A Matter of Fifty Degrees: Climate Change in…

A country baked to the core, its citizens roasted, an electricity grid…

Day to Day Politics: I think Turnbull has…

Saturday 21 October 2017 1 There are times in political life when an…

Ends And Means - Or Why The Right…

Ok, let's read Neil Cadman's ad a little more closely here: Mm, as…

Replacing Neoliberalism: A model for the future

Neoliberalism is in its death throes around the world. In the United States…

The Trans-Tasman Spat Show: New Zealand-Australian Tensions

It was an awkward moment for Australia’s foreign minister, Julie Bishop. News…

Day to Day Politics: Dutton still doing it.

Friday 20 October 2017 On 19 October 2016 I wrote the following: The Prime…

Amy Ewins - Remembering my dearest Mum -…

22nd January 1939 – 14th October 2017 ; 78 years old Remembrances by…

The Opium of the People and the Addiction…

By Terence Mills Several years ago a friend who gambles regularly mentioned to…

«
»
Facebook

The Genuine Article in Australian Politics

He was there with his entourage, a face unmoved bar the occasional muscle flex. “There’s Malcolm Turnbull!” exclaimed drinking companions at the Curtin on Melbourne’s famed Lygon Street, the artery of culinary matters Italian.

It wasn’t: Bill Shorten, the leader of the Australian Labor Party and contender for the Prime Ministership of Australia, was nursing a drink this Friday evening, treating it with the sort of caution one reserves for a lice infested child.

Various appellations and amalgams come to mind: Malcolm Shorten; Bill Malcolm; Malcolm Bill. Leaving aside the statistical dimension of who is the preferred person for prime minister, a poll that Shorten tends to lose, their similarity on much ground is stunning. Bill goes for the poor zinger-heavy speech; Malcolm goes for the fluffy slogan (growth, jobs) and the hunt for the tedious moniker to give his opponents. Substance is only optional.

Who, then, to turn to? Between the union machine hack and the uninspiring sloganeering merchant banker, Australian politics is suffering a death by boredom, the stifling middle belt that resists radical reform. The stage, then, is set for the next spectacular – this, after all, is the age of Donald Trump, where the absurd is scripted as a daily show.

The mad monk comes to mind, so mad he turns Australian politics inside out with an extreme touch, simple yet purely animal. That mad monk, the fab loon, the reactionary: Tony Abbott. There are others, the sort who infuriate, and trick, the spin doctor and the public relations entourage who distort and cloak. Their version of democracy is the controlled press statement, damage control and staged popularity. But former prime minister Abbott was always impossible to muzzle, allergic to modern forms of containment. Before Trump-Bannon, there was Abbott-Credlin.

If Australian forces would have to go it alone in Iraq, even without US air cover, he would say so with flag waving enthusiasm. On November 25, 2015, Abbott put forth the suggestion to staff and planners that 3,500 Australian soldiers could be deployed to deal with the Islamic State.

The Australian, a Murdoch paper usually in favour of drum beating reactionary politics, found this particular idea dazzling for its original stupidity. “The proposal to invade Iraq raises the issue of Mr Abbott’s judgment – it was made two months before his decision to award a knighthood to Prince Philip.” Trump would have been impressed with both.

If deploying Australian armed personnel into a Ukrainian war zone to consolidate an air crash site was possible, he would also step up to the mark. This nugget surfaced in the revelations of former Australian Army officer James Brown, who called this “the clearest case in recent times of a prime minister struggling to grasp the limits of Australian military power”.

Covering him in the news would be like encapsulating a typhoon of verity. However detestable, he remained, and remains, pure to his loathing, dedicated to principle. It is the purity he carries with him to his cosy position at Radio 2GB, where he is feted by the shock jock family.

On the issue of same-sex marriage, he is evidently at home, the revolutionary who prefers to attack, rather than govern. For those against the measure to change the marriage laws, he is gold dust, giving the impression of tolerance while making sure that his position is left clearly combative.

“Like most,” he explained in the Fairfax Press, “I have tried to be there for friends and family who are gay.  They are good people who deserve our love, respect and inclusion but that doesn’t mean that we can’t continue to reserve the term ‘marriage’ for the relationship of one man with one woman, ideally for life and usually dedicated to children.”

Marriage as the sacred, reserved institution, special, biological, and for the heterosexuals to make or break. Besides, claims this authentic article, same-sex couples already have “marriage equality” despite not having it, the existence of something by another name.

A similar genuine article, Deputy Prime Minister Barnaby Joyce, also teeters in mad territory, a fabulous counterweight to Turnbull. Here is a person who will make international waves attacking a Hollywood actor for evading quarantine regulations. He will snipe at environmentalists while defending the use of pilfered water from the Murray Darling system. Joyce has a mouth which will go on vacation when it needs to.

Through Australia’s upper chamber, we also see the colourful expressions of the genuine article. There is Pauline Hanson to shore up a form of extremism that tends to find diluted form in the centre of politics; there are such figures as Derryn Hinch and Jacqui Lambie. (“You have no moral values and to go after the public broadcaster is an absolute disgrace,” she thundered in a late-night Senate speech on the government’s media reforms).

Such figures rarely attain the top position, being monitoring spoilers, the shock troops of controversy. Abbott was rewarded with the prime ministership, briefly, and was knifed by his own party. Joyce may well find that he is ineligible to sit in Parliament, courtesy of New Zealand citizenship he did not believe he had. But no one would ever confuse them for Bill Malcolm, or Malcolm Shorten.

Dr Binoy Kampmark is a senior lecturer in the School of Global, Urban and Social Studies, RMIT University. He was a Commonwealth Scholar at Selwyn College, University of Cambridge. He is a contributing editor to CounterPunch and can be followed on Twitter at @bkampmark.

 

 


5 comments

  1. David1

    Well that read didn’t set my world alight.

  2. Michael Taylor

    Tony Abbott has only been the face of Australian politics because the Murdoch media (mainly) put him there. Even when in opposition most articles began with “The leader of the opposition says … “. Now why aren’t they giving Bill Shorten the same opportunity?

    We have a very capable leader of the opposition in Bill Shorten, and I think he’ll make a very capable prime minister.

    If people don’t know much about him it’s either due to him being “invisible” as far as the mainstream media is concerned, or people are simply relying too much on the mainstream media for their opinions.

  3. Glenn K

    Calling Bill Shorten the “union machine hack” is a dismissive way of ignoring his achievements. Whilst he may lack the personality (good or bad) of other leaders, it is high time we as the electorate moved away from the personality cult syndrome of choosing our leaders. The ALP were considered a long-time-dead proposition after the 2013 election wipe out. As the new ALP leader, Shorten accepted the task of rebuilding the ALP based on the hard work of policy preparation, attention to detail, and a unified vision of where the ALP wanted to take the Australian nation. He united the ALP to speak from the same strategy white paper developed within the party mechanisms.

    I am not an entrenched ALP voter – call me a swing voter – but I am hopeful the ALP will soon lead Australia with a strong majority in Parliament. Why? …..because Australia needs strong leadership – leadership based on policy depth/detail, based on social justice (we do actually live in a society), based on trust in a public service that has a mandate to serve the policy decision-makers in government, based on trust and active use of research, etc etc,

    Bill Shorten may lose out on in the “cult of personality” wars, but that’s exactly what Australia doesn’t need! He is sometimes referred to as a “policy wonk”. PERFECT! That’s what Australia needs. The TURC findings, if anything, proved Shorten did an excellent job of negotiating positive outcomes for both business and workers. Isn’t that the kind of leader Australia needs??? So dismissing him as a “union machine hack” is both disingenuous and lazy. It’s easy to write about personalities in politics – a bit more effort is required to actually write about policy objectives and outcomes.

    Bill Shorten is actually the only real “genuine article” when it comes to true leadership on the federal political stage in Australia right now. With respect, this article is intellectually lazy and a disservice to genuine debate – it simply panders to the “cult of personality” perspective which is so toxic to genuine debate on Australia’s political reality.

  4. John Boyd

    Good on you Glenn K….well said….It is distressing to me when even ALP members, of which I am one, echo some of the sentiments to which you refer. As a lowly party member, it has been really good to be a small part of what, as you point out, has been a disciplined and managed approach to the development of policy, and the management of business. Bill demonstrates every good quality that Turnbull lacks, including an inclusive approach to leadership of an extremely talented team. Compare the skills across the chamber on a one to one basis: minister to opposition spokesperson, and you can see what I mean.

  5. Bob Parker

    As for Abbott, I have often called him stupid, and he is. There are many other negatives too. But I have been off the real point. What he has demonstrated during the run up to the gay marriage debacle is simply this. He is in every way possible just plain useless.

Leave a Reply

Return to home page
Scroll Up
%d bloggers like this: