Australia moves further away from National Housing Accord target
New industry forecasts released by Master Builders Australia show the country has moved further away from achieving the National Housing Accord target of 1.2 million new homes.
Five months after the first forecasts covering the full five-year Accord period, Australia is projected to increase its housing shortfall from 112,000 to over 166,000 homes.
From 1 July 2024 until 30 June 2029, Master Builders forecasts 1,034,000 new home starts, 13.8 per cent lower than the Accord target.
CEO Denita Wawn said new home building started the Accord period from its weakest position in a decade.
“The downgrade in our April forecasts is off the back of a prolonged battle to curb inflation, persistently high interest rates and continued constraints on the supply side of the residential building market.
“We are expecting the market to gradually recover over the next few years as the macroeconomic conditions improve, but more work is needed to address the housing shortfall.
“Federal, state and territory governments have acknowledged the challenges around planning, workforce and productivity, but we aren’t seeing enough flow through on the ground.
“Productivity in the industry has fallen 18 per cent over the last decade. It’s clear that state governments need to expedite the rollout of planning reforms to reduce the high costs and time it takes to build.
“Workforce shortages continue to be the biggest challenge for the industry across all sectors.
“At the Federal level, the Government’s priority should be growing the building and construction workforce. This must include a mix of domestic and skilled migration workers.
“Domestically, we cannot fill this gap. We need to think outside of the box with better apprenticeship incentives, reskilling migrants already in Australia, and a targeted international campaign to bring in skilled tradies.
“The performance of higher density building will be crucial to meeting the target and combating the housing and rental crisis.
“Build times for these projects have blown out since the pandemic by around 20 per cent from approval to completion and costs have risen by around 40 per cent.
“Inflation is a capacity killer. Governments must speed up efforts to address these supply bottlenecks,” Ms Wawn said.
In some good news, the non-residential and civil sectors of the industry continue to expand and are helping to keep economic growth in positive territory.
Non-residential building activity should fair quite well over the next five years, increasing by 7.3 per cent over the five years to June 2024.
The civil construction sector is forecast to expand by 8.5 per cent, largely driven by transport and utilities construction activity.
Ms Wawn added: “Continued investment and support in the whole built environment is important.
“We can’t build the homes we need without the appropriate commercial and civil infrastructure to support it. This includes critical infrastructure such as utilities.
“Builders are up to the challenge to reach these targets but the barriers on the road need to be cleared to get the job done,” Ms Wawn concluded.
Like what we do at The AIMN?
You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.
Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!
Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.
You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969
3 comments
Login here Register here-
leefe
-
Andrew Smith
-
Clakka
Return to home pageSo, there’s plenty of bulding going on, just not homes. Yet it’s the wannabe home owners who get battered the most by the RBA’s supposed anti-inflatiion bludgeon. I thought economics was supposed to be logical?
There is a traffic jam but wrong population cohorts are blamed, by the use of headline data on supply and supposed demand created by students mislabelled as ‘immigrants’; backgrounded by permanent population baby boomer ‘bomb’ passing through and living longer.
Obsession of FIRE sector and RW media focusing on short term house prices, but missing stagnant real values of the past decade and signifianct falls in apartment prices/values, suggests weak demand?
Facts are student demand and supply are very different as temporary residents as opposed to citizens/PRs, but do cross over to the solution for smaller, mobile and single households ie. apartments and related relaxation planning in regions precluding high density, sub divisions, caravan parks/cabins and micro houses.
Yep, there’s plenty of bottlenecks.
There’s certainly a bottleneck in the civil / utilities infrastructure arena, and it’s mostly constrained by supply chain impediments for inputs like pipes and valves and etc. which in turn makes contractors averse to committing to investment in additional equipment, with most equipment being committed to mining and resource development. And on top of that shortages of construction timber, bricks, cement, glass, and aggregates for concrete, all stymied by development and investment risks associated with environmental regimes – it’s very complex.
There’s also a woeful persistence with ‘stick building’ as opposed to investment in and deployment of ‘factory built’ modular housing.
By these ‘barriers’ the old guard of land barons and their political mates hold consumers and the entire industry to ransom.