CPAC Down Under

Image from theepochtimes.com

It was a time for Australian conservatives to be boring, and bore each other. CPAC, otherwise known as the Conservative Political Action Conference, had arrived in Sydney. The real entertainment bill was to be supplied by such figures as Brexiter supremo Nigel Farage and former editor-in-chief of Breitbart News London, Raheem Kassam. The rest was poor filling, the tired, cranky Fox and Sky News set.

CPAC 2019 was described in the usual, fun-filled way on the organisation’s website. “The American Conservative Union and LibertyWorks are proud to bring CPAC to Australia for the first time!” Participate, went the message; the “shy voters” might have kept the Australian Labor Party out of office, but, and here Ronald Reagan was quoted with gusto, “The future doesn’t belong to the light-hearted. It belongs to the brave.”

For only the second time since coming into existence in 1974 with 400 registrants, CPAC was holding a gathering outside the United States. Its existence owed much to the initial explorations of the conservative magazine Human Events, and the creation of the American Conservative Union. The ACU was itself a gathering spurred on by the defeat of Senator Barry Goldwater in 1964. As Human Events described it, “The CPAC Conference was seen as a way of rebuilding the morale of conservatives and of refocusing the energies of the movement for future battles.”

Farage did not disappoint, filling the forum with the invective that keeps him afloat. He, for instance, had little time for those he termed “fake” conservatives, the foremost of them being former Australian Prime Minister, the very much knifed Malcolm Turnbull. He also demonstrated certain non-too conservative credentials of his own, aiming a few salvos at members of the Royal Family back home in conversation on a Sky News panel, and during a speech at a gala dinner on Saturday.

While describing the Queen as “an amazing, awe-inspiring woman”, her misguided, degenerate offspring and their issue were quite a different matter. “When it comes to her son, when it comes to Charlie Boy and climate change, oh dear, oh dear, oh dear.” The Duke of Sussex, Prince Harry, had lost the plot in desiring a modest brood of two children, being worried about climate change.

Where had that old Harry gone, “this young, brave, boisterous, all-male, getting into trouble, turning up at stag parties inappropriately dressed, drinking too much and causing all sorts of mayhem”? Instead of putting this down to age and, unusually for some royals, the maturing process, Farage had the answer: Meghan Markle. Once they met, his credibility fell off a cliff, ignoring, for instance, “the real problem the Earth faces, and that is the fact the population of the globe is exploding but no one dares talk about it.”

This was a chance for Australian conservatives to feel loved and thought relevant by their Anglo-American cousins. Noses were powdered, outfits tailored. US-UK contingent could hardly have been that impressed. Senator Amanda Stoker’s speech on industrial relations was soporific; polemical scribe Janet Albrechtsen struck an odd note of insecurity by deeming contempt cold. “When someone treats another person with contempt, they’re putting that other person down and making themselves feel superior.” (Albrechtsen, take note.)

To the Anglo-American set went the guns, the demagogues, the reactionary ballast. On the subject of guns, Kassam was happy to offer his own theory about the murderous bounty reaped by such devices in the United States: “the establishment media and the left”; and the pharmaceutical industry. The children of America were being pumped “with these medications […] and these lies. They want them to have a little anger, but not too much.” Mental instability, anger, and the gun-toting solution: all reasonable progressions in Kassam’s reckoning.

Otherwise, the current Human Events global editor-in-chief proved conventional, lobbing grenades at Islam, recalling his role in establishing an anti-radicalisation group seeking to prevent people “throwing homosexuals off buildings, FGM (female genital mutilation) and lightly beating your wife” and mocking gender politics.

The Australians, as they often do at events where Britannia and Uncle Sam hold hands, were eclipsed. Former Deputy Prime Minister John Anderson lamented “empathy culture” and the left’s abuse of “people who dare to disagree with you”. Former Prime Minister Tony Abbott, who has had his mild spell of demagoguery in Australian politics, took issue with Victoria’s assisted dying laws (“morally shocking”, no less), identity politics, and the loss of faith. “This is why it is so easy for people to put forward fundamentally inhuman ideas and have them taken much more seriously than they should be.”

The CPAC Conference tends to function like a reassuring echo chamber rather than an arena for debate. Added publicity is only generated by those who fear its reach. One such unwitting promoter of the event was Labor’s spokesperson for Home Affairs, Senator Kristina Keneally. Having made it her personal, and failing mission, to prevent certain attendees from coming into the country, she was bound to make a mention at CPAC 2019. She did so by winning the CPAC Freedom Award, one earned for promoting the conference.

This is something she did repeatedly, suggesting that Kassam be banned for his “extensive history of vilifying people”. Kassam, for his part, suggested that the senator, that model of Catholicism, had made him feel unsafe on the streets of Sydney. “She should be ashamed of herself…There is nothing Christian about silencing your opposition.”

What Keneally ended up doing was demonstrating, yet again, how free speech in Australia functions as a mutable construction, easily forgotten in the face of insult and the hold exerted by an odious opinion. Just let them babble and fume.

 

[textblock style=”7″]

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button

[/textblock]

About Dr Binoy Kampmark 1442 Articles
Dr. Binoy Kampmark is a senior lecturer in the School of Global, Urban and Social Studies, RMIT University. He was a Commonwealth Scholar at Selwyn College, University of Cambridge. He is a contributing editor to CounterPunch and can be followed at @bkampmark.

8 Comments

  1. A large pot of fascist shit hit town and demand respect, for what, a policy of lying, boasting, manipulating, loudmouthing and posing. We found out to our disgust, up to 1945, that the only good nazi type was a dead one, and thoroughly. Extreme catholic lay educational attitudes and upbringing gave us Hitler, Mussolini, Franco, Salazar, Peron, Pinochet, Horthy, Pilsudski, the appalling Ustasha, hundreds of regimes in South and Central America. Equally appalling Islamic upbringing has given us fascist versions of an otherwise acceptable and numerous religion. Religious extreme superstition is a blot on civilisation, progress, democracy, classic liberalism, the future. Backward and irrational primitives like Farage can shout and gloat, an eternal whining child showing off (think Trump) and it is a show fit for media maggots to show indeed. But there is no decency, promise, value, future in this level of idiocy. Wake up, now, fight them.

  2. Does this passage describe the present Australian Liarbal Notional$ misgovernment?

    “Cowardly men choose the most cowardly as their leader so that they will not have to show courage; and they choose the stupidest among the stupid, so that everyone can have the feeling that he is a little better than the leader”.

    K Heiden (1944) quoted in David Lewis (2003) @ p196.

  3. These are the consequences of the Brexit campaign led by Nigel Farage.

    SMH 130819 p26. Brexit will never last, A C Grayling.

    What do the factions in British politics want from Brexit?

    The right want to protect their assets held in offshore tax havens AFTER new EU laws come into force in January 2020. Many of the Brexit backers are high net worth individuals with BILLIONS held tax free off-shore.

    The Brexit “advisory only” referendum was a voting scandal in which almost 5 MILLION voters were excluded from the franchise, including 16 & 17 year olds, many expatriates, and EU citizens resident in Britain. Most of these excluded groups would have supported the Stay Campaign.

    The Leave campaign committed electoral fraud, were prosecuted for it and paid about $500,000 in fines and costs. Without the “advisory only” status the result would have been voided because of these crimes.

    The spurious “mandate” argument has cost the time Ministers, three governments, a lost election and will likely be reversed as soon as demographics show you voters under 50 in the majority.

  4. Well, Botty can hardly talk about democracy when he blocked anyone from further commenting on his page if they didn’t lick his bum. A conservative talkfest can never be described as anything but a load of rot. Albrechtson, while not quite as caustic, is as stupid as Devine and as ignorant, too.

  5. New England Cocky has it correct. The entire focus of mainstream politics has been shifted to the concerns of poorly-educated over-50’s. They are primarily informed by Tabloid press and Talkback radio, so they are caught in a vicious circle of cluelessness anyway. I didn’t think there were enough of them still extant to vote Scotty into power, but QLD proved me wrong.

  6. I love my rabbottians, especially the graduates, who don’t watch the ABC opinion shows because they are too far left for them. When I ask if there are left journalists on any TV or Radio show. They cite their ‘worst’ commentator, Kerry O’Brien who, to me, was honest and unbiased.
    Remember terry’s incredulous reaction at the rabbott’s amoral ignorance(oh how I wish Albo would laugh at at scummo’s fools and crooks)
    I tell them he’s gone and the replacement sales, after her horror start ‘have you read the report’ is very aware of how to defer, by using questions like would you like me to listen whilst you talk, for the lnp and have you stopped beating your wife for others.
    Oh how I wish albo would do something to excite sunrise and today.into asking awkward questions.
    ps queensland is a labor state any idea why labor did poorly enough to just win everywhere but lost the two seats that could have made shorten PM but would have put scummo at risk every sitting? recording a 23-6 in queensland? Here’s a hint di’s boys got a 50% increase in revenue.
    pps
    the fact that none of my rabbottians understood cpac or knew it was on showed rupert and lnp facebook was not on the ball

  7. @whatever: I think I have been misread. The quote at 1555 hours was from Adolf Hitler in 1922 before the abortive Beer Hall Putsche.

    The English Brexit “victory” before disaster was another disruption of democratic politics by persons committed to their own pecuniary interests rather than the common wealth.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*


The maximum upload file size: 2 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here