The Law

With the hounding down of Sam Dastyari today we saw the reality…

Liars always shout and make wild accusations to…

By Lauraine KnightTurnbull and his MPs have turned all their guns on…

Day to Day Politics: How to become a…

Tuesday 12 December 2017Author’s Note:This is a hypothetical piece written by an…

Train track media narratives

When a political event unfolds, you would expect that each media outlet,…

Day to Day Politics: I was right when…

Monday 11 December 2017On December 7 I wrote a piece titled “Bill…

A double agent in the house? It's the…

Loud hosannas resound in Canberra. Hallelujah. Could it be the joyous news…

Watch this space in 2017 - Redux

Normally around this time of the year over at The Political Sword…

Protection of, or Protection from Religion

By Terence MillsThe Prime Minister has called for a review of religious…

«
»
Facebook

Day to Day Politics: When did it all go wrong? Part two – Newspapers.

Friday September 23 2016

Murdoch Media. Where the truth goes to die.

What part have newspapers played in the demise of our democracy? There was a time in my life when to miss reading The Age daily would bring on symptoms of withdrawal. Newspapers have been part of my daily life for as long as I can remember. I purchased them for reasons of a desire to be informed. To understand what was going on around me. To shape a world view.

In modern terms ‘The Fourth Estate’ commonly refers to the media but more specifically the print media. In the American system of government the term segregates the media from the constitution, the law, various levels and branches of administration. In Australia the same principle applies.

And of course the truth of it. It has no official status but is of symbolic importance. Its function should be to provide access to the public of information vital to the essential health of democracy for two reasons. First, it ensures that citizens make responsible, informed choices rather than acting out of ignorance or misinformation. Second, information serves a “checking function” by ensuring that elected representatives uphold their oaths of office and carry out the wishes of those who elected them.

It is called the fourth branch of government because it plays such an important role in the fortunes of political candidates and issues. This is where the role of the media can become controversial. News reporting is supposed to be objective, but journalists are people, with feelings, opinions and preconceived ideas.

And it is the owner and the editor who call the shots and employs the journalists.

What is a newspaper?

“A newspaper is a publication that is issued daily or weekly and includes local and international news stories, advertisements, announcements, opinions, cartoons, sports news etc. It is an important method of letting the public know everything that is happening in their local area and around the world. Even with the advancements in computer technology, the internet and on-line bloggers newspapers continue to be an important, if not a rapidly declining aspect of everyday life.

Editorial opinion usually reflects the proprietor’s political philosophy. And whoever owns it is entitled to represent his or her views. Stories usually attract column space relevant to the credibility or authenticity of the subject. For example if 98% of the world’s scientists said that global warming was of major concern than normally the other side would receive exposure pertinent to its credibility. There is of course this fourth estate thing that requires truthful journalistic enquiry together with fair and balanced reporting. In this area Murdoch papers fail miserably. In fact his publications have abdicated any allegiance to the doctrines of the Fourth Estate.

When it was launched and for some time after The Australian was a decent newspaper. In the 1980s and 1990s, before the Internet, it was a credible source of computer industry news and general world affairs.

When it turned into the official newsletter of the Liberal and National Parties is difficult to pinpoint. But it certainly did.

The average print circulation for The Australian on weekday’s pre 2013 was 116,655 during the June quarter 2013, it fell 9.8 per cent compared to the June quarter 2012. The average print circulation for The Weekend Australian was 254,891 during the June quarter 2013, down 10.8 per cent compared to the June quarter the previous year.”

Murdoch newspapers have little readership and have been losing millions of dollars for years. Rupert Murdoch has been propping them up for two reasons. One it is in his blood and two because of the power and influence it gives him. In all probability when he dies The Australian (and others) will ether fold or be sold.

However as it stands The Australian is the go-to source for every right wing supporter and feral media commentator in the country. It feeds its conservative bullshit to the shock jocks and the awaiting throng of drooling journalists who would rather do the bosses bidding than report the truth.

An observation.

“If a newspaper article is written in a manner to suggest objectivity but subjective words are scattered throughout it together with carefully phrased unsupported statements then dismiss the article as having no cogency”.

As an example of their right-wing bias I put to you this list of stories that I collected from its pages on Thursday January 16 2014.

Yes it’s just one day a couple of years ago but on weekends it gets worse. It is not an isolated instance. Almost every day the front page is riddled with anti-left rhetoric.

1 Another instalment in the long running, dirty, smear campaign against Catholic Church child sex whistle-blower, Peter Fox.

2 Climate change denier, Maurice Newman, attacks scientists again.

3 Economist David Crowe defends Tony Abbott’s Commission of Audit saying there is no alternative to raising the GST and selling government assets including Australia Post and the ABC.

4 Another Republican Party report accusing President Barack Obama of a cover-up over the Benghazi attack on September 11, 2012.

5 A defense of Australian immigration minister Scott Morrison, insisting that the Australian navy never fired on a boat carrying asylum-seekers from Indonesia.

6 Kenneth Wiltshire calls for schools to teach conservative values.

7 Andrew Robb writes yet another article denying climate change.

8 Editor, Chris Mitchell, cheers on the demise of the Australia Greens Party in his sarcastically titled “Say a little prayer for Greens”.

9 Peter Shergold argues for the selling off and outsourcing of social services traditionally provided by government.

10 Greg Sheridan cheers Tony Abbott’s victory over people smugglers.

11 Gerard Henderson attacks SBS over a documentary on the history of ASIO calling SBS’ screening of the doco “totalitarian slurs” and accuses SBS of “leftist sympathies”.

13 Angela Shanahan calls for abortion to be banned at a national level.

14 Bjørn Lomborg says the burning of coal is not causing climate change.

Please Note. Janet Albrechtsen was on holidays so it could have been worse.

I repeat. This is not an isolated incident as the front page of the Australian often contains up to six anti left stories.

Generally speaking newspapers report both sides of an argument, its bias will usually slant toward its own editorial bent. However most will seek to achieve a reasonable balance in light of the weight of any given argument. With climate change it would be hard to argue the weight should come down on the side of science. Yet in his Quarterly Essay critique Australian academic Robert Manne read almost seven years worth of news and opinion articles in the Australian Newspaper and discovered that, of the 880 articles printed, just 180 were “favourable to climate change action and 700 unfavourable” – a four to one difference. On the newspapers opinion pages alone, the sceptics out-number the “consensus” 10 to one. Enough said. You be the judge.

An observation.

“It is a pity that fact in journalism cannot be made compulsory and decency legislated”.

The Murdoch media’s approach to journalism can best be described with these lines that I wrote some time ago and often repeat.

“It is said of pornography (and I am not expert in this field) that in order to maintain the viewers or readers interest it needs to progressively become more outlandish – more tantalising – more seductive-more flirtatious-more provocative – more stunning and more enticing. And in their desire to maintain some dominance, that’s exactly what main stream media is doing. It has chosen to prostitute itself in the forlorn hope of remaining relevant”.

The pity of it is that newspapers have chosen to address their declining readership with absurdity. No matter how many pictures of half-naked girls, sensationalist headlines and scandalous biased stories with melodramatic front page exaggeration their sales still go down.

Murdoch is so locked into a world where newspapers once dictated or swayed public opinion that he cannot see alternative ways of doing things. It would be impossible for him to consider that the opposite might work, that social conscience might be a worthy pursuit for any newspaper. This of course not only applies to him but to other proprietors also.

Newspapers as we know them will in a matter of years fail to exist. But the damage the have caused to society cannot be forgotten. Their capacity for persuasion is/was so misused. The lying headlines immune from criticism. The incitement to racial violence. Their character assassinations. The demonising of people seeking asylum. The half-truths. The imbalance in their reporting of Climate Change. The shaping of public opinion for nefarious reasons.

In the shaping of opinion they have a lot to answer for.

Of course I realise that the internet has had an enormous effect on newspaper sales but would Murdoch ever consider that telling the truth might just have saved them.

Murdoch Media. Where the truth goes to die.

My thought for the day.

“Less informed voters unfortunately outnumber the more politically aware. Therefore, conservative news outlets feed them all the bullshit they need. And the menu generally contains a fair portion of untruths”.

PS Next post in the series: ‘New Media’.

 


21 comments

  1. Rezblah

    Once upon a time mr Murdoch and co would have been strung up for sedition, simple as that

  2. Zathras

    I remember Murdoch’s The Daily Mirror newspaper during the Whitlam era.

    In particular there was once a headline that attacked Dole Bludgers saying they were raking in $350 per week.
    The Late Final Extra edition (which targets people going home from work) had the headline changed to $700 per week.

    When later challenged their defence was that it should have read $700 per fortnight (which was nonsense because they used the same big screaming font).

    I also recall how his journalists went on strike for the first time in history because their stories were being rewritten and they were being told to change facts to spin their stories to be anti-Whitlam and pro-Fraser.

    In an era where the internet was not even yet a fantasy, what chance did voters have of finding alternative sources of information?

    Nothing seems to have changed since then, except the decline in the quality of the journalism.

  3. stephengb2014

    Absolutely agree John, every part of your article has that “ring of truth”

    Whilst you admitted that AIMN is an outlet for the Left of politics. I note that AIMN and its contributors, are not just from the Left of the political spectrum, but that their articles have more of that “ring of truth” about them, often supported by reference and or links for varification and of course most importantly written by citizen journalists who, by my reckoning, are substantially more proffessional in their writing than the so called journalists tied to the MSM.

    AIMN contributors proffer varifiable facts rather than ignorant, sensationalistic and idiologicaly driven lies !

  4. stephentardrew

    Onya John.

  5. paulwalter

    Too early in the morning for a photo of Murdoch, the worm most singly responsible for hollowing democracy from the guts outward.

  6. Phil

    Too true John Lord. When oh when will this ethics-free disgrace-to-the-human-race Murdoch shrivel up and die? His right wing propaganda rags are distributed free to thousands of cafes, hotels, airlines daily where their front cover sits exposed with crude cartooning and giant font. All designed to drop a dose of daily poison to the unwary, uncritical passing minds.

    I will dance in the streets the moment I hear he has died, but we can sure that the LNP and and their rabies infected megaphones on radio and TV will wring their hands, weep and gnash their dentures realising that their game will be over – then the fun will begin.

  7. townsvilleblog

    For me, the day it began was the day the working persons hero was elected in 1983 and went on to doublecross Australian working people with his neo-con economics followed by his 2ic Keating. The party supposed to be representing Australian labour has never been the same since the treachery of 1983.

  8. Harquebus

    Spot on John.

    Reading newspapers and viewing news for me now is to observe what is not being reported which, is quite a lot.

    “Freedom of the press is guaranteed only to those who own one.” – Abbott Joseph Liebling

    “I’m a catalyst for change. You can’t be an outsider and be successful over 30 years without leaving a certain amount of scar tissue around the place.” — Rupert Murdoch

    “If you don’t read a newspaper every day, you are uninformed. If you do, you are misinformed.” — Mark Twain

    Cheers.

  9. Clean livin

    An unfortunate consequence in the change from balance to the right is / was the sell out of the journos that were with Murdoch. At one stage, The Australian had some extremely respected jounos, but now, one would expect, would blush if they admitted to being an Australian scribe.

    An example would be Greg Sheridan, a highly respected jouno on the international scene, who now religiously follows the Murdoch crap, and even worse, suggests that Tony Abbott will be seen as one of Australias best PMs.

    One can’t get much farther from the truth than that, thus Sheridans reputation has been sullied for (quite) a few pieces of silver!

