Denying our First Nations people a voice will…

For some reason, I find myself yet again writing about this referendum.…

From Balloons to AUKUS: The War Drive Against…

When will this hate-filled nonsense stop? Surveillance balloons treated like evocations of…

It's frightening when you join the dots in…

By Andrew Klein In 2023 we see violence against segments of the…

Solar industry feeling the heat over disposal of…

University of South Australia Media Release The renewable energy sector is facing a…

Brits spy on master spy writer

By Andrew Lownie I have never considered myself as a dangerous radical or…

Criminals at Large: The Iraq War Twenty Years…

The arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court for Russian President Vladimir…

Spent Matters: The AUKUS Nuclear Waste Problem

When Australia – vassal be thy name – assumed responsibilities for not…

For The Parents, Grandparents, Aunts and Uncles With…

Ok, I wrote this sometime last century and I was never sure…


Don’t mention a Default Price for electricity !

The National Energy Guarantee (NEG) we are told is all about bringing down the electricity prices paid by consumers whilst at the same time paying lip service to reduce our CO2 emissions. This latter objective is a little bit Ho-Hum as our prime minister is currently going to extreme lengths to appease the climate change deniers (and hold on to his job) and is likely to drop emission reduction targets altogether in the next few days, so for the moment let’s focus on bringing down prices.

It is electorally popular to have a policy of reducing household energy prices, the government have come out boldly and told us that with their NEG we can expect that the average household to start saving $550 a year on their electricity bills commencing 2020 and each year thereafter. But that headline-grabbing number won’t appear in any legislation neither will it feature as part of the ‘guarantee’. Indeed, only $140 of that saving is loosely linked to the NEG, the other $400 has got to come from somewhere else but it’s not clear where.

What the government are quite happy to sweep under the rug at the moment is the very sensible recommendation of the Australian Competition & Consumer Commission (the ACCC) who have said that electricity pricing should be transparent at the point of sale. What the ACCC are proposing is that we strip electricity pricing of the mystique that free market competition has brought to it. Their recommendation is to abolish standard retail contracts from big electricity retailers and replace them with “default market offers” set by the Australian Energy Regulator (AER). The regulator would be given the power to set the maximum price for the default offer in each state or territory, a form of price regulation imposing a price cap for consumers. The price set by the AER would represent the efficient cost of supply in a given region, including a “reasonable margin” for retailers from which they could discount should they wish to do so. Designated retailers would be required to supply electricity to consumers at the default price on request, or in circumstances where the consumer has not taken up a market offer. The default offer would contain simple pricing transparency for easy comparison purposes and would include minimum payment periods, optional paper bills (at no extra cost) and access to bill smoothing (spreading your estimated yearly energy costs over regular monthly installments : for example, if you estimate your annual outlays at say $1200 but with the concentration being during the winter [or summer depending on which end of the country you live] you will be able to pay at a pre-agreed rate of say $100 a month.)

This recommendation by the ACCC is simple and straightforward and will we are told bring down household energy costs and bring much-needed transparency to an industry that has thrived on obfuscation and the ability to gouge customers by intentionally making their pricing regimes obscure, unclear and unintelligible.

To quote the ACCC, their recommendation on default pricing would have the effect of :

Moving average residential customers who are still on the range of current ‘standing’ offers to the new ‘default’ offer could result in savings of $500 to $750 per annum (25-35 per cent). Similarly, small and medium businesses could save $1450-$2250 (30-35 per cent) per year by moving to a standard ‘default’ offer. Currently over 20 per cent of small businesses are on high ‘standing’ offers.

Whilst Labor have embraced the ACCC recommendations, the coalition have been less than enthusiastic with some on the far right of the coalition comparing this form of price transparency to rampant socialism.

At a time when our prime minister is poised to be unceremoniously dumped by a rabid right-wing mob led by Tony Abbott and Barnaby Joyce, like a bunch of extras from the Living Dead, salivating at the prospect of tearing down Turnbull and installing a potato in his stead – it is suggested that he will bypass the recommendations of the ACCC just to appease these knuckle-draggers. For us, the consumers, it is critical that we force the government to focus on and to adopt this eminently sensible recommendation from the ACCC.

The full ACCC report is here and the recommendation in question is under Chapter 12 Recommendation 30.

 284 total views,  2 views today


Login here Register here
  1. Nw England Cocky

    “This recommendation by the ACCC is simple and straightforward and will we are told bring down household energy costs and bring much needed transparency to an industry that has thrived on obfuscation and the ability to gouge customers by intentionally making their pricing regimes obscure, unclear and unintelligible.”

    And here are the reasons that the Liarbral Party and the “National$ prefer Adulterers” will NOT allow this to happen …. it would advantage everyday Australian voters and their families.

    “Women supporting Adulterers support National$”.

  2. Shaun Newman

    For the umpteenth time in the past 6 years, the L’NP is split asunder with the “strong leader” Prime Minister conceding defeat to his predecessor and in the process pulling the Liberal Party to pieces, and just for good measure the National Party with it. This L’NP government is now completely incapable of governing and the PM should immediately call an election so the people can decide.

  3. Max Gross

    The LNP do not “do” government, they do business opportunities for themselves and their cronies. That is all.

  4. king1394

    A quick way to reduce utility prices without the pain of negotiating with the privatised energy providers would be to remove the GST from household electricity and gas, which are just as essential as food. GST could be charged on a set excess perhaps.

  5. Kronomex

    Ah, nothing like the desperation of a man who sold everything out to be a “leader” and now sees the writing on the wall for his folly, narcissism, and greed for power –

    The self inflicted poo level is rising and is now just under his chin and he’s scared witless (bet you thought I was going to say shitless) by all the back room knife sharpening.

  6. Pierre Wilkinson

    All this whilst energy companies announce record profits… but wasn’t privatisation supposed to deliver cheaper energy?

  7. Terence Mills

    The prime minister is evidently taking his lead from AIMN :

    In a video posted to Facebook last night, Mr Turnbull also revealed a plan to impose
    default energy prices on power companies, as well as tough penalties for providers
    that failed to bring costs down.

    But will it save him ?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 2 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

Return to home page
%d bloggers like this: