Oxfam Australia welcomes Australia’s backing of UN Resolution…

Oxfam Australia Media Release Oxfam Australia welcomes the Australian Government’s vote in favour…

Blinken Atrocious in a Dangerous World

It is hard to credit one of the least impressive Secretary of…

How Foreign Influence Shapes Australian Politics

By Denis Hay Description: Explore how foreign influence shapes Australian politics, and the path…

All My Friends And Facebook Showed Me That…

When I opened my computer I had a plan to do something…

Cop 30 Climate Summit probable change of venue…

By Nicholas Beelzebub Lucifer I was a bit disappointed not to be invited…

COP29 comes with low expectations, but every step…

RMIT University Media Release COP29, the UN’s yearly Climate Change Conference, is currently…

Risk of PTSD 20 times higher for people…

UNSW Sydney Media Release Researchers at UNSW uncover evidence of the negative psychiatric…

Open Letter urges Tasmanian Premier to resist opposition…

By Tess Lawrence Chief advocate for the Alliance for Gambling Reform, Tim Costello…

«
»
Facebook

Dunkley sends all of us a message

“If you live in Frankston, and you’ve got a problem with Victorian women being assaulted by foreign criminals, vote against Labor. “If you do not want to see Australian women being assaulted by foreign criminals, vote against Labor. Send Labor a message.”

Labor easily wins Dunkley, increasing its primary vote to forty per cent. As no-one predicted. On her way to Canberra is Jodie Belyea, who introduces herself as “a mum from Frankston with two dogs and a mortgage” and a local woman dedicated to empowering other women. The likeable, highly-respected and refreshingly unassuming, local community activist and founder of the Women’s Spirit Movement (2018) is the candidate preferred, at last count, by at least 52% of the 133,000 registered electors who cast a valid vote, in the Port Phillip Bay sand-belt electorate where On the Beach 1959, a film about the end of the world was shot.

It’s another crushing defeat for Peter Craig Dutton, who is now lying low over Anklegate a scandal in which a released detainee fingered by Dutton and deputy Liberal leader Sussan Ley in Question Time for sexual assault and stalking turns out to be the wrong man – because the data from his electronic ankle bracelet wrongly put him at the scene of an alleged crime.

It’s par for the course for Dutton – a serial dud in every portfolio he’s ever held, from Health to Home Affairs. He’s now following Morrison’s delusion that Liberal Party salvation lies in the outer suburbs. The lie that Labor would tax utes and family cars when, in fact, its vehicle emissions standards will save money and help preserve what’s left of our planet’s atmosphere apes ScoMo’s abortive bid for the vote of a mythical outer suburban tradie.

But there’s more. Everybody loves trains. $900 million will treat rail travellers to an upgrade of the link to Baxter in the very Liberal seat of Flinders, should they wish to brave Stony Point mosquitoes in their eagerness to take a day trip to see how the other half lives.

For Liberal candidate Nathan Conroy, it’s all over. He did his best with a bad script about how bad crime was. Locals love that stuff. Is he a sore loser? It’s fashionable, in the heady hyper-partisan slanging match our politics is today, to maintain your hate. A developer-friendly Frankston Mayor for three years in a row, with a rate rise every year to show for it, Conroy, formerly of Cork, is a big man with a slab of a face such as you might encounter in a friendly punch-on in a rugby scrum or in a grudge-match of Gaelic football.

Thirty-one-year-old Conroy, who boasts he once ran a multi-million dollar business -as manager of a Richmond bowlo- (that’s a lot of parma)-is the Liberals’ archetypal pin-up boy. White, straight and blokey. With the business background, he could be another Bruce Billson who held Dunkley until he got a job representing small business, for which he was being paid months before he quit politics. Conroy is slow to congratulate his opponent – as are other Liberals – but he does publicly congratulate himself on his wife’s pregnancy.

He doesn’t know where he found the time … (to make a baby) … but he did, he says.

Conroy grins, sporting teeth like a barracuda. They are neat teeth in a crooked smile.

Mrs Conroy doesn’t know where to look. Does hubby think he’s at a buck’s night? Ley, who is as high as a kite, comes to the rescue; proclaims Nathan a national Liberal hero. Even better than making babies, he’s made Dunkley marginal. The truth is, the absence of One Nation and UAP from the ballot accounts for what Murdoch and our corporate media brand a four percent swing to the Coalition.

“We are coming for you,” Ley warbles, adding that a three to four percent swing across the nation would win the Coalition government. It wouldn’t. It holds fifty-five seats. Twenty-one are needed to form a majority government. The swing looks around 3.4 per cent at the AEC Tally Room, Sunday. But bunkum and bluster are the order of the day in the politics of a post-truth, Trumpian age era. Expect more “alternative facts” after Sky’s Peta Credlin stoutly declares that Dutton resonates in Dunkley.

Credlin strikes gold on the night. The heartland. It’s the Liberals’ Lassiter’s Reef. And it’s in Dunkley. Ground zero is probably half-way up Oliver’s Hill, under that cantilevered bungalow, where the late Graham Cyril Kennedy, AO, had an unimpeded view of Port Phillip Bay.

“… the base is back, the Liberal heartland is back”!

“Coming for you” means more smear ‘n fear. Look out, Albo. Albo is at least in Dunkley. Unlike Dutton, who does a bunk and is QANTAS clubbing his way back to Dickson. Classy.

The electorate is named in honour of feminist, telegraphist and union leader, the fearless, tireless, eloquent, advocate for equal pay for women in the public service, Louisa Dunkley 1886-1927. Victorian Liberal senator, Crumb-maiden Jane Hume, who is also at the Liberal campaign wake, thinks quotas are OK for corporations, but the Liberal Party is “a different beast”.

Discretion is the better part of valour, but it does mean Spud’s abandoned Ley and Hume at the bar to do the obsequies? At least former Frankston school-boy and Liberal fund-raiser, Jeffrey Gibb Kennett, is celebrating his 76th birthday there. It leaves Peter time to warm up the party bus. Tomorrow, Ley will be the scapegoat for that stunt about the released detainee being arrested by the police on charges of sexual assault and misconduct. After howling down Albo in parliament about his dereliction of duty in failing to defy the High Court and lock up all the detainees, most of whom, Team Dutton reckons, are hardened criminals and all primed to rape, pillage and “re-offend”.

Some detainees have already been locked up for a decade. Some have been offenders, but all have done their time. For most, their only “crime” is to seek refuge here by boat. We lock them up for the rest of their lives and when a High Court forces us to let them out we insist that the harmless and innocent majority wear ankle-bracelets alongside the few who have committed serious crimes? What could possibly go wrong?

But it’s not about justice, it’s about the theatre of cruelty as deterrence, and was once very popular. We’re so proud of our boat turnarounds, we’ve exported the idea to Rishi Sunak’s Littler Britain, where “illegals” will be exported at great expense to Rwanda.

Or back to certain death. Dutton once locked up “Deva”, a blind, mentally ill Sri Lankan man for ten years who sought refuge after being tortured by the Sri Lankan army, a fact established by Australian authorities. He could choose to go home, a type of death sentence. Or stay in detention. But we were flexible.

The Minister might grant him a visa. In the future. Which he wouldn’t get because the Minister had decided he had failed the character test. Concerns were raised then about Dutton’s use of the heads-I-win-tails-you-lose, god-like, arbitrary power the Home Affairs Minister has to either grant or deny visas at whim.

In his decision, Federal Court Justice Rares called it “absurd” and “unacceptable” to put forth that Dutton might issue Deva with a visa in the future when he had just found – on grounds not disclosed – that the mentally ill refugee failed the character test. The justice found that the government’s position was unreasonable and legally invalid.”

It may be rhetoric when Team Dutton pledges to lock asylum-seekers with criminal records up again. That is, whilst the Coalition is in opposition. But cheap words cheapen lives. Demean our own. Not to be outdone on “sovereign borders” a high-sounding nonsense in the game of chicken that is our asylum-seeker debate in Question Time, Labor has already been forced into the squalid compromise of the ankle-bracelet.

Perhaps there’s a glimmer of hope. Demonising can be a vote winner. But not in Dunkley. It might have worked once for Howard and again for Abbott, who in turn fostered con-artist Morrison, who gave us his tough cop on the beat, while letting Mike Pezzullo take charge via intermediary Scott Briggs. For five years, Pezullo gave the orders. Not that Morrison has anything to atone for because his God forgives him. It’s in his valedictory speech. And Ley has still not retracted her women-assaulted-by-foreign-criminals tweet on X.

An increasingly rubbery figure, Ley easily wins most mobile face on a night of such jubilation and jocund hilarity you would swear that the Liberals had won. At least she’s fronted up. Eighty percent of success is showing up, Woody Allen reckons.

Delivery? Ley puts so much into it that it’s exhausting just to watch. Has she had elocution lessons from Michaelia Cash, the lip-reader’s friend? She somehow finds extra facial muscles to come up with the whopper of the night. Tonight’s swing will win us government.

You know, she knows it’s a monstrous lie by the way she moves her jaw. Like a python swallowing an ox.

Dunkley, take a bow. The electorate is still “reeling”, as the Canberra gallery loves to say – it’s what you do after “bracing” yourself – another favourite cliché. But there is no word for how you recover from a sordid, multi-million dollar, US-style shit-storm of lies, stunts, and slurs amidst the static of Ley’s disgraceful racism, pitched so low it sounds as if it’s scripted by a tipsy One Nation intern.

The high spending low-punching campaign of fear, hate and racism is new to Dunkley, where the exotic and the aberrant are mainstream but try not to make eye contact after dark, especially in Young Street, Beach Street and around the train station subway. Even unflappable, seasoned, seen-it-all-before Frankston has never seen this before.

Ley may be a contender for a door prize, but what really steals the show is Advance. The Liberals are outspent by their bag-men and women, the billionaire, dark money propaganda unit Advance. But unlike The Voice, this time, the punters are not buying it. Cynics would say that the stage three tax cut beat Advance to it – a negative campaign doesn’t do so well against money in your pocket. But this battle for the hearts and minds of Dunkley probably is its own worst enemy. More than overkill, there is a sterling failure to communicate. And it’s hard not to see the whole, baroque excess of the assault, as something out of Monty Python; a futile exercise in lurid self-parody.

Perhaps we can take heart in the defeat of billionaire-backed Advance’s hate-bombing saturation campaign of lies, aggressing voters; “hammering letter boxes” texting, in-your-Facebooking, tweeting and other anti-social media sledging and its fleet of Truth Trucks, the mother of all defamatory mobile billboards. One features Chinese president, Xi Jinping, voting Labor insinuating that our ALP is somehow a crypto-Communist party. But the billionaires are thrifty. It’s the same image Advance deployed in the 2022 federal election.

It’s a wonder they weren’t laughed out of town. Advance’s outrageous assault on truth, democracy and decency belongs in Trump’s America. It’s an import we don’t need and won’t heed, however much a group of tone-deaf billionaires want it. But, it won’t stop trying. As Dr Jeremy Walker points out, behind Advance is the Atlas foundation, a global network of over six hundred libertarian think tanks.

Advance is a shadowy group funded by billionaires, including Gina Rinehart, also a queen pin in the IPA’s opaque funding and the man who did so well out of pro-coal Coalition energy policy, Trevor St Baker. It easily outspends the million dollar plus Liberal budget. It played a key role in sabotaging The Voice, but in Dunkley, failed to reprise its undermining of established democratic processes. As far as we know. We need, nevertheless, to demand to know who is behind it and what it is up to. Anthony Klan reports for Michael West Media, that Advance is being investigated by The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) because of its peculiarly opaque ownership structure.

Just as worrying is Advance’s calculated misrepresentation as some type of grassroots movement, a concept which Advance has already capably seeded in a corporatised and monopolistic Australian MSM where you can hear your ABC selling it as just a right-wing equivalent of Get-Up or the Unions. Every channel has the same pitch. We are being sold a pig in a poke.

In the meantime, we are vulnerable to a powerful propaganda machine, which may be crude at this stage but which will certainly be capable of refining its techniques.

We need to know just how tightly Advance has bound itself to the Coalition. The negativity of the “Noalition’s” campaign is an alarm call. Forget policy, issues, leaders’ integrity or party achievements, the Dunkley by-election is reheated leftovers and the Coalition’s happy place – rapists, paedophiles all aboard Tampa Redux; Howard’s trump card, politics as theatre of cruelty.

And Anklegate. Much as there will be a scapegoat at hand, the fiasco raises such serious questions about the role of the police and the liaison between it and the Coalition that in a healthy democratic system, Peter Dutton and Sussan Ley would already have resigned.

Sending Labor its threadbare message is less a federal opposition than the remnants of Morrison’s divide and rule legacy, not so much a Liberal parliamentary party as ten separate factions, headed by a duo of desperadoes, Peter “Paladin’s Cave” Dutton and deputy Sussan Ley who resigned from “Fizza” Turnbull’s cabinet over her 2015 “impulse buying” of a $795,000 Main Beach, Gold Coast investment property -from a Liberal vendor and party donor, whilst a gullible nation paid her travel bill to fly to Wesley Hospital in Brisbane to list new medicines on the PBS list. As you do. Team Dutton has swallowed Trump’s playbook whole in its bid to get attention; its eagerness to embrace the dark arts of media manipulation, disinformation. Lying its head off.

Flooding the zone with shit, Steve Bannon calls it. In other words, as Mike Seccombe explains in The Saturday Paper:

“Make outrageous populist pronouncements and then wait for the mainstream media to report them. Inevitably the other side will seek to debunk them. Ed Coper, Ed Coper, CEO of progressive communications outfit Populares. calls it the “weaponisation of lies”.

We should not be too startled by the right’s uptake of the tactics. Lying is a Liberal tradition. Wanton wastrel, a sterling pioneer in the politics of squander, John Winston Howard, took the proceeds of a mining boom and blew it on the middle class and the rich. Lied his eyebrows off over babies overboard to win the 2001 election. Howard is still lying about Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction. He “misled parliament” or lied to the house that our illegal attack of Iraq was constitutionally justified. He’d taken expert advice.

Failed priest, Tony Abbott, who crashed and burnt as PM because although he had the keys to the Lodge, he had no idea how to drive it, tipped off a startled nation in 2010 that you could only take as the “Gospel truth” stuff which he had written down.

But it’s not just the lies that paint Labor as an enemy of the people. Beneath the rabid dog-eat-dog, rancorous, hyper partisan, post-truth politics of our increasingly rattled right wing you can feel the fear and the desperation mounting. Link it with unlimited resources – and what could possibly go wrong?

Let’s put the band together. Supercharged with fear and the dark money of billionaires’ right-wing lobby mob, Advance, lead vocalist, Federal Coalition deputy-leader, Siren Sussan Ley, belts out her wog rapist in our midst shtick. Her leader and stand over tactician for Xenophobes-R-Us Benito Dutton, currently in witness protection because Victorians hate him – is on percussion. The Big Lie is that Labor (rather than the High Court) has released 149 former indefinite detainees into the community, a Goebbels-type lie central to a campaign of primal fearmongering, racist dog-whistling in conjunction with his corporate media backers.

Forget the light on the hill, we are out in the paddock in the ute, at night, roo-shooting, but with “rapists, paedophiles and murderers” in the spotlight. And not just at home. In the world theatre, “human animals” are to be exterminated by zealots.

Dunkley is won by a woman dedicated to the empowerment of women; Jodie Belyea represents some of the best values which are part of Labor’s democratic, social justice, working class heritage. Her victory gives us hope.

On the Coalition’s side of the ledger of party politics appears a yawning chasm of moral deficit and at times comically incompetent leadership, a party ripe for exploitation by Advance, a sinister organisation with its own agenda masquerading as a popular, home-spun movement. This enemy of the people is controlled by a small group of powerful billionaires with international links. Beneath the theatre of the by-election and the alarming spectacle of the Liberal Party’s decline are symptoms of its capture by a secretive, self-interested cabal which warrant urgent, extensive and through investigation.

 

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button

18 comments

Login here Register here
  1. Andrew Smith

    Symptom of the Libs or LNP following and being influenced by their own RW media cartel, talking points and related influencers, but the same narratives are neither couched in reality nor have traction with increasingly diverse urban voters nowadays?

  2. tess lawrence

    G’day Dear David, I do salute you. Thank you so much for writing this important article – and for the critical backgrounding and dot-joining you do. You have a wonderful way of combining forensic journalism with literary muscle. Learned so much. Onya.

  3. corvusboreus

    Welcome back David, I always enjoy the details in your work.

    Regarding the political shit slinging conducted by transnational ‘finktanks’, I’m not sure if the member for Warringahs proposed “stop the lies” bill would significantly effect the misinformative activities of Advance/Atlas/Heartland, but at least it would prevent public funding from adding to the reek.

    https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r7101

    Based on public polling, it seems that a “cut the crap” amendment is not exactly an unpopular notion within the general electorate.

    Overwhelming support for truth in political advertising laws following referendum

  4. David Tyler

    Thanks, Tess. Advance will continue to improve its influence unless there’s a concerted effort to expose their secret sabotage.
    Appreciate your support and your work, too, Tess.

  5. David Tyler

    Andrew. Agree. Bizarrely out of touch, terminally desperate and dysfunctional. And Dutton up shit creek. Advance already seems to be writing his party’s comms.

  6. Barry Thompson.

    Good to read your informative and well written work David.

    Hope to see more from you on AIM.

  7. Terence Mills

    The lack of any discernable policy initiatives from the Liberals was obvious at this by-election. When they should have been laying out their plan to do things better, they had nothing.

    Even Paul Murray On SKY had trouble admitting that the Labor Party had not lost any primary votes.

    Liberal candidate Nathan Conroy, was sadly deficient when interviewed by the ABC and he demanded that we have a conversation about nuclear power and the transition to small modular reactors. He was invited to open that conversation by saying how many SMR’s, where they would be located, how long they would take to build and install and what the initial and ongoing costs would be compared to renewable alternatives : he had nothing to say, he didn’t really want to have a conversation he was just parroting what he had been told to say.

    And when it comes to Susssan, I’m seriously worried about her grasp on reality, it seems to have slipped.

    And as for Spudley, nowhere to be seen, he doesn’t work weekends, seriously !

    What a bus load of frauds !

  8. Phil Pryor

    Much has been said and so much is clear to the observer, that a trail of dogshit in the park leads one by eyes and noses to the Liberal Party Policy Dungpile, with farcical acting by submediocre failures. LLLEEEYYY is such a cartoony carbuncle of a characterleached cadaverous clump that NOTHING will save her for honesty and decency of reputation. Dutton and his DUNGPILE team with its fascist moneyed, interfering backers got Nowhere here, for their swollen lies are hollow, a vacuum of vomitous vagueness. The bloodsuckers, oppressors, coercers, distorters and fabricators of the nasy right wing remain foully stupid.

  9. Lucy Hamilton

    Terence, I’m not sure why you are still looking for policy from the Liberals. They are an outreach arm of the Atlas Network aiming to cut taxes for rich and corporations, and deregulate (remove our protections) for the same people. That is not a policy position one can sell, and so they play culture war games to conceal it, to win an aggrieved base and because they are crippled nostalgics longing for a time when they didn’t have to share power with women and non-white people. They are not playing politics: they know once the climate catastrophe escalates and food prices skyrocket, that the civil unrest will escalate. They are looking for the relatively charismatic strongman who will give them the electoral autocracy that they intend to have to suppress the unruly mob who will interrupt their profits.

  10. David Tyler

    Terence – a busload of frauds indeed. Or a charabanc of charlatans. The stud muffin they picked as candidate didn’t help matters by being inarticulate, incoherent and completely innocent of any details. The modular nuclear reactor is a hoot. Doesn’t exist. Unless, of course, he means the power plant of a nuclear submarine such as we’re promised. Despite not being able to dock, crew or refuel.

  11. David Tyler

    corvusboreus, thank you. Will look with interest at the fate of that bill. As to finance, there was Kennett writing to Liberal Party members asking for donations and the word is they easily blew a million dollars -plenty of wealthy donors. But fascinating is how the official Advance figure is $300,000 because they are determined to play the game of being a grassroots organisation. Again, reliable estimates are that they spent more than the Liberals. We will never know because of the labyrinthine maze of companies they’ve chosen to hide their activities, assess and backers.

  12. RomeoCharlie

    David, welcome back. In a brilliant exposition of all that’s wrong with Spud’s spongers, you barely touched on, but did mention, what I consider to be one of the big issues of the Dunkley campaign, the police release of allegations of sexual assault into the campaign but then admitting they’d named the wrong person. I consider this an extraordinary intervention and one that needs to be fully explored. Heads should roll. And I agree totally with all you have said about Advance it is US style political interference we don’t want or need. I hope ASIC gets into it quickly and shuts it down though with the tentacles it has around the world it wouldn’t be long before a new iteration arose. Groundhog Day. Well done again.

  13. Sully of Broken Hill

    Thank you David for the great read.
    On Saturday night, self-anointed Dunkley expert, David Speers, who spent one day in the Dunkley Electorate, the week before last week told us that Advance is a right-wing version of Get-up, failing to mention Get-up is member-financed and member agenda driven, as against Advances Billionaire/millionaire funding and agenda setting.
    Sadly not even the supposedly “our” ABC can be relied on for the basic facts.
    I would guess most of the ABC’s audience is more politically aware than Speers, who gets very excited over LNP talking points.

  14. Fred Engels

    Goodness Gracious!
    In My Very Honest Opinion (IMVHO)

    SPUD the DUD!
    SPUD the THUG!
    SPUD the MUG!

    ” … he can GO … Mr Speaker …”
    “ … she … Susssan… can GO with him too … Mr Speaker …”

    Will this … DELUSIONAL PATHETIC SELFISH POLITICS from the LNP ever end?
    LNP is totally unelectable …
    BAZZINGA!

    Thanks, David, for the great article!

  15. Terence Mills

    Liberal MP for Flinders, Zoe McKenzie congratulated Labor’s Jodie Belyea on her Dunkley win. That was unforgivable to the Liberal warlords particularly as she said :

    “You have been a good friend to women across the Mornington Peninsula” Ms McKenzie wrote in her 10.30pm message.

    “Look forward to working with you in looking after paradise”‘

    That act of mature goodwill went down badly with some of Ms McKenzie’s colleagues, who called it ‘unforgivable’ and ‘naive’ when the Liberals are ‘at war’ with Labor. A photo of two female politicians together has caused shockwaves, outrage, name calling and talk of the major parties being at ‘war’ with each other.

    The two women were photographed together which brought about condemnation from Liberal colleagues who said, among other things :

    A senior colleague of Ms McKenzie’s told The Australian” the photo was ‘an absolute act of naivety”.

    Another said they were ‘floored’ by the picture.

    ‘To say the anger among the ranks is palpable would be an understatement,’ they said.

    A third said the friendliness on display would cause problems in trying to unseat Ms Belyea at the next federal election, which is likely to be held in May 2025.

    ‘We are at war with Labor. To think this new breed of Liberal thinks otherwise is infuriating,’ they said.

    Further complicating matters is that Ms McKenzie’s husband, Rodrigo Pintos Lopez, has just resigned as chief-of-staff to Victorian Liberal leader John Pesutto.

    One Liberal source said the photo showed ‘zero political judgement’.

    Clearly the Liberal Party is not ready to accept adult, mature women in their ranks.

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13152247/Photo-Zoe-McKenzie-Jodie-Belyea-Dunkley-byelection.html

  16. Clakka

    Excellent article, chock-a-block. Thanks David.

    Yes, well said TM.

    The Liberals at war with Labor and full of hatred.

    It seems that’s all they’ve got. The immature diversions, screeches, screams, tantrums and defiance of shit-filled potty-sitters.

    The biggest lie; that they’re not finished yet

  17. JulianP

    Thank you David for an excellent, informative article – much appreciated.
    You certainly cover a lot of ground.
    In your last para you state a number of conclusions which I believe are appropriate.
    I would add that while “truth in advertising” is worth pursuing, we really need to know who is funding campaigns and pretty much instant disclosure of political advertising.
    Overall I would support the independents’ demands for electoral reform, but like most of the readers here, I won’t be holding my breath.

  18. Cool Pete

    Sussan Ley’s statement sounded more at home in the anti-Chinese rhetoric of the 1850s and 60s or the speeches of Edmund Barton. There may have been a large number of Chinese men coming over after the discovery of gold, but many were sent by wealthier overlords. Okay, some of them had wives back in China, and some of the ones who were sojourners had a wife back in China and married an Irishwoman or an Aboriginal woman and had a few kids over here, and then returned to their families in China after around seven years. Some of them stayed, married local women and remained in Australia. Implicit in her statement, also, is a belief that crimes against Australian women by foreign men are unacceptable but crimes by Australian men are not!
    The Liberal Party has gone from being a party that believed in individualism to being an outfit of rednecks!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 2 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

Return to home page