  10. Matters Not

    Clean livin, these days Sheridan only does comedy. Look back at his ‘predictions’ over the last two decades or so and then see how they panned out.

  11. Terry2

    Well, the international press certainly rattled Turnbull’s cage yesterday in New York. At a time when he was trying to put a gloss on Australia’s border security successes and at the same time push for a seat on the UN Human Rights Commission he was pointedly asked several times what his government had done in the past three years about resettling acknowledged, processed refugees held in detention on the remote islands of Nauru and Manus.

    His response :

    “And you ask about the people on Manus Island and Nauru? Kevin Rudd put them there, the Labor Party put them there. We have been dealing with Labor’s legacy, their legacy of shame. ”

    As a certain Mandy Rice Davies noted when told by a court that Lord Astor had denied having sex with her : “Well he would say that, wouldn’t he ?”

    This man is now in the second term of government and still he cannot take ownership of a problem that is largely of his and his predecessor’s making and it’s time, once and for all, to accept that the policy of indefinite detention – no matter who initiated it – is a failed policy.

  12. Möbius Ecko

    I want you to think on this. If Turnbull is saying that the refugees on Manus and Nauru are Labor’s fault then ergo the success he’s claiming for stopping boat people belongs to Labor, not his government.

    It has been the locking up and cruel treatment of these people that the Liberals have been claiming as being the factor in stopping people smugglers and drownings. So why isn’t the media pointing out that according to Turnbull that achievement by his own admission belongs to Labor.

  13. Jack Straw

    Townsville Blog You could be right Hawke’s job on Pilot strike always puzzled me when he was in power.

  14. Rob Holmes

    To be a nit-picker, the fourth-estate refers to pre-revolutionary France where there was the crown, the nobility, the masses and the newspapers – the latter being the “fourth estate”. May have applied in other monarchies as well.

  15. Brad

    Yeah, spot on John! I was a regular reader for years of the W Australian until it became so frustratingly, ridiculously, biased that I now refuse to even look at the cover of the nasty rag in the newsagent’s. I believe global warming as an issue was the catalyst for a major shift further to the right for the paper, perhaps leading to a major shift of its readership. Shame really, it use to be an interesting read.

  16. Steve Laing - makeourvoiceheard.com

    The other problem we have is that with News Ltd owning such a large percentage of the media, journalists of whatever personal political persuasion must realise that being anti-Murdoch, or stating views that Murdoch might not approve, could be severely career limiting. They are effectively muzzled. That perhaps explains why so many otherwise quite sensible journalists are somewhat tentative in sticking the boot into the incompetent nincompoops we have had running the country these last three years (and opposing beforehand). It wasn’t until Laura Tingle finally announced that Abbott the Emperor had no clothes on, that the rest of them finally joined in and it was very quickly all over. But until that point, they were all vaguely non-committal. We are seeing exactly the same with Turnbull where they all appear to be giving him a remarkable fair suck at the saveloy, despite quite clearly not getting the mandate that was going to finally uncover the real Malcolm.

    Wait for that turn, and we will know its all over for Malcolm. Not the opinion polls unfortunately, the press gallery poll.

  17. Trish Corry

    Award winning stuff! Well done. A brilliant piece.

  18. wam

    the paper is reflected by the autocue journalists, every morning 0530-0900 and has been since 2010 when the rabbott began stirring.
    Surely turnball is ripe for a stir?
    Where is little billy????

    ps abortion is an indoctrinated nightmare and angela’s complaint is about stopping the right to harass and attack women.

    Does the 18c repeal apply???

  19. david1

    How appropriate, the spineless excuse for a PM Cayman Mal has a 4 million $ apartment in New York down the road from the Govts greatest benefactor Murdoch. Anyone for tea.

  20. Pingback: Day to Day Politics: Destroying what we stand for. | WewUnik World

Leave a Reply

Return to home page
Scroll Up
%d bloggers like this: