We must speak to people who require assistance and listen to their needs instead of speaking over them. In the case of Australia’s refugee policy, we wasted billions on toxic cruelty when we could have done much better by cooperating internationally and supporting people humanely.
One of the “greatest pre-resettlement programs in the world” for refugees began with “$200 and 50kg of books.”
That mantra neglects the key to the plan to educate refugee children stuck in limbo, of course, by focussing on the minimal outside support that enabled the endeavour. The driving force to educate refugee children came from the countless hours and endless energy dedicated by people trapped in refugee status themselves.
By labelling people refugees – or asylum seekers – in public discourse, we strip them of the hopes and dreams, the histories and experience, that make up the individual. Instead we impose upon them a permanent collective identity.
The politics made of the labels “refugee” and “asylum seekers” since the John Howard years in Australia have made for poisonous strategies to shape public discourse and venomous public policy that has wasted years and broken lives.
It has also cost us billions of dollars, this bigoted fearmongering generated by ambitious politicians and their strategist friends. The Refugee Council of Australia has calculated that from 2013 to 2022 alone, Coalition governments have spent $9.65 billion dollars on such policies. Australian governments have granted these billions to companies registered to a beach shack on Kangaroo Island; to donors with a company worth $8 dollars; to contractors suspected of drug smuggling and weapons trafficking; to corrupt foreign businessmen; to corrupt governments in Papua New Guinea and Nauru; even to people smugglers.
The result has been devastating harm: children dying of Resignation Syndrome as Peter Dutton’s Home Affairs fought their evacuation from Nauru, suicides, murder and abuse, not to mention families destroyed by long separation.
By contrast, the 5 learning centres currently educating 1200 refugee children in Indonesia continue to operate without government support. Thousands of children have been through these centres, and almost all have gone on to age-appropriate schooling levels on arrival in the new homes. Those children, displaced by war and genocidal armies, are now studying at university and committed to contributing to their beloved safe-haven homes.
In 2014, then immigration minister Scott Morrison said, in Holocaust-evoking dehumanisation, that Australia would stop taking refugees from Indonesia to take “the sugar off the table,” as if these people were insects. The decree that families would be trapped with glacial processing to places like Canada or Germany in – perhaps – a decade compounded the deep despair that pervaded the scared and isolated people trapped in Cisarua near Jakarta, desperate for a future that would save them from Taliban genocide.
The chance meeting of one of the most energised figures there, photographer Muzafar Ali, with an Australian documentary-maker, Jolyon Hoff, enabled the leasing of a two-room house that became the first learning centre that aimed not just to occupy children trapped in lodgings with increasingly despairing parents, but to prepare them for schooling in English-speaking countries.
Volunteer management and teachers took on the task of educating the community’s children, whether Hazara like the organising group or from other ethnicities finding a staging post in the town. These places became community hubs, teaching language and skills to parents as well as children, fostering hope.
The energy and excitement in the schools have always been palpable. The education now stretches from pre-school to GED qualifications which earn tertiary access. There are a karate club and futsal teams to promote physical health, sport enjoyment and confidence. The girls alone boast 10 futsal teams and ever more impressive skills.
The teachers too have gone on to grand achievements. University degrees including in teaching number amongst the opportunities embraced by these impressive figures in their resettled homes. Anyone who has worked to learn a foreign language, with a non-alphabet script, will grasp the scope of the effort required to gain university qualifications in it.
Muzafar and Jolyon made an exceptional documentary called The Staging Post around the initial project. Last year they released a second documentary recounting Muzafar’s efforts to find the legacy of the Afghan camel-men, who were central to Australian settlement. Now they are working to begin a sequel to The Staging Post where they plan to highlight the achievements of the people who have emerged from the Learning Centre project.
Meanwhile Clare O’Neil’s Home Affairs is only beginning to reckon with the harm done to the Australian record and budget by Scott Morrison, Peter Dutton and Michael Pezzullo, their chief public servant, recently removed in disgrace.
Australians ought to be angry, not only about the vast quantity of taxpayer money that should have been much better spent. We ought to be angry that enterprising people who could, with a little support, have achieved great accomplishments enabling a better future for them and the countries that would host them.
Above all, we ought to angry and ashamed at the harm done to people who fled persecution, genocide and oppression. Australia has been asked to host very few of the world’s displaced. Our response has been driven by populist politics of bigotry and grievance. We have a few young men remaining in PNG in 2024 from our Manus Island concentration camp, many of whom are barely functioning after years of Australian cruelty and Kafkaesque bureaucratic torment. What would these young men have become with just a little support instead of (expensive) torture?
Australians are beginning to learn what it means to be displaced by crises as the climate catastrophe displays that it is already underway.
We need to be taking lessons from the Cisarua project for Australians here as well as for the small percentage of the world’s displaced that have asked Australia for a safe future.
We must speak to the people who require assistance and listen to their needs instead of speaking over them. In the case of Australia’s refugee policy, we wasted billions on toxic cruelty when we could have done much better in ways that cooperated internationally and supported people humanely.
