Capitalism is doomed to collapse unless it learns…

In preparation for the election, the Coalition have reverted to their safe…

Australia, we need to have an urgent chat…

We live in a time where often it’s only a handful of…

Day to Day Politics: Pardon my cynicism

Friday 27 2018The Government would have us believe the economy is in such…

Day to Day Politics: Who will win the…

Thursday 26 April 2018It’s only as we come closer to a pending…

The capitalism beast beneath the bed

One of my daughter’s favourite bedtime stories is The Beast Beneath the…

Plunder Down Under: The Rot in Australia’s Financial…

It has all the elements of a crudely crafted if effective tale:…

Small government, like communism, might sound like a…

Deregulation, self-regulation, red tape, green tape, nanny state, small government, privatisation, asset…

Day to Day Politics

Wednesday 25 April 2018ANZAC REFLECTIONDeath abides Love hides Goodness vanishes Suffering manifests Truth a causality Faith is…

«
»
Facebook

Investigating the Banks: A Royal Commission in Australia

On Collins Street, Melbourne lies a monument that acts as a gloriously loud remark about how banks are treated in Australia. The ANZ Gothic Bank, studded with stain glass windows, and equipped with a chapel for bankers is a secular tribute to capitalism. It sprung up as a result of discovering gold and remains a shrine to Australian materialism.

Despite historical disasters, appalling decisions punctuated by periods of prosperity, the Australian banking sector has become smug, self-serving and automatically exploitative. It abounds in assumptions of self-superiority and global majesty.

It is also highly oligopolistic, a culture that encourages manipulation of lending standards, the bank bill swap rate and the forging of loan documentation. “The share of banking assets owned by the four largest banks in Australia,” observed the Financial System Inquiry in December 2014, “is higher than equivalent shares in most other jurisdictions.”

Smaller lending institutions and non-bank lenders have made the understandable point that such concentration frustrates competition. Not so for Australia’s Big Four, who insist without irony their presence guarantees competition, keeping low net interest margins and supplying good equity returns.

When grand public announcements are made by industry representatives, customers are meant to bow in appreciation. The recent move by the Commonwealth bank to abolish withdrawal fees from ATMs was trumpeted as a boon for customers. It was badged as a noble, kind gesture when it was merely a statement about the greater user use of online banking and relentless march to the moneyless economy.

While the Australian banker is deemed a sacred cow by captains of industry, valuable for the shareholder despite spiting the customer, the same cannot be said for a good stretch of the country whose citizens see banks as unaccountable providers of dubious services.

Suspicions abound that the Australian public is being hoodwinked even as the money pours in and profits soar. Australian banks alone have paid out over $1 billion in compensation and fines to clients in the last decade, and know that they are facing a corporate regulator with more bark than bite.

Spectacular individual instances also abound, including the Commonwealth Bank of Australia’s 55,000 breaches of terrorism financing and money laundering regulations. These are just a few instances of transgression. The list of banking improprieties compiled by former Deutsche Bank analyst Mike Mangan provides a grim buffet to pick from the last decade.

Such suspicions, and dismay, were simply too much for some members of the Turnbull government. While the cabinet resisted the grumbles from all sides of politics, various bank benchers were insistent. While the government did give some ground, hauling banking representatives before parliamentary committees and promising a future complaints process for the aggrieved, the calls refused to die down. An inquiry with sufficient powers was needed.

Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull duly relented. “Government policy,” he weakly stated, “remains the same until it is changed.” For Turnbull, the decision had been grudgingly taken to launch a Royal Commission. “While we regret the necessity of the decision, we have taken it in the national economic interest.”

The effort to immunise banks from inquiry is unrelenting. Even after the announcement of a royal commission, pundits in the banking industry and political supporters feel that business will suffer. Don’t touch the banks – that way lies doom. Former Australian prime minister John Howard had claimed, in rather novel fashion, that such an inquiry would amount to “rank socialism”. “Our banks demonstrated in 2009 that they were among the best-run, the most prudentially supervised, and the most well-capitalised in the world.”

What, then, would Howard’s view be on the policies of various governments after 2008 to essentially socialise banks in order to save them?  Australian banks, by way of example, received $120 billion in tax payer funds to assist refinancing international loans with an ongoing guarantee from the then Rudd government that they could continue borrowing using the AAA credit rating of the Commonwealth. A deposit guarantee remains in place, initially peaking at $1 million, and now coming in at a quarter of a million.

The thrust of such thinking is simple. To merely think of questioning the sanctity of banking is to undermine it. Let them, it seems, pay out outrageous bonuses and seek protection and subsidies from governments when things go belly up.

The pertinent question to ask here is how far a royal commission will actually go to affect change. Turnbull has reiterated that he has no intention of putting capitalism in the dock. The very act of announcing this inquiry guarantees that he can, at the very least, manage it, including the terms of reference.

The government, for one, has appointed former High Court Judge Kenneth Hayne, hardly a rabblerouser of note and likely to be unadventurous in his digging. “He is renowned,” went a joint government media release, “for his brilliant mind, his forensic skill, and his deep sense of justice.” Whether this translates into feasible and constructive findings will preoccupy the sceptics and detractors till 2019.


13 comments

  1. Robert REYNOLDS

    So, former Australian Prime Minister John Howard claims that to have a Royal Commission into the banks would amount to “rank socialism”.

    I wonder then, what he would make of my proposal that these rapacious and greed driven organizations should be nationalized rather than merely subjected to an investigation?

  2. Freethinker

    That would be pure Communism Robert, a evil ideology that will make the Cuban government proud.
    What next? keep our money under the bed and our children indoors?

  3. babyjewels10

    Has anybody been charged with these 55,000 breaches of terrorism financing and money laundering regulations? What does it take?

  4. Robert REYNOLDS

    Ahhh, hmmm, on balance Freethinker, I would much prefer to have what little money I have deposited with a state run bank rather than with the privately owned banks that are run by current collection of robber barons.

    In addition,I think that our children might be better off at good state run and fully financed schools, than either keeping them indoors or at the quasi privately run schools that we have now. Some of these educational institutions that we send our children to seem to think it necessary to have a ‘business model’. Where does this free-market madness end?

  5. Freethinker

    Sadly, Robert we re in the minority, not only in Australia but in the world.

  6. Robert REYNOLDS

    Very true, Freethinker, very true – at the moment. But I have a feeling that things are changing, albeit slowly and belatedly. What will speed the rate of this change up will be a further deterioration in the state of capitalism. The evidence that I have for thinking this way is the rise in influence of politicians who proclaim to be openly socialist such as Bernie Sanders in America and Jeremy Corbyn in England. Whilst I do not necessarily agree with everything that these gentlemen say, I do nevertheless think that their increasing influence is a definite move in the right direction.

    I also feel that you, like me, fully realized that this hideous experiment with free-market economics was bound to fail from its inception. Hopefully, a fully fledged socialist/communist./Marxist movement will rise out to the ashes and on this occasion will be more democratic and perhaps less nationalistic than it was in its last incarnation. (One can only live in hope.)

  7. Jamesss

    I suggest a look at the 4 major banks exposure to derivatives. At the time of the GFC amounting to 14 billion, now to 2017 36 billion. Guess who will get them out of that mess? Bail in. Give their buildings to the homeless and jail them all.

  8. Robert REYNOLDS

    Can you please provide a source for those figures on the derivatives, James?

  9. Jamesss

    Robert, cecaust.com.au. It seems I mislead you it’s trillion.

  10. Robert REYNOLDS

    Jamesss, when I click on that link all I receive is:

    Bad Request – Invalid Hostname

  11. Robert REYNOLDS

    Great! Thanks for the link Freethinker. It works.

  12. stephengb2014

    The CBA was a state bank up to 1983, thank you Hawke and Keating for ushering the neoliberal era.
    Privatisation is a fundamental policy of neoliberalism, as is the destruction of unionism. Private education is also aart of the mix, in particular the education about citalism free markets etc to the exclusion of any other ideologue.

    S G B

Leave a Reply

Return to home page
Scroll Up
%d bloggers like this: