A Copper’s Skewed Logic: Politicising Palestinian Visas

Image from Sky News (Photo by NCA NewsWire / Martin Ollman)

If only we could say that Peter Dutton, Australia’s federal opposition leader and curator of bigoted leanings, was unusual in assuming that granting humanitarian visas to Palestinians might be problematic. But both he, and his skew-eyed spokesman on home affairs, James Patterson, have concluded that votes are in the offing. Refugees may be accepted from the Ukrainian-Russian War, as long as they are Ukrainian, but anything so much as a whiff of a Palestinian fleeing the Israel-Hamas conflict is bound to be concerning. Ukrainians are noble victims; the latter might be terrorist sympathisers or Hamas militants.

This view started being floated in November last year, when Dutton began warning the public that visitor visas for Palestinians could result in a calamity. (At that point, 860 visas had been issued to Palestinians.) “The inadequacy of these checks could result in a catastrophic outcome in our country,” he foamed. “Taking people out of a war zone without conducting the checks, particularly those that are available to us in the US, is reckless.”

No concern was voiced about the possibility that Israelis, who had also been offered 1,793 visas, might pose a problem to the heavenly idyll of Australian security. It is also worth mentioning that Dutton, when home affairs minister, approved over 500 visas a week to Syrians fleeing the civil war. Ditto the granting of 5,000 visas to Afghans the month the Taliban resumed control of Kabul in the aftermath of retreating Western armies.

Dutton’s arithmetic is that of the typical copper: simple, direct, amateurish. Among the Palestinians, “one person, or could be 10 people, I don’t know” might be of concern. His concerns are feverishly listed: “Have interviews been conducted, do we know people’s ideologies, do we know their interest in the west, why they want to come to Australia.” This template would be applicable to every group of visitors or migrants seeking to come to Australia at any one point. No one is likely to say on their visa application: “I come to see your new country and hope to commit atrocities.”

Given the number of conflict zones on Planet Earth, Dutton was offering an obtuse statement calculated to boost flagging popularity. It was also timed within a matter of hours after the declaration of a four-day ceasefire in Gaza. While proving, at times, sketchy in her role as Home Affairs Minister, Clare O’Neil was close to the mark in stating that, “Dutton is a reckless politician who will do and say anything to score political points – even if it puts the national security of Australians at risk.”

But Dutton did not want to be dismissed as a paranoid former police officer who sees criminals everywhere and innocence as a constipated afterthought. “The prime minister here needs to hit the pause button – I’m not saying people shouldn’t come at some point – but people should come when all the checks are conducted.”

Again, a strange sentiment, given that visa applicants tend to face a series of tests that are more demanding than most when seeking to visit the Down Under Paradise where perfection is assumed. “If a visa applicant is assessed as posing a risk to the health, safety or good order of the Australian community, their visa may be considered for refusal,” were the dull words of a government spokesperson.

With the arrival of irregular migrants on the shores of Western Australia this month, cockeyed bigotry again assumed its role on the podium of Australian politics. Seeking to tie the arrivals as connected with shoddy security credentials, the opposition fanned out the implications of granting up to 2,000 visas for Palestinians, a fact seen as particularly galling to the shadow home affairs minister. “In the middle of an unprecedented antisemitism crisis, the government should be taking much greater care in granting visas to people from a war zone run by a terrorist organisation,” bleated Patterson. “How can they possibly assure themselves there is not one Hamas supporter among them? And how will it help social cohesion if they manage to slip through?”

By this logic, no one should ever leave a war zone, an area of devastation, a territory blighted by terror. You just might be a regime supporter, a sympathiser, despite suffering possible harm, even death. But there is an inadvertent slant coming through in Patterson’s mangled world view: Palestinians, having been maimed, murdered and traumatised, might wish to take out their grievance on a foreign power, possibly one sympathetic to Israel. Ignore the survival imperative, the desire to find, rather than abandon, security; focus, instead, on the motivation for vengeance. Even this view suffers for one obvious point: those wishing to avenge their families and friends are bound to wish to stay in Gaza and the West Bank, rather than flee and plot from afar.

With the current arrivals from Gaza – some 340 or so have managed to drip themselves from the Palestinian territories – the bedwetting fantasies of terror being induced by the opposition seem absurd and callous. But absurdity is a proven calculus for electoral success – at least sometimes.

 

[textblock style=”7″]

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button

[/textblock]

About Dr Binoy Kampmark 1443 Articles
Dr. Binoy Kampmark is a senior lecturer in the School of Global, Urban and Social Studies, RMIT University. He was a Commonwealth Scholar at Selwyn College, University of Cambridge. He is a contributing editor to CounterPunch and can be followed at @bkampmark.

10 Comments

  1. Peter Pox-Dutton should be devisaed, now, as he remains the most serious threat to our safety, sense, humanity, balance, intellect, social cohesion, our future. Disgracefully ignorant, he actually supports murderers and thieves.., his type.

  2. Be scared, be very scared, remain scared as long as the Spud has any say in it.
    The man (is he human?) has only one optic in seeking attention.

  3. I just have to wonder how much he is getting paid by the pro Israeli lobbyists.God help Australia if this fruit cake ever becomes Prime Minister

  4. They say that the Dunkley by-election at the weekend will be a referendum on the popularity of Albanese and his performance as PM and Peter Dutton as an aspiring prime minister.

    Labor had a 6.1% margin in the seat of Dunkley and pollsters are forecasting that Labor will retain the seat but with a smaller margin.

    My gut feeling is that Labor will retain the seat with an increased margin, what do you think ?

  5. Dutton’s use of the word ‘catastrophic’ has reached a catastrophic level. Perhaps he should reach for ‘cataclysmic’ for a change, the boring, predictable little tick (the poisonous parasite, not the mark of approval).

  6. The spud headed nazi is the biggest embarrassment in Australian politics. Not only that he is one of the biggest hypocrites in history. Perfectly okay when he was giving visas to Swedish nannies for his cronies without any checks whatsoever and assisting those HE deemed worthy of migrant status, namely any immigrant who had conservative leanings and plenty of money. The best thing that could happen for our country is to kick this ridiculous sub human out of politics and, preferably, out of the country altogether. Every day he makes more and more arrogant ridiculous comments that bring him down to the America orange menace’s level. A level he thinks is going to make him popular with a bunch of cultists too. Just imagine ‘The Spud Cult’. I cringe thinking of old blue haired grannies worshipping him like the silly old American women do to Don the CON. What a world we live in….

  7. Tellingly, Dutton’s perennial country cop suspiciousness never extends to members of his own side: I cannot recall ever once hearing him calling for formal war crime investigations against “Jihadi” – sorry “Holy Crusade” – John Howard and his fellow war mongers Bush and Blair, whose enthusiasm for the Second Iraq War did so much to further destabilise the Middle East, and whose presentations to the UN (which Colin Powell himself recognised as a most serious and tragic blot on his career) undermined the credibility of the USA with the UN to such a degree that it still now has not fully recovered.

    Every time Dutton, or anyone else of his lot reference the “rules-based international order”, it just reminds the world of the systemic hypocrisy of the stalwarts of “western” “civilisation”.

  8. Never mind the refugees, I’d be more concerned with those volunteer Australians who are currently fighting for the IDF in Palestine coming back home as possible war criminals.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*


The maximum upload file size: 2 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here