We must also steer clear of the disaster capitalists who would profit from every one of our catastrophes, with bonuses, growth, and profits as their goals, and apparently no care for their responsibility to the survivor or the taxpayer.
This essay was first published in Pearls and Irritations as A little support instead of billions on toxic cruelty
[textblock style=”7″]
Like what we do at The AIMN?
You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.
Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!
Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.
You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969
[/textblock]
An illuminating essay, Lucy. I truly believe that your willingness to speak truth to evil is profound and courageous, and I salute you for your endeavours.
The amount of money you quote, $9.65 billion dollars, spent by coalition governments on manifest cruelty and inhumanity against people fleeing intolerable circumstances in and of itself ought to be sufficient reason to never ever again allow these people to occupy the green benches of Canberra’s Parliament House. Their Goebbellian adoption of propagandist rhetoric: ‘We are the best economic managers’, ‘these boat people are a threat to Australian society’, ‘it is necessary to confine these people to offshore detention camps’, and much more along similar lines would have had the chief propagandist for the Nazi Party applauding their efforts and considering them worthy heirs of his approach to mastering the narrative.
The putative corruption and fiscal irresponsibility you cite per money splashed around like confetti at an Italian wedding to drug smugglers, weapons traffickers, shonky businessmen, corrupt politicians, people smugglers and worthless & assetless shell companies could and perhaps should be the subject of a Royal Commission into just how manifestly unsuitable these LNP people were to be in charge of the Treasury and spending programs. The scandalous spend in institutionalising human misery and its consequences is beyond appalling.
As if all of that wasn’t bad enough, within the halls of government and bureaucracy, as we’ve now seen, we had the likes of Machiavellian Mike, the scheming and empire-building puppeteer ever willing to institute programs noted for their cruelty and inhumanity… this conscienceless architect trousering close to $1M per year as a payoff for his Faustian pact with the LNP devils; Morrison and Dutton in particular, with the former perhaps the more egregiously bad player given his constant hypocritical bible-thumping and proclamations of Christian faith.
It’s like a fever dream, these years of LNP rule that has seen this country take a deep slide down the slope in terms of loss of goodness, humanity, willingness to accept and lend helping hands to those in need. The repair will be long and arduous, and will require faith and trust in Albanese’s skills and capacity to rebuild social cohesion and institute programs that benefit all.
all this tells us is how the Liberals will spend whatever money they need to stay in government. Pet projects that add votes are always easily funded. Doing the actual work to make our country function is not in their manifesto.
Dutton’s latest mutterings only prove my point.
Very well said, Lucy.
In the face of increasing suppression of the civic voice, and protest become a jailable offence, who do we rely on to bring these lying, deceiving, cruel and corrupt politicians to account?
The parliament, the NACC, UN, ICJ, ICC? Apparently not.
It seems these days that, at least in Oz, politics has been made the zone of exceptionalism, an interdiction / prosecution free zone.
They say they are apprehensive of insurrection, yet their designs from within their ivory tower sieges seem to be the main thing facilitating their fears.
Too easy, become a lazy ‘low info’ nation, distasteful and spineless how many Australians are encouraged to take ’empathy bypasses’ towards humanity for reasons or needs of border security, immigration restrictions, virtual NOM border wall (net OS migration/ temporary border movements), population control, electoral & FIRE (finance, insurance & real estate) PR.
Presently RW MSM and too many high profile finance analysts are glibly citing high ‘immigration’ and population growth for a housing crisis, and blaming international students & ALP govt. without analysis; suggests they learnt nothing about data or numbers at university, though it’s their occupation (grossly uninformed heuristic shortcuts masking nativist sentiments)
No coincidence right now the same tactics are being used by RW MSM in US on border and UK on Channel crossings & NOM, to deflect from other inconvenient but more important issues.
Informed by and related to the old fossil fueled ZPG anti-refugee and eugenics movement from 18thC, but more rebranded post WWII and locally (‘Tanton Network’), they inc. refugees etc. become proxies for a post 1970s white Australia policy…. to keep existential threat alive and the FOMO fear of missing out on housing etc. for working age.
When is someone going to give that retired Conservative Senator Bob Carr and SPA patron a heads up, presenting the same ‘talking points’ on right wing media inc. Sky News? Focus on ‘other’ temporary residents described as ‘immigrants’ but ignores the permanent population, 5 million ppl to pop their clogs over two decades, so this ‘non problem’ is solved? Doesn’t say much about Australians’ ability at basic maths & science….
Andrew Smith says it well and it is also discussed elsewhere, the inability of humans, particularly comfortable ones, to get away from self to at least a bit of concern for the “other”
Applies to us also, as we sit down and watch Gaza on TV while stuffing ourselves with Pizza.
Can the species evolve to some sort of more intelligent and compassionate whilst not losing the fright or flight instincts us that have us, rightly, evolving thru basic self concern?”