No means no

As the now former Royal Spanish Football Federation President Luis Rubiales discovered…

Mission to Free Assange: Australian Parliamentarians in Washington

It was a short stint, involving a six-member delegation of Australian parliamentarians…

The Angertainer Steps Down: Rupert Murdoch’s Non-Retirement

One particularly bad habit the news is afflicted by is a tendency…

The ALP is best prepared to take us…

There's a myth created by the Coalition as far back as I…

On the day of Murdoch's retirement...

By Anthony Haritos Yes, we were cheap. And we were very nasty. Yes,…

We have failed the First Nations people

These words by Scott Bennett in his book White Politics and Black Australians…

Fighting the Diaspora: India’s Campaign Against Khalistan

Diaspora politics can often be testy. While the mother country maintains its…

The sad truth

Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price's comment that: ... she did not believe there are…


Dirt-cheap solar evaporation could provide soil pollution solution

Media Release from the University of South Australia

A team led by University of South Australia researchers has pioneered a new soil remediation technique that is significantly faster, simpler, safer, and more cost-effective than currently available methods.

A recent report by the UN’s Food and Agriculture Organization identifies soil pollution as a major threat to the global production of safe and sufficient food, and notes that removing pollutants from soil is currently “a technically complex and costly undertaking, [with costs] ranging from tens of thousands to hundreds of millions of USD per year.”

A UniSA-led team including Associate Professor Haolan Xu and Dr Gary Owens has developed a new remediation technique that uses a super-efficient solar evaporation surface to draw water from the soil through a sponge-like filter that traps contaminants, mimicking the process of transpiration that occurs in natural plants, but at a greatly accelerated rate.

“Plants naturally draw mineral components out of the soil when they move water from their roots into their stems, leaves and flowers, where those mineral components are trapped,” Dr Owens says.

“This means plants can be used to extract contaminants from soil, but the process is very, very slow, often taking multiple growing seasons, particularly in heavily contaminated situations, where the soil toxicity means the plants struggle to grow and often die.

“We have created a system that mimics this process – a form of biomimetic plant – but one that does so at a much faster rate and without any of the problems caused by toxicity.”

Worldwide, more than 10 million sites are considered soil polluted, with more than half contaminated by heavy metals such as cadmium and lead, or metalloids such as arsenic.

The new system can remove such contaminants in as little as two weeks by using a super-efficient solar evaporation surface to rapidly draw water and contaminants from the soil into the biomimetic plant body.

“The solar evaporator used in this system is a variation of technology we are developing for many purposes, including desalination and wastewater purification,” Assoc Prof Xu says.

“We are achieving world-leading evaporation rates with this technology in many other areas, and as far as we know, this is the first time this approach has been applied to soil remediation.

“It is a very exciting adaptation of solar evaporation techniques, with huge potential for addressing a growing global problem.”

Both the evaporator and the contaminant-capture component are made from cheap, abundantly available materials with extremely long operational lives, and the system requires very little maintenance, with minimal setup and running costs.

“Installing this system is about as easy as driving some stakes into the ground,” Assoc Prof Xu says, “and unlike some existing soil washing techniques, it doesn’t disturb or destroy the soil composition.

“Also, the water that is added to the soil could be captured from the evaporator and recycled, meaning this could operate as a closed system, with almost no running costs.”

Further adding value to the technique, Dr Owens says it is a relatively simple process to remove the captured contaminants from the biomimetic plant body.

“This means those materials can be harvested for reuse, and the adsorption material, which has a very high saturation point, can be reused over and over again,” he says.

The remediation technique has currently been successfully tested on a range of heavy metals including lead, chromium, cadmium and zinc, and the research team believes it will also prove a viable approach to removing other major soil contaminants.

“By adjusting the properties of the adsorption material, we could use this to remove antibiotics or PFAS from soil, and to reduce soil salinity,” Assoc Prof Xu says.

“As it is so simple and adaptable, this really could be a complete game changer – a paradigm shift ­– for soil remediation,” Dr Owens says.

“And that could have a massive impact on millions of people around the world.”

Related journal articles:

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button


Login here Register here
  1. New England Cocky

    Another example of R&D providing a solution to a problem that will create work opportunities for Australian voters.

    NO R&D No Economic Future ….. something Little Johnnie Howard & his Crooks ignored to our peril.

  2. Clakka

    Excellent news.

    Ground decontamination processes are incredibly complex and dependent not only on the nature of the contaminants, but also on the stratigraphy and hydrology in and surrounding the contaminated zone. In all Oz states it is illegal to sell land known to be contaminated unless it has been decontaminated. Of course, other than petrol stations, and industrial tank farms and refineries, the majority of sites are owned by the State. Accordingly, most of the sites remain contaminated, unused stranded assets in the hands of those that owned them prior to the legislation.

    Having been intimately involved in a major decontamination project where ‘world best practice’ was thoroughly investigated and assessed by geotech/geochem engineers and other scientists all seeking to achieve ground that meets designated human health / environmental standards as well as neutralising risks of re-contamination. Processes were throughly investigated, and costed, such as ‘biological removal’, ‘insitu chemical treatment’, ‘containment cells’ (insitu encapsulation), ‘thermal dissorption’, removal of soils and ‘co-burning’ in old-style coal-fired power stations.

    All were very costly, and very slow and some merely changing the nature of contamination. And although a scheme was developed that would become a new ‘world best practice’, ultimately, despite their policies against it, the government for time/cost expedience opted to relocate the problem via a dig-dump-wrap process. Such as currently being undertaken on the Westgate Tunnel project with PFAS contamination.

    Suffice to say, that most ubiquitous, serious and hard to manage contamination is at sites where fossil fuel derivatives are the deadly culprits. And those derivatives always contain very persistent chemicals known as ‘BTEX’ (Benzine, Toluene, Ethylbenzine and Xylene) which amongst other concerns, also end up concentrated in the food chain and us. It has been for many years illegal for these chemicals to be present in manufactured products (like toluene once used extensively in paints and inks such as house paint and printing inks).

    Just another reason why we MUST move on from the deadly business of extraction and use of fossil fuels, as the resultant clean-up may take generations.

    It is important to understand whether the process described in the article can also capture and remove BTEX chemicals.

  3. Phil Pryor

    As far as the untrained and unaware can be informed, This looks a promising path on a tricky problem area to me, and while it is not “news” like the Merde Dogs want for profiteering and control, it is part of the real and often not well publicised news. Any environmental remediation is wonderful for us all.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 2 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

Return to home page
%d bloggers like this: