The Mythologies of Musk

By James Moore Living in the Rio Grande Valley in the mid-70s was…

The Perils of Political Capture

The Perils of Political Capture: When Vested Interests Hijack Progress By Sue Barrett In…

Australia’s coming Dutton-deluge of nuclear propaganda

By Noel Wauchope There's something dramatically splendid about King Louis XV of France's…

Climate Change: Why Your Voice Matters More Than…

By Denis Hay Description: Climate Change Discover how young Australians can reshape climate change…

Finding the Unmentionable: Amnesty International, Israel and Genocide

It was bound to happen. With continuing operations in Gaza, and increasingly…

"When Labor Run Out Of Money, They Come…

“You understand, he said to me, the ability and the art of…

The ABC goes to Hungary: the culture war…

Some of the most dangerous people in the world right now are…

Peter Dutton’s nuclear fantasy equals soaring power bills

Solutions for Climate Australia Media Release Solutions for Climate Australia today called out…

«
»
Facebook

Emergency leaders say nuclear reactors pose unnecessary risk

Emergency Leaders for Climate Action Media Release

NUCLEAR REACTORS WOULD introduce significant and unnecessary risk to Australian communities and emergency responders, including firefighters already stretched by escalating climate fuelled disasters, warns Emergency Leaders for Climate Action (ELCA) in a submission to the parliamentary inquiry into nuclear power generation in Australia.

Greg Mullins, speaking on behalf of 38 former fire and emergency service chiefs from across Australia said: “Our firefighters are on the frontlines of escalating climate fuelled disasters, like bushfires and floods, fuelled by climate pollution. They’re not trained or equipped to deal with nuclear emergencies that could arise from nuclear reactors or the transportation and storage of radioactive waste.”

The ELCA submission highlights that nuclear reactor emergency planning and management has not been addressed by proponents of nuclear energy and emphasises that Australian emergency services lack the experience and resources to handle potential nuclear emergencies.

“Australian emergency services would have to be built up from scratch to respond to nuclear disasters, with no costings or plans in place to achieve this. There are no fully staffed urban fire service stations near the proposed sites for nuclear reactors, and it’s neither feasible nor reasonable to expect volunteer bushfire fighters to handle such high-risk emergencies,” said Mr Mullins.

“I oversaw the deployment of Australian firefighters to assist in the wake of the earthquake and tsunami that led to the Fukushima disaster, where the chaos and devastation caused by nuclear failures was stark. First responders, many of them civilian firefighters, were thrown into situations they weren’t trained for. That’s not a risk we should take in Australia, no matter how remote.

“There are no safety or environmental frameworks in place to manage the risks of nuclear reactors or to safely transport and store radioactive waste in Australia.

“Placing nuclear reactors in disaster-prone areas like Latrobe, Lithgow, Singleton, and South Burnett would add to the burden emergency services already face responding to worsening bushfires, floods, and storms.

Beyond the safety risks, former Commissioner Mullins called the proposal a “dangerous distraction” from the energy solutions Australia urgently needs right now. “Every coal-fired power station will shut down before a single watt of nuclear power can enter our system. Nuclear reactors simply cannot be built quickly to address the urgent task of slashing pollution and reducing climate disaster risks right now.

“Our communities and emergency services are bearing the brunt of worsening disasters driven by burning coal, oil and gas. We don’t have the luxury of waiting decades for new power stations, we must slash climate pollution now to protect Australians. Australia can’t afford to risk our energy security, economy and safety on a nuclear fantasy when renewables can cut pollution today and help ensure a safer future for our kids.”

About Emergency Leaders for Climate Action: We are 38 former senior Australian fire and emergency service leaders who have observed how climate change is driving increasingly catastrophic extreme weather events that are putting lives, properties and livelihoods at greater risk and overwhelming our emergency services.

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be greatly appreciated.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button

4 comments

Login here Register here
  1. uncletimrob

    That’s ok, Dutts will just contract nuclear disaster management to the private sector “because clearly government, semi-government and local government entities cannot be trusted to do the job properly”

  2. Truth Teller

    Not to mention silently condemning the residents on LeFevre Peninsula in Adelaide, and residents in the vicinity of Garden Island in WA to be compulsory neighbours to a Nuclear Waste Management Facility.

    Another piece of legislation that was passed and enacted in record time a few months ago, and with zero consultation of local communities.

  3. Terence Mills

    I see that the Liberals (Ted O’Brien) are calling for publicly broadcast debates (ABC and SKY) around the country with Labor on respective energy policies.

    About time IMHO.

  4. Andyfiftysix

    I dont see nuclear as a threat physically. I see it as a threat financially.

    Imagine having so much solar that power is virtually free. How many industires would we able to run at reduced costs compared to the world. Doesnt that give us an exchange advantage?

    Now imagine 5 nuclear plants that cost a fortune to subsidise yearly, higher taxes to fund the crap. Power wont be cheap to anyone so no national advantage. And all to support 7% of our energy needs.

    It doesnt make any planning sense or financial sense……its all about political posturing and malfeasance towards the average australian.

    Have a debate with who? ted obrien is a fool or a wilfully lier. You cant play with a fool, he has had more experience than you…..and you cant debate somebody who lies all the time

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 2 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

Return to home page