Nuclear Energy: A Layperson's Dilemma

In 2013, I wrote a piece titled, "Climate Change: A layperson's Dilemma"…

The Australian Defence Formula: Spend! Spend! Spend!

The skin toasted Australian Minister of Defence, Richard Marles, who resembles, with…

Religious violence

By Bert Hetebry Having worked for many years with a diverse number of…

Can you afford to travel to work?

UNSW Media Release Australia’s rising cost of living is squeezing household budgets, and…

A Ghost in the Machine

By James Moore The only feature not mentioned was drool. On his second day…

Faulty Assurances: The Judicial Torture of Assange Continues

Only this month, the near comatose US President, Joe Biden, made a…

Spiderwoman finally leaving town

By Frances Goold Louise Bourgeois: Has the Day Invaded the Night or Has…

New research explores why young women in Australia…

Despite growing momentum to increase female representation in Australia’s national parliament, it…

«
»
Facebook

Closing your ears on closing the gap

In 2008, Opposition indigenous affairs spokesman and ultimate opportunist, Tony Abbott, told The Age:

“When we were in government we could decide whether an apology (to the Stolen Generation) happened or not, but in opposition all we could decide was an attitude to an apology which was ultimately in the hands of others. My own view was if an apology was going to happen anyway why not make the most of the situation and at the very least not rain on the parade.”

It’s all about the look isn’t it Tony?

In 2011 Tony was interviewed by Chris Uhlman about the Northern Territory intervention:

“Well, I think that for too long there has not been the expectation that Aboriginal kids would go to school or the expectation that Aboriginal adults would take work. Now, we’ve got to break that expectation and one of the very encouraging things is that we now have senior, highly articulate Indigenous advocates, like Alison Anderson and Bess Price, who are saying things have got to change, our people have got to take responsibility, and at the heart of that is being normal Australians, at least in that respect. Our kids go to school and our adults go to work.”

And who better to advise the Prime Minister for Indigenous Affairs on how to “normalise” Aborigines than one of his favourite minority, “older, private school-educated, conservative white men”.

Billionaire mining magnate Andrew Forrest, was given the task to report on ways to improve training and education for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. Forrest has no particular expertise in this area apart from a compassionate interest and a personal record in looking for innovative ways to promote Indigenous employment.

The Forrest Review makes 27 recommendations, including that all welfare payments other than age and veterans’ pensions, be paid into an account which can be accessed with a new Healthy Welfare Card.

The card would only allow spending on goods and services deemed by the government to support a healthy lifestyle and would block the purchase of drugs, alcohol, or gambling.

The report also recommends financial penalties for parents whose children fall below a 90 per cent school attendance rate.

“I’m afraid over the last decade or so the truancy laws have effectively become a dead letter,” the prime minister said.

“I don’t say that welfare quarantining in these circumstances is necessarily the only answer. But I am absolutely determined to have some form of sanctions where the kids aren’t going to school.”

“There has to be consequences for sub-optimal behaviour.”

“If the states and territories aren’t prepared to do this or aren’t prepared to do it in what I think is a reasonable time-frame – with enough decisiveness – I will look at what we can do at a federal level to make this a reality.”

Russell Marks commented in The Monthly:

“Forrest’s report goes well beyond his brief, and advocates a return to the paternalistic and punitive welfare models of centuries past for not just Indigenous welfare recipients but hundreds of thousands of others. There are echoes of the “poor laws” of British mercantilism in his proposal to punish parents for their children’s non-attendance at school. His proposal to extend “income management” – that attempt at controlling how welfare recipients spend their money which has proven so divisive among Aboriginal communities – harks back to the trust accounts of past decades.

Like the Audit Commission’s report, Forrest’s report will be a bridge too far for the government, which begs the question: why does it persist in asking wealthy businessmen to report on matters outside their expertise?”

Eva Cox was also critical of Forrest’s report:

“This step backwards fails to accept that recognising and respecting the civilisations and contributions of Indigenous peoples is necessary to unravel the damages of long-term cultural dominance, which strips away communal strengths and well-being.

Nowhere does the report make any serious acknowledgement of systemic exclusion of both Indigenous knowledge and cultural competencies. It offers no recognition of the value of language diversity and the maintenance of cultural identity.

Missing too from the report are the data that show the failure of many of the proposed programs such as anti-truancy measures. Having children at schools that do not meet their needs does not improve outcomes.

Forrest dismisses oral cultures and languages, and all other learning that cannot be applied in job seeking. He ignores the importance of community and focuses on fixing individuals.”

In light of the very poor results in the recent Closing the Gap report, Tony’s comments on Australia Day 2012, the day the Aboriginal Tent Embassy in Canberra staged a 40th Anniversary celebration, sound even more out of touch:

“Look, I can understand why the tent embassy was established all those years ago. I think a lot has changed for the better since then. We had the historic apology just a few years ago, one of the genuine achievements of Kevin Rudd as prime minister. We had the proposal which is currently for national consideration to recognise indigenous people in the Constitution. I think the indigenous people of Australia can be very proud of the respect in which they are held by every Australian and, yes, I think a lot has changed since then and I think it probably is time to move on from that.”

And he wonders why they were offended.

The Closing the Gap report identified high levels of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people with undetected treatable and preventable chronic conditions that impact significantly on life expectancy. The nation has the ability to make relatively large health and life expectancy gains in relatively short periods of time by focussing on access to appropriate primary healthcare services to detect, treat and manage these conditions.

They stress that good health is important to employment, education and community safety. Further, the health sector is the biggest employer of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and increased investment in health services will result in increased employment.

Evidence shows health services controlled by the Aboriginal community are outperforming others in the detection and treatment of health issues.

This is because they know that everything is connected. In health services controlled by the Aboriginal community, doctors, nurses and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health workers treat each person in a holistic, culturally appropriate way. They spend longer with their patients, know their history and know how to deal with the complex issues they face daily – homelessness, food shortages and mental health issues.

The report also expresses concern “that hard won Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health gains could be negatively impacted by proposed measures contained in the 2014–15 Budget.”

Over the next five years $534 million will be cut from Indigenous programs administered by the Prime Minister and Cabinet and Health portfolios.

More than $160 million of the cuts will come out of Indigenous health programs. The health savings will be redirected to the Medical Research Future Fund.

Funding for Indigenous language support announced in the last budget will also be cut by $9.5 million over five years.

The Government failed to make any commitment to the National Partnership Agreement for Indigenous Early Childhood Development which, without extra funding, is likely to see 38 Indigenous childhood development centres across the country close.

There will be changes to the National Partnership Agreements that have controlled how the states and territories share spending in specific areas in Indigenous affairs.

The agreement on remote service delivery will be replaced by a new Remote Community Advancement Network and bilateral agreements with each state and territory.

The Closing the Gap report specifically warns against devolving responsibility to the States:

“The Campaign Steering Committee emphasises the need to ensure that potential changes in Commonwealth-State relations do not have the unintended effect of undermining the Closing the Gap Strategy. While recognising that all jurisdictions have a responsibility to contribute, the Campaign Steering Committee firmly supports the Australian Government’s continuing leadership role in an overall national approach.”

But the federal government thinks otherwise.

The Commonwealth has withdrawn responsibility for funding about 180 remote Aboriginal communities in WA in a move the State says could cost $10 billion over 20 years and threaten the health of vulnerable residents.

The latest Overcoming Indigenous Disadvantage report shows rates of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander imprisonment increased by 57 per cent between 2000 and 2013.

“It is scandalous that while ­Aboriginal and Torres Strait ­Islander peoples comprise less than 3 per cent of the Australian population, we now account for almost 30 per cent of the prison population,” Mr Cubillo said.

The Abbott government has stripped funding from the peak Aboriginal legal aid organisation and its state affiliates, but has moderated the extent of cuts to services at the coalface following an outcry from the indigenous community.

The cuts to NATSILS and all law reform and policy officer positions within each state and territory ­affiliate will save $9 million over three years

The budget did outline some new expenditure on Indigenous affairs – or perhaps a redirection of funding.

This includes a school truancy officer program in 74 schools at a cost of $18 million; $54 million over four years to build seven new police stations in remote communities; $2.5 million over four years to employ Community Engagement Police Officers in the NT; $6.8 million in 2014–15 for non-government schools with more than 50 Indigenous boarding students or where 50 per cent of boarding students are Indigenous students from remote or very remote areas; and $26 million for Indigenous teenage sexual health programs.

Far from self-determination, this government’s approach is to impose sanctions for what they perceive to be “deviant” behaviour. The ultimate nanny state will punish people into getting healthy, getting a good education followed by a job, “even if it is picking up rubbish”.

We have plenty of money for more police and truancy officers, and more gaols, but none for legal assistance, domestic violence programs, culturally relevant education, or preventative health initiatives.

Worse still, we show little respect for the knowledge and abilities of the original custodians of this land. Tony Abbott may think Australian history began with the First Fleet. In so doing he ignores the wisdom of the people who have the oldest continuous culture on the planet.

13 comments

Login here Register here
  1. John Fraser

    <

    Just more of the pig Abbotts F = Fail.

  2. Florence nee Fedup

    Patting that head, says it all. id not Abbott say yesterday, he could not do much. Was up to the people themselves. Then we seen the walk out during Shortens very well constructed reply. Shorten had te hide to comment that $500 million had been taken from the Indigenous budget. Funny, Shorten was saying, what all the Indigenous representatives, including Mundine was saying elsewhere.

  3. JohnB

    The Forrest Review extends into Aboriginal land management :-
    “..With the Commonwealth Government’s push for 99-year leases, the Forrest Review’s call for Aboriginal land to be privatised so as to be bought and sold, and attacks upon the Northern Land Council in particular over their defence of traditional ownership and their responsibilities under the Land Rights Act…”
    https://independentaustralia.net/australia/australia-display/abbott-and-forrests-assault-on-indigenous-land-rights,7052

    The negotiating skills and techniques of the Abbott govts. Andrew Forrest Review are in full view in these video’s:
    Part1 – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6w_fB7e0WCY
    Part2 – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3xa1eX_E0p8

    If this is a representative sample of the governments conduct of the Forrest Review, the Aboriginal communities will be unconscionably fleeced by corporate wolves.

  4. diannaart

    Time for indigenous folk to have autonomy over their lives and political presentation from one of their own.

    Well past time for middle class white men to stop holding authority over non-middle-class white men.

  5. sandrasearle

    Diannaart, perhaps they could form a party of 1st nations people, just as the Maori have done in NZ. At least that way they would hopefully get the general public more fully conversant with just what is going on with them. A lot of non indigenous here in Australia are very much in favour of proper recognition in the constitution as the 1st nations people.

  6. sandrasearle

    So pleased to hear about positive moves Diannaart. Was told by a very well respected Maori (when I asked about the differences between the 2 races), approx 20 years ago, that the only difference was that Australia was about 20 years behind the Maori, both in education & their own sovereignty.
    With a person like Tony Abbott representing Indigenous in this country, a person who has closed ears in charge my guess it will take a few more years before we get a genuine concensus won’t it.
    Still we must not let up on this issue.

  7. Kyran

    Can’t help but note, we have robbed the First People of their culture. Until we acknowledge that, the apology is meaningless. As I understand it (happy to be corrected), “they” don’t own land, it is part of “them”. “Their” culture is an embracing welcome to country. Forget constitutional recognition, that’s going to require lawyers and apologists and all sorts of garbage. Why can’t we make it part of the curriculum in primary schools that we learn “their” dance, song and culture? The whole notion of prescriptive, “we know better” crap, is, simply, not worthy of serious thought. For the record, I am an older Australian (Irish immigrant). I refer specifically to “their” culture, because, right now, “our” culture is seriously deficient in so many areas. We don’t need to empower “them”, we desperately need “them” to make our culture “OUR” culture. I mentioned the Irish thing only because colonial rule has form, always destroy the culture first. Twiggy who? Or should that be “Twiggy, who gives a #$%^ about what you, allegedly, think? As always, thank you Ms Lee. Take care

  8. Kaye Lee

    I think Twiggy genuinely wants to help but he is judging things from his perspective rather than reality. The only way to achieve real change is to consult with and facilitate our indigenous Australians in achieving the goals they find important. That is what works best – bottom-up, culturally appropriate programs in partnership with – and not for – local groups for the long term. What doesn’t work is top-down, centrally decided models that change with every new government.

  9. Blanik

    It’s time we got rid of professional politicians and took the government back to the people. Professional politicians are just that. Their main concern is lining their own jeffing pockets, and they are deep pockets.

    And the leaders of both main parties seem to be tarred with the same greedy brush.

  10. Anon E Mouse

    Good article Kaye Lee.

    However I disagree with you regarding Twiggy. Stories from his ‘training’ of Indigenous people for work in his mines do not indicate any other interest except person greed on behalf of Twiggy.

  11. stuff me

    Twiggy is after one thing, Aboriginal land at minimum cost to him.

  12. Pingback: IMAGE AND REALITY OF TONY ABBOTT’S INDIGENOUS POLICY | Permanent Socialism

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 2 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

Return to home page