Hello, national security? It's QAnon here.

By Karen Stewart Mr Morrison, I was rather shocked by your choice of…

Papers Instead of Human Lives: The Sentencing of…

In May 2019, the US District Court for the Eastern District of…

Sameness

By Ad astra Asked what he wanted from life, a wise man said: I…

No comments!

Good morning. We are hearing that people have not been able to leave…

"This Won't Be A Sympathetic Interview, Mr Morrison!"

Sig O'Phant: Good evening, tonight we're bringing you an interview with the…

Afghanistan, Failure and Second Thoughts

It is a country other powers simply cannot leave alone. Even after…

GG Picking his Spots Oblivious to the Crisis…

The GG Buffoon is a do-nothing Liberal backer and military general hand-picked…

Morrison and the exploding fish. A reverse ferret.…

Don't you just love the suspense? A tiny peepshow of a lectern…

«
»
Facebook

Explaining Media Inequality

As many of my social media friends and Twitter followers know, I have written a book about the cause of media bias – explaining media inequality. The book is done so it’s time to find a publisher. To help with this journey, your sharing of this post would be appreciated. Thank you!

The book is written for news audiences. It traces many recent and historical cases of media bias; it is cathartic in highlighting and explaining reasons for media inequality, making sense of mass audience exasperation. It is also for journalists who want to improve their work.

The 1st chapter describes how important news is to society and healthy democracy through related functions: watchdogs on powerful, and facilitators of what should be fair, diverse marketplace of ideas. When they fulfil these roles, democracy thrives. When they don’t, it dies.

In chapter two, I describe how frustrated audiences are with media bias – 500k signed Kevin Rudd’s petition seeking royal commission into the Murdoch media. Bias is the bogeyman under the bed: audiences know it’s there but find it hard to define. Yet, journos claim it doesn’t exist because of watertight routines of objectivity and balance.

To explore audience frustration at media bias, I delve deep into reporting of Vic COVID-19 crisis in 2020. I explain how many of audience’s explanations for bias – such as Murdoch conspiracy – do not fully account for bias, and how my ideas challenge much academic orthodoxy on bias.

To showcase media bias, in chapter three I tell a story of media bias by describing the one-sided coverage of 2016 Country Fire Authority (CFA) dispute. I quantified bias in over 300 news stories about this politicised industrial conflict in my PhD project. Bias existed in collective media narrative.

In chapter four, I argue CFA dispute the story to fit default industrial story-template used through Australian history – the authority narrative. Bias is about assumption. The assumption of authority story is that head of business/organisation (capital class) are automatically legitimate. The other side of this coin is those who challenge the authority story, who challenge power – trade unions, left wing political or social groups – tell an empathy story which is not the default narrative, and is instead assumed by media to less legitimate and gets little coverage. Dominant authority story explains taken-for-granted legitimacy of powerful ahead of less powerful: employers ahead of workers, right ahead of left, men ahead of women, white people ahead of people of colour – media inequality results from and contributes to structural inequality.

In chapter five, I describe how default authority story and less-powerful empathy story are evident in other historical industrial news narratives. Authority story dominated reporting of Shearers’ Strike and Hawke Accord – it is as old as the hills and as powerful as ever.

Chapter six shows that in rare occasions when the authority narrative is strongly undermined – when capital class and Liberal politicians who represent them overreach and damage public interest – undo their legitimacy and the news narrative flips from authority to empathy. Examples of empathy story dominating media reporting are the Pig Iron Dispute, the Waterfront Dispute and WorkChoices – all successful campaigns for the labour movement, but none having a sustained influence on the ongoing pattern of media bias towards the authority story.

In chapter seven, I present idea of train-track narratives to explain how journalists tend to follow-the-leader when it comes to collective storytelling. I discuss how characters in news stories are framed as villains, victims or heroes, and how info is moulded to fit on tracks.

Chapter eight builds on bias train-track idea to explain how extreme cases of bias result in disinformation. This occurs when news info is moulded and fudged to fit the dominant story, to the point where reality is misrepresented, is not verified, and represents false narratives. This chapter also discusses the perils of false-balance – or false-equivalency – referred to as ‘bothsidesism.’ I am reminded of a wonderful tweet: “If he says it is raining, and she says it is not, the job of the journalist is to look out the window and tell the audience which is true.”

Inevitably, chapter nine is about conscious bias by interrogating Murdoch media. The default authority story is unconscious bias, but in Murdoch’s case, it’s deliberate, partisan-bias. I describe how Murdoch runs interventionist campaigns and how their coverage infects the rest. In this chapter, I use the false-narrative of ‘African gangs’ to show how Murdoch media is responsible for divisive cultural wars, working in concert with right wing politicians, and how their intense media concentration is damaging the social fabric and distorting reality.

Chapter 10 is about media power. Although journalists claim to be passive and not powerful, they hold the power to craft reality for the audience. With this power comes responsibility to deliver more equality in the marketplace of ideas. I ask “who is watching the watchdogs?”

Finally, the last chapter is about the impact of media inequality on the audience. Like all inequality, those who suffer it feel a great sense of injustice. This includes the destructive impact of media bias on CFA firefighters and Victorian news audiences during the COVID-19 crisis. In this chapter, I give some insights into how journalists react (badly) to complaints of media bias, how they circle the wagons, call the audience names, and ultimately, how they work together to delegitimise those who critique them (as evidenced on Twitter), rather than self-reflecting.

So there you have it. If you’re keen to read more about each of these topics, please show your support by sharing or liking this post.

 

The research underpinning this book is peer reviewed – mine and others.

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Donate Button

8 comments

Login here Register here
  1. Mr Bronte ALLAN

    What a great read DR Rollison! I used to work at the now defunct Adelaide News until it was “merged” into the Adelaide Advertiser mob & know full well just how rotten & ignorant etc this fucking Mudrake is! He started out in Adelaide at his father;s doing, penny pinching 7 scare mongering even then. However since he has abandoned Australian citizenship, created havoc in Fleet Street & is now an American , he has become even worse than ever. and millions read his rags around Australia & believe any crap he prints! WTF??

  2. Phil Pryor

    Has there ever been a bigger manifestation of an anus than Merde Dog, the dinosaurial drophole of media muck and money making manipulation, through the bent and twisted control and organisation of politically perverted power?? Good luck with the book. I have two useful books at hand for anyone’s consideration, “Media and Society”, Gorman and McLean, 2003, and “The capitalism papers”, J Mander, 2012. The expansion, inflation, totalitarian egofixation of Murdoch is displayed in all its unwiped stinking glory. Privatised media, with corporate interconnected advertising and donor driven power is quite pre-1945 totalitarian oppressive cornering of your and my control over basic living.

  3. Harry Lime

    The trouble is Doc,far too many of the ‘meeja’ behave like they are part of the power structure,scuttling around the corridors of power like the courtiers of sixteenth century monarchs,clambering over one another for advantage and access,and in the process usually corrupt their messaging.Not helped of course by the directives of a vindictive foreign ‘monarch’ driven by power and money.
    How much money does it take to end up looking like an amoeba dredged up from the depths of an alien ocean?

  4. Old Codger

    Harry, I think you make a good point. Many ‘journalists’ like to think they are part of the ruling classes and act as latter-day ‘Warwick the Kingmakers’, flattering themselves that they actually have a say over and above the ordinary voter. The ordinary voter is simply not interested in politics as John Curtin found during WWII, the majority of the population were not concerned about what was happening to the north; well they were personally not affected. Much the same now. I also believe from observation, that many ordinary Australians like to think they are special and so identify with the ruling classes. To vote anything other that conservative would be like wearing a brand, showing yourself to be not worthy. A kind of snobbery.

  5. wam

    If the editor wants to keep its job it does what the owner expects(jim bowditch, the greatest editor in my experience).
    If you want to keep your job then do what the editor tells you.
    If you are zealous in carrying out your job there is no pretence at fair reporting with the end point being negative spin and outright lies are preferable to publishing truth that will cause the loss of your job.
    In darwin, since 1973, the paper has been, almost exclusively, anti-labor. At times so pro-clp as to be laughable. There is no doubt in my mind that new editors, on arrival, are feted by the clp heavies and ‘informed’ as to expectations.
    The ABC has plenty of ex-murdoch employees and anti-labor bias often appears.

    .

  6. Terence Mills

    Not good news for media diversity : Sky News will be available in 17 of Southern Cross Austereo (SCA)’s regional markets from 1 August and in select WIN Network regions, following a pair of new regional content deals.

    This will impose the Sky ranting on communities in regional free to air areas in Victoria, Southern NSW and Queensland including Cairns, Townsville, Sunshine Coast, Canberra, Wollongong, Wagga Wagga, Orange, Bendigo, and Ballarat.

    For those of you who haven’t been subject to Peta Credlin, Andrew Bolt, Alan Jones and Paul Murray beware these people are conspiracy theorists and they have a Murdoch agenda.

  7. Leesa Petitpuu

    At times I watch media and I admit it is fairly consistent. Fairly consistent crap. However, it is amusing to watch the antics of toddlers all miked-up in their Sunday best. The media exposes some corruption as a kind of elaborate ruse while hiding other corruption, and we are supposed to not notice? The article* ‘Political influence network in Twitter 2017’ has a simple diagram, Figure #1, showing how Think Tanks are the main driver of public influence and policy. We could do with more of Project Veritas exposing Facebook, google and twitter.
    Article* http://www.realinstitutoelcano.org/wps/portal/rielcano_en/contenido?WCM_GLOBAL_CONTEXT=/elcano/elcano_es/zonas_es/politicaexteriorespanola/ari66-2017-sanchezgimenez-tchubykalo-political-influence-network-twitter-2017
    Good luck with your book btw.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 2 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded.

Return to home page
Scroll Up
%d bloggers like this: