HAK Birthdays: Henry Kissinger Turns 100

“Once you’ve been to Cambodia, you’ll never stop wanting to beat Henry…

Yes is inclusive, No is divisive

The words speak for themselves, but I shall return to them briefly…

Modi in Australia: Down Under Bliss for Hindutva

There is an interesting thread that links the Indian Prime Minister, Narendra…

Why the Conservatives cannot win the next election…

You are probably thinking, referring to the headline, that it is a…

Five Things That Don't Make Sense (OK, But…

I've often said that I can accept that people will disagree with…

Education at the Showground

In the conurbation that is South East Queensland, most of the towns…

New coal mines and protests crushed: is Labor…

It is more shocking watching Labor governments implement draconian anti-protest measures than…

Visits of Justice: Stella Assange’s Plea to Australia

It certainly got the tongues wagging, the keyboards pressed, and the intellectually…


Forget Coal, Joel And The Latest Poll: Elections Are Won With Maslow

Now I know that many of you will have heard of Maslow’s Hierarchy of Need, but for those who’ve never seen it, it looks something like this:

The basic idea is that one needs to meet the needs at the bottom before one aspires to the needs at the top. In order to demonstrate this, I’ll use a fictitious account of a young, homeless woman called Grace.

Grace is on the street and hungry when a man approaches her and tells her that he has a spare room and food and he hates to see anyone like this. While Grace is suspicious of his motives, sleeping rough isn’t safe either so she goes back to his house where she is fed and shown a room where she can sleep. With most of her physiological needs met, she barricades the door to make herself feel safe and gets some sleep.

After a few days, she comes to accept that the man has no ulterior motive and that she can come and go as she pleases and he is no threat to her. He gives her jobs to do so that she doesn’t feel like she’s relying on his charity. However, she feels no sense of belonging.

One day, on the way to the grocery store, she sees a guy rummaging through the bin looking for food. She approaches him and offers him some money so that he can buy food. He stands and looks her in the eye. He is strikingly good-looking. He tells her that his name is Pedro and that he has no need of her money because it perpetuates a capitalist system which is destroying the planet and that he prefers to scrounge for the wasted food and to live in the streets because that places less pressure on the planet.

Ok, I could go on for several pages with the love story that develops and how Grace is attracted to Pedro and all her dilemmas about whether she can leave her comfortable room to fulfil the next rung of needs: Love and Belonging. And how her decision to turn her back on the charity of the other man gives her Self-Esteem and that she rises above her need for food and shelter.

However, I’m not going to do that for three reasons: 1. I’d just be writing another sexist story about how a woman keeps getting saved by men. 2. It doesn’t fit with Maslow’s concept and 3. This is really more about elections and the story is just a vehicle for a lot of silly stereotypes that are so prevalent in the media.

I’m not suggesting that the Man is the government and that Pedro is The Greens, but I am suggesting that Grace is the electorate.

And this brings me quite neatly to the problem with how polls are used, viewed, analysed, and in the end quite meaningless unless we get to vote on things much more frequently. In the end, people are most focused on their immediate needs so they’ll vote for the party that appeals to their needs at the lower end of the hierarchy. This is why a fear campaign works well at times. And a party can scoop up some votes with the next step on the hierarchy with a sense of Love and Belonging. “As Australians…”

Before one allows something as important as battling climate change to affect one’s vote, one usually has to be high up on the hierarchy of needs. Consequently, Joel Fitzgibbon is appealing to those in his electorate who feel their jobs are threatened by any action, even though inaction won’t save their jobs in the long term.

When we start to look at the next election in terms of Grace, we can clearly see that it’s not that she objects to Pedro’s ideas about helping save the planet; it’s just that her more immediate needs are being met by the man who took her in. And so it is with the current Coalition government: they’ve taken a lot of people in.

But when looking forward to the next election, the question needs to be asked, does the electorate feel a strong sense of loyalty and gratitude to Scott Morrison and his merry men, or does it – like Grace – just feel that they’re better than sleeping on the streets. While the electorate may not embrace the extreme Pedro, it’s not because they don’t want to help save the planet. It’s just that they don’t want to put their own needs at risk. And any political party that can make them feel like it’s not threatening those needs can make the electorate aspire to feeling self-esteem and to do their bit for the world.

This is not just true of climate change. There are a whole range of issues where the polls tell us that the electorate would be behind a whole range of changes – take the marriage equality vote as an example – but we’re made to view them as risky by those opposing the particular change. In the case of renewable energy, we used to be told that people were against it because it was more expensive. Now that the costs are down, we’re told that it’s because it doesn’t deliver “base-load power” when the sun doesn’t blow and the wind doesn’t shine, or whatever that slogan is. What happens when batteries make that argument irrelevant? Well, I can just hear the PM telling us: “Isn’t it worth paying a few cents more for your power to keep coal-miners employed?”

Snigger at that if you think I’m being ridiculous, but remember that this is the government that had Dan Tehan tell us that the vaccine rollout “wasn’t a race”. Why not? Well, because the Melbourne Cup is a race, so…

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Donate Button




Login here Register here
  1. Craig Daniels

    In the 1970s and 1980s most working class and middle class people figured that both Maslow’s hierarchy and social mobility was a one way street, always ascending. I’d suggest that since ~2001 that belief has been devalued and demolished.

  2. Phil Pryor

    T V used to show wizardry of a planet, with computer generated reduction to get smaller, smaller, until one got down to very small sizes, perhaps making your house or yard the feature, a tiny fraction of the reduced planet where we began, the google earth gimmick, and, it does get your attention. So, imagine a huge portrait of a man, galactic, certanly planet sized, being zapped and reduced and reduced until we saw only the shrinking body, to focus in the anus. But it doesn’t stop there, for the annular sepia or beige object can be further reduced to little portarits of little heads and, one can see what is there, now, Morrison, Mc Waggawanka, S Robber, Tehan, Fryden burnt, Greghunt (isn’t he), Cash (the forgery), rows of circularity of a whole conservative ring of no confidence. It’s our blessing, our salvation…

  3. New England Cocky

    Uhm ….. a person with about 10 minutes study of poll construction and analysis will advise you that a variation of 1% in a pair of averaged results is statistically irrelevant ….. especially when there is good reason to believe that ”the conclusion is my hypothesis”.

    A continuing +/- 1% variation in results over an ever-increasing duration is even more suspect that the same individuals are being polled form the same check list of subjects.

    Maslov is certainly relevant in the Australian political scene, but why do working class Australians, educated individuals and thinking persons allow themselves to be hoodwinked to their own disadvantage by shock jocks paid by the self-serving establishment??

    Could it be that most Australians do NOT believe that politics is a participation sport? Or are they STILL looking under their beds for the Reds that the nice Mr Menzies warned them about nearly 70 years ago??

  4. Gangey1959

    #1. It strikes me as being only slightly ironic that ALL of the diagrams and plans for the betterment of humankind are triangular, with the pointy end at the top. None of them ever start with “ME” at the bottom, and if I do X I improve the lot of Y number of species, and if they do the same then Z happens etc etc, and we get an inverted parabolic curve, with everyone at the benefited end.
    #2. As a Victorian, and one who is extremely proud of what Victoria both as a state and as a part of the mighty Nation of Australia has achieved and created for planet Earth, I must appologise to the rest of the nation for the extremely poor quality of federal guvv’m’nt repr’sentayshn. The Victorian federal ministers are an absolute disgrace, and show a emotional vacuum that has not been observed in cnidaria. They are well matched by their counterparts from the rest of the nation, but this is no excuse. As a mexican I have standards, and they fail miserably. They should be cut free from the species at the earliest convenience. I did not elect them, but for their tragic performances I am truly sorry.
    #3. It bloody well IS a race. It’s not a 100m sprint, it’s more like a 100k relay steeplechase, but it IS a race, and we ALL have to do our lap.
    #4. ByGeorge I’ve done it. I have the solution to carbon capture. I found the attached at work. And it’s recycled. All we have to do is print more barcode labels.

  5. Andrew J. Smith

    Craig Daniels agree. Further, many senior well paid execs and directors ,with temporary but well paid and big face tenure, can find themselves at the income less and bottom of the pile too; maybe they are as fearful as others?

  6. Stephengb

    New England Cocky

    It is a fact that working class Australians believe themselves to be individuals, but I am afraid they are mostly uneducated and unable to think for themselves.

    Why else would 51% of the population repeatly vote against their own interests

  7. wam

    Not Maslow but Pavlov. Albo needs to ring the bell when pointing out scummo’s lies.
    stephenB what arrogance what bullshit they voted against themselves because they were frightened of losing jobs.
    If you look at townesville you’ll see a reason for that fear in the days before the election.

  8. Kade

    Stephengb even the most educated among us will vote in self interest if they fear losing something they can’t live without or they feel entitled to. I’d say voting is more about self interest and less about logic.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 2 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

Return to home page
%d bloggers like this: