Australia's Humanitarian Visa System is Inhumane: An Open…

By Loz Lawrey Dear Minister Giles, Since my previous emails to you of 14…

AUKUS, Congress and Cold Feet

The undertakings made by Australia regarding the AUKUS security pact promise to…

"If The Voice Loses It Will Be Albanese's…

"If The Voice Loses It Will Be Albanese's Fault!" Yep, I saw that…

Research shows young people want to contribute to…

Victoria University Media Release Victoria University research in partnership with the Youth Affairs…

Meta and Privacy: The Economy of Data Transgressions

Meta, to put it rather inelegantly, has a data non-compliance problem. That…

We need to change how we think and…

By Callen Sorensen Karklis Neoliberalism is an illness: unregulated capitalism, it is not…

HAK Birthdays: Henry Kissinger Turns 100

“Once you’ve been to Cambodia, you’ll never stop wanting to beat Henry…

Yes is inclusive, No is divisive

The words speak for themselves, but I shall return to them briefly…


A pox on both your houses

By 2353NM

As the hostilities resume on Capital Hill, it is probably time to consider some of the ramifications of the May 2022 Federal Election.

As discussed by Katherine Murphy in The Guardian, the Liberal Party rout in affluent suburban areas of Brisbane, Sydney, Melbourne and Perth speaks volumes on the topic of former Prime Ministers Abbott and Morrison pushing the Liberal Party away from the ‘broad church’ of Menzies toward a far more conservative view of the world espoused by the likes of the fundamentalist Christians. However those that follow the ALP’s light on the hill should also be looking for some illumination towards the future. A government that two thirds of the population actually chose to ignore with their first preference isn’t that popular either. The vote split almost evenly between the Coalition, Labor and a diverse group of ‘others’.

While we could go into the positives and negatives of preferential voting versus first past the post or some other election system, that’s a discussion for another day. Suffice to say that any voting system has built in flaws and not everyone will get the result they want all the time. One good thing about the Australian system is it is highly unlikely that any disaffected candidate with delusions of political victory will be inciting people to storm our Capital Hill any time soon.

The Greens and independents that were elected in the House of Representatives a couple of weeks ago have an opportunity to fundamentally change the way Australia is governed. For example, Greens Leader Adam Bandt has held the seat of Melbourne since 2010, Independent Andrew Wilkie has represented part of Tasmania since 2010, Bob Katter has won the Far North Queensland seat of Kennedy for 10 elections and Indi in Victoria has been held by Independents since 2013. If the ‘non-aligned’ (to either of the ALP or the Coalition) do their job and represent their community, it seems they are usually trusted to retain their job.

It seems that a considerable number of people voted for a non-aligned political candidate out of desperation. Really it is a similar process to trying a new product or service in the community because you have lost faith in the existing providers. The first time you are rather hesitant that the new product will provide the same level of service or enjoyment as the familiar product. Sometimes the new product will be perceived to suit your needs better, so you stay with it. Others will have a differing view and revert to the comfort they perceive they are missing, in this case with the major political parties.

That’s a problem for both the ALP and Liberal Party. Both of them are disliked more than they are liked. While Prime Minister Albanese said all the right things on election night, he will have to deal with Parliamentarians that are not wedded to his party-political machine and, in theory at least, will look to guidance from members of their communities rather than what ALP, Liberal or National Party headquarters tells them to think or say. He may have to implement a choice that is not entirely of his or the ALP’s preference. Despite a nominal majority in the House of Representatives, the Government will have to negotiate to get legislation passed in the Senate.

Those with far more resources than we have will examine the entrails of the election result for some time into the future. It is highly likely if they are honest, that the entrails will tell the major political parties that neither of them are trusted by the vast majority of Australians. A lot of that is to do with the lies, obstruction and bias displayed by various members of both the ALP and Coalition, together with the blatant pork barrelling (AKA funnelling money to either buy votes or favour political mates) that has been evident in Australian politics for far longer than the reign of Abbott, Turnbull and Morrison.

It’s time to turn the heat down. Humans are born with two ears and one mouth; the appendages should be used with the same ratio. Rather than shouty press conferences where everything is related back to the failure of ‘the other side’ to govern properly – even if the alleged failure was over a decade ago, front up, explain the issue, explain what the proposed solution is after seeking guidance from those that probably do have a clue as, like pandemic specialists, they are experts in their field. By definition, Parliamentarians cannot have expert knowledge of everything they are asked to implement. If the media don’t like the lack of the 15 second sound grab or a detailed explanation why something is now a bit different to the original plan – well that’s their problem, not ours.

Albanese and Opposition Leader Dutton will have their work cut out to convince Australians that they do address the concerns of Australians in the same vein as the ‘teal’ independents, the Greens or One Nation. However, the demonstration of that proof is the only way for the major political parties (including the Nationals, who suffered a swing against them in most of their seats without losing any) to regain the confidence and faith of the Australian public. It may take decades for the third of Australia that voted for someone other than the representative of the Coalition or the ALP to consider returning to the fold.

This ABC article discusses the policies that the Albanese ALP Government took to the election and broadly they are in alignment with the publicly available policies of the non-aligned MPs and Senators. In a lot of cases, any differences are small. If Albanese can implement his policies with assistance when needed by some of the ‘others’, he will be able to demonstrate that he (and by implication the ALP) does do what it says it will.

Despite the majority, it wouldn’t hurt Albanese to bring the parliament on the journey and invite them all to participate in the process of legislation preparation. If the non-aligned or even the Coalition get some of the credit for some of the good decisions, it demonstrates the ALP is actually governing for all Australians. You also have to own the decision to take credit for the implementation.

Of course, sections of the media will point to ‘disfunction’ and ‘crisis’ should there be public discussions around policy positions and preparation, just as they did when Gillard was Prime Minister. Depending on Dutton’s ability to manage his Coalition, there may be outbursts of illogic such as LNP Senator Canavan’s petulant outburst on the Sunday after the election to SkyNews where he claimed the election loss was the fault of the moderate Liberals choosing not to put their respective heads in the sand and ignore community expectations regarding energy, climate change and culture.

In the meantime, none of us can expect any government to change the world overnight. Whitlam and Rudd both tried that, and it didn’t end well. Albanese has a history of building consensus and getting results, so rather than scream from the rooftops that your particular policy or action isn’t done inside the next 100 days, calm down and wait. Albanese isn’t the new Messiah and he can’t please everyone. But if he can demonstrate major political parties and good governance don’t have to be mutually exclusive, a lot more people will go into the polling booth in three years’ time without the virtual pegs on their nose.

What do you think?

This article was originally published on The Political Sword

For Facebook users, The Political Sword has a Facebook page:
Putting politicians and commentators to the verbal sword

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button


Login here Register here
  1. TomeoCharlie29

    I think this article is unnecessarily and unfairly critical of the ALP’s result in the election. The constant refrain that they only got a third ( or whatever) and were not chosen by two-thirds of voters, while factually correct, does not reflect the impact of the incredible array of opponents they had to see off, not just a lying PM and His cabal of shonks but the mad Nationals the big spending United Failure Party of Palmer with his millions but the combined weight of Murdoch’s hysterical,even unhinged media empire, the Nine mob run by smirking Costello and even the Stokes mini empire. If you wanted balanced coverage you couldn’t even get it from the national broadcaster. Only a few independent outlets like this one, Crikey, the New Daily, the Saturday Paper and The Guardian offered anything like an honest critique of the stinking Coalition. Given all of that it was no surprise that the result was as close as It was though the drubbing handed to the Liberals does indicate than even with the cheer squad they had, they were deeply despised.

    Yes Albanese and his team have the job ahead of them, especially given the land mines the coalition left behind but to suggest he should seek bipartisanship with the Lib:Nats is polyannaish, especially given the post election comments of Mr Potatohead and, even of the defeated and obviously bitter Zed Sezelya today show they have learned nothing.

    I was disappointed with some aspects of the modest policy program Labor took to the election but clearly having been burned by the response to a much more ambitious, and indeed worthy, program in 2019 it was ever going to be thus. The Teals, and the Greens have earned a place at the legislative table but only a few of the others deserve oxygen. The Lib/Nats need and deserve a long period in the wilderness where, hopefully, some will have the self-awareness to reflect and change.

  2. pierre wilkinson

    “In the meantime, none of us can expect any government to change the world overnight. Whitlam and Rudd both tried that, and it didn’t end well. Albanese has a history of building consensus and getting results, so rather than scream from the rooftops that your particular policy or action isn’t done inside the next 100 days, calm down and wait. Albanese isn’t the new Messiah and he can’t please everyone. But if he can demonstrate major political parties and good governance don’t have to be mutually exclusive, a lot more people will go into the polling booth in three years’ time without the virtual pegs on their nose.”
    couldn’t agree more

  3. Max Gross

    There is nothing “conservative” about the current Liberal Party of Australia. It is a reactionary cesspit of extremists, crooks, creeps, crackpots and degenerates. At least we can thank Scotty from Pay-Me-Now-Jesus for destroying it. Menzies would not even qualify for membership now!

  4. leefe

    Not getting a first preference vote does not equate to being disliked. It’s more likely to come from a “keep the bastards honest” attitude.

    “Humans are born with two ears and one mouth; the appendages should be used with the same ratio.”

    My ears no longer work. Does that mean I get to talk a lot more?

  5. Andrew J. Smith

    Think dynamic missed was how many normally Labor voter sin safe Liberal seats voted for independents.

    Another point, from the past, is this: ‘That’s a problem for both the ALP and Liberal Party. Both of them are disliked more than they are liked.’

    It’s what we hear from Russian protagonists, ‘whataboutery’ and making false equivalence to distract and deflect; Ian Haney-Lopez in ‘Dog Whistle Politics’ warned that it’s not just about race and directed at immigrants and/or minorities, but liberal democracy aka Brexit and Trump.

  6. Geoff Andrews

    “First past the post”? Forget it – too easy to rig.

  7. Phil Pryor

    Greed, vanity, stupidity, insularity, unawareness, egoambition, pose, righteousness, tonedeafness, these are just some of the core policies, attitudes, doctrines, beliefs, required prayers, of the conservatives in Australia. Networking helps, plus fleecing the brains of hired help, as in lobbyists, lawyers, accountants, thinkstinktankers, crawlers, henchmen, yessir types… Up their Khybers…

  8. Albos Elbow

    Would you rather Scummo was still PM?
    Every day I thank Christ that he is no longer Australia’s PM.

    I didn’t vote for either, but under Australia’s current political system only Labor or Coal-NP could form government and provide Australia’s PM.

    I agree that none of us can expect Labor to change the world overnight however, major issues like cost of living, rising inflation and interest rates and the failing energy grid and energy crisis does mean urgent action needs to be instigated right now in a number of key policy areas.

    Fossil fuel billionaires are deliberately withholding supplies and shutting down coal fired power stations unnecessarily to gouge Australian taxpayers with inflated prices.

    That’s the kind of Australia that Scummo left us with and we need to change it for the better ASAP.

  9. B Sullivan

    Is it too much to expect that if thirty per cent of the voters want to be represented by a particular party then they should be entitled to thirty per cent of the seats in parliament and no more?

    Instead of pretending to be a democracy, might it not be a good idea to actually be one? And with proportional representation Australia could become a true democracy. Instead of being ruled by a privileged minority that receives more seats than it deserves.

    A win should not be accorded the honour of a win if it is not fairly won. Labor did not get a democratic majority of votes and so should not, in a true democracy, be entitled to a majority seats allowing it to govern without the consent of other representatives of the people who under the present electoral system are being denied the right to equal democratic representation and a fair say in parliament as to how Australia should be governed.

  10. Terence Mills

    Geoff Andrews

    First past the post in Britain : The 2019 United Kingdom general election resulted in the Conservative Party receiving a landslide majority of 80 seats. The Conservatives made a net gain of 48 seats and won 43.6% of the popular vote – the highest percentage for any party since 1979.

    But, still fifty six percent of the electorate voted for another party !

    I’ll stick with our preferential system.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 2 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

Return to home page
%d bloggers like this: