The best laid schemes

The best laid schemes o’ Mice an’ Men Gang aft agley, An’ lea’e us…

So, How Will You Do It Better?

By 2353NMIn the next 12 to 18 months there are a number…

A personal view of a failed democracy

I sometimes wonder if it is in becoming a parent, responsible for…

Assange’s Fourteenth Day at the Old Bailey: Elections,…

September 25. Central Criminal Court, London.On this Friday, the Assange trial moved…

Reverse JobKeeper cuts and protect working people, say…

Two days after assailing the Morrison government for inaction on a jobs…

Dean Jones: Life of a Cricketing Entertainer

He was very much one of those cricketers who made the pulse…

Seeking the Post-Corona Sunshine: More Continuity for Post-Fitzgerald…

By Denis Bright  Even Nostradamus himself might be hesitant about predicting the final…

Jobs plan must be a way forward, says…

On the day where the Morrison government’s announced cuts to the JobKeeper…


‘FREE’ Election Policies Form Guide

abbott policies

I was an admirer of Julia Gillard. What I liked most was her devotion to sound progressive Labor policies that were forward looking and would serve the common good. In her short stint as Prime Minister she oversaw more policy reform (in a minority parliament) than most long serving governments. By any standards her policy legacy stands unique among any of her predecessors. And surely that is what governing is all about. Good policy that improves the wellbeing of every Australian. The fact is that regardless of whoever wins the forthcoming election the winners will find themselves implementing some Gillard policy.

As a political strategist she out positioned the leader of the opposition leaving no big ticket policies for him to pursue and I might add no funds anyway. Therefore in commenting on policy in general this conversation concentrates itself mainly on the government’s proposals. Having said that it might be unfair on the opposition given that the campaign has not yet started. Who knows they might pull a policy rabbit out of the hat. After all they have had three years to develop them.

When we vote a number of factors come into play. A particular allegiance to one or the other parties and its ideology. A like or dislike for one or the other candidate can persuade us. A leader’s character. A hip pocket ‘’what’s in it for me’’ mentality. Or even a one policy agenda such as ‘’Marriage Equality’’.

However policy is important to most people. In this election they are confronted with a number of policy proposals that will determine Australia’s future. Mr Abbott has vowed to oppose everything so the voters have a clear choice. Traditionally the areas of economy, health and education have been of major importance to the electorate but from time to time nation changing or indeed moral issues are added to the mix.

This election is significant in the policy sense because some of the election policies being proposed will have far reaching consequences for the nation and its future.

Now let’s look at the election policies that are on the table and way them up as best we can. I don’t propose to be long winded about each one. Just too randomly list each one and make a few comments.

• Education funding: The opposition education spokesman, Christopher Pyne, has had some conflicting things to say on his party’s policy. The one certain thing is that they don’t have one. He has said that they would repeal Labor’s Gonski funding package. His leader has stated that it would go ahead if Labor could get all the states to sign up. Pyne has also said that they are happy with the current funding arrangements until something better comes along. The Gonski proposals offer equality of opportunity and have wide public support. In the absence of any policy from the opposition it’s a one horse race.

• Climate change: The Prime Minister has pulled the rug from under Tony Abbott’s feet by dumping” the carbon tax and bringing forward a floating carbon pricing scheme. You can argue whether that is good for the environment but it is smart politics. Abbott can no longer shout his carbon tax slogans. But a bigger problem for him is his own policy. Or lack of one. What he has now has been thoroughly discredited by all and sundry. To quote Lenore Taylor in The Guardian.

‘’Business is desperate to know how the 2009 Direct Action policy will actually work, but usually emerge from meetings with the Coalition spokesman, Greg Hunt, with few answers. Hunt has promised a white paper after the election to flesh out the details, with legislation to be finalised within six months of a Coalition term.’’

I might add that Mr Abbott’s own goal statement ”what an emission trading scheme is all about, it’s a market, a so-called market, in the non-delivery of an invisible substance, to no one.” Follows his previous similar statement where he dismissed carbon dioxide as an “invisible, odourless, weightless, tasteless substance”. Statements such as these conclusively but him in the climate change official nutter’s category. We can only conclude that the LNP has no policy at all.

Dr Harley Wright Principal at Climate Sense put it rather succinctly:

I plead to the Coalition to come to its senses and deal with this serious issue seriously. Stop playing political games with our descendants’ future. A return to a responsible, bipartisan approach would be welcomed, possibly respected, all-round.

NBN: If we go back to when Abbott appointed Malcolm Turnbull as opposition shadow communications minister it was, if I am not mistaken for the purpose of “destroying” the NBN. That’s what Abbott in his Luddite naivety wanted. When exactly the realisation took place that the Internet has a vital place in our world took place, is unknown. But apparently it did. And so they made their policy announcement in the studios of Murdoch’s Fox Studios.

The next morning I did my early morning scan of on line MSM and it is fair to say that the LNPs policy had met with universal condemnation. Although I must say the Melbourne Herald Sun couldn’t find any room for it at all amongst its daily drivel. But then it is the newspaper where the truth goes to die so I wasn’t surprised. The Age ran an online poll of around 27.000 people and around 75% gave the policy the thumbs down.

A quote of mine:

“On the NBN. “The problem with designing a network to meet the needs of today is that it denies you the ability to meet the needs of tomorrow”.

NDIS: The opposition has said it supports this policy. It is however so popular that they could hardly say otherwise. But it is Labor policy and how ironic it would be if the conservatives had to implement it. And there is no guarantee that they wouldn’t re hash it in some way.

The Economy: We should not under estimate the difficulty the LNP will have framing an economic policy for the next election. With the downturn in revenues the government has had much difficulty in costing its own initiatives. The opposition will have more so. Despite pressure from the government it has yet to say where all its savings measures will come from. It has said it will eliminate the school kid’s bonus scheme and super will be cut from lower paid women but they will need a lot more than that. And of course they will take around 12,000 jobs out of the public service. The government has a record of outstanding economic performance and with Rudd at the helm should be able to sell it more vibrantly.

The opposition intends to have a “commission of audit” after the election, to review government spending “top to bottom”, rein in waste, identify where taxpayer funds should be spent and start “with a clean slate” on government spending. That’s a pretty broad brief and I would interpret it to mean a repeat of the Queensland experience.
Now cast your mind back to the last election and remember that Abbott was not capable of presenting LP Economic Policy himself so he hand balled to Hockey who in turn passed it on to Robb. It then became a total balls up and the accountants they hired to verify their figures were fined for dishonesty. The policy they presented would not get past a first year economics student. It will be interesting to see if Abbott has the guts to present this time around remembering that he has said that the subject bores him.

Asylum Seeker-Immigration Policy:
Both sides of politics should hold their heads in shame for the politicisation of such a human crisis that is not only one of national importance but one the international community is trying to come to grips with. But Tony Abbott who despite having had numerous opportunities to join a bipartisan approach has chosen together with Scott Morrison to tread gutter filth in the hope that they may win a couple of redneck seats in Western Sydney. These two have done more to demonise legal asylum seekers that any other members of parliament. Some of their comments have been founded in racism. And they are both practicing Christians.

My view is that in all its complexity there is no solution to this dilemma. It can only ever be a ‘’manageable problem.’’

A people smuggler in Indonesia has told the ABC that none of the domestic policies being considered in Australia can stop the boats. As the Federal Government looks for answers leading up to the election, the people smuggler says proposed measures like turning boats back or making it harder to get refugee status are not enough. The smuggler says there are now too many people fleeing death and persecution and that factor outweighs Australia’s attempts to stop them. And while more boats reach Australian waters, some former refugees who have lost family members on the dangerous journey say the immigration system is oppressive.

At the time of writing Kevin Rudd seems to be coming up with some fresh proposals and we can only live in hope that Tony Abbott might come to his senses and adopt a more humane and bipartisanship approach. Lies and shouts of ‘’stop the boats’’ will resolve nothing.
• Maternity Leave: The Liberal Party does have a policy. It will increase company tax by one and a half per cent. Most economists say the policy is unaffordable and caters for women with high incomes. No costing’s have come to light.
• Marriage Equality: Tony Abbott is totality against it because of his Catholic beliefs. Imposing his own morality on everyone. Kevin Rudd is in favour and has indicated that he will legislate. And so he should. Meanwhile the rest of the world moves on.

An Australian Republic: The Labor Party would support a plebiscite as a first step. Mr Abbott is a devout Royalist and led its campaign at the last referendum. In doing so he told some atrocious lies.

The following Liberal Party policies are taken from an article in The Guardian by Lenore Taylor.

• Renewable energy: The Coalition has promised a review of the 20% renewable energy target in 2014, even though it was already reviewed by the Climate Change Authority just last year. Some in the Coalition are demanding that it be scrapped altogether. More likely, say senior sources, it will be wound back a little, because its promise to deliver 41,000 gigawatt hours of renewable energy by 2020 is working out to be more like 25%, due to falling electricity demand. Bottom line: the renewable energy industry is not sure what will happen to the target under the Coalition.

• Federal state relations and COAG: In his budget-in-reply speech, Abbott promised that within two years of a change of government, working with the states, the Coalition would produce a white paper on Coag reform, and the responsibilities of different governments, to ensure that, as far as possible, the states are sovereign in their own sphere. The objective will be to reduce and end, as far as possible, the waste, duplication and second-guessing between different levels of government that has resulted, for instance, in the commonwealth employing 6,000 health bureaucrats even though it doesn’t run a single hospital.”

• Northern Australia: The absence of a northern Australia policy would not normally be notable, but Abbott recently released a “vision” to have a white paper on the development of the north. The “vision” said the white paper would look at most of the ideas being vocally advocated by mining magnate Gina Rinehart and the Institute of Public Affairs, but in terms so vague and non-committal it is unclear whether the Coalition intends to actually do them, or was just trying to appease its powerful backers.

• Industrial relations: The Coalition’s policy promises only minor changes to the fair work laws, but will ask the Productivity Commission to undertake a “comprehensive and broad” review of industrial relations policy – with the results to be taken to the next election

• Car industry assistance: We know the Coalition will cut $500m from the budgeted car industry assistance between now and 2015. It says it will have another Productivity Commission inquiry into what assistance should be provided after that and how it should be spent. Given that the industry says ongoing assistance is essential for its survival, that leaves a large question mark.

. Childcare policy will be the subject of yet another Productivity Commission review. The terms of reference ask for policy to be assessed against the working hours and needs of modern families, and leave open the possibility of government rebate being extended to in-home nannies. That all sounds good, but we also know spending will be constrained so the results remain unclear.

• Competition policy: The Coalition has given mixed signals on competition policy, saying both that the existing laws are too onerous and that small business needs more protection against large competitors. Competition law will be the subject of another “root and branch review” after the election.

• Tax policy: Abbott has said he will repeal the carbon and mining taxes and promised a “modest” company tax cut, with the size and timing still uncertain. He has also said he will have a white paper, a full review of the tax system, with any subsequent decisions to be taken to the next election.

Authors note: The Labor Party intends to scrap its carbon tax in favour of a floating price so Mr Abbott can no longer campaign on a repeal the tax policy.

There may of course be other policy areas that would interest people. Predominantly in their own electorates. I think however I have covered the key issues. This election should be about policy and who has the best to serve the nation. Of course the personal character of the opposing leaders will hold some sway with the punters. One is a negative individual and the other sees a positive future for our country. But I do hope policy determines our fate. Hope all this helps you in your decision making.


Login here Register here
  1. writtenmad

    Reblogged this on writtenmad and commented:
    The mainstream media won’t give you this run down…

  2. Kaye Lee

    I watched Joe Hockey on Sunrise this morning being asked about the polls showing Turnbull way out in front as preferred leader. His stance was that is not about personalities but policies (I pert near choked on that one), yet in the next breath he was talking about “Kevin Kardashian”.

    I listened to Ben Fordham on 2GB interviewing Sophie Mirabella (choke before she even says a word), where she was bemoaning the jobs that will be lost due to asking people to justify their car expense claims by a 3 month log book once every five years. When asked to confirm that the Coalition would not implement this change she refused to do so, though it appears Tony went into damage control saying something about consulting the industry. Am I to believe that a whole industry has been built on tax rorting and that they want to protect said rorters?

    I have to say, I am feeling some sympathy for Turnbull, Hockey and Hunt as they try to present policies they patently do not believe in.

    As an amusing? aside, I have been banned from commenting on the Liberal Party page after I suggested that Brian Loughnane should be prosecuted for false and misleading advertising. Considering the comments I have posted there in the past, it surprises me that THAT comment was the one that got me banned.

  3. Colin Thai

    I really think Abbott and LNP are up to the part where they are hitting the wall. What insane policies can they still connive . Look I’m not a person to judge a book by it’s cover “sorry to coin a phrase” but I look at this Abbott team my god it’s like something out of a Monty Python show, they are a ludicrous bunch, I just would love to know if they ever watch any of their antics while at home, it could make a great series…… Thanking you

  4. Terry2

    Kaye, It’s not so much that Turnbull, Hockey et al don’t believe in the coalition’s policies. I think that, like us, they haven’t been told what they are.

    If Joe Hockey trots out his Kevin Kardashian line one more time I will throw up !

    John, there is also the coalition’s disappearing “bipartisan” support for the referendum on local government recognition in the Constitution. Tony Abbott has said that, ‘if you don’t understand it, just vote No’ (it’s worked for him). Rather than saying, if you don’t understand it get up off your arse and find out what it entails.

    Prediction: Kevin Rudd will abandon the referendum which, without vigorous bipartisan support will fail

  5. johnlord2013

    Yes I forgot that one. Just another NO from Tony.

  6. Merilee Mann

    The oft-quoted speil about the federal department of health not running a single hospital is ridiculous if it is being used to justify getting rid of it! The states run the hospitals, the federal department has completely different functions. We do not want each state to run their own PBS, Therapeutic Goods section (to approve surgical implants like hip replacements for example), provide funds for medical research (NH&MRC). There are many other national functions carried out by the federal department. It would appear that the Coalition are planning to cut staff without having the slightest idea what those staff do. Scarey stuff.

  7. joy cooper

    Typically hypocritical of the mendacious Liberals is the frothing at the mouth outrage of Mirabella & Abbott over the mild tightening of the FBT rules. They are now screaming that the local car industry will be “rooned”!!!! In fact, as mentioned above, & as announced by the awful Mirabella herself, they intend to rip out $500 million from the car industry assistance package.

    Also, gullible people are swallowing whole the salary-packaging industries’ anti-FBT changes propaganda furphy claiming that it will be nurses, teachers & police who will be affected by these changes not the wealthy. This is ridiculous as none in these occupations would need to use their leased vehicles for work & few, if any, would be given salary-sacrifice packages anyway. Still that doesn’t stop the unthinkers from protesting something which only affects the better off & not themselves. If affected people are upset about having to fill in a logbook, detailing usage of salary-sacrifice leased vehicles, splitting use into work 80% non-work 20%, for a total of 15 weeks spread over 5 years then it’s a rort!!

  8. Lisa Pantorsa

    Hi Johnlord2013,
    Thanks for the above, Install panels a handful of at a time to split down the expense in environment up your house to run off of photo voltaic electrical power. There is no need to obtain every little thing all at the moment, as there is significantly scheduling involved. You need to have to give your self time to make adjustments and master a lot more as you go alongside. If you are considering about making use of solar energy in your household, you have to take into consideration how a great deal direct sunlight your household is essentially exposed to. In get for solar electrical power to be worth it, your roof really should have entire solar publicity a minimum amount of 6 hours each day. You need to also be cautious of any locations of your roof protected by shade. Switching to solar vitality can preserve a ton on your electric powered bill. Solar power is absorbed through panels that are appropriately positioned on your roof. It is primarily practical if you dwell in an place that will get a prolonged of sun. This will supply usable energy to your home in a considerably less expensive trend than standard electrical power. If you happen to be considering about installing solar panels to generate your possess energy, make positive that the roof you may be putting in them on gets lots of great sunlight. Very good daylight takes place between 9am and 3pm. You will make the most electrical energy if your roof receives full, uncovered sunlight between all those hrs each and every working day. Your solar electricity system will continue to keep working as extensive as you manage it often. You should really examine your machines at least at the time a month and wash the surface of the panels thoroughly. Do not hesitate to retain the services of a expert to support you clean and inspect your process but keep in mind that you can save a good deal by inspecting your procedure you. Situation solar panels on the east or west side of your home or company. Because the sunlight travels from east to west all through the working day, inserting photo voltaic panels on places of your roof that face north or south is a waste. You can get much far better energy returns by subsequent the exact same path as the sunshine.
    Keep up the posts!

  9. clash of clans hack latest update

    gearings gearless geekdoms geekiest geepound gelatine gelating gelatins.
    tarots   tarpan   tarpon   tarred   tarres   tarsal   tarsia
      tarsus. licker   lictor   lidars   lidded   lieder   liefer   liefly   lieges.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Return to home page
Scroll Up
%d bloggers like this: