Malcolm’s Bitter Harvest
By Ad astra
It would be trite to begin with the platitude: You reap what you sow. To Malcolm Turnbull though, that cliché must have an ominous ring about it as he reflects on his past. To what extent has he brought upon himself the political troubles that afflict him now?
His career was illustrious before he entered federal politics, but once inside the rabbit fence the rules changed and so did he.
Brought up by his father, he had a sound education at Sydney Grammar School and the University of Sydney, from which he graduated in Arts and Law, and on a Rhodes Scholarship at Oxford he took a degree in Civil Law.
He is remembered as an adventurous barrister defending Kerry Packer against the ‘Goanna’ allegations made by the Costigan Commission, and is famous for his success in the ‘Spycatcher case’ when he took on and defeated the UK government, which was trying to suppress the publication of the book of the same name by Peter Wright, a former MI5 official.
He tried his hand at journalism, moved into merchant banking and became managing director and later a partner at Goldman Sachs. Subsequently he showed his entrepreneurship and technical skills when he oversaw the expansion of Internet Service Provider OzEmail, which he later sold for $60 million. He was Chairman of the Australian Republican Movement, and entered federal politics in 2004.
Even his opponents acknowledge his intelligence, his enterprise, and his substantial achievements. So how has it come to this?
This week, Bernard Keane began an article in Crikey: The Abbott legacy: Turnbull heads for the worst of both worlds with: “
The political chattering class owes the people of Australian an apology. Nearly all of us, to a woman, were badly off-beam about the transformation of Australian politics last September. We were overcome with a sense of relief that the chaos and debacle of the Abbott era was over…
“Enter Malcolm Turnbull. Turnbull the adult, Turnbull the brilliant communicator, a changed Turnbull who had learnt his lessons from 2009 and would now lead a rational, mature, consultative government. He promised to give us a genuinely Liberal government, in contrast to the reactionary rabble he had just ousted, and he promised reform via an intelligent conversation with the electorate. The years of destructive, negative politics from Abbott, the years of internecine squabbling from Labor, were at long last over.
“For a while it seemed to work. Turnbull was charming and, yes, Prime Ministerial. He refused to rule out reform options, insisting he was going to change politics by refusing to play those sort of petty games…
“Then it went wrong. Turnbull’s government is adrift, there’s open warfare within it…the much-vaunted tax reform package will be barely worth the term ‘minimalist’, with almost every worthwhile tax reform now ruled out because of backbench pressure, the desire to run an uncluttered scare campaign…
“What we missed in the relief rally that accompanied Turnbull’s ascension was that merely because there was a new prime minister, that didn’t mean the underlying causes that drove Australian politics into the ground in the first place had vanished. They were still there, and still capable of damaging politics and policy.”
Many of us, while enjoying the prospect of a more progressive prime minister to replace the reactionary conservative Abbott, had our reservations.
Puff the Magic Malcolm published on 18 February on The Political Sword, began with an initial optimistic paragraph that ended: “Most important though was his stated vision for this nation: it was upbeat, forward-looking, encouraging and exciting…” But the second and third paragraphs read: “
Those of us who have followed politics for many years had reservations though. We remembered how after his rather brutal takeover from Brendan Nelson to become Leader of the Opposition in 2008, he offered much promise to his party and to the electorate. Many applauded particularly his enlightened views on global warming and his collaboration with Kevin Rudd to mitigate it. But after a promising start, an ill-considered instance of over-reach brought him undone. Failing to do the due diligence required of an accomplished barrister, a disturbed Liberal mole in Treasury, Godwin Grech, led him up the garden path with a fake email. He remained there, stranded and exposed as one too obsessed with bringing down a prime minister and his treasurer. ‘Utegate’ uncovered a fatal flaw in Turnbull’s personality. He did not recover fully until he removed Abbott in September last year.
“But everyone knows that to garner the votes he needed to replace the unpopular Abbott, he had to compromise many of his beliefs and principles. Just how many, and to what extent, we would soon discover.”
Turnbull has sown the seeds of his own decline, and possibly his own destruction.
He took on the leadership with some cherished principles and beliefs:
- the need for action on global warming
- the need for marriage equality
- the need to move to a republic
- the importance of the Gonski school reforms
- the need for superfast broadband for all
- a cities policy with emphasis on public transport
- the need for sound economic management (which he believed his predecessor lacked).
One by one he has diluted or abandoned each of these:
Far from his support for an emissions trading scheme in the Rudd era, and his sarcasm about the Coalition’s Direct Action Plan, which he described as a ‘fig leaf’ for doing nothing, on becoming PM he immediately endorsed it, took it to Paris, and left us looking dangerously inattentive to climate change in the eyes of the world. And recently he has done nothing about the decision of Larry Marshall, chief executive of CSIRO to slash 110 positions in the Oceans and Atmosphere division, effect a similarly sharp reduction in the Land and Water division, and reorient climate change activities. Overseas climate scientists are alarmed that they will lose an important data-gathering source. Turnbull has been unmoved.
His support for marriage equality has been seriously diluted by his acceptance of the Abbott delaying tactic of a plebiscite after the election at a wasteful cost of $160 million. In similar vein, his support for the ‘Safe Schools’ program that supports gender diversity and counters bullying of LGBTI children, has been diluted by his authorization of an ‘investigation’ into it. In both these instances, the hard right conservatives and the Australian Christian Lobby have been let loose with their divisive propaganda.
His reaction to the revisiting of the Gonski reforms was unenthusiastic. He allowed the same old negative rhetoric of the Abbott/Pyne era to resurface, thereby giving it credence: “You can’t fix the school curriculum by throwing money at it. No alternative was offered, with or without money.
His management of the NBN after Abbott ordered him years ago ‘to demolish it’ has been no better than Labor’s, which he ridiculed in such derogatory terms. It is still far behind schedule, costs are rising inexorably and will likely exceed the cost of Labor’s NBN, and the technology is antiquated.
His cities policy and his advocacy for public transport seem to have taken a back seat. Big promises; little achieved.
And as for the superior economic leadership and fiscal management that he insisted was needed after what Abbott gave us, it has all but evaporated. After hand-on-heart promises of comprehensive tax reform and attention to industrial relations, we are now facing a desolate scene as the fiscally inexperienced Morrison struggles to formulate his May Budget with virtually all his options propelled by a fractious Abbott-led backbench into the too-hard basket.
How has this all come about?
The answer is straightforward. Abbott and his henchmen, some of whom sit on the backbench, have made almost impossible every move Turnbull wanted to make.
The hard right reactionaries, supported by the coal lobby, have made action on global warming dangerously difficult.
The same neo-conservatives, aided and abetted by the ACL, have got their teeth into the sexual equality and Safe Schools debates, and have already debased them.
The Gonski reforms sit on the shelf, opposed by the Abbott conservatives who do not believe in equal opportunity for good schooling irrespective of postcode, income and ethnicity. How many of these are themselves recipients of private education, who believe in ‘user pays’? If you can’t pay, too bad!
The NBN will remain second rate because of the mixed technology and copper wire connections to the premises. Why the LNP does not warmly embrace FTTP technology, so essential for a first world economy and competiveness, seems mysterious until one recognizes that the FTTP NBN was a Labor initiative, and therefore must be denigrated and despoiled by the LNP.
Behind all this opposition is an Abbott-led Fifth Column of reactionaries, who still bridle at what happened to their man. It is determined to show us that they were absolutely right when in power. Abbott announced last week in Japan that he wears his 2014 Budget as a badge of honour. At the weekly party meeting he again called for spending cuts, particularly to welfare, and tax cuts, which will benefit mainly the wealthy.
Abbott has another objective: to upend and replace PM Turnbull. Anyone who doubts this has a faulty memory for Abbott’s characteristics. He has always been a poor loser way back to his student days. He is a bare-knuckle street fighter who never gives up his quest to destroy his enemies – destroy, not simply defeat. Turnbull is his enemy, notwithstanding Abbott’s vow to do all he can to have the Turnbull government re-elected. This is another of his lying utterances, like his promise that there will be no wrecking, no undermining and no sniping. Now all of these are happening! His erroneous comments about the delay to the purchase of submarines were an overt attempt at wrecking and undermining.
There is now talk of the ‘Second Abbott government’. Already he is out and about with another set of slogans he believes will win government: He has condensed Labor’s election promises to a threat of: ‘five new taxes’ a housing tax (negative gearing), a wealth tax (capital gains), a seniors tax (superannuation), a workers tax (smokers), and the carbon tax. It is vintage scaremongering Abbott, but his behaviour is infuriating his colleagues. He has declared open war on Turnbull.
So has Malcolm sown the seeds of the harvest he is now reaping?
Yes. His bitter harvest is the direct result of his willingness to sacrifice so many of his sacred principles and policies in order to scavenge the votes he needed for leadership.
He put his longstanding ambition to be prime minister ahead of his deeply held values and principles. He ought to have known that the Shylocks who extracted that price are ruthless operatives for whom power is all that matters. They will never give up. They are determined reactionaries, hell-bent on upholding their ultra-conservative beliefs at all costs. Indeed, some believe it would be better to lose the election in order to cleanse the LNP of the moderate elements and restore and protect conservative values. To them, that is of supreme importance.
We should not be surprised at their destructive behaviour. They will not change; they cannot. They will fight to the bitter end in what is now clearly a life and death struggle between Turnbull and his moderates and the Abbott-led extreme right wing reactionaries. Abbott told us often that the LNP is not Labor. He was right. The LNP is now set upon a course even more self-destructive than that of Labor.
Malcolm’s Bitter Harvest is upon him. He has reaped what he sowed.
This article was originally published on The Political Sword.
Also by Ad astra:
The Peta Principle – how Abbott rose to the level of his incompetence
Safe Schools, Unsafe Politicians
This article was originally published on The Political Sword
For Facebook users, The Political Sword has a Facebook page:
Putting politicians and commentators to the verbal sword
Like what we do at The AIMN?
You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.
Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!
13 comments
Login here Register hereMal has been at this harvest quite a while. Even though the author of this old article gets it wrong about Turnbull’s leadership, it’s interesting to read it along side this current article.
https://theaimn.com/malcolm-turnbull-in-a-muddle/
I reckon LNP types must secretly hate that Google exists.
Malcolm has clarified one thing for me; the blemish of Godwin Grech/Utegate was not just an abberration, a passing blemish, those misdeeds were a forewarning of the real Malcolm Turnbull.
Thank you so much. Being unable to access articles behind paywalls I appreciate your writing.
It is indeed a bitter pill that he swallowed yet it is us who will need a doctor. Not them.
As we heard in Insiders this morning, we have a government that is announcing to all the world, they have no ideas of what to do.
Half way through March, still can’t say when the budget will be, let alone the policies it will be based on.
“Puff the magic Malcolm” being taken down by the Rabid Rabbott. May it continue until election day.
Brilliant article thanks
If turdbullshitartist had any brains at all, he would resign as leader immediately, not seek re-election whenever it is called, and let the Australian people make our own decision on what We the Voter are fully aware of as being the real State of the Nation. He can watch from the Caymans if he really cares at all.
The mad monk seems to have more rattle in his sabre than anyone else to the speakers right, and is far more willing to play by the ipa rules. Heaven help us if the lnp and the fat pig get back in.
Or maybe it will be a case of Heaven help THEM, because the more people I speak to, the more I hear from people who don’t care about themselves, but are not prepared to just give it all up because their kids and grand kids deserve better than we are getting at the moment. From either major party.
And no mention of the Cashless Welfare Card and what that will do, not only to people on welfare, but to many small businesses who are not going to be able to access its operation. The lies and deceipt around this are another issue that will end up in the Human Rights Court, and, once again Australia’s name is dragged through the mud. Shameful, and totally discriminatory behaviour towards one whole level of society!
Folks
I thank you all for your comments.
I was fascinated ‘Vote Labor’ to read ‘Malcolm Turnbull in a muddle’. What a prescient piece that was. Even then, the author, Dan Rowden, was aware of the dilemma Turnbull faced as he tried to reconcile his cherished beliefs with the demands of the conservative right in his party that demanded he adopt their beliefs. He was conflicted then, and is even more so now.
He has achieved his longstanding aim to be PM, but as ‘Malcolm’s Bitter Harvest’ shows, he has had to abandon his beliefs to gain and retain power. We see the conflict day after day; we sense his discomfiture and witness the confusion and indecision it leaves in its wake. It is an awful situation for Turnbull, but it is the nation that suffers while he dilly-dallies. Shades of fiddling while Rome burns…
I dub thee Malcolm Grech! https://pazzoredento.wordpress.com/2016/03/10/climate-change-remains-the-same/#more-10
I loved the article,but I am nonplussed by the comments re his so called long held belief in any good for all policy.I have never ever think he ever stated any publicly.I allways doubted any “Good Policy ” statements made by him.Merchant banker with a heart?? I don’t think so.
Now politician,less so.M F.
Max Gross
Nice label. He will not live down that error of judgement.
michaelattoowoomba
Pleasant place Toowoomba: lived there for a while as a kid.
Of course, you are right. Malcolm’s good policy seems to have remained at a conceptual level. Implementation is his enduring problem, which we see writ large day after day.