In trying to keep a lid on disagreements within the Trump administration on how best to cope with COVID-19, we are left with the impression that expertise, for such individuals as Birx, is a consideration subordinate to political direction. If her services were to be retained by the new administration, in whatever form, officials can be assured that dissent will be severely diluted, assisted by the chain of command.

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Donate Button

 212 total views,  6 views today

6 comments

Login here Register here
  1. wam

    Well she is no prof fergusan or mark parton, who unwittingly didn’t know the WA lock out but is she really worse than fauci and the others who stood by trump as he rabbotted on??
    Is she as bad as scummo letting the virus deniers and anti-vaxxers run riot without any censure??
    Keep them both to show how trump was a bully as well as an idiot.

  2. wam

    soory, dr kampmark
    the good professor resigned when he strayed.
    oops ‘stands next to’ is what my ‘by’ meant.

  3. Michael Taylor

    wam, if you get a moment have a peek at my last comment on Kaye Lee’s “To everyone” post.

  4. Matters Not

    Re:

    left with the impression that expertise, for such individuals as Birx, is a consideration subordinate to political direction.

    Brix didn’t handle that tension as well as Fauci in my opinion but one suspects she didn’t have the same expertise muscle that Fauci had. Make no mistake there is a tension here in Australia as well. Note;

    public servants are accountable to ministers and, through them, to the Parliament

    So public servants are firstly accountable to Ministers. One wonders how many of our voting citizens knew that or even cared. And for those who think that that public servants should be driven by the public interest then you’ll be relieved because they are. But note well.

    1.3.5 Within the laws established by parliament, it is ministers who decide what is in the public interest and how it should be brought about.

    Yes it’s Ministers, here in Australia, who decide what is in the public interest. And no conflict of interest? Lol. Not sure how it works in the USA but one suspects there wouldn’t be too many differences..

    https://www.apsc.gov.au/section-1-working-government-and-parliament

  5. Michael Taylor

    MN, it was a shock to the system when I transferred from ATSIC to a mainstream department.

    At ATSIC we had the belief that we were working for Aboriginal Australians. Everything we did was an attempt to make every aspect of their life better.

    In the public service in Canberra – in my new department – I was told that we all worked for the Minister. My minister was Joe Hockey. 🤮

  6. wam

    haha michael, spot on. when I was a D3F at uni, we would play badminton and at about 11pm we would squash 6 of us into george’s small (that was also his name) ford prefect a charge off to elizabeth where we would drink. except george he was a coke addict at least 6 a day(his mum offered us a keg if we could get him on a date so we tried but his mum didn’t know none of us had been on a date so it was the blind leading the blind). We only played two albums harry belefonte at carnegie hall(1959) and return (1960) with miriam mikaba the kingston trio and a magnificent singer odetta(my darling and I met her outside the town after a concert). George would drop us off on the way to brighten where he lived and I was the last drop off at woodville west our song for the home trip was a screamingly loud tuneless, each with our own key. “In South Australia I was born, heave away, haul away In South Australia, ’round Cape Horn, we’re bound for South Australia” Just about every sat I would get home just as dad got up for work and I’d cook him eggs on toast. What memories????? I can still croak many of the songs and my kids and grandkids all loved being odetta in there’s a hole in the bucket.
    ps good game tonight to quote crocodile dundee
    these sheilas play it seriously’

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 2 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

Return to home page
%d bloggers like this: