What a cheeky way of going. Death is rarely a matter of good timing but it can be part of a good career move or, as Robert J. Hawke’s passing might prove, the perfect conclusion to his political party’s attempt to reclaim office. Having shuffled off his mortal coil a few days out of an Australian federal election, his Labor counterparts will hope so.
At a time when Australian politics suffers from dull atrophy and an entrenched dreariness, Hawke, virtue and vice, seems nostalgically stellar. He cried on public occasions; he bellowed at his opponents with fury; and was fundamentally vulnerable to the usual failings: drink and women. He wore his errors and his broken promises (with notable exceptions, particularly towards his treasurer and ultimate usurper, Paul Keating), lending himself to a whole assortment of descriptions.
Rather gratingly, the term larrikin is being used, or misused, in describing Australia’s twenty-third prime minister. Originating in the Australia of the 19th and early 20th century, the word was hardly flattering, alluding to the hooliganism and violence of youths who came together in “pushes” and wrought mayhem upon the citizens of Melbourne and Sydney. The taming, and domestication of the larrikin was an Australian historical achievement. Urbanised and turned to sporting mania, Australian society vanquished the larrikin, only to see the form re-appear in hologram form and shoddy cultural analysis.
Hawke was careful of his image, nursing and adjusting it for the negotiating muscle needed for the worker’s movement. His stint at Oxford as a Rhodes Scholar minted him as a candidate for the political establishment, a Commonwealth man, if you will. Not that he would mention it. Stress was placed, instead, on the macho, the Herculean: Hawke could drink you under the table and down a yard glass in record time. As he remembered, revealingly enough, in his autobiography, “The feat was to endear me to some of my fellow Australians more than anything else I ever achieved.” In 1954, he made it into the Guinness Book of Records downing 2.5 pints of beer in 11 seconds.
He became an exaggeration of the common man with gifts, the everyday man with otherworldly talents. But many of his instincts were standard political attributes: vanity, a lust for power, a desire for the top position. As the Labor government of Gough Whitlam shuddered through its short burst of occupancy between 1972 and 1975, Hawke was having meetings with US embassy sources.
This was hardly accidental. He smelled trouble, and wanted to put his oar in; with Whitlam’s days numbered, Hawke sowed the seeds of confidence: any future Labor leader, namely himself, would be more accommodating to Washington. Embassy officials, and a few US intelligence personnel, had gotten edgy over Whitlam’s concerns with the US-Australian alliance in various respects. Fears were floated that the leasing arrangements of the joint Pine Gap facility might not be renewed; the Nixon administration also pondered the prospect of downgrading its relationship with Canberra. US embassy accounts, revealed through cables available via WikiLeaks, show Hawke, then the federal president of the ALP, keen to rubbish his doomed prime minister.
In a cable dated August 12, 1975, Hawke’s agitation is clear. Whitlam had left the party in “bad financial shape”; credibility had been “eroded by ‘Whitlam stupidity’.” The prime minister was deluded, incapable of appreciating the imminent “parliamentary disaster” he and his party “surely faces at the next election”. Subsequent embassy cables noted the tense relations between the two men, with Whitlam seen as the dreamer before the apocalypse, and Hawke, the level headed realist in waiting.
When it became clear in the early 1980s that the Liberal Party’s Malcolm Fraser was winding down his government for the fall, Hawke saw his chance: the opposition Labor Party, nurtured by then leader Bill Hayden, would have to make way for him. This was bruising to Hayden – Hawke had only been a member of Parliament for three years; Hayden was a tried, loyal veteran. It also showed the other side of Hawke avoided, and forgotten in the tear-watered eulogies: Hawke as brute and political slayer. While Labor’s return to power in 1983 after being banished in the crushing election defeat of December 1975 was seen as a glowing achievement, a memorable remark by Hayden remains: even a drover’s dog could have won that election.
Yet for a person described by punters as “a voice for the working man”, Hawke saw Labor go along the way of its equivalents in other countries: embrace neo-liberal canons, the sawdust of microeconomic reform, and succumb to the temptations of privatisation. Selling the public silver had one fundamental trickledown: governments at every level in Australia began doing it to balance the books and grab some ruddy cash.
The floating of the dollar, the cutting of tariffs, and the deregulation of the stodgy Australian banking system signalled the yielding of government responsibility to the irresponsibility of the corporate boardroom. The commonwealth would be tied to the corporation. As this was happening, Hawke was attempting to boost the social welfare state, marked by universal health care, and encourage an accommodation between the interests of business and labour, in what became known formally as the Prices and Incomes Accord. Consensus, not bludgeoning, was the solution.
With the body still warm, Australian politicians from across political affiliations have been reflecting. “He was true to his beliefs in the Labor tradition and defined the politics of his generation and beyond,” claimed the conservative Prime Minister Scott Morrison rather blandly.
Prime Ministerial aspirant Bill Shorten spoke of the saluting, by the labour movement, of “our greatest son”. “The Australian people loved Bob because they knew Bob loved them.” But it was in Hawke’s collaborator, rival and foe Keating, that we get one of the better reflections of Hawke’s stewardship in political life. The Hawke-Keating partnership of the 1980s is seen as one of farsightedness mixed with stab-in-the-dark modernisation. Keating recounted “the rationale we employed in opening Australia to the world.” Less than a larrikin, Hawke was an all-seeing politician and gifted performer, a ventriloquist of the Australian mood. He could be consummately venal when he wanted to be and tenacious in what he thought was realism. It came with its far-reaching consequences.
[textblock style=”7″]
Like what we do at The AIMN?
You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.
Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!
Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.
You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969
[/textblock]
This seems to me to be a fair reckoning of the ledger on Hawke, albeit a generous one. Hawke then Keating embraced Thatcher/Reagan neo-liberal economics and globalisation. No rightwing politician before them had had such audacity The pair, followed up by small-target spinmeisters ‘Bomber’ Beazley et al in Opposition, gifted Conservative PMs including Howard with super-abundant liberties and accommodations paving the way for full-blown lassaise fair capitalism. Hawke/Keating fundamentally changed Australian society and enabled the diminution of equality and the fair go. Who can forget the images of Hawke with millionaires such as Bond and the unimaginable use of defence personal to break the Airline Dispute. The Accords paved the way for Howard’s draconian industrial ‘reforms’ and contributed to the flat-lining of wages for the last decades. Keating’s minister Gerry Hand introduced mandatory detention and resulted in the seemingly irrevocable detention of asylum seekers in Australia’s off-shore gulags.
In short, a fitting snapshot of Australian economic and social life is the index of wealth where presently the top 5% own as much as the bottom 70%. This was set in motion during the Hawke/Keating reign. The ALP, and Left in general, has not been able to shape the narrative of an inclusive, multicultural, and just Australia. At every turn, the Right has determined not only the narrative but called the strategic shots with the ALP either fearfully acquiescing quietly or outbidding and lurching in lockstep with the LNP.
The last few weeks saw Shorten’s ALP enunciate bold, strategic policies but struggled time and time again with nailing a compelling narrative and pitch to the people. The unlosable election was lost to a ‘miracle’ for Morrison, an ad man, who single-handedly drove the LNP juggernaut, devoid of policies and his government up to its neck in corruption and scandal, let alone incompetence but also criminal negligence of our environment, to win power, at all cost.
Also let us not forget Hawke’s collusion with the corpulent Peter Ables to destroy the pilot’s union.
Thanks for this great summary, BK.
“. . . Selling the public silver had one fundamental trickledown: governments at every level in Australia began doing it to balance the books and grab some ruddy cash. . .”
I wonder, was there no other way?
So it went on like this: “The floating of the dollar, the cutting of tariffs, and the deregulation of the stodgy Australian banking system signalled the yielding of government responsibility to the irresponsibility of the corporate boardroom. The commonwealth would be tied to the corporation. As this was happening, Hawke was attempting to boost the social welfare state, marked by universal health care, and encourage an accommodation between the interests of business and labour, in what became known formally as the Prices and Incomes Accord. Consensus, not bludgeoning, was the solution.”
And CP says: “In short, a fitting snapshot of Australian economic and social life is the index of wealth where presently the top 5% own as much as the bottom 70%. This was set in motion during the Hawke/Keating reign. The ALP, and Left in general, has not been able to shape the narrative of an inclusive, multicultural, and just Australia. At every turn, the Right has determined not only the narrative but called the strategic shots with the ALP either fearfully acquiescing quietly or outbidding and lurching in lockstep with the LNP.”
Is Labor still Labor? I mean with the Hawke/Keating ‘concensus’ Australia has fared quite well for a while. We thought some kind of change in Labor policies could be brought in about now. But no, it looks we might have to wait until the next election.
At last some sanity about the legacy of Hawke. The working class went backwards under his stewardship and even worse when Keating was let loose on a long suffering working class. ‘ John Pilgers A Secret Country ‘ gives the low down on Hawke. Not to flattering. Also Tom Uren a Minister in the Whitlam government hated Hawke’s guts. Uren being old school was a mans man, unlike the likes of Hawke who always had the cavalry with him when he shot off his big mouth.
The Labor party has a knack of making heroes’ of it’s supposed statesmen or for that matter, supposed stateswomen. I.E. Gillard another labor party luminary, responsible for giving us the shower of shit houses we are about to endure for another cycle of chaos and heartache. Her claim to fame, her speech referencing the shit head who just got the arse for being himself an ignorant buffoon. Listening to some on the left, you would think his replacement was Karl Marx himself. What a laugh it all is.
i hope those responsible for Saturdays unmittigated disaster are now happy. Not as happy as they’re going to be shortly I’d wager. Morrison must be beside himself with glee, he will now bring on his and his party’s wet dreams. Make no mistake, he is going to go through the working class like a dose of the salts.I just hope to live long enough to see the faces on the pensioners ( that’s me) when the indue card gets rolled out Australia wide or when they start paying for all the medical tests that are at the moment ‘ Buckshee ‘.
I despair.
I’m sure there is a patch for him on Gardening Australia …. if you get my drift.