The Angertainer Steps Down: Rupert Murdoch’s Non-Retirement

One particularly bad habit the news is afflicted by is a tendency…

The ALP is best prepared to take us…

There's a myth created by the Coalition as far back as I…

On the day of Murdoch's retirement...

By Anthony Haritos Yes, we were cheap. And we were very nasty. Yes,…

We have failed the First Nations people

These words by Scott Bennett in his book White Politics and Black Australians…

Fighting the Diaspora: India’s Campaign Against Khalistan

Diaspora politics can often be testy. While the mother country maintains its…

The sad truth

Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price's comment that: ... she did not believe there are…

A tax incentive to accelerate diversity in Australia's…

Science & Technology Australia Media Release A new tax incentive to drive diversity…

It was all a con

By Andrew Klein I remember that as a teenager we had to…


The Coalition needs an Abbott-proof fence

By Ad astra

If you were to ask Malcolm Turnbull to tell you honestly what was his most demanding and persistent political problem, Tony Abbott would most likely be his answer.

We are well aware of the legislative issues Turnbull faces, and the exultation he exhibits when finally he achieves a success – the passage of Gonski 2.0 is a recent example. We know too that he has dissention among the hard right elements in his party room. Cory Bernardi has already abandoned the Liberal Party to establish his Australian Conservatives, but Turnbull still has Eric Abetz, Kevin Andrews, Ian Macdonald, Craig Kelly, Andrew Hastie, Chris Back, Rowan Ramsay, Angus Taylor, Tony Pasin, Michael Sukkar and Zed Seselja, regular irritants led by the pernicious and vengeful Tony Abbott.

But even without his henchmen, Abbott alone is a destructive force that bursts out into the open whenever an opportunity presents. If Abbott senses that he can make political capital out of anything that Turnbull does, or says, or proposes, he is out there shafting his leader.

How can he be stopped?

If you need any reminding, here are some media accounts of Abbott’s recent assaults on his leader:

In an article by Katharine Murphy in The Guardian on 24 February titled: The postie always rings twice: Abbott and Fahour give Coalition the smell of death, after dealing with the resignation of Ahmed Fahour’s from Australia Post, she gets to Tony Abbott after his unwanted intervention in the energy debate with these words:

“The right in Australian politics is currently hell-bent on consuming itself. Civil war keeps erupting before our very eyes.

“Tony Abbott dished it out to Malcolm Turnbull in a most extraordinary fashion, using a book launch to unveil a sweeping conservative manifesto for the next federal election, declaring the Coalition needs to cut immigration, slash the renewable energy target, abolish the Human Rights Commission, and gut the capacity of the Senate to be a roadblock to the government’s agenda.

“In a provocative speech that contained several pot shots at his successor, he warned that the government won’t win the next election unless it wins back the conservative base, declaring that “Politics can’t be just a contest of toxic egos or someone’s vanity project.”

Murphy goes on:

“His intervention was a precision strike against the man who took his job, with Newspoll in the field over the weekend, and federal parliament returning next week.

“Abbott wasn’t actually talking to the colleagues, which is probably wise, given many of them want to lock him in a cupboard and throw away the key.

“It was more vicious than a conventional party room courtship exercise.

“He looked over their heads, and spoke instead to the voters Malcolm Turnbull is currently intent on trying to woo back: white working-class voters in regional areas stranded at the fag end of the mining boom – the folks drifting dangerously in Hanson’s direction because they’ve had a gutful of the circus in Canberra.

“Abbott had one simple message for those people: the emperor has no clothes.

“He took the central pitch of Turnbull’s New Year strategy to put a floor under the Liberal party’s ebbing primary vote – the energy security offensive and the government’s big coal pivot (which resonates in the post mining boom regions) – and he demolished it.

“He said the government’s policy on climate and energy was an incoherent crock.

“Not content with yanking the rug out from under Turnbull and the government’s political ‘recovery’ strategy for 2017, Abbott then upped the ante in the political arms race for disaffected conservatives.

“He put immigration on the table. Apparently we need to cut immigration to help housing affordability – a complete nonsense, and incendiary to boot – but designed to hit the front bar ‘nod’ test. (“So that’s why I can’t afford a house. Bloody immigrants. Hogging Aussie houses.”)

“It’s a little fire you light in fractious times, and watch the embers burn. If voters have logged the substance of Abbott’s pitch, rather than just consumed it as colour and movement, his message will certainly resonate in some parts of the country, and it also reflects one view inside the government.

“The chairman of the government’s backbench committee on environment and energy, Craig Kelly, just to take one voice, agrees with most of what Abbott said on Thursday night, including the desirability of lowering the immigration rate.

“The Abbott 2.0 manifesto does, however, generate one obvious response for those of us still trying to reside in a fact-based universe: if this is the answer to what ails Australia, why didn’t you do it yourself? When you were … you know … the prime minister. With power.

“Abbott’s speech was, in a fact-based universe, mildly delusional, and almost entirely hypocritical. But as acts of rank political bastardry go, it was comprehensive.

“There is only one conclusion to take away from the performance, and that is that Abbott is hell-bent on Turnbull’s destruction, never mind the cost, never mind the casualties. If he can’t take him out in the party room because he’s a general without an army, then he will take him out with the conservative base, and drive a cleaver right through the heart of rightwing politics.

“If the political right shatters into shards, so be it. At one level it’s pure nihilism.”

In another article in the The Guardian, this one on 17 April, Gareth Hutchens begins:

“The former prime minister Tony Abbott has again spoken out publicly, urging the Turnbull government to make changes to reconnect with the electorate and offering a plan to stop Labor winning the next election.

“In an opinion piece in News Corp Australia tabloids, and in a follow-up interview on Sydney’s 2GB radio, he outlined measures to stop Labor’s momentum.

“We have to do something about housing affordability, and I think scaling back immigration until housing starts and infrastructure has caught up would be a good way of doing that,” he told 2GB.

“We’ve got to do something about political correctness, because we’ve got political correctness running riot in our country right now.”

In response, veteran Liberal MP Warren Entsch called on Abbott to shut up or quit after he again offered his views on the performance of the Turnbull government.

“He was going to step down graciously, he was going to serve in the best interests of the country but he was not going to do a running commentary, he was not going to be critical. Well it has been anything but that.”

Entsch said that Abbott’s actions were ‘reinforcing all the negative aspects of his time’ and seemed aimed at getting back at Malcolm Turnbull who ousted him from the prime ministership.

Abbott made it quite clear when he left office that he would not be a Kevin Rudd, that he would not provide a running commentary, he would positively contribute. He was very specific when he said that – and most of us believed him.

“But what he’s doing now is reinforcing all the negative aspects of his time. And if it continues like this, this will be his legacy – and he won’t be remembered fondly. He’ll just be seen as a wrecker, hell-bent on destroying an individual.”

Writing in the next day, Malcolm Farr in an article titled: Why Tony Abbott wants Malcolm Turnbull to become his clone had this to say:

”Tony Abbott isn’t after Malcolm Turnbull’s job but he does want a new entity in the Prime Minister’s office – a Tone Clone.

“Mr Abbott is seeking that marvel of the science of politics, a full body policy transplant. He wants an Abbott-like figure doing the things he attempted as leader and at times failed to implement, a figure indistinguishable from his current self apart from the physical presence.

“His explosive column in yesterday’s Daily Telegraph confirms previous reports that Mr Abbott had accepted he would not succeed Mr Turnbull – at least not before the next election – and his sensible view was that a leadership change would further wreck the government’s chances of being returned.

“All delivered with an offhand barb: “Of course people are disappointed with the government …”

“He has told colleagues he fears a Coalition wipe-out in Queensland producing a national rout. The Abbott answer is for Mr Turnbull to adopt the policy clobber of Tony 2017 and be quick about it.

“This message has developed to uninterrupted background noise of comparisons between the Abbott government and the Turnbull venture, from Mr Abbott himself and surrogates ranging from Eric Abetz to Peta Credlin.”

Let’s jump to more recent Abbott interventions:

When the Finkel Review surfaced, there was Abbott ready to exploit any opportunity to counter its recommendations and criticise his nemesis.

Writing on 12 June in The Guardian in Tony Abbott fears Finkel’s clean energy target could be ‘a magic pudding, Katharine Murphy and Gareth Hutchens write:

“Tony Abbott has declared that the new clean energy target proposed by the chief scientist, Alan Finkel, sounds like a ‘magic pudding’ and he says the Coalition must not adopt a new tax on coal.

“Ahead of a discussion of the Finkel recommendations by the Coalition party room on Tuesday, the former prime minister used his regular radio interview on 2GB to sound a warning about the reforms proposed by Finkel to the prime minister and the premiers last week.

“My anxiety listening to reports of the [Finkel] review, and this statement [that] they are going to reward low-emissions fuels while not punishing high-emissions fuels, is [that] it is going to be a magic pudding,” Abbott said on Monday.

“If you are rewarding one type of energy, inevitably, the money has got to come from somewhere – either consumers or taxpayers.

“If it is from consumers, it’s effectively a tax on coal, and that is the last thing we want.”

How can Turnbull keep this man at bay? Abbott never gives up. He is determined to undermine his leader every time he can.

Just a few weeks ago, Abbott was at it again, this time in the terrorism arena. An article in Crikey by Michael Bradley: Tony Abbott is helping the terrorists win Bradley begins:

“There’s a lot of competition these days for the title of Politician Most Likely to Exploit Terrorism in an Appalling Manner, what with Trump, Farage and Hanson all jumping on the latest London atrocity in a matter of minutes to demonstrate their particular brands of hate. Still, Tony Abbott remains special for his ability to combine clarity with idiocy.

“Abbott’s been all over the media since London, just being helpful you know. He has two Big Ideas this time: militarising Australia’s response to terrorist attacks, and creating special courts to deal with suspects. Not new ideas, but they approach the outer edge of a response structure, which would ensure that terrorism achieves its ends.

“Abbott wants the Australian Army to be ‘the lead agency’ in cases of ‘multiple or complex terrorist incidents’. The vagueness of his prescription is no surprise; the point is its apparent robustness. Not for Abbott any of the constitutional or operational complexities of sending in the troops to deal with what are, when the rhetoric is put aside, crimes of violence rather than acts of war.”

Of course, fervent Coalition promoter, retired General Jim Moylan, backed Abbott’s bizarre ideas to the hilt!

Even last week Abbott was out again, this time calling Christopher Pyne disloyal and treacherous because he suggested at a private Liberal Party function that same sex marriage would pass parliament ‘sooner than we thought’. Abbott was also outraged that his delaying tactic of a plebiscite was under threat, forcing Turnbull into a hasty disclaimer.

Although still burning with anger about Christopher Pyne’s ‘revelation’ that he had never voted for Abbott (leaked to Andrew Bolt), he was in Brisbane the next day reiterating his alternative political manifesto at an Institute of Pubic Affairs event, as reported by James Massola in The Sydney Morning Herald:

“He outlined three energy policy measures – freezing the renewable energy target at 15 per cent, a moratorium on new wind farms, and for the federal government to potentially go it alone and build a new coal-fired power station – to put downward pressure on power prices.

“He also called for immigration to be temporarily slashed to put downward pressure on house prices and upward pressure on wages, and advocated banning all new spending except on defence and infrastructure.

“Mr Abbott warned the Coalition can only win the next election if it draws up new political battlelines that will give the conservative side of politics something to fight for and, in a down-beat assessment of the nation, Mr Abbott said Australia “plainly, is not working as it should” and that “we are letting ourselves down”.

“For conservatives: “our challenge is to stay the course, to keep the faith and to fight the good fight”.

For his misdemeanour, Pyne is now being attacked ferociously by Abbott’s conservative base, who are demanding nothing less than his removal from Turnbull’s Ministry.

I could go on quoting example after example of Abbott’s treachery – my file on Abbott is loaded with examples, but these are enough.

Abbott sees himself as the protector of Abbott initiatives, of his own legacy, and of conservative values, and even if he can’t replace Turnbull, he wants at least to diminish him, embarrass him, humiliate him, and render him impotent, even if that results in the Coalition losing the next election, when the opportunity to oust him, and replace him, would arise.

Abbott’s venom towards Turnbull is inexhaustible. He flaunts it unremittingly.

But does Abbott realize what thin ice he’s skating on? Has he got the electorate behind him? If he thinks so, he’s seriously deluded! Of almost a thousand visitors to the AIMN blog site, 61% voted Abbott as the worst ever PM out of nine choices from Whitlam on! Only 19% voted Turnbull the worst.

How can Turnbull and his loyalists counter Abbott?

Whilst it might seem comical to suggest it, perhaps a hypothetical ‘Abbott-proof fence’ might do the job!

Like Trump, Turnbull’s Coalition is unlikely to cough up the funds for such a fence! Crowd funding may be the only way.

Donations for its erection can be forwarded to the Prime Minister’s Office.
Contributions of $2 or over are tax deductible.


This article was originally published on The Political Sword

For Facebook users, The Political Sword has a Facebook page:
Putting politicians and commentators to the verbal sword

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button


Login here Register here
  1. Keith

    Abbott made promises that he would not cause problems for the Liberal Party. After making such a promise, anybody who had been watching Abbott would wonder how long he would he could maintain such a promise. He has been true to form.

  2. Susan

    Australia needs an Abbott proof fence.!!

  3. Zathras

    When he was leader of the Opposition and deliberately blocking everything Gillard was trying to do it was a matter of “give me the job or I’ll wreck the joint”.
    Now it’s happening again but more out of pettiness and spite than an attempted return to the Prime Ministership.

    The difference now is that he doesn’t have Credlin keeping him on a short leash to protect himself from himself.

    His latest rant about nuclear powered submarines is also strange.

    Besides the obvious problem of having no domestic nuclear support capabilities to allow such a strategy I would have thought that coal-fired submarines would be more along his lines of thinking.

  4. Klaus Petrat

    Let Abbott continue work on it. Anything to aid Labor. I love Abbott!!

  5. helvityni

    Abbott proof fence sounds so much friendlier than Alan Jones’ hessian bag….

    Keeping someone out it’s fine, throwing someone in the sea to drown (to die) equals murder…

  6. helvityni

    Susan, no worries, no fences needed: if the foreigners don’t have University levels in English, they’ll be sent back home. We can’t send Rhodes scholars out of Oz, or can we…

  7. Jack Straw

    Helv: Keeping someone out it’s fine, throwing someone in the sea to drown (to die) equals murder…

    Don’t give those 2 any more crazy ideas.I am convinced Alan Jones is mad and so to The Mad Monk.Not too sure I agree with Klaus either. It just points to how toxic politics is.Abbott is the crazed man you can never quite kill. He never gives in. He better to give him a portfolio.Or invent one for him. Minister for Men. Maybe then he’d have to analise himself.

  8. astra5


    Thank you for your comments. Abbott seems to have few friends.

    Even some in the Murdoch media are getting stuck into Abbott. Writing in The Australian, in We are witnessing the cowardice at the heart of Abbott’s campaign, political correspondent David Crowe says:

    *”The anger over Christopher Pyne’s remarks last Friday night was a sideshow compared to Abbott’s naked aggression towards the government.

    “The real story was the fact Pyne’s comments were leaked from a closed gathering of about 200 factional allies and given to Andrew Bolt to maximise the advantage for the conservatives and inflict the greatest damage on the government. The poison within the Liberal Party has reached such toxic levels there may be no cure.

    “It is brutality writ large,” one Liberal MP says of Abbott’s tactics. Some MPs believe this will continue until Abbott forces a challenge to replace Turnbull. Just as the government tries to talk up its victory on school funding, Abbott is there to denigrate the Gonski reforms. Turnbull has driven the government into Newspoll quicksand but Abbott has been there at every stage to make an escape impossible – breaking the shovels, hiding the winch.

    “Could Turnbull revive the government’s fortunes if Abbott were not undercutting every policy? If this week is any guide, nobody will ever know. The Liberal party room has a far bigger “apathy faction” than an Abbott support group. The AAA club — Abbott, Kevin Andrews and Eric Abetz — may have a handful of allies out of 83 federal Liberals on a good day, judging by estimates from MPs. Turnbull’s challenge is to convince pessimistic MPs that he has a plan to deal with Abbott and engineer a political recovery.

    “Abbott promises ‘something our people can fight for’ but his manifesto is a huge risk for the Liberals. He promises spending cuts that voters dislike, scrapping a renewable energy target that has majority support, and holding a referendum on Senate reform that would probably go down in flames.

    “His greatest appeal to jaded voters is his call to scale back immigration and get tough on jihadis. The man who took on Pauline Hanson two decades ago now copies her.

    “This is a plan to fight 2014 all over again, with another dead end in the Senate. It is the cry of a man consumed by the past. The result is likely to be irrelevance for Abbott and a disaster for the government.”*

    If Murdoch journalists feel able to writ like this, where does that leave Abbott? On the wrong side of the Abbott-proof fence?

  9. helvityni

    Jack, I’m more worried about whom the Coalition wants keep IN , not worried about the backbenchers (the way-outs) but the Inner-circle members, the Duttons and the like…

    I remember a time when the Libs laughed loudest, the nastier Abbot’s Juliar insults were. Is he not so funny anymore…? He’s hurting us…!

  10. economicreform

    It is obvious to all independent observers that Abbott is acting as a wrecker, and despite his promise – after his deposition as party leader and PM – to refrain from doing so. I am puzzled by what he hopes or expects to achieve by doing this. And also by why the mainstream media persist in giving his antics so much free publicity.

  11. Jaquix

    Love watching the Libs in disarray – can’t be enough of it for me.

  12. astra5

    Abbott’s behaviour defies logical explanation, unless one sees his objective as simply revenge and the urge to destroy his nemesis, no matter what the cost to his party.

    Abbott has always been an aggressive, vengeful person who sees politics as a perpetual battle. His book is titled Battlelines. In the last few days he has called for new battlelines to be drawn up to defeat Labor, and has outlined his alternative manifesto.

    Abbott the pugilist continues his combative approach, now with Turnbull squarely in his sights. He will never change!

  13. helvityni

    economicreform, many knew that he was a wrecker, the attacks on Julia were laugh-out-loud funny to them… Yet wrecker or not, they voted him to be our PM.

    This wrecking business is not something knew, the Liberals are good at it, ….they can dish abuse ,but not take it….

  14. J

    We need Abbott as it leads to internal conflict that aids in the implosion of the Mussolini party, the more internal conflict the better I think. Certainly outclasses the Rudd/Gillard days

  15. astra5

    Trenchant condemnation of Abbott by his colleagues continues.

    Writing in the 30 June issue The Guardian, in an article titled: Liberal senators round on Abbott, criticising him for trying to ‘rewrite history’ Gareth Hutchens says:

    < The Liberal senator Concetta Fierravanti-Wells, a former one-time ally of Tony Abbott’s, has joined the defence minister Marise Payne in publicly rebuking Abbott for his latest undermining of Coalition policy.

    She joins the growing pushback from Liberal moderates, including the social services minister, Christian Porter, who this week rubbished claims the Coalition government had lurched to the left under Malcolm Turnbull.

    The Liberal party’s factional brawling has continued to spill into the open on Friday, sparked by a leaked recording of Christopher Pyne – revealed on the weekend – caught bragging to colleagues about the influence of the moderate faction in the government.

  16. astra5

    The criticism of the latest Abbott push to destabilize Turnbull continues:

    In an article in Crikey by Paula Matthewson: Tony Abbott’s plan for revenge has gone horribly wrong, she writes:

    …this week’s new approach, while perhaps a bit too subtle for the fans of horse-race politics, is more problematic for Abbott because it weakens his key contention — that the Liberal Party and its base are predominantly conservative.

    Any student of politics knows this claim is nonsense, but very few contemporary voters know the antecedents of their favoured political party. So it is significant that cabinet minister Peter Dutton and junior minister Angus Taylor — both touted as future conservative Liberal leaders — went out of their way this week to argue that moderates (or progressives) have a traditional and legitimate role within the Liberals.

    In an interview on Sky News, Taylor noted the two streams of thought had always existed within the Liberal Party, and that there had to be recognition that “the factions had far more in common than what divides us”.

    Taylor’s comments came just before another up-and-coming conservative and cabinet minister, Christian Porter, told Sky News that Pyne’s remarks had been “beaten up well beyond reasonable proportionality” and that Abbott’s contention that there was “some kind of shift to the left under the Turnbull government” was not sustained by “actually looking at the policy areas”. While this was not an acknowledgement of the legitimacy of moderates in the Liberal Party, Porter was nevertheless rejecting the Abbott camp’s rhetoric.

    However, the most telling intervention from the pro-Turnbull conservatives this week came from Immigration Minister Peter Dutton, who in his regular chat with tabloid radio host Ray Hadley warned that “we need to move on before all of this [Pyne] stuff consumes us”.

    In response to prompting from Hadley that the government needed an “awakening” that involved the purging of moderates from cabinet, Dutton countered that the success of John Howard during his time as prime minister was that he had “people from the left and the right” in his government, such as Peter Costello who was “accused of being from the left” but was nevertheless a “great treasurer”.

    Dutton then pressed the point, saying he believed “the Liberal Party operates at its optimum when we do have a broad church, when we do have people across the spectrum”, and that it was good to have a diversity of views in cabinet because “you have a more rounded discussion” and better decisions as a result.

    This subtle shift in rhetoric from conservatives in the Turnbull ministry might have been overlooked by reporters and commentators looking for the more obvious signs of conflict between the Liberal party’s factions.

    But it won’t have been missed by Abbott. The same senior conservatives that he is trying to peel away from Turnbull because he’s a “moderate” are telling Abbott that moderates are their colleagues-in-arms and not the enemy. This means Abbott’s battle plan for revenge has gone seriously awry.

  17. astra5

    Even without inflicting more damage than he has done this week, it looks as if Abbott will kill off Turnbull’s prime ministership.

    Writing in, Joe Hildebrand, in an article titled: Malcolm Turnbull in political death spiral says:

    The words may have changed but the song remains the same: One year on from his disastrous cliff hanger election campaign, Malcolm Turnbull is being savaged on virtually every policy he produces.

    Extraordinary data obtained by reveals the Prime Minister, once the darling of the online world, is now so toxic that even his successes are overwhelmingly piled upon with scorn.

    This is despite the fact the issues that decided the election just 12 months ago have been all but completely forgotten and replaced with new hot topics that are still killing the PM…

    “There were very few social posts generated by the public defending the Coalition,” .

    The second biggest topic was the NBN, with more than 15,000 mentions in relation to the PM or the Coalition – an issue probably slightly over-represented given the online forum.

    Yet once again the sentiment was staggeringly hostile to Turnbull, the former communications minister, with 45 per cent negative, 52 per cent neutral and just three per cent positive.

    On both issues there was an almost complete lack of trust with the Coalition, linked back to Tony Abbott’s previous breaches of faith, with a recurring theme that “because the Coalition has a history of broken promises, there is no reason to trust Malcolm’s comments”.

    And it is this that is still crippling Turnbull now: Even with an election win (albeit a threadbare one) and a big benevolent budget under his belt, the Prime Minister is caught in a political death spiral.

  18. paulwalter

    I always laugh when the words “Abbott” and “honesty” are mentioned in the same sentence.

  19. Florence nee Fedup

    If Turnbull was more successful as PM, there is no way Abbott could undermine him.

  20. crypt0

    Yep … abbott is da man !
    Keep it up tones … more is better !

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 2 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

Return to home page
%d bloggers like this: