Ben Roberts-Smith: The Breaking of a Plaster Saint

It was an ugly case lasting five years with a host of…

The Strange Case Of PWC Or Where's Sherlock…

Someone has assured me today that Price, Waterhouse, Cooper did not change…

Australia's Humanitarian Visa System is Inhumane: An Open…

By Loz Lawrey Dear Minister Giles, Since my previous emails to you of 14…

AUKUS, Congress and Cold Feet

The undertakings made by Australia regarding the AUKUS security pact promise to…

"If The Voice Loses It Will Be Albanese's…

"If The Voice Loses It Will Be Albanese's Fault!" Yep, I saw that…

Research shows young people want to contribute to…

Victoria University Media Release Victoria University research in partnership with the Youth Affairs…

Meta and Privacy: The Economy of Data Transgressions

Meta, to put it rather inelegantly, has a data non-compliance problem. That…

We need to change how we think and…

By Callen Sorensen Karklis Neoliberalism is an illness: unregulated capitalism, it is not…


A Road Paved with Irritations: Macron’s Strategic Third Way

Emmanuel Macron’s recent visit to China did not quite go according to plan, though much depends on what was planned to begin with. In one sense, the French President was consistent, riding the hobbyhorse of Europe’s strategic autonomy, one hived off from the US imperium and free of Chinese influence.

Europe’s third-way autonomy would be a mighty thing for the Elysée Palace, especially given French pretensions in steering it. After all, Frau “Mutti” Merkel is no longer de facto European chief, presiding over the bloc with matronly care. Her successor, Chancellor Olaf Scholz, is finding himself caught in undergrowth, a difficult thing at times for the continent’s largest economy, and the globe’s fourth.

What, then, of the fuss? In the first place, Macron had company on his Beijing visit: on his first day of the trip, the European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen had decided to come along. This was never going to go well, given their respective views over the Middle Kingdom. Von der Leyen, for one, uses a larded management approach to Beijing, ringing the relationship with restrictions and signals of constipation. On Taiwan’s status, she sticks to the warring line embraced by policy makers stretching from Canberra to Washington. Macron, at least in one sense, understands the power of China to be not only inextinguishable but a logical weight against the US.

The fuss then began in earnest with Macron’s remarks, made on his plane, the Cotam Unité, after the three-day visit. To reporters from Politico and Les Echos, he began conventionally, reiterating the view that Europe should be a third power, a counterweight to Washington and Beijing. But it was his remarks on Taiwan that caused some bristling across a number of quarters. “Do we [Europeans],” he posed to Les Echos, “have an interest in speeding up on the subject of Taiwan? No. The worst of things would be to think that we Europeans must be followers on this subject and adapt ourselves to an American rhythm and a Chinese overreaction.”

The mania over Taiwan’s fate constituted a potential “trap for Europe”, landing it in crises “that are not ours”. The heating up of the US-Sino conflict would frustrate European ambitions, be it in terms of time or finance, to develop “our own strategic autonomy and we will become vassals, whereas we could become the third pole [in the world order] if we have a few years to develop this.”

Those familiar with the Macron recipe have seen it before. An interview of frankness acts as kindling. The fire rages. Then come the explainers, clarifications, points of qualification. The fire abates. In 2019, he warned of NATO’s “brain death”. (Since then, that brain-dead patient has become ever more emboldened and enlarged, engaged in a proxy war with Russia.) He has also been unabashed about offering a fig leaf or two to Moscow, despite its Ukrainian adventurism.

Representatives of the US empire-set, nervously clinging to orb, sceptre, and some misguided sense of civilisation, sneered and scoffed. Senator Todd Young (R-Ind.), rolling around in the rhetoric of anti-Sino thrill, called the Chinese Communist Party “the most significant challenge to Western society, our economic security, and our way of life.” The remarks from Macron had been “embarrassing”, “disgraceful”, and “very geopolitically naïve.”

Republican Florida Senator Marco Rubio, who sits on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, offered his few cents worth. “If Macron is speaking for all of Europe, and their position now is they’re not going to pick sides between the US and China over Taiwan, maybe then we should not be taking sides either.” His point: the US was essentially funding a European war, and to what end?

The Washington Post viewed the visit as one that “angered politicians and analysts on both sides of the Atlantic, highlighting gaps between the US and French approaches to China, showcasing division within the European Union – and probably delighting Beijing.”

The Wall Street Journal was even more bullish in its criticism, suggesting that Macron had refused to get with the anti-China deterrence program. (Good of the paper to openly admit that such a policy is actively being pursued in Washington.) “If President Biden is awake, he ought to call Mr Macron and ask if he’s trying to re-elect Donald Trump.” At the WSJ, warmongering is ascendant.

For some commentators, notably in Macron’s camp, the anti-China pugilists had misunderstood the whole message. This was the reading from French lawmaker Benjamin Haddad: “Macron is much closer to the European centre of gravity on China than the numerous scandalized comments on his comments would suggest.”

Chances are that Macron knew exactly what he was saying, cognisant of the preening egos he would affront. The same cannot be said about the number of US lawmakers who, ignorant of their own republic and its warring ambitions, are keen to interpret the views and ambitions of another as disturbingly independent of their own.

Were these figures to go back to school, directed by the spirit of Lafayette, and the French purse that was broken in supporting the American War of Independence, such lawmakers might show a greater appreciation about the view from Paris. But those days are long gone, and Washington, in its increasingly trembling way, is keen to stay the pretensions of any power that will challenge it, and make others toe the line.


Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button


Login here Register here
  1. New England Cocky

    Read this excellent article and understand that Scummo initiating the sale of Australian sovereignty for a few USUKA subs on the American never never payment scheme is the most expensive ”wrong way go back” move in Australian politics since ”all the way with LBJ”.
    Doubtless when Scummo finally quits Feral Parliament, after dilly-dallying on the way for personal effect, he will find a low engagement corner of some US submarine manufacturer to count his fingers and receive the benefits of his largesse to that industry. Alternatively, he may resort in a FRWNJ operation where work is an optional extra.
    Either way, the best part is that Scummo will slide into a well deserved obscurity and unlike Howard, remain out of political sight for the duration of his remaining life.

  2. mugsey

    Love your work, Mr Kampmark.

  3. wam

    France is a permanent member of UN Security Council, elsewhere they are just noise.
    Macron’s handshake battle with trump is his level//

  4. Phil Pryor

    Macron leaves more intellectual effort in his potty than typical USA politicians, especially of the repulsivelikan type, do in loudmouthed efforts to be someone, anyone, to be noticed, attract donors, fans, notice, pose, invites. Mr. Farr-Kemded of Florida has said that Macron is a totally wrong type, being educated, civilised, diplomatic, sensible and free of filthy ego, thus betraying the ‘Merkin Way. Thus Macron and other deviates of sense and education, are not fit to chew Superman’s Shorts, the usual gesture of patriots who wish to trump others in showoffmanship. Peace would ruin us, said Mr. Farr Kemded, a leading shareholder in military equippers and a generous donor to confederacy conmen and pseudo ladies. It’s the home of the slave and the land of the Me. Just ask Trump, while he’s still outside of court and of jail. Even Murdoch has managed to learn something and stay out of court where residual honesty remains alive. Worth more than a billion, that does. So stand and sit and LIE all at once, with the USA

  5. Clakka

    Excellent article.

    It’s a dirty job, and someone’s gotta do it.

    It’s amusing to behold the floating of thought bubbles from trembling ‘democratic’ short-term neo-potentates. From their other hemisphere they carry to the east their dimming enlightenment and self-righteous pumped polarities and versions of hegemonic and now shaky rules-based order wrought from within their own millennia of divisive cultural oppression, brutality and creative destruction – quite a recipe.

    Following on from their last 250 years of incursions into the east, the west’s sponsored piracy, ballistic cruelty, intellectual ignorance, criminal fraud and land, materials and industrial theft, its undoubtedly simple to understand what they want, but somewhat difficult to really divine how they want to do it.

    Where are the bright ideas, the associated policy developments, and demonstrative initiations?

    Unless and until they get serious about it, both at home in the west, and abroad, eg in decisive repair after the 500 years of sacking of Africa, their entreaties stand out like dog’s balls as being hollow, disingenuous posturing and lip service. Just a parody of circumlocution over a wall of cultural intransigence.

    The west is fixated upon a 4 billion strong reinvigorated ingenious east, and must get over their ignorant self-defeating projection of the inscrutability of the ‘others’. Never mind just China, how are the west going to deal with India, and the likes of Modi, and at the same time with an emergent Africa?

    Just who will really be doing the dealing will be something to behold.

    Of course, amongst all this, the utterly irresponsible and blood-thirsty MSM are deservedly dying by driving themselves into irrelevance. To what end, I ask myself.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 2 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

Return to home page
%d bloggers like this: