Narendra Modi’s Cricket Coup
What a coup. Nakedly amoral but utterly self-serving in its saccharine minted glory. India’s showman Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who otherwise appears to have clerkish, desk-bound qualities, had what he wanted: an accommodating, possibly clueless guest in the form of the Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese; a common interest in India’s national sport cricket, and a show illuminating him as supreme Hindu leader presiding over a new age of politics. For Albanese, this was ill-fitting and disturbing but all in keeping with the occasion.
This month, Albanese, who has been held to the bosom of great powers of late, found himself at the mercy of cricket diplomacy at the Narendra Modi stadium in Ahmedabad. He had been placed upon an improvised golf car with Modi prior to the start of the fourth cricket test between Australia and India. But Albanese was not merely Modi’s guest; he was also appearing in a stadium named after the prime minister he was keeping company with. Modesty had been exorcised; pomp and narcissism had taken its place.
For Modi, this all meant opportunity and glory. He is the classically dangerous politician for those of the broadly described West who think they understand him. Supple, gentle, oleaginous, Modi is both unscrupulous and prone to wooing. And Albanese was there to keep him company. The teams of two great cricket nations were effectively shoehorned into the show, with Modi and Albanese giving the captains of their respective countries their caps before the game’s commencement.
The nexus of power in world cricket – and its link Modi – was also affirmed by the presence of officials from the enormously powerful Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI). They were on hand to give Modi that most vulgar of gifts: a gaudily framed photo of himself.
The scenes should have made Albanese feel uncomfortable. While Australian officials, business types and opportunists dream of market opportunities in India, it is also worth appreciating what Modi is. This is only relevant given the mighty, moral bent Canberra takes on such matters: the Chinese and Russians are seen as barbarians hammering away at the rules-based order and shredding human rights – or some such – and there lies India, promising, vast and nominally democratic.
Things, however, are not well in the world’s largest democracy. Only in February, the BBC offices in Delhi and Mumbai were paid a less than friendly visit from tax officials intent on conducting a “survey”. This came just weeks after the organisation’s release of a documentary that shone a light less than rosy upon the dear leader.
For all this, Australian governments can hardly complain: the Australian Federal Police engaged in similar acts against the national broadcaster in June 2019, and even went so far as to suggest that two journalists from the Australian Broadcasting Corporation might be prosecuted for national security violations.
Modi also had a superb distraction to be used against the Australian PM. He could chide his guest and prod him about what was happening regarding recent acts of vandalism against Hindu temples in Melbourne. “It is a matter of regret that attacks on temples have been regularly reported in Australia over the last few weeks.”
These have primarily featured slogans of support for the pro-Khalistan Sikh separatist movement. The wall of the ISKCON temple located in the suburb of Albert Park, for instance, featured the words “Khalistan Zindabad (Long Live the Sikh Homeland)”, “Hindustan Murdabad (Down with India)”, and “Sant Bhindranwale is martyred”. Another incident at Carrum Downs featured, according to Victorian Police, damage that “included graffiti slogans of what appear to be [of] a political nature.”
Albanese, caught up in the role of being the good guest, could only say that such acts had “no place in Australia. And we will take every action through our police and also our security agencies to make sure that anyone responsible for this faces the full force of the law. We’re a tolerant multicultural nation, and there is no place in Australia for this activity.”
In India, on the other hand, there is more than enough space for intolerance when PM Modi and the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) authorities egg it on. The rights of Muslims, for instance, have been curtailed by the Citizenship Amendment Act, an instrument that enables non-Muslim communities originally from Pakistan, Bangladesh or Afghanistan to apply for Indian citizenship if they had arrived in India prior to December 31, 2014.
Violence against Muslims and Islamophobic statements from officials has also become more common, with India’s Supreme Court warning that mob attacks risked being normalised in the current environment.
None of this came up in the Modi-Albanese discussions. Nor did the conduct of India’s premier port-to-power conglomerate, the Adani Group, which has extensive mining, rail and port interests in Australia. To add to its inglorious environmental report card, Adani was found by the activist short-seller Hindenburg Research earlier this year to be allegedly responsible for accountancy fraud and stock manipulation. To keep that off the agenda was yet another mighty coup for the Indian leader.
Like what we do at The AIMN?
You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.
Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!
Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.
You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969
5 commentsLogin here Register here
Christians get persecuted too. In fact any non-Hindu is fair game. Not to mention any woman.
In addition, Albanese could have said “Puneet Puneet” to Modi. To non-Melbournians that might not mean anything. A random Google search gives this by way of explanation https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theage.com.au/national/victoria/hit-run-driver-puneet-puneet-granted-bail-in-india-20220718-p5b2kn.html
It all just goes to show how hypocritical we are as regards India vs China
Very informative, thank you.
Cricket was just the sideshow for Modi. More importantly, he watched Albanese tear up Australian qualifications standards, just to ice the cake of Albanese’s insane immigration drive. Whose target nations are India 1, China 2.
Just think for a moment – is this in Australia or India’s interest? Correct, it’s all downside for Australian voters.
I don’t know if Albanese has much time for reading or has been briefed on India’s special trade relationships, but here’s a clue: BRICS – Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa. Driving around a cricket oval in a paper mache cart with shonk Modi, what does he hope to achieve? Stephen S, as for the ‘insane immigration drive’, in Labors eyes, that is for the good for putting more stress on the rental market and helping out Harvey Norman sales and Uni enrolments etc. No wonder inflation is ripping.
BRICS formed in the first decade of 21st century is a trade bloc formed on tenuous footings. Whilst at the time it filled a void and a need in the rapidly changing security relationships within the ‘globalisation’ spread, the ability to effectively operate would always be hampered by the disparate forms and exercise of politics of its members. It has been said that it could be seen as a toe-hold for disruption and an alternative to the prevailing (USD-based) world order of financial exchange. Since its inception it has done little except hold a few summits, form the New Development Bank, which has also done little but establish itself bureaucratically and institutionally. It would appear that its tenuous footings along with the last 5-10 years of rapid political changes and changes in the geopolitical and economic landscape and not least, Xi’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) have rendered BRICS’ future somewhat ambiguous and uncertain.
Nevertheless, the QUAD in its reiteration and close affiliation with ASEAN can be seen as more relevant today, and perhaps, a ‘belts and braces’ effort to balance the BRI (especially the ‘Maritime Silk Road’) and in light of the Russia / Ukraine situation, and the precursor events in South Asia and Middle East.
To me it appears logical and essential that Albanese visit Modi (pertaining mainly to the QUAD and other sideline Oz trade interests) before then moving on to San Diego and the joint AUKUS submarines announcement.
In a decade or so, India’s population will exceed that of China. There is much to dislike about Modi’s BJP and its m.o., not to forget its relations with the Adani Group, but India remains a critical hinge in the operation of the hinges facilitating rise out of global stagnation and the pressing necessity of decarbonisation transformation.
It all seems part of a rapid rush to form appropriate and functional blocs necessary to achieve that global transformation and maintain at least a detente whilst doing so.